Bitcoin Forum

i want to ask if the trust system can be used to tag accounts with errors copying articles similar to other participants?. to my knowledge the trust system is only used to tlag fraudulent bounty violations and trade scams,.!

Plagiarism should not be an error, but tagging the account of someone that plagiarized may not be considered right, left to the person that tag the person, the account supposed to be reported to moderators for ban, as it is against one of the rules of this forum.

Trust should be used for people that you trust and people that you know are scammers, but it has been used for some other reasons like account sales, merit abuse and joining same campaign with alts

He didn't plagiarize on the forum, he plagiarized on Medium for which he got tagged by the bounty manager.

@OP Since you are ready to copy/paste someone else's work I would definitely consider you as a trading liability so no surprise there that you got tagged. And I love that "mistake" argument that all of you cheaters likes to use, like someone else's text can appear in your article by a wrong click.

Never mind I did not check the reason for his tag, he deserves negative trust in this regard. It's an indication that when he was participating in a campaign, campaign manager saw him plagiarized and got his account tagged. This should be the best against such inappropriate act when ban is not possible.

At least there should be consideration,. right! because this is just a small mistake, similarity article,,,if I am proven to have violated the <ALT ACCOUNT> campaign rules then I am ready to be TAG,,.! but this is just a resemblance article, .! I don't understand who gave him the rights as a DT, .!

Joeperry made the right call. Copying and pasting medium articles for rewards is similar to cheating. I have seen so many accounts get tagged for cheating bounty campaigns. If plagiarism of medium articles is not allowed, then why would you go ahead and do it.

The red trust also helps other campaign managers who might want to hire you know that what you do is to just copy and paste medium articles instead of writing up original content.

Yeah yeah, small mistake.. we heard  all possible excuses for plagiarism. Looking at the very first sentence of your article (https://archive.md/8Ila1#selection-449.0-449.63) ("AIIP is the best project of the cryptocurrency blackchain world") no wonder that you decided to plagiarize since you are obviously incapable of writing a simple sentence in English, let alone whole article.


Other members who put him on their trust list.

---

Altcoin bounty campaigns are a joke, but this idea that articles written by illiterate  people will somehow attract investors is even crazier.

I understand I don't have full power in this very extraordinary forum < PRESTIGIOUS> <COMBAT FORCES> so there is neither justice nor defense for ordinary people like me. .!&$@$%87156#1...... but if there is a chance I will change...!!


only 1 time i made that mistake bro #!@#1>,



yes bro  ,.,,..@!@!@!@   i not fluent in english #515234@! . . after all it's not a big problem just a difference of 1 letter

You don't need "full power" to do the right thing. How many low ranked members have been negatively tagged here for writing up original articles?

Unfortunately for trust, even that one time counts.

If you think I am lying, Just try plagiarizing some content and posting it in the forum. You will earn a permanent ban, even just for a single post or sentence.

Yea, the bounty manager reserve the right to tag you if you abuse his campaign. This isn't a mistake at all, you consciously plagiarised others' content for that you expect to get paid. In straightforward you steal others' works and claim it's yours. If it's on the forum then the punishment would be stronger rather than tagging your account. So the only person who could help you left the feedback. Rather than violence here you might apologize to the manager. He has the right to remove it. No one gonna counter your feedback anyway.

I'd argue that it isn't similar; using content from the web in order to take credit and thus get paid for it is blatant cheating.  And I agree with everyone that the account deserves to be tagged for the reason you mentioned, i.e., to warn other bounty managers that this person has a history of this sort of BS.  The tag also needs to be from at least one DT member, because otherwise it might not even be seen if those managers don't check all feedback in advance of accepting members.  I don't think most of them do.

No, you're not....but damn, the way you write is like littering on the sidewalk.  Do you pick those out-of-place characters and words at random or what?  Do yourself a favor and don't try to earn money by writing.  You don't have a knack for it.

Oh man, I'm just having my morning coffee and end up on this thread, well I really like this guy joeperry, he just made my day :)
He even archived the plagiarized posts so no way of escaping and going around the RULES! That's quite a professional work of a bounty manager.
Great work man! I'm your fan now :)
I hope all those lazy ba$tards who just copy/paste things to make $ get what they deserve ... the BAN HAMMER!

WE NEED MORE BOUNTY MANAGERS LIKE JOEPERRY on BITCOINTALK!!!!

User has been tagged for plagiarism. It's fine if he uses paraphrasing tool or other tools but copying the exact content (word to word) is different thing and I don't think it's a simple mistake.

Here's the user content: https://archive.md/8Ila1#selection-507.0-507.53
Here's the original from AIIP Official Medium Account: Master the universe of investments and digital assets with just one simple platform — AIIP (https://aiip-official.medium.com/master-the-universe-of-investments-and-digital-assets-with-just-one-simple-platform-aiip-929b9682cab4)

By the way a user contacted me on Telegram before this post and he said his content is not plagiarized and it's on spreadsheet #19 (ASALAMUALAIKUM (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3385257)) and after a while he said to me that I abuse the Trust system and I sent him the reputation link and asked him that if he really think I abuse the system, he is free to create an accusation/topic and include proofs of his claim I was surprised that the OP is #26 (DT-2021 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3413156)) created this topic are you related to each other?

It's not fine to use paraphrasing tool, still the content he posts is not his, just copied in a tool to scramble the words and pasted again, but it's more difficult to catch this king of activity, it's still plagiarism.

I would recommend if you have a proof of plagiarism, them just report the accounts in here >
Report plagiarism (copy/paste) here. Mods: please give temp or permban as needed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.0)

They break rule 33.

@TheBeardedBaby Thanks, I just can't accept to see them doing it on other campaigns too and I leave them a negative feedback as a reference for other managers. Also, I think the rule 33 only applies in the forum so I don't think I can report him to the mods, the least I can do is to give them negative feedback.

---

You sure 1 mistake only? How about this one? from XEGGEX Bounty Campaign (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5377034)?

Original content (not entirely sure if this is an original too but this content is from Dec 22): XEGGEX — Platform For Crypto Trading (https://medium.com/@dissanayakachamila29/xeggex-platform-for-crypto-trading-81aa92f93830) - [ Archive (https://archive.vn/h20ju) ]
His content: xeggex exchange (https://dt-2021.tumblr.com/post/671506006415671296/xeggex-exchange) - [ Archive (https://archive.vn/uRFwa) ]

And what about the Alt account named: @khokaboss999.
I saw @khokaboss999, using the same Telegram as you.

1. khokaboss999 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3377711)

[ Archive (https://archive.vn/wip/U8y5b) ]

[ Archive (https://archive.vn/wip/MuxVh) ]

And this is proof of the involvement of @DT-2021 & @khokaboss999 in the campaign below.

SPREADSHEETS (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xH-bvKjImKzWOdKM5l7BxSddTsPkrZtqVGZVlQzWQQU/edit?usp=sharing)
https://zizihub.com/b37772.jpg
https://zizihub.com/64de40.jpg

Topic: Coindogs 🚀 [Bounty] Social, Article, Signature 💰🕵🏻‍♂ 10 000 000 DOG 🥳 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5375566.0)

---

---

One more how about another account named: @Sharktail.
Here I also get the TRC address also in use by: both of you.

1. Sharktail (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2437237)

[ Archive (https://archive.vn/wip/gYzPH) ]

[ Archive (https://archive.vn/wip/MRSjd) ]

So, what is the reason the above two Alt accounts are linked to you and cheated in the campaign.

You are doing right and never mind this complain as long as users violating your terms on your own campaign, You are free to tagged them since they agree on your terms by still participating on it. This copy pasting of work with 0 effort didn't deserve to give chance especially if there's other participants that doing there work honestly for to there stakes for the bounty.

Abused is when you tagged them without a valid reason or just for a personal vendetta.

We have to address the mods here. If you plagiarized content and pass it as your own outside of the forum with proof and still post on the forum passing this work as yours even as a link ( I don't know if you require the bounty hunters to make reports every week) then this should be enough to get you out of here. Rule 33 should apply.

My personal opinion is that the forum do not need cheating people only to make $$. We already have enough of them.
In case the mods decide to not ban those accounts, feel free to let me know, and I'll tag them as well.

Unfortunately I didn't ask the participants to report on the forum and only asked them to fill up the google form to submit their article/s. But that was a good idea to ask them to report their article in the forum.

No, you actually did a great work choosing not to post weekly reports on the forum but in a google spreadsheet, more campaign managers should follow this approach. This takes off the slack of the forum traffic and it's less likely to create "Legendarily newbies" like those. (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382409.0)
I just added you to my trust list :)

Thanks I appreciate it  :)

Not entirely but only the article campaign, since traditional reports can be useful sometimes: Bounty/Promotional Campaign Cheating Reference (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5383361) but I'm going to think for a more approachable and efficient way and utilize the google spreadsheet and google forms.

The more managers we have who are not too lazy to look closely at the reports of bounty hunters, the more DT will give them the right to be part of DT.
joeperry, I'm also adding you to my trust list. To be honest, I didn't expect you to be so attentive to hunter reports. This is serious work. Please accept my respect. Yesterday, when I saw the copied reports, I thought that a lot of people are doing this, we just don't pay attention to it. Cheaters have realized that they are being caught for multi-accounts, and now they have come up with new tricks. But thanks to joeperry for making this trick known.

I will understand this as admitting that you plagiarized. here ends every story of your innocence in this case.


many managers present themselves as anti-spam fighters and then set such a rule like weekly reports on the bounty thread. thus they themselves are responsible for generating spam. i'm even very suspicious that most even check all links on report to validate it.

btw. nice work joeperry

Yep, paraphrasing  and text spinning is considered plagiarism as well  and so its far from fine and it shouldn't be accepted as a valid bounty submission.


Question here is whether bounty hunters submit their work via google form. If that's the case, I don't think that rule nr 33 is applicable here.



That's another thing I don't understand really, why bounty managers force bounty hunters to submit their work via bounty thread instead just using simple google form. Seems like a double work, to make bounty hunters submit their work in the thread, and then manually update their data. The only reason I see is to keep bounty thread at the top, making it more visible for other bounty hunters.

HE !!!! A very bad manager abused the trust system on the forum to flag just a minor problem! I have no power! I hope everyone outside bitcointalk needs to be careful before planning to join this forum. it's one of the prestigious forums in a bad way. ass licker