|
Title: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: odolvlobo on January 17, 2021, 08:43:59 AM Who are the most prolifically bad posters on Bitcointalk?
Criteria for nomination The poster must: 1. post an excessive number of posts or post frequent walls of text, and 2. require careful study in order to be understood, and 3. show lack of logic and reason and exhibit a potential disconnect from reality. Note that basic grammar and spelling mistakes are not sufficient, and poor English by itself is not a criteria. Not Criteria 1. Spammers 2. Scammers 3. Bounty program posters 4. People you don't like. 5. People you disagree with. My nominees: cryptoboss2020 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2835857): over the last 6 months, cryptoboss2020 has posted an average of 4.8 posts of utter nonsense each day in a variety of forums. Example: In my indestrstood the cbdc are not and coin but its a Word of regulations The usdt dai usdc will be regulated and called first CBDC COINS. BECOUSE of this pandemic uk might be first one to start use usdt usdc and dai I guess here is way to make profit to sell coins to others becouse they need CBDC approved payment Method OpenCryptoSystems (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2201231): In just the last month, OpenCryptoSystems has made over 90 posts that rival those of cryptoboss2020. Example: If someone is good with money it means he or she knows a lot about money . You can say that you are not interested about money and financial system...welll the covid 19 was good example tgat you need to know about money Before the covid the richest people sold their assets why so ? You think it was inside info ? No it wasnt they just know about money And crypto is money and when you dont know about money then you shouldnt be in crypto ... Or you stay in crypto learn hard and its a miracle you learn more about money Now days when we face the facts that most of the money will go in. Crypto and stock commoties markets and real business ownership will need to have state licenses .... The you realise that you must learn. ...those main things : When the economic circle start amd when it finish When to buy and whem to sell How to know if its just FUD/ shake out the weak hands or actual financial liauitity crisis ? ...[snip]... World is scam and fraud so you better learn how the scammers and fraudsters will try to scam you legally and not so legally but its all scam so scam Honorable Mention: Polo7 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2640926): Polo7 hasn't been around since last November, but the brief appearance included some bold and ridiculous predictions that never panned out. I wonder if Polo7 is the same person as OpenCryptoSystems. Example: Governments all around the World Secretly start using together with banks the bitcoins. Oil is done so They replace bitcoin instead of oil. The btc volatility might go like daily 50k-100k price Changes. Bitcoin will be instutionalized permanently. The Global market prices Liqutation postion will be fluctuated by Bitcoin price. I said this before but nobody didnt listen but now its here!! Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: bL4nkcode on January 17, 2021, 09:13:41 AM Oh, yeah, I found that one of them is in my ignore list.
Economics is full of their threads, I remembered one day maybe that was last december or november, found most of the recent threads on economics are made by them both, like most of them. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Foxpup on January 17, 2021, 09:24:36 AM Most of the P&S regulars probably qualify, though the grand prize I think goes to BADecker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149737), who has made over 250 posts since the beginning of the year, and about 5k posts last year, most if not all of which are conspiracy-theoretical nonsense.
Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: mk4 on January 17, 2021, 09:26:04 AM There's this one dude named "HardFacts" whereas he pretty much almost always ends his topics with "Hard Facts" thinking he's so smart and clever or something. Thankfully he's already stopped spamming these crappy threads. He's pretty much the sort of "version 1" of cryptoboss2020.
How Valuable is the worlds First FIAT CURRENCY ??? How big is the world first BANK ??? Does everyone still want the first CELLPHONE ??? I bet no one here even knows what the first in the list above are if they did not google it... Being first is great, you can have a nice run with a great new idea and zero competition, and make a fortune 💰💰💰 But being first has a very limited time to profit before competition with better products arrives. Just like FIAT currencies, there are an INFINITE number of Crypto Currencies that can be created via the Blockchain. The Blockchain is a world changing technology, but Bitcoin has no exclusive claim on it. Bitcoin had a great run up for being first, people made fortunes, but those days have past.... Just like the assets in the above list have gone to zero an are long forgotten, we are now seeing the decline in Bitcoin. I wonder how low it has to get before some of the " Faithful Believers " figure it out. I have no doubt that Crypto Currencies will be the future of money, but it will not be bitcoin. It will likely be some real asset backed Crypto, gold backed, or Petro Backed, you name it, but backed by something of real value. Bitcoin is backed by NOTHING, do you REALLY think people will want Bitcoin when better Crypto Currencies with real backing come along ??? You can ignore reality, but you can not ignore the consequences of ignoring reality 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Hard Facts Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Kittygalore on January 17, 2021, 09:44:25 AM Your nominees will definitely win, as far as I know they might be the accounts of the same person. If I ever come across their post, I tend to look not at their OP but the others who seems to understand the way they talk. IMO this is a little bit overboard for me because as you can see I might end up as a nominee too, but I can see where you are going at. They do not deserve the shaming though, they haven't hurt someone in any manner but I like this criteria maybe for others to become a better member that creates a better post.
Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Pictureme on January 17, 2021, 09:51:02 AM In my own little understanding, I will say those posters are non English speaking individuals, they are probably using google translate.
If they can't write well it means they can't speak at all. or they are not that educated. Well In all these, I sincerely believe that they are using a translator, is only google translate that will translate financial into Money. To clear our doubt, we should also check if those users are also participating in local groups Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: FIFA worldcup on January 17, 2021, 10:27:48 AM In my own little understanding, I will say those posters are non English speaking individuals, they are probably using google translate. If they can't write well it means they can't speak at all. or they are not that educated. Well In all these, I sincerely believe that they are using a translator, is only google translate that will translate financial into Money. To clear our doubt, we should also check if those users are also participating in local groups Not everyone is a native English speaker but since English is a global language and is taught in school in most parts of the world, many people know how to write proper English. But if we see such posts as mentioned by the OP where there are too many grammatical mistakes, this means either the person is using any sort of translation , using a spinning text tool or is very poor in English language. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Marvelman on January 17, 2021, 10:38:09 AM There's this one dude named "HardFacts" whereas he pretty much almost always ends his topics with "Hard Facts" thinking he's so smart and clever or something. Thankfully he's already stopped spamming these crappy threads. He's pretty much the sort of "version 1" of cryptoboss2020. I think he's a classic troll. Now he's playing some kind of convert, and at the first opportunity, if the bitcoin price drops again, he'll go back to his old ways, and that's spitting all over the crypto community. Ignore is the best weapon against such idiots. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: TheNineClub on January 17, 2021, 10:44:07 AM In my own little understanding, I will say those posters are non English speaking individuals, they are probably using google translate. If they can't write well it means they can't speak at all. or they are not that educated. Well In all these, I sincerely believe that they are using a translator, is only google translate that will translate financial into Money. To clear our doubt, we should also check if those users are also participating in local groups Yes, they are probably not, but if you take a deep dive you can rule out grammatical errors and spelling mistakes. And If their writing is even below that, then what is the point of writing on English based boards? For example, I have come across a couple of Cryptoboss2020 posts and it didn't seem like the lack of knowing English is a problem, it seemed like nonsensical empty talk. And yeah, if you look at some of my posts and my rank, you could say that about me as well, so it's not straightforward, but I guess veterans on this forum have seen it all and know better. The activity level is also a good indicator. edit: you can also spot pretty clearly when someone is fishing for merits. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Lordhermes on January 17, 2021, 10:57:53 AM Ignore is the best weapon against such idiots. No body trying out opinion is an idiot, every conversations among different categories of people carries something meaningful, as pictureme had pointed out, those users might not be an English speaking people while translator does imperfect work sometimes. If you can't comprehend with their statements, find the nearest exit (doesn't mean they are idiots) while others might fully understand them more better. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Marvelman on January 17, 2021, 11:05:53 AM If you can't comprehend with their statements, find the nearest exit (doesn't mean they are idiots) while others might fully understand them more better. Please read my post again, but this time with comprehension. Do you even know which user I was referring to? Take a look at his post history a bit and you might understand. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Lucius on January 17, 2021, 11:18:36 AM I think that of the three listed users in the OP, it is difficult to find a better candidate - although I personally do not visit the Altcoins board and I do not know if there are similar patients there.
I wonder if Polo7 is the same person as OpenCryptoSystems. It seems to me that Polo7, OpenCryptoSystems and cryptoboss2020 are the same person. My candidate is DashingAgent (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1183223;sa=showPosts;start=0) This user is mostly shilling for altcoins in Bitcoin Trading board, but he often gives very strange advice and if you take a closer look at his post history he often contradicts himself. He also often asks for donations for his work, as if his posts really help someone. US people are buying LTC while the other world is avoiding it There are 6 billion people around the world, just eliminate the people who do not use the internet then there are 1 billion people atlest who use the internet which means that 1 LTC is for 119 people. If only an individual has the purchasing power of $1, we can say that LTC will hit $119 at least to be divided equally among all of the people. But big exchanges like binance and kraken only allow to trade minimum of $10, let say that everyone has the purchasing power of $10 then LTC will hit $1190 in the future but when we don't know. So without any improvement in Litecoin network after paypal adoption, we may claim that LTC will hit at-least $119 per coin and it will never ever return back below to this level. If in case it happens then some whale will only be selling it. Will Crypto live forever or die? I am asking that question because there is a possible World WAR after many years it is because US has raised the threats for many Christian countries and it is the only who'd empowered Muslims (terrorists) against the Christian, US is a biggest enemy of Christianity Since the day one. Just imagine that US sold trillion dollar weapons to Kingdom of Saudi Arabia alone who is a founder of many terrorist organizations including ISIS + Al Qaida along with the terrorists groups/organizations they created in Pakistan, US also sold weapons to Turkey + AE + Many other Muslim countries and raised a threat for Europe and many other Christian countries. The interesting thing which is seen is that that US did never raise an accountability for his weapon puppet countries like the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and AE, So it is possible that all Christian countries may awake and there could be a possible WW3. If it happens then do you think that bitcoin will live anymore? You believe or not but the future of cryptocurrencies are ETH and another one You believe or not but the future of cryptocurrencies are Ethereum and another one which starts with the 17th Alphabet, why I think that that because it is strongly possible that any group or whatever I cannot specify because I do not want that it may happen can create a super computer in order to temper the blockchain and do the 51% of attack on bitcoin network which currently looks impossible due to the current hashing power but to increase his/their balance in bitcoin, they would need to manipulate all the blocks, bitcoin network currently has less blocks comparing to ethereum.... Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Csmiami on January 17, 2021, 03:24:10 PM I'm sorry to spoil the fun, but how is this thread not intended to feed trolls?
Similar to the Troll category from the Bitcointalk community awards that ended up being discarded for being: This is the ultimate version of feeding the troll. Or maybe I'm bitching over something that is not really a reason to bitch about Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Poker Player on January 17, 2021, 04:35:31 PM *snip* Not surprisingly, I have those three forum members on my ignore list: cryptoboss2020; OpenCryptoSystems and Polo7. The forum looks much cleaner without their posts. Economics is full of their threads, I remembered one day maybe that was last december or november, found most of the recent threads on economics are made by them both, like most of them. Yeah they sometimes go on opening-threads sprees. I wonder if they do so after drinking. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: suchmoon on January 17, 2021, 05:27:14 PM I believe Polo7 is banned. He briefly showed up with a new account (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2931451) and was banned again for evasion. It took a lot of reports to get that first ban and unfortunately mods are far more lenient towards cryptoboss2020, so that's not going well.
Some nutjobs like BADecker seem to have carved out an even larger niche over the years - it's hard to get even his most egregious offtopic nonsense deleted. I wonder if Polo7 is the same person as OpenCryptoSystems. You're probably onto something here: This what polo7 said here guys i needf to contact him so badly need to know what to do next this guy knows about everuthimg Here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5281350.0 How to contact woth this guy he should be my financial advisor https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5283747.msg55431386#msg55431386 Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: nutildah on January 18, 2021, 02:14:27 AM Most of the P&S regulars probably qualify, though the grand prize I think goes to BADecker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149737), who has made over 250 posts since the beginning of the year, and about 5k posts last year, most if not all of which are conspiracy-theoretical nonsense. Not to be terribly unoriginal but I would like to nominate BADecker as well, who I've had on ignore for about 23 of the last 24 months. There's some real mental illness flourishing in the P&S section. Its home to several posters who have specific threads they hang out in and basically just chronicle news items that confirm their paranoid suspicions. I'm pretty certain they all have diagnosable schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or schizoaffective disorder... But for the most part they're not really hurting anyone and I'd feel bad mentioning them by name. Who are the most prolifically bad posters on Bitcointalk? Criteria: 1. The poster must post an excessive number of posts or post frequent walls of text. 2. Their posts require careful study in order to be understood. Note that basic grammar and spelling mistakes are not sufficient, and poor English by itself is not a criteria. 3. Their posts must show lack of logic and reason and exhibit a potential disconnect from reality. If I am allowed a second nomination, it would be for franky1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65837), specifically for meeting all of the above criteria to a degree shared by few others, at least several thousand times. With 33,500 posts in all (#2 on the forum), its going to be hard to beat BADecker, tho. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: odolvlobo on January 18, 2021, 02:58:03 AM Most of the P&S regulars probably qualify, though the grand prize I think goes to BADecker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149737), who has made over 250 posts since the beginning of the year, and about 5k posts last year, most if not all of which are conspiracy-theoretical nonsense. I agree that he is prolific and somewhat detached from reality, but his posts are very readable. I would say that 2 out of 3 makes him a runner-up, along with his arch flat-earth rival notbatman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=244104), who appears to have left in disgust almost a year ago. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: PrimeNumber7 on January 18, 2021, 03:29:04 AM I would nominate Cryptohunter and his related alts. He frequently complains about the trust system, particularly those in DT. I tried reasoning with him a long time ago, but he was unwilling to listen to my logic nor compromise.
Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Quickseller on January 18, 2021, 05:03:44 AM Most of the P&S regulars probably qualify, though the grand prize I think goes to BADecker (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=149737), who has made over 250 posts since the beginning of the year, and about 5k posts last year, most if not all of which are conspiracy-theoretical nonsense. I agree that he is prolific and somewhat detached from reality, but his posts are very readable. I would say that 2 out of 3 makes him a runner-up, along with his arch flat-earth rival notbatman (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=244104), who appears to have left in disgust almost a year ago. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: tranthidung on January 18, 2021, 06:21:26 AM Oh, yeah, I found that one of them is in my ignore list. Many topics of theirs now in Off-topic board. Ignore and don't forget to report if you have time.Quote Economics is full of their threads, I remembered one day maybe that was last december or november, found most of the recent threads on economics are made by them both, like most of them. My surprise is their threads attract many posters to join and 'discuss'. Earlier, I did not notice anything, and join discussions too but later on, when I found that those topics are from topic spammers, I ignore them.I considered it as spam topics as too many topics were created per day or in a few days, and topic authors simply created topic and open it for discussions and abandoned it (lock button were not used). It is too easy to scan around and leave comments as a pro-spammer and it was tested by @actmyname in [EXPERIMENT] Testing the Limits of Shitposting (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5133932.0). Honestly, in the past 2 or 3 months, it takes me more time to find good topics to join discussions. This step takes me more time than what I spent for my posts (sometimes). Some halls/ walls
Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: davis196 on January 18, 2021, 07:11:04 AM My nomination goes for game-protect https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254)
but this guy isn't active since July 2020.Perhaps he got tired of scamming and trolling. He left me negative feedback for participating in a signature campaign in which I wasn't even accepted. Also he left negative feedback to many forum members for no valid reason. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Laudanum on January 19, 2021, 01:37:38 PM I would nominate Cryptohunter and his related alts. He frequently complains about the trust system, particularly those in DT. I tried reasoning with him a long time ago, but he was unwilling to listen to my logic nor compromise. But hasn't he already won the king of the trolls poll? He can't win everything can he? You know the poll where he won king of the trolls then requested any example of his presenting undeniable and conclusively debunked information as true or visa versa ( the definition of trolling as per the board rules and explained by SS a mod for 6 years). Not 1 example was provided ?? How about i nominate quickseller aka Primenumber7? Hmm complaining about undeniable holes in the trust system vs Your own... Self escrowing ? Scamming Lying about being banned? Sig spamming anyone that will have him Engaging in red tag removal trading and removing warnings on legitmate scammers he had held for years simply to get some btc dust. Doxing people Then slobbering around asking for forgiveness. King of the weasels. Slime of slime. Actually I see now more attention must be lavished on you quicksellout7. This weasel like behavior must be focused on and assistance must be given that you may recover and work towards being trustworthy and respectable. Reasoning with cryptohunter a long time ago? Can you provide the evidence? Do you mean as quickseller or primenumber7? Good job I just noticed this post. It could be very revealing. Now let me challenge quicksellout7 here publically and see what happens Present where your logic and reason was presented to CH and explain why he should have adopted your view. I will wait. Lol at a thread about hall of shame that does not feature scammers, proven financially dangerous individuals or those that willingly promote high risk schemes verging on scams. I dispute this can be a legitmate hall of shame or that more detailed description should be given so as not to be misleading. The stipulations for hall of shame is what? Long winded posts that you can not grasp? This is hilarious. I mean people are nominating others and giving clearly bogus reasons like quicksellout7 here. He claims that cryptohunter was wrong not to adopt his logic and reason? I ask to see the evidence to explore this. Where is it? Hurry up. If he can not provide it just demonstrates how worthless and misleading the entire thread is. All nominations should be accompanied by corroborating evidence. Even then hall of shame ? Lol Proven scammers and liars like quicksellout7 nominating those he falsely claims should adopt his weasel logic and reason for hall of shame. Is this a comedy thread? Every person who has argued with CH over the merit and trust system and have had their arguments debunked over and over again. Every person who refutes and fights against a transparent and objective set of criteria being used as the standards and basis for the trust system should be nominated. Debunk my points if you can. I nominate most of DT1. Their constant fighting to give the current broken merit and trust system any value and deny it is dangerous is of course illogical and void of all reason. Get them all nominated. The OP needs to be drilled down on until it is not abused and meaningless like most other posts here. All nominations must bring corroborating evidence that can be analysed for truth and objective value. Hall of not adopting the bogus reasoning of low functioning weasels. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: suchmoon on January 19, 2021, 01:50:36 PM My nomination goes for game-protect https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=874254) but this guy isn't active since July 2020.Perhaps he got tired of scamming and trolling. He left me negative feedback for participating in a signature campaign in which I wasn't even accepted. Also he left negative feedback to many forum members for no valid reason. game-protect is a scammer so doesn't fit OP's criteria. Inactive because he's banned, but very likely has sockpuppets continuing to trash the gambling board. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Poker Player on January 20, 2021, 02:46:59 PM I think there is another one worth putting on the list: Pizzalover420 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2890175)
Similar behavior to others quoted in the OP. I've seen him a couple of times before but now I've just decided to put him on ignore. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Marvelman on January 20, 2021, 05:29:34 PM I nominate Lordhermes (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1803138;sa=showPosts).
He makes 25 posts a week on average and shows a serious lack of logic and reason in his posts. Some examples: In the coming weeks, ripple price will go more higher than expected because it is cheaper at the moment. ... I personally used ripple alot for my transactions while selling it to my fiat currency which delivers fast at low fee. A coin rises and falls when due so long as it's been listed in good exchange with high volume and volatility, and I may advise you never to follow up news regarding pumping of a particular coin,it might be the whales wanting to decieve newbies into buying high. Newbies might not be positive at first time, but over time as news on heavy gains with Bitcoin comes up lets them sink in, never have the intentions of forcing them into getting it, rather let them think over it again and again, it was a nice experience though while I was happy that I let someone, a friend bought btc at ATH, I'm glad. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: tertius993 on January 20, 2021, 06:36:52 PM My nominees: cryptoboss2020 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2835857): over the last 6 months, cryptoboss2020 has posted an average of 4.8 posts of utter nonsense each day in a variety of forums. OpenCryptoSystems (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2201231): In just the last month, OpenCryptoSystems has made over 90 posts that rival those of cryptoboss2020. I thoroughly endorse your nominations though I am convinced they are the same person: they make similar / identical spelling errors and they post an absolutely unparalleled level of utter tripe ... surely two different people couldn’t independently achieve this? Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: suchmoon on January 20, 2021, 07:12:30 PM I'd like to nominate Broly46 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1106100), who might have a brief spark of sanity here and there but mostly it's tripe like this:
Yup, bitcoin was scam, during the pre 2009, internet itself was scam too, but thing could change, still today I wouldn’t trust internet, especially absurd demand KYC from some internet exchange or internet websites, is bitcoin less scammy than internet itself? Who know? Still I do not trust internet. Some strong believers want the economy to return to it’s former peak, I said they’re dreamer, economy never return, future is not predictable, and there is rarely any pivotal point in the life, or there should be never have one from the beginning, are we going back to America dream again? Any news of it’s coming? Anybody still dreaming of it’s coming? Or many have already gave up and move on, although it’s without painless, persistence on one belief is always full of pain. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: The Sceptical Chymist on January 20, 2021, 08:10:01 PM cryptoboss2020 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2835857): over the last 6 months, cryptoboss2020 has posted an average of 4.8 posts of utter nonsense each day in a variety of forums. I'll give it to you: those two are definitely good candidates based on your criteria. OpenCryptoSystems (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2201231): In just the last month, OpenCryptoSystems has made over 90 posts that rival those of cryptoboss2020. Honorable Mention: Polo7 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2640926): Polo7 hasn't been around since last November, but the brief appearance included some bold and ridiculous predictions that never panned out. I wonder if Polo7 is the same person as OpenCryptoSystems. Man, I'm so bad remembering bitcointalk members' names--especially when they're shitposters, but I've always thought Khristian (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1094922) (I hope I got his username right) was one of the worst, though I don't think he'd meet your criteria, OP, since he doesn't seem to be that active anymore. All of his posts (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1094922;sa=showPosts) were generic nonsense, and they used to drive me up a wall. Sorry, I just had to mention him. I think cryptoboss2020 is an alt account of some other shitposter, probably one who's banned, though that's just conjecture on my part. I don't have any hard evidence. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: LTU_btc on January 20, 2021, 11:47:51 PM If I am allowed a second nomination, it would be for franky1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65837), specifically for meeting all of the above criteria to a degree shared by few others, at least several thousand times. Agree about this and his walls of text. I tried to discuss with hom several times, but soon I realized it's pointless thing and I just waste my time.I won't be unique, but No. 1 is BADecker. I don't know who can beat him. And maybe not the sharpest knife in the kitchen, but IMO it's worth to mention KingScorpio and his poorly written conspiracy theories. Title: Re: Bitcointalk Hall of Shame Post by: Poker Player on January 21, 2021, 08:27:07 AM If I am allowed a second nomination, it would be for franky1 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=65837), specifically for meeting all of the above criteria to a degree shared by few others, at least several thousand times. Agree about this and his walls of text. I tried to discuss with hom several times, but soon I realized it's pointless thing and I just waste my time.I agree also and I've put franky1 on ignore but I don't think he is the worst one. What about this Laudanum who has even posted on this thread? He argues his answers/threads a lot but I'm starting to get pretty tired of his walls of text and it seems he is alt of a troll (cryptohunter?). |