|
Title: Divisible by 1 billion Post by: PointHope on November 22, 2020, 02:54:23 PM So btc ain't gonna run out.
The new smaller unit , to be called 'Roger'. If you get paid in 'roger', you're being rogered. Title: Re: Divisible by 1 billion Post by: fiulpro on November 22, 2020, 03:36:36 PM So btc ain't gonna run out. The new smaller unit , to be called 'Roger'. If you get paid in 'roger', you're being rogered. Do you have any url supporting your argument ?? Plus why would someone name the smaller unit in *Roger*?? Plus no one who gets paid this small would even take the job. You have to understand the fact that this won't happen overnight , we are not even using the unit : Satoshi yet , it's there but it's not that practical. Thus we have to first encompass the point where we can use *Satoshi* practically and then think about this new unit you believe is going to come. By the way I believe we might have much more efficiency if we name the unit differently. We can very easily use the units already in the use instead of giving them different names . https://i.ibb.co/vjcqYLR/10-1-centi-c-milli-m-micro-nano-n-pico-p.jpg (https://ibb.co/bK6mJND) (Taken from google) Things like micro-btc etc.. would be more logical. Title: Re: Divisible by 1 billion Post by: pawanjain on November 22, 2020, 03:45:37 PM Do you have any url supporting your argument ?? Plus why would someone name the smaller unit in *Roger*?? Plus no one who gets paid this small would even take the job. You have to understand the fact that this won't happen overnight , we are not even using the unit : Satoshi yet , it's there but it's not that practical. Thus we have to first encompass the point where we can use *Satoshi* practically and then think about this new unit you believe is going to come. By the way I believe we might have much more efficiency if we name the unit differently. Very well said. Getting paid in less than a Satoshi doesn't make any sense as of now. And why does it has to be called "Roger" at first place?We can very easily use the units already in the use instead of giving them different names . Things like micro-btc etc.. would be more logical. Sounds like it represents Roger Ver in some way. What @fiulpro said about the units makes more sense acutally. Using terms like micro-btc would sound more appropriate for such conditions. For example : It seems appropriate to use the term nano-btc instead of Roger. Title: Re: Divisible by 1 billion Post by: Tipstar on November 22, 2020, 03:55:59 PM I don't think we'd be transacting a fraction of satoshi anytime soon, mostly due to fees on the original bitcoin network.
Lightning network, a proposal to ease the bitcoin network with pseudo transaction does use millisatoshi as 1/1000 of a satoshi as they are already making payments using 1 satoshi and that could further be decreased. Never heard of Roger and if they plan to bring a fraction of Satoshi, hope it won't be called that. Title: Re: Divisible by 1 billion Post by: PointHope on November 23, 2020, 02:14:23 AM So btc ain't gonna run out. The new smaller unit , to be called 'Roger'. If you get paid in 'roger', you're being rogered. Do you have any url supporting your argument ?? Plus why would someone name the smaller unit in *Roger*?? Plus no one who gets paid this small would even take the job. You have to understand the fact that this won't happen overnight , we are not even using the unit : Satoshi yet , it's there but it's not that practical. Thus we have to first encompass the point where we can use *Satoshi* practically and then think about this new unit you believe is going to come. By the way I believe we might have much more efficiency if we name the unit differently. We can very easily use the units already in the use instead of giving them different names . https://i.ibb.co/vjcqYLR/10-1-centi-c-milli-m-micro-nano-n-pico-p.jpg (https://ibb.co/bK6mJND) (Taken from google) Things like micro-btc etc.. would be more logical. In case you haven't noticed BTC is a new animal, Hence new names like 'satoshi', the 'roger'' is my twisted idea of a joke. If someone offered you 100 'roger' to do a job, then you've been 'rogered'. Anyway the point of my OP is that BTC isn't going to run out as some dufus media are reporting. Title: Re: Divisible by 1 billion Post by: SquirrelJulietGarden on November 23, 2020, 03:47:07 AM The Bitcoin Wiki has a table for units Table of all units (https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Units)
Bitcoin Unit Converter: Convert satoshi, mBTC,Finney, μBTC to 43 fiat currencies (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5289916) Title: Re: Divisible by 1 billion Post by: pooya87 on November 23, 2020, 05:57:49 AM If you get paid in 'roger', you're being rogered. then you suddenly realize that what you have received is not even bitcoin, it is a shitcoin called bcash ;)Title: Re: Divisible by 1 billion Post by: Poker Player on November 23, 2020, 09:45:04 AM LOL.
It is divisible by any amount (apart from 0, which isn't exactly an amount). So, it isn't going to run out because an smaller unit can always be created. Great post OP! Did you come up with it while you were taking a shit or something? Title: Re: Divisible by 1 billion Post by: bhadz on November 23, 2020, 10:55:49 AM Will there be consensus for that Roger? ::)
It's already been set and there's already a label for the smallest unit of bitcoin. That will never happen unless satoshi tells that it's going to be the smallest unit but that's impossible to happen. How'd you come up with that Roger? I understand it as a joke. :) Title: Re: Divisible by 1 billion Post by: btc78 on December 20, 2020, 03:19:42 PM So btc ain't gonna run out. Am i missing something here? ROGER 'Rabit' ? Lol ..The new smaller unit , to be called 'Roger'. If you get paid in 'roger', you're being rogered. Satoshi is even Smaller why need to another lower Unit? Maybe if Bitcoin already reached a Million Dollar then Something like this will gonna happen but for now, Lets Enjoy the Name of our Creator in the Smallest Value of Bitcoin. Don't rush things we are just Going to Break 30k lol. |
