|
Title: BFL has a unrealistic product bet thread Post by: El Cabron on December 02, 2011, 03:55:10 PM This is a bet/thread that involves Inaba, SadPandaTech, p4man and myself.
Thank you! Title: Re: BFL has a unrealistic product bet thread Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on December 02, 2011, 04:05:10 PM This is a bet/thread that involves Inaba, SadPandaTech, p4man and myself. Thank you! I quoted the bet so that the rules can't be changed later. On a side note, why does a goat have an avatar of an elephant and associates with a panda? Is there a convention coming up we're not aware of? I bet that this bet has something to do with this thread and of who and what is posted within. How close am I? Also, how much is the bet and can others join--for a price? http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/rma/lowres/rman9523l.jpg Title: Re: BFL has a unrealistic product bet thread Post by: sadpandatech on December 02, 2011, 06:06:26 PM This is a bet/thread that involves Inaba, SadPandaTech, p4man and myself. Thank you! Hiya and thanks. This was the final details of our bet; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48863.msg612646#msg612646 Did you and P4man have similar terms? I did not look through all the back and forth for them. Cheers Title: Re: BFL has a unrealistic product bet thread Post by: sadpandatech on December 02, 2011, 06:26:42 PM I bet that this bet has something to do with this thread and of who and what is posted within. How close am I? Also, how much is the bet and can others join--for a price? That's up to Goat. I can't stand gambling, believe it or not, and only offered to do this in hopes it would help to calm our buddy goat down a bit. ;p I think we made a decent Gentlemanly bet and this is ok with me. Even if I may likely lose it due to BFL engineers quoting 19.8w to the marketing side and them not accounting for it being a 2 chip board. hehe Cheers Title: Re: BFL has a unrealistic product bet thread Post by: Inaba on December 05, 2011, 10:51:02 PM So ya'll let me know who you guys agree is the winner and where to send how many coins!
Title: Re: BFL has a unrealistic product bet thread Post by: sadpandatech on December 06, 2011, 01:05:58 PM Just to make sure terms are clear again as I linked to earlier here; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48863.msg612646#msg612646
Quote Quote from: Inaba on November 09, 2011, 06:58:57 PM Can you define what you mean by "defaulted" in this context? My understanding that the bet is won for negative proof if the device fails to live up to the hashrate OR power consumption within 25% of margin OR 2 months and 8 days elapse without a workable unit. The bet is won for positive proof if and only if the device performs within 25% of it's advertised hashrate AND power consumption, on the low side. If it out performs there is no upper bound and the bet is considered won for positive proof. Negative proof win is for Goat Positive proof win is for Sadpandatech Is this correct? Quote Yes, this is correct. I had intended for 'default' to mean if we still had nothing to test at stated end time. But, that would not be fair to the other better. So, in hindsight I agree to the terms as amended by you. cheers Title: Re: BFL has a unrealistic product bet thread Post by: Inaba on December 06, 2011, 02:38:44 PM So is the consensus that Goat won both bets?
Title: Re: BFL has a unrealistic product bet thread Post by: P4man on December 06, 2011, 03:42:37 PM Did 2 months and 8 days pass already ???
|
