|
Title: Bitcoin Emission vs Ethereum Emission Post by: coinpricetoday on February 01, 2021, 06:23:58 AM How many Bitcoin and Ethereum Emitted Every Month ?
Can anyone share this figure . Bitcoin is 2700 BTC every month what about ethereum Also mention about emission in Eth 2. Thanks Title: Re: Bitcoin Emission vs Ethereum Emission Post by: hartley on February 03, 2021, 07:16:24 PM The amount of computing power on the Ethereum network is currently at an all time high following weeks of volatility in key metrics on the blockchain. In addition, data from crypto mining pool F2Pool shows that it is currently up to three times as profitable to mine Ethereum instead of Bitcoin. Bitcoin has a lower coin supply and is more liquid than Ethereum, but Ethereum has better technology and provides more uses than Bitcoin does.
Title: Re: Bitcoin Emission vs Ethereum Emission Post by: fiulpro on February 03, 2021, 07:34:11 PM Quote While Ethereum's is almost 60% lower at around 3.1 million tonnes of CO2, it is still roughly equivalent to the total carbon emissions of Namibia over the same time period This one's regarding Ethereum^ Let me quote some facts. Now when we talk about bitcoins. Quote The Bitcoin system has a carbon footprint of between 22 and 22.9 megatonnes per year. That is comparable to the footprint of such cities as Hamburg, Vienna or Las Vegas. "Naturally there are bigger factors contributing to climate change Now you have to understand the fact that, bitcoins is limited but Eth is not limited therefore I would say for the long period of time the carbon footprint of ETH would be much bigger than BTC at the same time you have to understand the fact that even after all the bitcoins have been mined the machines would still be used to make the transactions work. (All the information is taken from google) But there are a lot of things that one has to consider: -If someone is using renewable sources of energy or no and stuff like that. Title: Re: Bitcoin Emission vs Ethereum Emission Post by: lumierre on February 06, 2021, 07:46:25 PM I am sure that Ethereum will not be able to catch up with Bitcoin, but I admit that it has a chance to repeat its trend direction, and will increase its value at the rate of Bitcoin. In general, BTC and ETH cannot be compared. They can be seen as a profitable investment and not as competitors.
Title: Re: Bitcoin Emission vs Ethereum Emission Post by: lobo13hf on February 07, 2021, 01:09:42 AM Quote While Ethereum's is almost 60% lower at around 3.1 million tonnes of CO2, it is still roughly equivalent to the total carbon emissions of Namibia over the same time period This one's regarding Ethereum^ Let me quote some facts. Now when we talk about bitcoins. Quote The Bitcoin system has a carbon footprint of between 22 and 22.9 megatonnes per year. That is comparable to the footprint of such cities as Hamburg, Vienna or Las Vegas. "Naturally there are bigger factors contributing to climate change Now you have to understand the fact that, bitcoins is limited but Eth is not limited therefore I would say for the long period of time the carbon footprint of ETH would be much bigger than BTC at the same time you have to understand the fact that even after all the bitcoins have been mined the machines would still be used to make the transactions work. (All the information is taken from google) But there are a lot of things that one has to consider: -If someone is using renewable sources of energy or no and stuff like that. Eth is not having limitation on its supply now but it will be determined by the POS system. Ethereum will be leaving the POW consensus and won't it make ethereum become even more conservative than before? This time ethereum is also available for staking and it's just the matter of time until it will be fully moving to the POS. Every 4 years bitcoin halving will happen and that will make miners must put more and more mining rigs to mine bitcoin. The mining rig on bitcoin chain will be last forever and this will become a big problem. |