|
Title: [WARNING] CWD Global plagiarized by slightly changing the wording Post by: $crypto$ on June 07, 2022, 07:56:42 PM What happened:: CWD Global plagiarized by slightly changing the wording.
Website: https://cwd.global/ Archived: https://archive.ph/wip/rZFl9 ANN Bounty: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5401670.0 Archived: https://archive.ph/wip/38VTP Promotion: OneNutS (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3466830) Quote from: https://whois.domaintools.com/cwd.global Created on 2021-01-12 Expires on 2026-01-12 Updated on 2021-12-03 CWD Global - https://github.com/crowdwiz-biz/whitepaper BitShares - https://docs.bitshares.build/docs/get-started/bitshares-whitepaper/ https://i.gyazo.com/240689f3f559938cf42f1fa6eb3a37a4.png https://i.gyazo.com/787cf359e41db8eddeba47f532b700d7.png https://i.gyazo.com/cd53169e4ef02c6e2d0f79562c4feb93.png https://i.gyazo.com/d5d48de4d43d75c66d8ac26be3897534.png https://i.gyazo.com/33c788df80abf7bbdebe3feb283e3bbe.png https://i.gyazo.com/3d4366228db6f461775f89cbff3a58f3.png https://i.gyazo.com/106b972818be1f256583d44f11b9b522.png https://i.gyazo.com/de2e4c1e1c2b8492569fa5475a820b75.png https://i.gyazo.com/4df7f257e735679cce26ffb33fcc354e.png https://i.gyazo.com/fa9813e0a4d4ed9889c6c0649957388b.png https://i.gyazo.com/fbc7a728fcf1f3d265f6f75dbfe0f833.png https://i.gyazo.com/3a7e6541ca54b1f6324f003a98a2327f.png https://i.gyazo.com/8f31c507dc3b012cdb57fd5ca5c36aa8.png https://i.gyazo.com/295df4e61cb8d2bdab0b9abb068c1284.png https://i.gyazo.com/ed2fe41ac346c35aa3fda58a671c2b45.png https://i.gyazo.com/a5a2ed90adef63e775c45436a64f3dfa.png https://i.gyazo.com/56ab1d5e515e7c5a57768ece49e8f281.png https://i.gyazo.com/e19d523c13f523e7258fe90493fcda59.png https://i.gyazo.com/08d940ed9081a575afedb8de57a23235.png https://i.gyazo.com/ba59d38e53bec8c85ed685d313f6e12d.png Title: Re: [WARNING] CWD Global plagiarized by slightly changing the wording Post by: Cantsay on June 13, 2022, 09:08:29 AM A similar case (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5391087.msg59620630#msg59620630)was open for Mr Crank (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=908376) and even a recent one (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5394852.msg59880213#msg59880213) for OneNuts.
Here's what I found: I think Mr Crank and OneNuts accounts are owned by the same person, and here's my proof: https://imgur.com/gallery/oK67uPp after the first case which was the Ukan's plagarised whitepaper Mr Crank was tagged with some negative trust and flag (https://imgur.com/gallery/oK67uPp) which made him leave the account to create a new one. For a person to keep making the same mistake of managing projects with plagarised whitepaper means they don't even bother to do any research about the project or maybe they're just too greedy to reject a campaign even after they find out it's plagarised. I think OneNuts deserves a red trust, because even if the campaign benefits BOUNTY HUNTERS what about those that are going to invest in it? Since both Mr Crank and OneNuts are operated by the same person a trust (even if it's neutral) should be created to notify people that both accounts are owned by same person. Quote I don't know if the proofs I provided above are enough but those are the only ones I could find. |
