Bitcoin Forum

Other => Politics & Society => Topic started by: Lancersong on November 07, 2021, 02:43:45 AM



Title: one world one cryptocurrency
Post by: Lancersong on November 07, 2021, 02:43:45 AM
Both CHINA and USA could be  “harmony but not sameness" in political issues. However, we could live in a world of Great Harmony using one cryptocurrency under the condition of
reaching a consensus on the " ONE" cryptocurrency.Once it is relized, Taiwan question can be easily solved. Therefore, Only one harmony cryptocurrency will stand out. Which one do you think it will be?


Title: Re: one world one cryptocurrency
Post by: Hispo on November 07, 2021, 03:00:44 AM
Excuse my ignorance but I did not quite understand the relationship between crypto-currency and classic warmongering/international conflicts.

I am afraid, I shall need you to explain further so illiterate fools like me may have a chance to understand your post.


Title: Re: one world one cryptocurrency
Post by: Newlifebtc on November 07, 2021, 08:45:31 PM
This totally an Alt account a newbie asking such complex question ?
Still trying to understand what you have just said,I don't mind if you could let us know vmuch better about it.


Title: Re: one world one cryptocurrency
Post by: BernyJB on November 08, 2021, 02:25:37 PM
I don't see it as much as a complex question as a utopic one.
Get 50 of this same forum's members, and have them agree on your "one cryptocurrency" concept. Now translate that to almost 200 countries, each having its own problems, its own culture, it's own economy, etc.
Same could be said about "one world, one species: one country". Just as difficult to implement, and just as naive.


Title: Re: one world one cryptocurrency
Post by: syedakhlaque on November 09, 2021, 04:59:23 PM
Although there are many differences among the nations of the world, they have harmony on some political and financial issues. One thing that can unite them on a platform may be Bitcoin in the future. The era of war and fight has gone. Now all world nations have gotten awareness that peace and development are better for human beings than fight. And internationally the use of one currency may bring prosperity for all of them.


Title: Re: one world one cryptocurrency
Post by: amishmanish on November 10, 2021, 05:10:41 PM
Someone saying things like "Great Harmony" only reminds me of the CCP and their grandiose naming conventions.

There has never been a question of China and US NOT living in harmony. They have lived in harmony since China got its wings. In fact, US naivete and US corporations have helped China find its feet in the modern world. But the CCP and these ultra-nationalists have always had a history of back-stabbing those who help them.

First it was India back in the 60s as China violated the Panchsheel agreements. Now it is the USA. China has been well known for its philosophy of "Biding time" when the enemy is stronger. It is unfortunate that the Middle Kingdom's inferiority complex always makes these people want to dominate everybody else. The Chinese have now made Taiwan an issue which it never was in world politics while China needed foreign companies to setup plants and factories where they could steal IP from.

Once that goal was accomplished, suddenly there is disharmony. What is insulting to the rest of the world is that they try to act like some sort of messengers of peace at the same time. The Chinese people have never had a say in this monolith and monstrous organization called CCP. If they had, it wouldn't be so filled with malfeasance and so devoid of human emotions. I hate to see this but in the coming decade, the world may well have a huge problem facing it due to the uncertain nature of CCP's figureheads.


Title: Re: one world one cryptocurrency
Post by: illiki23 on November 10, 2021, 09:37:02 PM
One world one crypto would suck.  Diversity and competition is necessary for healthy evolution.  Imagine one gene pool one gene set?  Hopefully it won't be you.

I was about to bring up liberties and all but that is such a loaded word.  I am believing this only for overall efficiency.