Title: Evil users Post by: suchmoon on October 13, 2020, 06:57:38 PM I'm assuming users who have "Never" as their last active date, like this here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2237312 Edit 2020-10-17: Probably not quite as simple. "Evil" (proxybanned) users can have a valid active date so some of them might be in the "No Login" and some in the "No Posts" column below.
Here are month-by-month numbers of total new registrations vs Month Total No Login % No Posts % Banned % Active %Charts because who doesn't love charts... Y axis is percentage in all charts: https://meem.link/i/a/2uCx0n.jpg Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image https://meem.link/i/a/U5l40p.jpg Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image TBH I'm not really certain what this means. Trending up? ATH soon? Should we invest in evil futures? https://meem.link/i/a/MSw7l0.jpg Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image https://meem.link/i/a/sH6Gr0.jpg Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image Title: Re: Evil users Post by: jackg on October 13, 2020, 07:05:51 PM In % we've been kinda low for a while.
It probably discourages users to have to pay the evil fees to register via tor but newbie jail was rejected before t Evil fee implementation so it'll probably be the same again now... Title: Re: Evil users Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on October 13, 2020, 08:37:58 PM That time period in the months in and around October 2017 were effin' awful for the forum. I recall that when I was doing a lot of reporting of shitposts (to soothe my nerves) and trying to link alt accounts, I kept seeing that many of them had registered right around that time. I think the later months of 2017 were when a lot of ICO bounties were being created, and it brought out all the shitposters who no doubt created at least several alt accounts each.
It was also when bitcoin was exploding in price, so it was extremely hard to find a spot in a regular bitcoin-paying signature campaign. Anyway, that's why I think there were so many accounts registered between the summer and tail end of 2017. I don't know a lot about what that "evil fee" is, though I've certainly heard of it. That's for when you get IP banned, is it not? Well, in any case it also doesn't shock me that there's a lot of "evil" accounts generated in 2017. And boy, the numbers have stayed quite low ever since the merit system kicked off, eh? Title: Re: Evil users Post by: suchmoon on October 13, 2020, 09:51:25 PM I don't know a lot about what that "evil fee" is, though I've certainly heard of it. That's for when you get IP banned, is it not? Here's some info: When you register, the IP that you used when you submitted the registration form is used to calculate your evilness. The more frequently this IP or its neighbors were banned, the more evil is associated with your account. The amount of evil associated with an IP decays slowly over time, but the amount of evil associated with an account does not. You must pay or be manually whitelisted to enable posting on one of these "banned" accounts. Here are some stats:
Currently each unit of evil requires a payment of 4023 satoshi. You only need to pay something if you have 1 or more, though. It looks like the system was in place well before 2017 so perhaps the last active date wasn't always set to "Never" for those users back in the day. Or more people paid the fee when Bitcoin was cheaper. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: notblox1 on October 13, 2020, 10:28:34 PM What about undercover hidden evil members who got banned, but they purchase new accounts, use new IP, and continue with their evil campaigns?
If we include them than your chart would look even more bullish :) Title: Re: Evil users Post by: 1miau on October 14, 2020, 12:08:58 AM https://i.snipboard.io/Nklq0c.jpg My technical analysis skills are very limited, but let's try: TBH I'm not really certain what this means. Trending up? ATH soon? Should we invest in evil futures? https://i.imgur.com/A4IwyQu.png Looks like make or break SOON! :D I would not invest because it's infinite supply, isn't it? :P No financial advice of course, always DYOR!!! Title: Re: Evil users Post by: icopress on October 14, 2020, 01:06:26 AM It looks like the system was in place well before 2017 so perhaps the last active date wasn't always set to "Never" for those users back in the day. Or more people paid the fee when Bitcoin was cheaper. What about undercover hidden evil members who got banned, but they purchase new accounts, use new IP, and continue with their evil campaigns? These are isolated cases that do not contribute to the overall picture. In addition, the option of paying for a VPN service for such users will be much more acceptable than paying a fee for each blocked account. (I'm talking about the fact that this data does not include information related to VPN IP addresses).If we include them than your chart would look even more bullish :) Here's some info: suchmoon, Do you know what is the time range for saving evil IPs? I know that IP dims over time, but I don’t know how long it will take for the IP to turn white.Title: Re: Evil users Post by: suchmoon on October 14, 2020, 01:16:53 AM suchmoon, Do you know what is the time range for saving evil IPs? I know that IP dims over time, but I don’t know how long it will take for the IP to turn white. I have no idea and I don't think theymos would divulge that info - it could probably be used to game the system. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: Little Mouse on October 14, 2020, 02:17:50 AM Where did you get the data? Are they public? I never knew the existence of the data publicly :P Is there any valid reason why evil IP has suddenly increased in May 2017 while it was too low at April? Any changes made on the evil on IPs criteria at that moment?
I would not invest because it's infinite supply, isn't it? :P No, limited as yearn finance I think and that's why there are more evil on a lot of IPs. The % is moving slowly and that's good for future, same thing happening in bitcoin too.Title: Re: Evil users Post by: tranthidung on October 14, 2020, 02:24:40 AM It will be a good support if theymos shows the 2020 ban-map to compare with ban-maps in 2015 and 2018 (with same code for ban-map).
Last time, in May 2018, theymos wrote a topic when he created the second ban-map update. All Internet evil, mapped: evil score visualization 2 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4101785.0) That time period in the months in and around October 2017 were effin' awful for the forum. It is the period you are mentioning and charts look like flash crashes happened but statistics on those have never recovered well. Fortunately, it is good for the forum. :DTitle: Re: Evil users Post by: suchmoon on October 14, 2020, 04:18:57 AM Where did you get the data? Are they public? I literally checked which profiles have "Never" as their last active date, like I mentioned in the OP. I don't know if that's entirely accurate but it seems unlikely that so many users would just register and never login for some other reason. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: Yogee on October 14, 2020, 07:42:24 AM This topic by LoyceV appeared when I searched about evil fees https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5175905.0
A $58 fee to be able to post is just insane and that was 2019. That could have been higher for accounts that were created in 2017. ...... That is an excellent TA 1miau hehe. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: Rikafip on October 14, 2020, 08:29:46 AM I literally checked which profiles have "Never" as their last active date, like I mentioned in the OP. I don't know if that's entirely accurate but it seems unlikely that so many users would just register and never login for some other reason. While majority of those accounts might be inactive due "evil fee", there is one very active group that is constantly using old accounts with no prior posting history, Vitor Services (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5160199.0) and I guess some of those might be theirs, waiting to be activated. They sell thread bumping, and for some reason they prefer using old accounts and every time those accounts get tagged or banned, they just replace them with fresh batch. It is like they were thinking in advance and years ago created thousands of them, and then just activating when and if needed. They are probably still creating new ones.For example, you can find those accounts I am talking about currently active in these two threads. Accounts created in 2018, no activity whatsoever and then suddenly waking up few years later and going straight to "work". If those get tagged they wake up new ones, rinse and repeat. [ANN] Baex dApp - Trade traditional stocks directly through the blockchain (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5278713.0) [ANN] ZYX NETWORK - A GROUND-BREAKING POS-BASED PRODUCT FOR A WIDE AUDIENCE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5265765.0) Title: Re: Evil users Post by: Pmalek on October 14, 2020, 08:59:47 AM Here's some info: I wonder how big that neighborhood is? I remember reading stories of users registering on the Bitcointalk forum for the first time and they were presented with an evil fee. That is a good way to get rid of unwanted members, but unfortunately it keeps legit people from being part of the forum as well. When you register, the IP that you used when you submitted the registration form is used to calculate your evilness. The more frequently this IP or its neighbors were banned, the more evil is associated with your account. The amount of evil associated with an IP decays slowly over time, but the amount of evil associated with an account does not. You must pay or be manually whitelisted to enable posting on one of these "banned" accounts. Question is, how well does the evility perform under VPNs, proxies, and socks? I guess free VPNs can't be used since most of them would probably have been misused by someone by now. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: CryptocurencyKing on October 14, 2020, 10:25:54 AM This is a statistic that I don't think is being considered much as it should be in terms of influx of new users in to the forum. Fee payment serves like a deterrent to most users with a need to join the forum but for some reasons, can't afford the fee and even if they do, they are yet to discover the leverage the forum offers it's users and the potentials found there in.
This fee payment could be the main reason behind most brand new dormant accounts remaining dormant. I don't know but, is this fee payment really a good thing, considering the fact that it to some extent hinders new prospective forum users from joining the forum. Not like the fee is levied on every new account as I believe there are criterias for this and influx of prospective users doesn't seem like a major concern for but, is is it really or so important that these fees be levied? Title: Re: Evil users Post by: suchmoon on October 14, 2020, 12:35:41 PM For example, you can find those accounts I am talking about currently active in these two threads. Accounts created in 2018, no activity whatsoever and then suddenly waking up few years later and going straight to "work". If those get tagged they wake up new ones, rinse and repeat. [ANN] Baex dApp - Trade traditional stocks directly through the blockchain (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5278713.0) [ANN] ZYX NETWORK - A GROUND-BREAKING POS-BASED PRODUCT FOR A WIDE AUDIENCE (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5265765.0) Interesting. So I checked a few users: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1746040 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1747918 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1748332 All registered in 2018, all started posting in 2020. These accounts did not have "Never" as their last active date when they were dormant so I'm still fairly confident that "Never" means something different than just a reserve force for future spamming... likely the evil fee. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: PrimeNumber7 on October 14, 2020, 01:19:32 PM Where did you get the data? Are they public? I literally checked which profiles have "Never" as their last active date, like I mentioned in the OP. I don't know if that's entirely accurate but it seems unlikely that so many users would just register and never login for some other reason. A profile indicating they have "never" been active means the person has never logged into their account, and does not know if they need to pay an evil fee or not. I just confirmed the above procedure a minute ago and the above is correct. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: icopress on October 14, 2020, 01:21:47 PM Interesting. So I checked a few users: This is what I was asking about ... when I wrote about time slots.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1746040 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1747918 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1748332 All registered in 2018, all started posting in 2020. These accounts did not have "Never" as their last active date when they were dormant so I'm still fairly confident that "Never" means something different than just a reserve force for future spamming... likely the evil fee. Judging by this data, all these accounts were blocked immediately after registration due to "evil IP" for this reason, "Never" was as the last active date. The beginning of publications in 2020 can be explained by the fact that after a time (a year or three) the blacklists were dropped, the owner of these Alts came in and saw that the accounts were no longer blocked. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: suchmoon on October 14, 2020, 02:13:00 PM The beginning of publications in 2020 can be explained by the fact that after a time (a year or three) the blacklists were dropped, the owner of these Alts came in and saw that the accounts were no longer blocked. AFAIK once an account is hit with an evil fee it never gets reduced for that account. So even if you log in after two years you'd still have to pay it. Not sure if you register a new account from the same IP if it could get a lower fee, assuming the IP address was not involved in any more bans in that time. But I don't think registering a bunch of accounts and reactivating them later is a viable strategy to avoid the evil fee. I'll add a couple more columns to the table in the OP that might be more useful - number of users who made at least one post and number of still-active users. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: icopress on October 14, 2020, 02:46:35 PM You may be interested in: Applications and mapping algorithms (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_curve#Applications_and_mapping_algorithms)
AFAIK once an account is hit with an evil fee it never gets reduced for that account. So even if you log in after two years you'd still have to pay it. Not sure if you register a new account from the same IP if it could get a lower fee, assuming the IP address was not involved in any more bans in that time. But I don't think registering a bunch of accounts and reactivating them later is a viable strategy to avoid the evil fee. Probably this happens only in those cases when the account itself is banned, then you will have to pay a little for registration or activation through the same IP address.I'll add a couple more columns to the table in the OP that might be more useful - number of users who made at least one post and number of still-active users. Below is a quote that I understand as confirmation that it takes time for the IP to turn white, This probably only applies to IP addresses that have not been associated with evil in the future. Unless the accounts are blacklisted or permanently blocked, this can be a viable strategy to avoid being charged. Do evil points ever fade away Yes. This map is pretty short-term. And I'm probably not going to update it. But it's still interesting IMO. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: suchmoon on October 14, 2020, 03:43:13 PM Below is a quote that I understand as confirmation that it takes time for the IP to turn white, This probably only applies to IP addresses that have not been associated with evil in the future. Unless the accounts are blacklisted or permanently blocked, this can be a viable strategy to avoid being charged. Well that's what the evil fee is... the account is essentially banned immediately after being registered. So no, if you register an account and wait - it won't get the fee lowered. The only ways to get a lower fee (or no fee) would be finding a "clean" IP or waiting until your IP's evil decays, both of which seem kind of unpredictable, and then registering an account but you don't know how big the fee is until you register. A bit of a chicken-egg situation, which probably results in a bunch of throwaway accounts that spammers create to probe for evil fee amount. The amount of evil associated with an IP decays slowly over time, but the amount of evil associated with an account does not. You must pay or be manually whitelisted to enable posting on one of these "banned" accounts. The more I think about it the more it looks like a problem for legitimate users who register through e.g. Tor than a real impediment for spammers who can automate it and upon finding a "clean" IP register a large number of accounts through it. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: Rikafip on October 14, 2020, 05:18:21 PM All registered in 2018, all started posting in 2020. These accounts did not have "Never" as their last active date when they were dormant so I'm still fairly confident that "Never" means something different than just a reserve force for future spamming... likely the evil fee. True, you are probably right.I just though that one part of the accounts I mentioned might have been be in that "never" group before waking up, since I noticed that those spamming groups for some reason like to use old accounts that have been completely inactive. On top of that, it looks like they have unlimited supply of those.The more I think about it the more it looks like a problem for legitimate users who register through e.g. Tor than a real impediment for spammers who can automate it and upon finding a "clean" IP register a large number of accounts through it. For some reason it became relatively common issue in Croatia. I have a few friends who got that evil fee thing (and I heard about more cases ) even though they had nothing to do with bitcointalk before I finally talked them into joining. Naturally, when they saw this thing they didn't want to have anything with the forum. Sure, they could circumvent this thing by trying registering from someplace else, but simple registering on the forum shouldn't be such a hassle, especially now when there are many different platforms and people can choose.Title: Re: Evil users Post by: suchmoon on October 14, 2020, 05:45:03 PM True, you are probably right.I just though that one part of the accounts I mentioned might have been be in that "never" group before waking up, since I noticed that those spamming groups for some reason like to use old accounts that have been completely inactive. On top of that, it looks like they have unlimited supply of those. I would imagine that spammers who need some throwaway accounts to make a few shitbumps probably wouldn't pay the evil fee - not worth it. But what could happen is that someone has a bot to probe different IPs until they find a "clean" one (without an evil fee), then register a bunch of "free" accounts on it and keep them until needed. Or sell them to spammers in bulk. If that's what's happening - there should be a reasonable limit of how many accounts can be registered from one IP. For some reason it became relatively common issue in Croatia. I have a few friends who got that evil fee thing (and I heard about more cases ) even though they had nothing to do with bitcointalk before I finally talked them into joining. Naturally, when they saw this thing they didn't want to have anything with the forum. Sure, they could circumvent this thing by trying registering from someplace else, but simple registering on the forum shouldn't be such a hassle, especially now when there are many different platforms and people can choose. Yeah this system is quite rude to new users. Perhaps there could be an approval process so that instead of the evil fee the new user is placed on probation until someone reviews their posts and confirms that it's not a spambot. I think hilariousandco had suggested some sort of a newbie review system. This could be outsourced to the community to avoid overloading moderators. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: eddie13 on October 15, 2020, 07:31:21 PM True, you are probably right.I just though that one part of the accounts I mentioned might have been be in that "never" group before waking up, since I noticed that those spamming groups for some reason like to use old accounts that have been completely inactive. On top of that, it looks like they have unlimited supply of those. I would imagine that spammers who need some throwaway accounts to make a few shitbumps probably wouldn't pay the evil fee - not worth it. But what could happen is that someone has a bot to probe different IPs until they find a "clean" one (without an evil fee), then register a bunch of "free" accounts on it and keep them until needed. Or sell them to spammers in bulk. If that's what's happening - there should be a reasonable limit of how many accounts can be registered from one IP. For some reason it became relatively common issue in Croatia. I have a few friends who got that evil fee thing (and I heard about more cases ) even though they had nothing to do with bitcointalk before I finally talked them into joining. Naturally, when they saw this thing they didn't want to have anything with the forum. Sure, they could circumvent this thing by trying registering from someplace else, but simple registering on the forum shouldn't be such a hassle, especially now when there are many different platforms and people can choose. Yeah this system is quite rude to new users. Perhaps there could be an approval process so that instead of the evil fee the new user is placed on probation until someone reviews their posts and confirms that it's not a spambot. I think hilariousandco had suggested some sort of a newbie review system. This could be outsourced to the community to avoid overloading moderators. Registering accounts itself dirties the IP and you can only get away with creating something like 6-10 accounts from a completely clean IP (a hospital for example ;) ) before more accounts start getting charged the evil fees.. Even without doing anything “bad”, or even doing anything at all.. Creating accounts builds evil.. IME Where did you get the data? Are they public? I literally checked which profiles have "Never" as their last active date, like I mentioned in the OP. I don't know if that's entirely accurate but it seems unlikely that so many users would just register and never login for some other reason. A profile indicating they have "never" been active means the person has never logged into their account, and does not know if they need to pay an evil fee or not. I just confirmed the above procedure a minute ago and the above is correct. I doubt you did it from TOR because it’s basically impossible now.. 50 captchas and then they will refuse to solve, do that like 10 times and then it might finally work.. Half hour.. Choose an already used username? Start over.. Finally tells you to log in? 50 captchas that refuse 10 times to log in.. Get evil fee? Select new TOR IP.. Repeat.. Last time I tried it I gave up after about an hour and a half trying to create an anonymous account.. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: Smartvirus on October 16, 2020, 02:30:48 PM I guess the evil fee was kind of a controlled mechanism after all. With it being levied on previously used IP address or addresses to which an account has been permanently banned before. It just shows how in control bitcointalkforum is. Quite unique and it seems fair.
But what could happen is that someone has a bot to probe different IPs until they find a "clean" one (without an evil fee), then register a bunch of "free" accounts on it and keep them until needed. I guess the possibility of bots guessing IP addresses is were the problem lies. It's kind of like a mining trick but instead of mining coins, it's guessing IP addresses. It's really so uncool when a new prospective user happens to open an account and the evil fee comes up especially, when the user has still got a lot to learn on Bitcoin. Issues with hackers and besides, who buys a user ID anyway. It feels off and besides, the addresses comes with emails that can be used in resets of which, the third party has which isn't such a good thing.Title: Re: Evil users Post by: PrimeNumber7 on October 16, 2020, 03:20:55 PM I doubt you did it from TOR because it’s basically impossible now.. 50 captchas and then they will refuse to solve, do that like 10 times and then it might finally work.. Half hour.. Choose an already used username? Start over.. Finally tells you to log in? 50 captchas that refuse 10 times to log in.. Get evil fee? Select new TOR IP.. Repeat.. Last time I tried it I gave up after about an hour and a half trying to create an anonymous account.. As mentioned, when the account showed as being never active, I had no way of knowing that I had to pay a fee to post. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: Rikafip on October 16, 2020, 05:18:55 PM Registering accounts itself dirties the IP and you can only get away with creating something like 6-10 accounts from a completely clean IP (a hospital for example ;) ) before more accounts start getting charged the evil fees.. Thanks for explanation about this, I had no idea that after you make several accounts you will get start getting charged. I suspected there is some cap after which you will get flagged and that you can't make new accounts indefinitely but based on so many sock puppet accounts made by farmers, I though that number is much higher than 6-10. Even without doing anything “bad”, or even doing anything at all.. Creating accounts builds evil.. This may stop some low level abusers like bounty hunters that just want to create few more alts, but unfortunately that's no issue for pro account farmers. Better that than nothing I guess, but how can someone that never visited bitcointalk before nor used Tor/VPN when registering get this "evil fee" message? Does that mean that for example someone in his building or close to him made bunch of accounts so he got affected by that too? Then again, what are the chances of that happening... Title: Re: Evil users Post by: eddie13 on October 16, 2020, 06:32:06 PM I doubt you did it from TOR because it’s basically impossible now.. 50 captchas and then they will refuse to solve, do that like 10 times and then it might finally work.. Half hour.. Choose an already used username? Start over.. Finally tells you to log in? 50 captchas that refuse 10 times to log in.. Get evil fee? Select new TOR IP.. Repeat.. Last time I tried it I gave up after about an hour and a half trying to create an anonymous account.. As mentioned, when the account showed as being never active, I had no way of knowing that I had to pay a fee to post. Last time I tried it, quite some time ago, it was about impossible for me to create a usable account from tor.. Maybe their should be a sort of newbie jail forum for evil accounts or some way to state your case.. Instead of evil banned, maybe an evil probationary period or something.. I haven’t used any alt account in a very long time, and have basically just for asking stupid questions that I thought might be controversial.. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: suchmoon on October 16, 2020, 07:55:51 PM Where did you get the data? Are they public? I literally checked which profiles have "Never" as their last active date, like I mentioned in the OP. I don't know if that's entirely accurate but it seems unlikely that so many users would just register and never login for some other reason. A profile indicating they have "never" been active means the person has never logged into their account, and does not know if they need to pay an evil fee or not. I just confirmed the above procedure a minute ago and the above is correct. I doubt you did it from TOR because it’s basically impossible now.. 50 captchas and then they will refuse to solve, do that like 10 times and then it might finally work.. Half hour.. Choose an already used username? Start over.. Finally tells you to log in? 50 captchas that refuse 10 times to log in.. Get evil fee? Select new TOR IP.. Repeat.. Last time I tried it I gave up after about an hour and a half trying to create an anonymous account.. LOL that's what I get for ignoring Quicksy... but he might be on to something here. I have updated the OP to reflect the uncertainty about who's evil and added some new numbers. A few notes on the new data:
Title: Re: Evil users Post by: philipma1957 on October 16, 2020, 08:52:28 PM So Am I lost here or isn't there an easy way to change your ip?
93.301.156.218 is not my ip it is a random ip i put up for an example. If I turn my network modem off I get a new one. So can't an evil fee be avoided by simply shutting your service modem off. Then putting it on getting a completely new ip. Title: Re: Evil users Post by: TryNinja on October 16, 2020, 09:03:48 PM So can't an evil fee be avoided by simply shutting your service modem off. Then putting it on getting a completely new ip. The evil fee also applies to their neighborhood IPs. So even if you change your IP, you can get one which is close range to your previous malicious evil IP and get to pay the fee anyways.Here is an old post about this with a visualization of the IP ranges. When someone is banned, their IP and some of their neighboring IPs receive evil points. The thought occurred to me recently that you could create a map of the Internet according to evil points, and I couldn't resist doing this right away. The result is pretty cool-looking IMO. It also seems to show that the evil score system is working as expected: the vast majority of the Internet is not being forced to pay, and in the isolated sections where a registration fee is required, prohibitively-large fees are very rare. Here's the image (zoom in): https://bitcointalk.org/banmap201510.png Each pixel is a /24 address block (ie. each pixel represents 256 IP addresses). The colors are: █ Zero or nearly zero evil █ A small amount of evil █ More █ More █ At this point you actually have to pay if you register an account in this block █ More █ More █ More █ Pretty high █ A ton of evil, more than anyone is likely to pay This is per block, so a single IP address could have an evil score requiring payment while its block still shows up as black here. A colored pixel indicates the evil score of a typical IP in that block. Addresses are laid out in the standard way. So you can for example cross-reference with these maps: https://ant.isi.edu/address/ A /24 should almost never uniquely identify someone, but to be safe I randomly added, removed, and modified some of this data for plausible deniability. |