Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Scam Accusations => Topic started by: lovesmayfamilis on February 28, 2021, 11:52:56 AM



Title: Virus !!!Plagiarism whitepaper-BITCOINBLACKCORE.COM
Post by: lovesmayfamilis on February 28, 2021, 11:52:56 AM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happened:  Plagiarism whitepaper
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2650

ANN Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5320586.0
Archive link: https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5645/56454693.html
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3103849
Website link: https://bitcoinblackcore.com/
Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20210213233405/https://bitcoinblackcore.com/
Whitepaper : https://bitcoinblackcore.com/whitepaper.pdf
Archive link: https://web.archive.org/web/20210228113950/https://bitcoinblackcore.com/whitepaper.pdf

Quote
Domain Name: BITCOINBLACKCORE.COM
Registry Domain ID: 2588686938_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namesilo.com
Registrar URL: http://www.namesilo.com
Updated Date: 2021-02-13T22:24:13Z
Creation Date: 2021-02-02T02:03:08Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-02-02T02:03:08Z


Plagiarism whitepaper
https://bitcoingold.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/BitcoinGold-Roadmap.pdf

https://copyleaks.com/dashboard/v1/businesses/report/pv7s5kxcjkqi5p50/preview?key=4x4reskqe26frecq&suspectId=9533658132&viewMode=one-to-one&contentMode=html&sourcePage=1&suspectPage=1

https://i.ibb.co/sthFzwv/Untitled-Feedback-Loop.png (https://ibb.co/N7XLbj6)

https://i.ibb.co/4tw63vB/Untitled-Feedback-Loop.png (https://ibb.co/c3KGVfz)

Fake reviews

https://i.ibb.co/9TkF6nt/Untitled-Feedback-Loop.png (https://ibb.co/QN32L9d)

https://i.ibb.co/b1xxkHx/Screenshot-1.png (https://ibb.co/zs11z81)
https://i.ibb.co/vVPzw83/Untitled-Feedback-Loop.png (https://ibb.co/ZG8TLCB)


Title: Re: Plagiarism whitepaper-BITCOINBLACKCORE.COM
Post by: TheUltraElite on March 01, 2021, 10:51:10 AM
I remember some more projects that have imitated this words bitcoin/black/core to make up a new altcoin in between the first bitcoin forking event back in 2016-17 and they managed to scam a lot of bamboozled noobs.

What surprised me here is that this user @asus2021e (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3103260)-  has left a positive trust rating. It is a newbie account which never posted again but that is adding to the number of "fake reviews" here.

Plant a flag on this one too, I will surely support it as long as no other reputed member has anything to say for it.


Title: Re: Plagiarism whitepaper-BITCOINBLACKCORE.COM
Post by: The Cryptovator on March 01, 2021, 05:51:37 PM
I thought projects are reducing plagiarism nowadays, but seems it's hasn't been happening. It's really sad to see they even can't put minimum effort into their dream projects. Also faking reviews is an immediate red flag for me, which means I can't trust them anyway. However, sadly investors don't even bother to read the whitepaper and I doubt they have been checking plagiarism. Good to see that OP continuously exposing them.

Tagged, by the way, there should be flag type one.


Title: Re: Plagiarism whitepaper-BITCOINBLACKCORE.COM
Post by: FatFork on March 02, 2021, 12:12:42 PM
I thought projects are reducing plagiarism nowadays, but seems it's hasn't been happening. It's really sad to see they even can't put minimum effort into their dream projects. Also faking reviews is an immediate red flag for me, which means I can't trust them anyway. However, sadly investors don't even bother to read the whitepaper and I doubt they have been checking plagiarism. Good to see that OP continuously exposing them.

Tagged, by the way, there should be flag type one.

Yeah, white paper plagiarism and faking reviews are very clear signs of the scam project. It seems that this is just another quick cash grab scheme and that scammers are running out of new ideas to scam. This project is designed to fail from the very beginning.
Hopefully nobody falls for this scam coin.

Tagged and supported the flag.


Title: Re: Plagiarism whitepaper-BITCOINBLACKCORE.COM
Post by: goaldigger on March 02, 2021, 12:53:27 PM
A lot of Plagiarized project got busted in the past months and its really alarming because if no one spending time analyzing and make a good research about that specific project, then it can successfully scam many investors. Let’s warning users from dealing with this project, this is a total waste of time and money i hope newbies are doing well on their research as well to avoid losing money.


Title: Re: Plagiarism whitepaper-BITCOINBLACKCORE.COM
Post by: Obito on March 02, 2021, 01:33:57 PM
Nice catch, but I can't access the plagiarism checker that you are using for this plagiarized whitepaper. I don't know if it is the country, the Internet or just something that I don't know yet. Can you recommend other sites, the one I am using is not that good for my taste. I will be checking out that TinEye for the particular reason that it can find stock photos and that it can help in anything that I might be looking for in the future.

Here is the link of the one that I am using: https://plagiarismdetector.net/


Title: Re: Plagiarism whitepaper-BITCOINBLACKCORE.COM
Post by: asus2021e on March 03, 2021, 05:15:41 PM
I corresponded with the creators about this subject in the telegram group today. They told me that the topic in bitcointalk was not created by themselves, they had nothing to do with the person who opened the topic, but they also said that it was not a problem. As a result, they explained that there was a misunderstanding. They stated that both their website and the whitepaper are not finished yet, only keeping them on their sites as sample drafts and making constant changes. I would like to point out that this is a trial project, it is worked on examples and we should not forget that every altcoin is a fork. If we say the misfortune of friends or my luck, a project that is still under development has become an involuntary subject here. Think of it like this, you have 1 year to get the title of doctor and someone writes dr in front of your name and publishes it. Does that mean you are a dishonest? no. I can understand the people here, experience and security are of course important. however, try to get a message right away with those responsible for starting a scam campaign. Please do not exaggerate.


Title: Re: Plagiarism whitepaper-BITCOINBLACKCORE.COM
Post by: lovesmayfamilis on March 04, 2021, 07:19:03 AM
I corresponded with the creators about this subject in the telegram group today. They told me that the topic in bitcointalk was not created by themselves, they had nothing to do with the person who opened the topic, but they also said that it was not a problem. As a result, they explained that there was a misunderstanding. They stated that both their website and the whitepaper are not finished yet, only keeping them on their sites as sample drafts and making constant changes. I would like to point out that this is a trial project, it is worked on examples and we should not forget that every altcoin is a fork. If we say the misfortune of friends or my luck, a project that is still under development has become an involuntary subject here. Think of it like this, you have 1 year to get the title of doctor and someone writes dr in front of your name and publishes it. Does that mean you are a dishonest? no. I can understand the people here, experience and security are of course important. however, try to get a message right away with those responsible for starting a scam campaign. Please do not exaggerate.

Yeah, let's start coming up with different excuses. If the site is not ready, then first you should inform about it. The same goes for your "unfinished" white paper.
However, I noticed that the project is not ready, but the pre-sale is in progress? Not? I was wrong?

https://i.ibb.co/sbTWWC3/Screenshot-2.png (https://imgbb.com/)

And in addition, your wallet is not completely clean, it contains a virus.

https://i.ibb.co/DVsTYC1/Screenshot-1.png (https://ibb.co/Wxqj0yH)
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/8fa703462f38989c481d5ebec67066c155e7d23dda002b0daaf6db3f3874cdc1/detection