Bitcoin Forum

Other => Meta => Topic started by: TheBeardedBaby on August 21, 2020, 10:44:53 AM



Title: SMF Search engine question.
Post by: TheBeardedBaby on August 21, 2020, 10:44:53 AM
How difficult is to add new search option to exclude results from specific person(s)?

Now we have two options in the "by user" field:

  • "*" - all users
  • <username> - specific username

I'm looking for this option "~" to exclude from the results the post made by a specific user.

Example :
 ~<user1>

If it's easy they we can have also additional option like:
~<user1>; ~<user2> ...~<userN> - exclude more users.

Use case scenarios are:

Hunting for connected accounts- looking for specific address. Easily show who else posted the same address. Same with telegram IDs and Twitter accounts.

Many alt account hunters will benefit from this option.


Title: Re: SMF Search engine question.
Post by: Rizzrack on August 21, 2020, 12:09:19 PM
Creating additional features for "old archived releases" of a software can be very tricky to say the least.

If it helps you can exclude keywords from search
Quote
A minus sign in front of a word excludes the word
Source (https://github.com/SimpleMachines/SMF2.1/blob/fdc9c476450851c9173f76821a8dc1aac2c8f1e2/Sources/Search.php#L699)

So if you search "A -B" you would get posts with A that do not include B
Hope it helps :)


Title: Re: SMF Search engine question.
Post by: Pffrt on August 21, 2020, 12:51:43 PM
As forum isn't concerned about multi-accounting, I think for such usecase, this feature isn't necessary. On top of that, there are many useful feature need to be implemented than this one. I'm not criticizing your suggetions, it would be good to have but not important one which we must need while 2FA has been a must in my opinion.


Title: Re: SMF Search engine question.
Post by: LoyceMobile on August 21, 2020, 03:06:02 PM
Just wait for this:
I could run this code on 53 million archived posts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5167469.0), but the main problem will be excluding quotes. That's annoying and slow to do, and if I don't exclude them, it will completely mess up the data. On the other hand, quotes may still contain information that was deleted by the user who posted it.
Even without quotes, users still post Bitcoin addresses that aren't theirs, for instance when providing evidence on a scammer.
This is planned for my post archive. I had done that but only with ETH addresses and the 15m posts you sent me + the new scraped one.

I plan to scan all old posts + new ones for ETH and BTC addresses after everything is working fine (new bot + full database with the whole post archive).