Bitcoin Forum

Will the current hype & acceptance of the initial exchange offering (IEO) over the erstwhile initial coin offering (ICO) affect the opportunities for bounty  hunters?

Can a project on initial exchange offering (IEO) still fail or exploit people?

IEO projects can still fail for different reasons, the only reason why IEO is better than ICO is because of top exchanges involvement, top exchanges have big reputations to protect and they are very strict when investigating a new project that wants to use their service for IEO fund raising

No initial exchange offering don't affect any opportunities for bounty hunters because even with the existence of ieo bounties are still available, everyday there are new bounties coming up looking for exposure through hunters, project team use hunters to gain exposure by conducting a bounty campaign so this is another way of marketing,
And yes there is a possibility of an ieo to fail for several reasons, especially ieo conducted in low quality exchange, there is always a tendency of failure.

Almost 99% of new bounties since the beginning of this year are all Initial exchange offering and they don't have bad effect on bounty campaigns, many of them introduce bounty promotions and things works out just as it would with ICO bounties

Not really some projects that are doing IEO are still launching bounty campaign to create awareness, bounty campaign is for advertising their projects to get funded it is a big push for the project IEO to get more fund and investors to help them to get acquainted, it's a win-win situation for both parties.

IEO projects can still fail, many did failed because they use small or bad exchanges like p2pb2b exchange or exmarket or sistemkoin to raise fund whereas only very limited reliable investors use these small exchanges, the key to success of new IEO projects is top exchanges

Yes, Presence of IEO took lot of legit projects from ICO which means opportunities lost for the bounty hunters.

Yes, If the project created for money making reason with no real usage.

No opportunity is reduced in bounty campaigns because of IEO, it's still the same old result you will get from ICO bounty projects, rewards are reduce in value because of the present market condition, even if I come across a ICO bounty project I would prefer to ignore and find a IEO bounty project

That is indeed true, there is no great effect. Even Projects that do IEO, are more likely to be trusted and we even see where (projects) do IEO. Most likely will list on the exchange. So that we are no longer afraid of projects that are not listed to be exchanged. It's just that what we are afraid of is a project that does not pay bounty participants.

Its failing because bad exchanges are taking part of these IEO and bounty hunters, despite that projects are obviously a scam still promoted these projects. I was one of those who tried promoting one project that just wasted my time for over 2 months. And in the end the token end up with a worth 1 satoshi and not even listed to n exchange anymore. Bounty hunters are just not making money due to this IEO.

When it comes to IEO bounties always avoid projects that want to use small exchanges to raise fund, it's certain that the project will fail, if you can't find details about what exchange the team want to use then judge using the utility of the project

New projects always choose top exchanges for IEO implementations, so they won't need to generate bounty to attract investors. That's why we can't find too much bounty this year, and for projects that implement IEOs on small exchanges, they do generate bounty but the price drops many times after that because the exchange is not liquid. Too hard for bounty

There are many exchanges that offer IEO services, but only a few can guarantee that IEO tokens are sold. this is where the bounty campaign plays, they are needed to promote the IEO project. so a bounty campaign is still needed, unless the project does IEO on a big exchange like Binance or Bittrex.

It is just the same, opportunities for bounty hunters will be there, it's just depend on the markets sentiments. If we are in a bullish phase, then definitely, there is a possibility that those coins are going to be worth something in the end. Or there's one angle that the projects will turn out to be a scam and not pay the bounty hunters. Nothing has change a bit, ICO->IEO, same people are behind.

What do you mean affect the opportunities for bounty hunters? There will be plenty of opportunities, don't you worry and I don't think it will slow down a bit.


Yes, IEO can still fail because the market is free and there will be competitions and we have want we wall life cycles of a project, and after the initial hype, the project will simply die down, regardless if it is an IEO or ICO. As far as exploitation? I will be honest with you, as long as there are bounty hunters willing to accept measly payment, then there will be projects that are going to pop up and make use of bounty hunters.

Indeed, even it is IEO, there is no guarantee for the success of a project. IEO is about fundraising and promotion, it is an early stage for a project to develop. We cannot determine the success of a project only from this step. Although a project can be successful in its IEO, there is always a chance to fail later on. Be careful to join a project that provides an IEO on small or unpopular exchanges. They have a bigger chance to fail than those projects which provide IEO on popular/big exchanges. Regarding bounty hunters, I don't IEO reduce the opportunity of bounty hunters. You must see that many of IEO projects still need bounty hunters for their promotion.

I a gree with you IEO really needs bounty hunters so that their sales will run smoothly but I chose join IEO that can do in a big market so that my hard work can produce

An IEO on popular launchpad like Binance would never need a bounty unless they want to get the fake number of followers. Binance IEO are sold within seconds, a lot of people even do not get the chance to take participate. So, yeah, it has directly affected bounty. Serious project from which hunters could make money go ditectly with IEO with reputed exchanges.
If IEO is helding on Binance, I doubt it would be failed.

I don't think IEO can affect the opportunities of bounty hunters if you checked the bounty section there are a lot of campaigns on IEO and it adds to the credibility of the project an IEO based project doing a bounty campaign.
and on your second question, it's possible it's hard to grasp the mind of the developers once the IEO is finished we have projects left by developers.

Past failed or scam IEOs or ICOs affect the chance to get new successful IEO or ICO because people are more careful when invest in such. It is only one of reasons.

Other reasons and are bigger ones are:
Merit & new rank requirements (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818350.0)
Enhanced newbie restrictions & requirements (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5030366.0)

You can join bounties but make sure to remember to protect your chances to join future bounties: keep the forum clean.
Since 2018, what did you contribute to prevent signature ads removed globally? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5175874.0)
Good projects have better attraction to investors.

I believe that past failed IEO and ICO are eye opening events that have turned many investors into a better investors, who don't know that top exchanges are the only exchanges with the better chance of success for any IEO projects?

So far most of the IEOs that were hosted on big exchanges (binance, Huobi, etc) are doing well even though some of those projects lost value but they are still actively developing the project but beware of IEOs from p2pb2b and, LAToken because most of them are scam project.

Many IEO projects are still releasing bounty campaigns for bounty hunters and the results are very good this year, ICO is no more and any project who tries to use ICO today should be of high quality, investors have given up on ICO

That's true and remember there was so many IEOs that have already finished their campaign too and it looks like the golden year for ico is coming back again. i think that what has already said by him is not 100% true

Yes it is still a possibility the scammers can even deceive the exchange team that approves a project as IEO listing but to be honest the chances of scam reduce significantly as compared to open ICOs.
Regarding bounty hunting, i think there will not be much effect because each and every project, whether ico or ieo needs to send the message across and also build a community of supporters for their project. So the effective way is to run a comprehensive bounty campaign only.

Not most of it, but it is certain that 99% of the projects that carry out IEO there, indeed fake projects and the projects quickly die. so keep joining the projects that do IEO on the top exchanges so that the money we invest is not wasted

The fact is these projects that do IEO are helping both investors and bounty hunters they can now participate in good projects with potential in the market, the exchange acts as the mediator to check if the project is good and worth holding IEO in their project it's a win-win situation for bounty hunters and investors.

IEO is currently a hype, but this hype is useful when ieo is listed on a large exchange. If you notice, you can see that almost all the exchanges now list ieo, but most of them are low volume exchanges. This means that the amount of big investors in that exchange is less. By doing this, the ieo is less likely to have a big success. And those ieo are listed on big exchanges, they don't need bounty. Because there are so many big investors in those exchanges that an ieo succeeds in seconds. So they think they don't need a bounty for their project. Bounty Hunter would have benefited from the bounty of the projects that are listed on the Top Exchange.

It all depends on which exchange the IEO is being held. And even good exchanges can't guarantee success.
There's plenty of "cheap" IEO's out there where exchange promises unrealistic results, and when it fails, it's like "oh well, we guess your project isn't interesting to people".

My question to you is, what do you consider failing? Project stopping, or just general price fall after listing?

I don't think Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) are reducing opportunities of bountier that much, it is also depend on which exchange that the project choose to conduct their tokensale. If it's like on Binance, Okex, Poloenix, and other huge exchange, the project are not needed to conduct a bounty program, since their IEO will most likely sold out by minutes.

Initial exchange offering has nothing to do with blocking bounty opportunities,  infact, nowadays all bounty campaigns are conducting ieo from the project that launch the campaign, this is new method of raising funds now so it is not affecting bounty in anyway.

Of course a projects that is conducting an IEO can still fail to deliver what has been promised prior the IEO, but still, being a project that raised its funds via IEO gives you at least some level of security, especially when it comes to price performance as exchange market makers tend to make sure that price wont dump too hard upon the listing. But in the long run, projects have to secure their existence by themselves.

One of the main reasons why project promotion would be reduced somehow. I have noticed that projects to undergo and conduct IEO Binance exchange don't not call on for bounty hunting because Binance already is a perfect one for wide promotion. The tasks performed by hunters are good one for low exchange ieo promotion, such exchange are the probit, vindax, biki and many low volume and liquidity exchange.

It depends on the exchange platform. From experience, when exchange platform such as Binance lists a project on their launchpad, such project requires little or no promotion from bounty hunters before it flourished. I could remember, Harmony project that had a bounty campaign but immediately binance accept them for IEO, they stopped the campaign. So I will conclude by saying getting project listed on a big exchange for IEO reduce the chance of launching such for bounty campaign

IEO doesn't have any significant impact or difference compare to ICO if the end-user is bounty hunters. Better, bounty hunters on IEO less likely become empty hand cause their reward at least have an exchange to sell, not like most ICO. Of course, a project with IEO can fail or try to exploit people. IEO doesn't mean safe-proof, risk-free so you should do your research properly.

many IEOs that still need support from bounty hunters, especially those who do IEO on intermediate exchanges such as probit or huobi, which really don't need hunter support is an IEO that is done in binance. so IEO still doesn't reduce bounty opportunities

For the projects running on the Exchanges for IEO there is also a great chance that they will fail to perform good and can still be a big upset. But the thing is with those projects the chances of the bounty hunters getting scammed or not paid are pretty less as these projects will definitely get listed on that exchange and for sure will not scam people, but the rewards are always less or nothing compared to those projects where the team hosts an ICO or is hosted on a low grade exchange where the reward is high but the risk if getting scammed is also high due to poor regulations implemented by these exchanges.

I would assume that in the end we are talking about a scenario where IEO is both working for those projects but they are not still fully 100% hyped, so bounty hunters could still get a work in those IEO's, we have seen so many of them get so many attention as well, yet right now there are some who think they do not need it too and they might be right. So finally, if you owned a project, which one would you prefer?

You know you will be picked no matter what, your project will be on an exchange no matter what, would you still hire a bounty hunter to promote you anyway so that you could be hyped and known by a lot more people or would you just let it be because you are still getting listed no matter what? That answer could answer OP's question as well depending on what you say.

Binance exchange topics is always different. Binance exchange doesn't like promoting and IEO at a time. Binance exchange IEO doesn't need any promote. Binance exchange listed coin never paid good rewards to bounty hunters. Most of the projects likes ICO, but for low investment they are interested on IEO.

The thing is if project will raised much money for run their project and manage a good exchange for their token/coin with good liquidity then bounty hunters might be profit able for their work. Back 2018 crypto industry saw many scam projects which are maximum based on ICO. That's why IEO arrived but many scam exchanges destroying this platform too. IEO is not a bad option for hunters. Scam and bad projects/exchanges are bad thing for bounty hunters and for everyone.

One lesson from ieos or icos is that it does not depend on the Bounty hunters, for a Crowdfunding to be successful, there is a need for it to be listed on a reputable exchanges, and also be of great value to prospective users to stand a chance at survival

I think it is the opposite, IEO will bring advantage both for investors and hunters who promote the project.
Why ? Because when the project holding IEO, we know that the project is not a scam, it will listed on the exchange and hunters can sell their reward there. But of course we still need to see, what exchange they holding the IEO because many scam exchanges as well.

Not really. There are still ieo projects that introduced some bounty campaign. Bounty hunting always have their perks and having a more option for crowd funding is an additional advantage I guess. Also there are some projects still employ hunters to boost their project in spite of their listed on a good exchange for an offering.

Nowadays bounty hunters are in very hope-less because of the IEO that are bringing with a new policy for their promotion and even some are not paying the reward to the hunters or paying very less. The ISOs are also imposing a rule of minimum ranking on Bitcointalk to participate in the bounty.

Of course, nowadays many small exchanges or even scam exchanges have IEOs, and almost all of them have failed. Fundraising methods are not a guarantee for a project's success.

Currently IEO is indeed the best space for investors who want to contribute, it all happens because many investors do not trust ICOs. however, in my opinion, it is a little more difficult and could reduce the opportunities for bounty hunters to participate in a project, as it has stricter regulations. failures are sure to persist, when the IEO is hosted on an exchange with a low / bad reputation, which in the end the altcoins / tokens will end up worthless. whereas IEOs hosted on reputable exchanges like Binance, rarely need the help of bounty hunters to campaign.

I don't that ieo is any different for bounty hunters than what a Ico does for them. Both cases the project needs publicity and we are a means to provide them that and spread the word among the like-minded people.

Its no affect at all since this is also a new project that want to raised an offering using exchange .

Don't forget that success  of the project in IEO is depend on the exchange they want to be listed so they also need marketing in other platform if they want to have more investors to come and invest. , this means they still need a bounty hunters to do that job. The only thing will be different is if the project listed in reputable  and known exchange which is the users of that exchange is enough to not make any more advertisement and user's will enough as target investors.

You are right, if new projects choose IEO on small exchanges they will surely fail. I have seen a lot of projects like that, so do not participate in promoting IEO projects in Latoken, P2PB2B because the price will definitely drop many times and the budget will be dropped many times.

I don't think IEO has reduced the opportunity for bounty hunters. This is because several projects still organise bounties despite the fact that their tokensales is through IEO. In fact, the IEO gives the hunters a feeling of assurance, when the exchange in question is a reputable one. Though most of the projects that seek promotion from bounty hunters don't carry out their IEO on the global exchange like binance or bittrex.

not reduced but only adds another oppurtunity  . we have another choice now aside from ico and if we are not getting good results on ico we can switch to ieo same as when we arent happy with ieo we can go back on ico  .  again just like ico , ieo can fail too and they can cheat investors or hunters  .  its impossible to have a perfect model where there will be no failures but atleast the failures in an ieo are now reduced than compare to ico to the fact that you can choose an exchange  .

As long it's just promotion of a new project there nothing need to worry on this behalf. Even I do believe that with IEO(Initial Exchange Offer) method bounty hunters feel more secure than before.

Most of the genuine IEO's now are only participated by big holders, you can't invest like 20 dollars just like on ICO. Binance requires 50 BNB minimum which is equal to $1200 more or less for 1 ticket to participate and it is not guaranteed yet that you can get an allocation because their IEO is lottery style, In majority only big holders are getting richer. Of course, IEO fails on sh*t exchanges, IEO is only good in reputable exchanges. About IEO reducing opportunities? not really there are projects that conduct IEO that has bounties too but only few. Those scammers creating scam ICO before they are the one reducing our opportunities damaging the image of ICO.

This thought may be correct but still each project needs marketing and that is why perhaps we see more and more post listing bounty campaigns as well, so it is good and competitive thing for the market. Some projects are just starting bounty campaigns after IEO and listing to increase awareness, support and to increase the community related to their projects also it brings the project in the front and it is effective way to showcase a new project and introduce it to the crypto community.

Don't really get the actual point you're driving at in this question.  But both Initial Exchange Offering (IEO) and Initial Coin Offering (ICO) do not affect hunters.  Both Offerings are just means of raising funds for the project.  If you are not an investor, you are not really concern about it, though the success or failure of the IEO or ICO also has some says on the reward of the hunters.

I think so and when there are some people wanna try to send their proposal to the IEO platforms and when the team will have accepted their proposal and the people who have already chosen by the dev will create a bounty campaign or promotion campaign.

Bounty projects have reduced since 2017 I heard but till date there are still many new bounty projects showing up everyday, enough to get you busy, ICO or IEO have no negative impact on bounties

Reduce opportunity is not important but important question is that which IEO is valid. Because many new projects launch their bounty and many bounty hunters involved with it but end up with they get penny for their work. So before choosing any project its must important to research background of project so you will not waste your time and work.

If an IEO is held on an exchange that has a good reputation, then participation in such an IEO is 100% profitable. The chart below shows that Binance is the leader in conducted on the IEO platform. I am sure that the upcoming IEO The Sandbox (SAND), which will be held on the stock exchange on August 14, will confirm my words.

https://i.ibb.co/RPfFrSD/23554345345445.jpg (https://ibb.co/hHb6QMm)

It seems like that because the enthusiasts of the sandbox are very big and yes, apart from holding ieo on binance, I heard this project also gets fresh funds from 4 quite large companies, so I agree with what you say the sandbox 100% profitable, and also the sandbox probably doesn't need bounty programs or another programs, but let's see once the ieo is done.

If the project is listed on a large exchange platform, then this exchange platform definitely has big marketing plans to attract potential investors, so in this case IEO reduces opportunities for bounty hunters because I do not see that the project needs to do a Bounty campaign and loses part of its project tokens on free promotional campaigns, And if the project team did bounty, their bounty would have complicated conditions and they may ask the bounty hunters to pass the KYC, A small number of hunters will join it.

Happened to me, and I think each of us here had at least one mistake with choosing the wrong bounty. I try to learn from my mistakes and to check deeply every next bounty I participate in. Still, there's a lot of space for making new mistakes, I am aware that scammers are smarter and they are finding new and better ways to trick us.

No, IEO didn't reduce opportunities for bounty hunters. Bounty campaign like promotion. If you think that 100 people joined in bounty and they have 10k twitter followers(each). Then it will be 100*10000=100000. So that amount of people see project posts etc. So they will get attention. Legit projects don't have so many desire to get big investors from bounty hunters. They get attention and it's brand awareness. So IEO didn't reduce bounty opportunities.

My calculation might be wrong or my statement might be wrong. I just tried to tell my thinking.

Deep research on the bounty project does not guarantee that we will not fall as a victim of scam projects but it does help us to avoid. IEO projects might still be the same with ICOs before because it's still give opportunities to bounty hunters but i think IEO is quite stable and transparent than ICO.

In a way it affects the number of bounty projects that were launched in this forum some years back but I mean does it really matter as most bounties have not been paying anything worth it. However, some projects after IEO still have some form of bounties such as testnet, bug test etc. Maybe is time we took bounty hunting on a different level with skills and creativity.

Of course IEO projects are not always successful, there are several IEO projects that fail, especially IEO projects promoted
by unpopular exchanges. Therefore, choose an IEO project promoted by big exchanges such as Binance, Kucoin, Okex and Huobi.
The success rate is sufficient high. But the problem is that big exchanges rarely open IEO projects for bounty hunters, they prefer
to promote in a way themselves for fundraising. Hopefully in the future many big exchanges will open up opportunities for bounty
hunters to promote the IEO project.

What is the relationship between IEOs and reduced opportunities for bounty hunters? Precisely with the IEO, bounty hunters have the opportunity to enjoy a more valuable bounty. Although not all of the exchanges selected are reputable exchanges, at least they are already on an exchange.

Probably. However, the chance is very small. At least they have been listed in the exchange, they may be not able to scam more people. However, it may be probably because sometimes they only list the coin in exchange without considering whether the exchange is good or not. And then because of no volume, the project will fail.

why ? that year is when everything in crypto became lively , price going up , people enter and more ico being created . after the year ended thats the time ico are decreasing   .

sorry bro but they are . bounties are being involved in ico and ieo for helping them promote . ico is notorious for bad records but ieo has more  a good record till date .

Reduce opportunity? yes, because if you compare it with ICO in the past, you are just getting  peanuts promoting IEO projects now, but what's important is there's still an opportunity. Actually, IEO is just starting, it has not reach its peak yet so might not feel it yet, but at least with promoting IEO, there's  lesser chance that you'll not get your reward although the reward is lesser compared to ICO.

Let's face the current situation, the team are paying for IEO listing so it's just normal that they won't be aggressive with the reward as investors might not like it and the risk of the project to fail is high, I hope we will understand, but if you can promote more IEO, that would help to increase your income.

It didn't reduce the opportunities for bounty hunter for me they are the upgraded ICO.
Other's have said that they are more secure compare to ICO and I think it is better than ICO and better for the hunters because they are securing that the hunters reward would have a value.

IEO projects can still fail or maybe they succeed and they don't pay the bounty hunter I've participated in that kind of IEO and they're failing because lack of investors and they put their token to low rated exchanges.

I think IEO is good for bounty hunters.Before, some project  run ICO and they arranged bounty and there was no guarantee that project will list on exchanges and some project had never listed.But because of IEO we at least know that in which exchange they are gonna list.Most of the project who run their  IEO in good exchange at least most of the cases they are legit project and we receive our coin though profit will be more or less unlike ICO.Majority of the ICO was scam.So Bounty hunter most of the time didn't get their reward.

Initial exchange offering (IEO) can still fail or try to exploit people but it reduces the chance and lower the risk. The same thing applied for bounty hunters if they join in IEOs instead of ICOs. It actually helps the bounty hunters not completely empty hand like the old day of only bounty campaign from ICO projects.

when a project enters an IEO there still a big possibility that the project will fail. its not guaranteed.. the good thing about this initial exchange offering is the security that the project is already in exchange..

I think you need more explanation, there are many some projects that did IEO and still did bounty campaigns, projects like Cartesi, Elrond and bought did well in the market. IEO do not mean a project can't fail but because some exchanges do not vet their projects well before allowing them to IEO on their exchange so your own due diligence must not be outsource to other people.

It can still fail, as we experience, even with the IEO, there are still some projects that fails. Also, there are a lot of people says that the hype of IEO come to its end because what is happening before during the hype of ICO is what exactly is happening right now in IEO's

They will not affect at all in fact bounty hunters will feel somewhat secure knowing that they are going to have a good projects to promote since they have passed criteria coming from exchange that makes them legit project just make sure the exchange where they are going to launch an IEO is trustworthy

There's no guaranty that the project that hold their IEO will guaranty success there are many factors like project, marketing and the exchange.

There are few IEO offering bounties but with different approach, some project or manager prefer larger platform rather than spamming in BTT or social media platforms. We cant blame IEO eliminating bounties, since some hunters abused and never really cared about the project they're promoting. Also to answer your last question, Yes IEO doesnt guarantee a success, some project failed and thrive to be relevant in crypto space.

there are some projects that offer IEO but they have also bounty programs.. those projects that do not need exposure are not into bounty.. they will just offer this ieo to get an investor and take that not all projects that offer ieo's became a successful project  ;D

New IEO projects still use bounty hunters for promotion, even IEO projects that goes on binance exchange still use bounty hunters till date, there is no difference between the ICO bounty era and today's IEO time

Each project will certainly offer to those who promote it, including bounty hunters. I think if their marketing is not maximal then there will be a bounty program because it is the right way to attract investors.

I don't think and that will be happening when the ieo will be running on the crap exchange sites,you can try to create a comparison between ROI that has already made by the trusted exchange site and crap exchange site. you will know the differences.

It's time to sum up the interim results of my participation in the IEO the Sandbox (sand), which took place on the Binance exchange. As I expected, SAND turned out to be the most successful among all IEO's and allowed its investors to get a profit on the first day of trading in the amount of 1000%.

No, instead ieo Bounties give chance for bounty hunters to earn even more because the project would have no choice than to pay hunters after earning deserved promotions and better price on the exchangea

It is not a matter of can a project on IEO still fail.
Over the period of IEO era, a number of projects that conducted IEO had failed while other pulled a exit scam.
A good number of IEO projects still conduct bounty campaign. I do not see any correlation between IEO and bounty activities.

Perhaps he is mostly conversant with those projects hat eventually had their IEO on Binance launch pad, because after seeing to rate at which it has grown, they find it so difficult to pay bounty hunters. Most times, they stl.pah and we all have serane atmosphere without any issue.
Most off those that list on other exchanges still end up paying.

That's only the thing that can be taken by the IEO investors to make sure if their project will be listed on the exchange site instantly. So many times people have already started to say this and IEO is the same as ico but with the listing guarantee that will bring the hype.

I think that's the best way to do fundraising because we know that when creating a project the end goal is to be able to register at a good exchange and be able to provide high trading volume, whereas if you use the IEO method then it's a smart choice because it's certain. will enter the exchange used for cooperation.

IEO does not affect bounty hunters because bounties are still existing.
Some projects are also launching a bounty campaign even they already conduct an ieo.

If the ieo is not held in a reputed exchange, its likely to fail. Thats why investors are choosing an exchange like binance when investing in ieo to have a high chance of getting profit.

unfortunately some IEOs that are moving at exchanges still provide a bounty hunter program but I don't think the bounty allocation can have much influence on the price of the token on the exchange if the project is really good and used by many people then the price will still remain stable.

I think even if a project conduct an IEO still they will run a bounty campaign for them to attract more investors and bounty hunters will do the rest to make thier IEO to become successful.

There have been many failed IEO projects. On the Huobi exchange, Bitmax had many IEO hosted projects and then I did not see them appear anymore. I mean, they're fuzzy and there are some dead projects like DEEP CLOUD. I think the success of a project is not about how much money it attracts, but what it does and how much value it brings to its owners. For example, Thorchain, they only raised a few hundred thousand dollars but currently, their capitalization is 80 million dollars.

At the moment IEOs are following in the ICO's footsteps, mostly pumping and pouring, there are very few IEO projects that have achieved success and stand firmly in the market.
Even projects released on reputable exchanges like binance or houbi can fail.

On a clearer note, those initial exchange offering project that still engaged in doing Bounty's are not actually sure of their project and those exchange aren't big types. Imagine, doing an initial exchange offering on binance and on bitfinix then still want to get the hunters into it, that would be a total waste of resources and uncalled for. A good project doing an initial exchange offering on Binance doesn't need anything for the project to spike fire at a go.

In my opinion the ico were fine, only the formats were completely wrong, the projects need the bounty hunters who are the people who have brought so many people closer to the world of crypto! Another big problems of crypto are easy money for developers brings to many scammers! Projects don't need millions to get the best project need only people who are willing to develops a good project! ! Twitter and facebook started with 10K dollars and now are the best social project listed on the stock exchange with huge frightening economic income...the problem of the ico is the format...few people want to become millionaires immediately, it is not possible anymore ... projects must start from the bottom and prove their value over time, absurd to buy coins for 1 dollar created from scratch at no cost only with the whitepaper..Hope make sense what i say!Many people do not like these things I say but it is unfortunately the truth-

but there is nothing wrong if the developer uses the bounty campaign method to create certain goals, one of which might be used to increase the volume of transactions on the exchange when it has been registered to the exchange and can be used for trading.

The IEO hype is over and IEO doesn't guarantee success. There's a lot of IEO projects that didn't even reach their desired IEO price. I see some IEO projects here that have a bounty in this forum. No matter what kind of crowd funding style developers will do, if they fail to market and develop their product, or even gain investors' trust their project is doomed to fail.

Dont we have a lot of altcoin productsl that fail in the end despite being successful with IEO ?
There is no guarantee that the altcoin will last much longer without serious development from the developer.

The lack of traction for trader and investor means that many of these altcoin are weak in the market, and it is certain that they will fail over time. Some good altcoin and starting well-known exchange IEO may be able to outlast the market due to that exchange support. But still development will play an important role in the existence of a product in the market.

If the IEO is run by a large exchange then they don't need to promote with a bounty because the team already knows that an IEO on a large exchange will be successful without a bounty hunter, so now most IEOs on low exchanges only run bounties because in my thinking they are still lacking in marketing.

IEO doesn't affect crypto project promotions, it's either you join or you don't, this year many IEO projects still seek for bounty hunters to promote their project for them, it's never going to stop no matter which crowdfunding strategy entered the space

I think it depends on the exchange where the IEO of the project is happening.
If a project has a IEO on binance or any other of the big exchanges i don't think they need additional advertisinig through a bounty campaign.
If the IEO is on a small exchange, some additional marketing surely will help.
Plus the phase where almost every new project does an IEO is already over.

The only difference between an IEO and an ICO is regarding the platform. ICOs use independent platforms, while the IEOs are launched using already established exchanges. But then, both of them need investment and for that purpose they need to advertise themselves. So the role of bounty campaigns and bounty hunters remain equal in both IEO and ICO.

IEOs only help projects to be successful at an early stage, after which projects need to work hard to gain long-term interest from investors, and continue to invest. their project. I also saw many projects on OKEX get dead after a while listed