Title: [LEARN] LOGICAL CONNECTIVES Post by: Peanutswar on March 26, 2021, 07:59:42 AM This topic is much related to the previous one I created which is the [LEARN] LOGIC GATES and chance to earn merit. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5263519.0) if you understand the logic gates its easier for you to understand the concept of the truth table with logical connectives.
IMPLICATION(→) - the value will only become false, if X is true and Y is false.
BI-CONDITIONAL(⇔) - The value will only become true if they are both true or both false.
NOT/NEGATION(¬) Where you reverse the value of the given statement.
OR(V) either if there's a value of true the answer becomes true.
AND(∧) either if there's a value of false the answer becomes false. The only possible becomes true if X and Y are true.
PROBLEM SOLVING Let's try to solve this with the combination of both logical connectives.(P → ¬Q) ∧ (P V Q)
Here we go again for another challenge hoping that other members would really like to solve this kind of problem. Of course there's also a merited reward but only one per member who got the correct answer to become not abuse only 5 sMerit will be distributed. (¬P ∧ ¬Q) → (P V Q)
Code: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/mathematical-logical-connectives Title: Re: [LEARN] LOGICAL CONNECTIVES Post by: jackg on March 26, 2021, 08:34:35 AM Is there a reason why some are missed? Can you make it explicit.
Edit [removed just in case clue given] Title: Re: [LEARN] LOGICAL CONNECTIVES Post by: Peanutswar on March 26, 2021, 09:09:13 AM Is there a reason why some are missed? Can you make it explicit. Edit [removed just in case clue given] Are referring about logical operators like the ||, ! and &&. Or those like boolean algebra like this? Title: Re: [LEARN] LOGICAL CONNECTIVES Post by: jackg on March 26, 2021, 10:48:17 AM Is there a reason why some are missed? Can you make it explicit. Edit [removed just in case clue given] Are referring about logical operators like the ||, ! and &&. Or those like boolean algebra like this? No. The truth table for implication, or and and are missing a set of inputs (false and false). |