Bitcoin Forum

I have wondered over the years why would certain nations will be at liberty of owning certain weapons yet determine to stop other sovereign nations from having  same.
Hypocrisy at international scene is heart breaking. Let go of the nukes in your coven, then we can talk.

Even though the US denies taking part in the recent Israeli massive airforce drill to stimulate a nuclear base in Iran, the world knows that no such drill can take place without the knowledge of the US intelligent community.

This is the problem. No one wants to get rid of their nukes. The question is: would you rather have a country like Great Britain have the nukes, or an islamic dictatorship like Iran?

It'd be better if no one owned nuclear weapons. Ideally, you shouldn't be indebted to another nation to maintain the peace or risk a nuclear winter. We just accept the current predicament because the countries with the nukes are supposedly the responsible ones. Everyone in the international community has agreed that Iran is not responsible.

Iran is the largest state sponsor of terrorism. There is no reason why Iran should be allowed to have any nuclear technology. In fact, Iran even pursuing nukes is a pretty strong argument in favor of launching a pre-emptive nuclear attack against Iran.

Typical leftist nonsense defending terrorists.

Me say, watch ring of the gobi and repent...

yes, yes...

there is no other way...

now.

on a side note...

I think there are a lot of shias in arabia... bcz....

(fasten your camel's seat...)

it's necessary for judgment day...

anyway... who knows

I don't know

but true...

resaid

slave / bitch at the mercy / bribe / temptation / degeneracy or simply outright kuffardness of the occupiers of the west (ghandi only saw western people under occupation) or the words...

deal done.

;)

aka temporary truce with flare up (unavoidable) but waiting for the settlement.