Bitcoin Forum

I participate in the bounty of the Interfinex project company in the signature company. It ends today. I have strong evidence that the bounty manager is a scam. It is very easy to check his untidiness in the conduct of a subscription company. The accrual of shares is contrary to all the rules of the company. It is impossible to attribute this to inattention.
 I don’t want to accuse a person of fraud unfoundedly, especially a bounty manager.
I am asking you for your help in verifying this information. I may be wrong. Then I will immediately apologize. But everything is somehow too obvious.

Here are the terms of the subscription company:
● Each participant should make at least 10 posts per week during their participation in the campaign. 5 of them can be in local threads.
● Posts must be at least 100 characters long.
● Comply with the terms to avoid problems with the distribution of stakes.
● Maximum 3 comments per day.
● Focus on next threads: Bitcoin, Economy, Alternate cryptocurrencies.

Claims against the manager are reflected in the screenshots:

https://i.imgur.com/sIeeZ8i.png

https://i.imgur.com/buOQQVH.png

Plinteng -  week 2 - 3 posts,  week 3 no posts
Hocaneshaw - the last post was in July, then some reports.
Gbrendeh -  week 2 - 2 posts, week 3 no posts.

I will not list further, you can find it if you wish.

We cannot call it scam bro but easily it is some kind of negligence from the bounty manager, either the manager has not checked the posts of each participant properly or it could be their own accounts, who knows. If they are serious and it happened due to mistake i hope they will quickly correct it so lets wait and see.

Most likely an alt of that bounty manager because as far as I know, he shouldn't be that stupid to make obvious mistake like that. Sr. Member for 1 stake? how can that be then? also, I think managers at least check the post made the participants.

Either that or the bounty manager is too lazy to do his job. Managers like this shouldn't be bounty managing with that level of laziness. The list is just too messed up according to this. They should have just hired a reputable manager.

It's more like a negligence than a scam. The bounty manager might also have considered as it was the first week of the campaign and the participants didn't had a complete week. The bounty manager also seems to be the forum media manager for the project and a direct representative from the project itself. So, I don't doubt they are making their alts post 10s of post a day to get bounty as they can provide it in any form.

It is more like cheating than scam. We cannot tell that those users are really from bounty manager but those members that has been tagged probably own by a single user and that bounty manager also has been with negligence towards counting of the posts per week to get stake. Well, it can be corrected and instead of posting this thread why now PM the BM to correct this one? You should have also to consider how much work a bounty manager could be.

I don't think so it could be scamming. There are some reason:
- Bounty sofico is the bounty manager thats why its not possible to be scammed i think so.
- It could be some problem but don't worry it will be fixed when distribution will start.
- Bounty sofico is trusted bounty manager i have seen ever so don't worry.

Nah, this is no scam, but thanks for bringing this up, maybe the bounty manager might double or triple check everything again. Maybe it was just a oversight on his end as he might have other projects as well.

But good call, at least you brought this things up in this community. So that bounty managers will be sensitive to make sure every entry is correct in the spreadsheet.

Bounty manager is making his own entries in order to get more rewards, may be?

I think the team has to know about this too, and though the bounty managers made some mistake, I believe there is a double checking done by the team to ensure that data entries are accurate and valid, maybe you can directly PM to the team, but IMO, this is more like a negligence but this is huge as it affects the reward participants. Honestly, this is not the first time, I've seen a lot of these in the past when I'm still active with bounty campaign.

That is not enough to call this project a scam or we are saying for sure that BM is scamming the project until we can confirm that those accounts belong to BM. But unprofessionalism is visible very clearly and this type of accusation is not new for this BM. Sofico got red trust for one of these types of activity before.

It may be possible but I do believe if the managers were checking without try to see the work that already made by the participants. It's not only happening once or twotimes but so many times the managers wanna try to did their job asap by manipulating the result of stake.
I'm feeling doubt about why people are still participating in this bounty as the interfinex project itself already abandoned project.
That makes me feel curious about what happen with them all.

There are managers who are really consistent with the rules made, there are also managers who make the rules look formal.

Regarding Sofico, I really hate this management because of the many negligences it made in the past that harmed me and some other honest hunters. I'm not surprised to see this problem because it's being managed by a bad manager

Sofico is a well known bounty manager but not as popular as Hhampuz and bubbalex, he is been hired to managed the project how is this a scam? He is just doing is job and whatever you see in the spreadsheet will be fixed if it's a mistake, you should take the problem to him instead of accusing the project to be scam, it's wrong

Can you prove it if sofico is a legit manager? as far as i know if sofico is also a part of the worst manager in this year. There are some scam projects that managed by him.
I think that your opinion is not having a strong evidence. There are so many people also saying he was a bad manager too.
Interfinex could also be the next dead project.

In my opinion it cannot be confirmed that they are scammers, because in some cases there are so many like this in each campaign, if you have a problem like this you should report the complaint you are experiencing to the bounty manager and explain to him about the problem you are experiencing, because if you are accused of being fraudsters with reasons like this there is no certainty that the project is a scam, unless the project really dies and leaves the project it can be said to be a fraud.

The bounty manager is really at the mercy of those who experienced the mismanagement, that is my opinion. It is unfortunate that these managers are getting negative points for mismanagement. Possibly something was missed and at some occasions payments were not made. Before you give a negative point to bounty managers you need to be aware that they manage so many bounty participants and that there will be occasions of mismanagement. Better to send the person a message to correct the said mistake. Sometimes you just have to rattle some swords for them to correct it.

I wrote about a claim regarding stakes in the bounty section, I wrote to the manager in a personal message but received no response. I wrote to the moderator of the forum, who said that this is a topic for discussion by the community and he personally cannot influence. Only after that did I write here. I do not accuse the project of fraud, I protest against the unscrupulous actions of the manager. This is not an isolated error. Everyone is wrong. But I have not seen this yet. When stakes are placed on someone who has not made a single post, and this is throughout the whole company. And to the one who made 10 posts per work, zero. There are not so many participants in the signature company to make so many mistakes. I just have no words left to express my indignation.

This problem is not only once in the last few years, in fact this problem has happened very often, the solution is to complain about the problem or complaint to the admin who is always active in order to get a faster answer, because it is not too late to complain about this problem to the admin, because the calculation is not yet final , if the calculation is final it will be difficult to appeal to the admin, in my opinion you can contact this admin from the Interfinex project @sofia_stahovska which I know the admin always responds to all participants ...

There might be other possible reason not only as  altal account t maybe his friend account or something that want to take advantage for his campaigns by asking a stake in favor to him .

We don't have enough evidence to make an accusation that both account that recieve stake is an alt unless there are proof that the account is connected to each other.

 It is also possible for the manager to make an error because the post history of each member involved is not chicked by him instead they give stake to everyone, to make his job easy.