Bitcoin Forum

Damn .. I missed the bounty campaign with a lot of ETH allocation, maybe it's still not fortune yet .. I can see that many newbies are happy and laughing because the rewards are so great.. One of the participants got 71 ETH :o
Wallet Manager: 0x72D884a51C90210b25aF8B8C8f2da8149D16c359
tx participant payment: https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x72D884a51C90210b25aF8B8C8f2da8149D16c359

🔵🔴[CLOSED][BOUNTY]DeFi Yield Protocol(DYP) Total of 200 ETH Bounty Pool🔴🔵 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5281567.0)
https://i.imgur.com/EgTci4a.png  :o

This is new to me  because i missed out on the bounty; do you mind to share me the name of the bounty or perhaps the bounty thread; so i can monitor preceedings and see if the bounty manager is one to be trusted. Etherum rewards bounty are very good and healthy, even Tron, as long as there are participant caps; it will be very rewarding. One bounty like that i know is the Injective protocol bounty. Please do share more information.

That sounds something unheard of, you have just posted the reward amount out of excitement but you should have also named the project and campaign with basic details so that the community could get better understanding.

How did you know those were transactions for bounty payments purposes? Who knows it was transactions for another purpose, if it was true then it might one of the greatest bounty payments of the year.

Maybe you can add the link to the bounty that you talking about.

Yeah, the problem is that he/she didn't link the bounty project here. So I have my doubts here, specially giving out 71 ETH? You just show us the wallet address here, you can just get any wallet address out there and claim that it came from a certain project.

So just to be clear here, I have my skeptics until this is proven. You'll just putting some hype here, specially those newbies who join bounties after bounties. Maybe you are giving them false hope, just saying.

This is probably the bounty OP is talking about; 🔵🔴[CLOSED][BOUNTY]DeFi Yield Protocol(DYP) Total of 200 ETH Bounty Pool🔴🔵 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5281567.0). I can see lots of happy bounty hunters in there. Such well paying bounties come up once in every hundred announced bounties.

There is also likely to have been a lot of cheating in that bounty due to the payment structure.
https://i.imgur.com/EgTci4a.png  :o

I am also having doubts that someone got paid 71 ETH given that the total pool prize was just  $20K.

There's 71 eth and 18 eth on the transaction but is there an assurance that those are the bounty hunters that were paid and it's his/her stake?
Real or not, receiving 71 eth from a bounty is such a huge incentive.

It's not participant's address

that address being used to create a payment to the participants and it's a hot wallet that used by the dev to store the payment and i have been watching the campaign.
There's no participant who has been getting 71 ethereum as his payment. You should have checked it again dude.

You're wrong dude.

That's what I've come to realize. That 71 ETH reward shocked me. Bounty campaign pays but that was too high especially as the campaign didn't have one of the biggest bounty allocation I've seen. It looks like OP was only looking via the transaction history and wasn't too concerned with the wallet it ended up in.   


It's not a just one bounty participant that got that huge payment. It was made by the dev to dev store in a wallet that would auto distribute at once to all the participants.

If that's true, then the participants were lucky enough to get the rewards. These days it is quite hard to find a bounty that pays good. Even if we examine much about the core value of the project, we can't get a conclusion on the bounty. Sometimes the random pick benefits the users. 71eth out of bounty is really impossible to think about, which means $41535 in present value of ethereum. Good luck everyone for such bounties in 2021.

200 ETH pool and one participant got 71 ETH?
How could that happen?
3 participants only?
Will they even continue the campaign with just 3 participants helping them to promote?  ;D

Never heard of this, and why would they give 71 eth for just one person? will a company waste thousands of dollars just for a campaign, at the same time you just post transaction like what others said you never share what company is it, too good to be true, but if its really true then we missed an opportunity, kinda thinking what the company name is or project.

It sounded to good to be true. These altcoin bounties usually have a low budget for marketing and are not just going to give a newbie 71 ETH. There are still some bounties that are paying well so you should not be disappointed about missing out this time. Even if you earn a little you can still hodl or exchange for ETH or BTC and it will become more valuable later on.

I know we tend to have high paying bounties of this nature, but the challenge is that they come ones in a blue moon and there's always the tendency for one to be sceptical of the reward because its too good to be true. I wasn't fortunate enough to participate but I'm happy for the participants who got this juicy reward.

wow that's so fantastic, it's rare to find such a bounty. this is probably a big paying bounty during this year. but a successful bounty is no guarantee that the project will be good in the future. Keep in mind that in 2017 there were many projects that paid a lot of money, but were not in line with their development. So for investors who invest in the project, you should not believe completely, let alone think that the project has a lot of development funds and will not be left behind.

They have bunch of participants. The thread starter just didn't understand about this campaign and he was seeing it when the campaign already ended. I have seen that before when the spreadsheet were still opened. There are also some people made complaints in this section about their reward from the DYP bounty too.
it looks like all of problems alreayd solved.

How dare you say it is a reward payment without showing details?

You need to add Bounty Thread, project name including bounty manager.

An ETH payment does not show what you think...

Maybe it's is mouthful reward but it happened sometime when the project is really good. I dont believe 71 eth payment for one person maybe this is for the whole campaign.

But it seems cant seem to find any participant that come here and confirm the payment. Curious whether they will come here and brag their rewards. But if this is a legit payment then that's good news at least we know that there are still campaigns worth doing. This is more than how many times a btc campaign payment if this is true.

I am sure, OP does not understand how payment system provided by the Bounty, so he gave wrong information here, There's no way one can get 71 ETH in current situation, if its true their allocation is 200 ETH, then that means only 3 participants joined, and I think it is impossible for Bounty project to continue their program with only 3 Bounty participants.

what is the bounty? why many people don't know that information. however, it would be better if you provide the link. Besides, how did you know that it was a payment for a bounty hunter? besides, the ethereum share is not the same as dividing the bounty payments in general

This is the spreadsheet ------>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-8223-bWfM85mll1ho4b6C9szYA_e8CeUbguxlBwR54/edit
Unfortunately I have no permission to access it. Anyone who's able to access it can confirm to us if the address receiving high rewards participated in the bounty.
But I have so far seen addresses of other active bounty hunters who applied for the bounty in the transaction history

How come that one of the participants got 71 ETH in this bounty? when I looked at the campaign the budget allocation was 20, 000$ only
then if it is 71 ETH received by one participants only it total more than 20k$, are you sure about this thing? I don't know if missed look the thread section, but correct me if I'm wrong.

Never heard of this but I think for something huge project like this I think needs to have an escrow right? If I remember, before there was project that claims of paying huge amount of Bitcoin and a lot of people joined and turns out it was a fake one. I think escrow could solve this kind of problem.

How tired of these tales. Show us proof of this here. Take a screenshot of the participant table, where we can all see the participant's wallet and his rates. Otherwise, it looks like delusional dreams of an inflamed imagination. Who will pay one-third of the pool in one hand?

This is how I actually expect bounty of nowadays to be rewarded. Like this, the coin price will be prevented from dumping usually attributed to bounty distribution. Although, this doesn't proof the project will be successful but it proves that the team really means business and want to know what they're doing wrong in the case of price dump.

I don't really get the point you are driving at, is it that you are telling us to tell campaign that we know which pays well in Eth or you know of a campaign that just launched and you want us to join. I will like to know if there is such that pay like the example you gave will be nice to end 2020 on that note.

That's still a huge payment for bounty if it belongs to certain people. How many are the participants for the specific 71 ETH?
They will celebrate the holidays with a lot of food in the table then.

It is doubtful really but it also is possible.  If we dig and investigate further we might find the truth. I was a bounty hunter for years but I never had the chance to get that certain amount in just a single campaign. May this was just some wallet transfer between the manager and the devs.

He assumes that if there's a guy who participated in the campaign already got 71ethereum as his payment but some members here are seeing he was making miss calculation about that.
The project paid all of the participants and there's no participant that has gotten 71 ethereum as his payment. he didn't confirm it with the developers too.
he was making others are feeling curious with it dude.

Maybe that's the reason why we aren't heard about this project. If it's true, then lucky are those who participated and got rewarded with such a huge amount but it seems like Op didn't understand the whole system of the campaign because it sounds too good to be true. He should have told us the name of the campaign so everyone would be enlightened.

Without any legitimate proof of campaign or spreadsheet screenshot, I think it's getting harder to digest this thing. Because I have been a bounty for a long time but I never heard anyone got a reward like this one.  Like 71 ETH it is a very huge reward and somehow he got 71 ETH reward from the allocation of 200 ETH, so this seems pretty much weird to me.

I have been monitoring this bounty campaign for a long time because they are allocating a lot of money. But I was disappointed that they didn't have a signature campaign or articles. So I can only see a lot of participants getting big payouts.

But the campaign I saw had some problems, many complained in the thread but it ended well for all. The campaign has been over for quite a while and it is impossible for anyone to get a 71 ETH payout as it is a new transaction. After all they have informed that the bounty is over by spending $20k of the total allocation of 200 ETH.

wow, it is really lucky that the person who got the Etheruem prize,
i know it is now difficult to get a good bounty and people think that the bounty has ended,
but everything is answered, that good bounties still exist and I hope this will be an encouragement for other bounty hunters

The end of the story is for those that participated to get their rewards received in their wallet. Many projects of this nature ends up not paying while some do pay but congratulations to those that did it and hoping to earn. We have many rich in spreadsheet projects but hopefully this wouldn't be like others. Once more congratulations to hunters that did the bounty.

I think that 71 ETH is not for participants, maybe it is another wallet that has developer or BM. What is certain is that when I saw the thread, one participant got 4 ETH