Bitcoin Forum

Which one hast the worst future?

How do the indicators determine whether a project is good or bad in the long run? do you have a standard we need to set in analyzing the project?
As far as I'm concerned it depends on how effective and efficient a project with objectives matches your investment. For those who believe that project A is a profitable investment or trade vehicle then they will drop their money.

Actually this will depend on how they grow over time, and if there's no good development then that could be a big disappointment for this projects.
I suggest not to look for a least promising project, better to focus on knowing their strengths and their status in the market as a whole. I'd rather buy more coins that is belong on top, there's a good reason why they are on top and with this, I can see MATIC as a good investment.

Huh?

The list is a good project based on my observation, how you can be determined the project is being listed to the worst project? I don't thin from all-of this project is the worst project. I even not choosing anything.

Currius, how @OP choosing this project.

No one can exactly predict that.

We can tell the possible reasons on why we don't like a certain project but we can't be accurately telling them that they can be worse in the upcoming years to come.

Everyone will look at their ranking in the market and to give you a clue, if they're part of the top then many will agree that they're good projects to invest.

I don't understand how you define this category but at least to say this project is bad should be based on what you find that makes it look bad.
If you look at the list, there are even some projects that other people considered quite good in the past few months, such as Matic and Sandbox there.
As for what I see now, it can't be said that this is getting bad too because from all aspects it is now bearish and they will not be able to grow well until bitcoin starts to squirm.

IMO moonbeam may become the one that has no future at all. I meant if you are seeing based from the daily activity of project and moonbeam is the having the lowest activity on its platform compared with another project in your list. Sandbox is starting to create more partnerships with the big brand to build their office in the metaverse. I think that if moonbeam and near can be considered as the worst choices from your list. I know that no one can predict accurately but this based on the price performance as well.
It can be seen if you are using the common indicator like that.

@Loco1887, are you serious? They are all top tier projects mate ::). But if I had to choose the worst from the five projects that you provide, I would choose Moonbeam (GLMR).


Honestly, I personally don't know in depth about this project, but from the results of my research, I found that the main utility of this Moonbeam is for developers. Of course because of this, Moonbeam doesn't have much utility. Unlike Polygon and Near, they are the native tokens of their network and ecosystem. Also we cannot compare it with Aave and Sandbox which are pioneers in the DeFi and Metaverse space.

Reference:
1. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/moonbeam/

I agree, all of those projects seem good enough for those which are interested in altcoins and it could be worth to invest in all of them so you do not miss in any huge movement, after all it is impossible to predict how a project will evolve, a project may seem to be great now but if the developers are lazy or simply too slow with their updates another coin that at this time may not seem as if it is the best can overtake it and become your best investment, so if the OP has enough money then I think investing in all of those coins seems like the best choice.

On which criteria?

It's really hard to judge those projects in order, I mean the best gauge perhaps is their rankings on cmc that's it. But there could be criteria like who is the people behind, their whitepaper, road maps etc.

But for me, I would say the one that I didn't heard of Moonbeam, I'm not familiar with it, just saying.

reasoning for moonbeam:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ed4sZqTYrk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0KojxqkTRE&t=2s

All the 5 projects you mentioned above are good projects and at present, it's hard to predict which will not perform well. As far as I understand I don't see anything problematic thing in these projects they all are doing well even if you can ask us which 4 coins you guys will choose from the above list and even you can ask us what are the thing that needs to be improved so that you get a specific answer. I don't know on which grounds you will measure the project is worst and about the future prediction is not easy. If I have to take out any of them I would choose Moonbeam as I have not heard much about it and I don't have much knowledge about this Moonbeam and the rest of the four projects are high-potential projects in my opinion.

Even though they have a top rating, it doesn't guarantee a project will be successful in the future, for example, the Teraluna project was proud of for a bright future, but in the end it failed, right? That many big investors felt a big loss because they trusted Teraluna as a good investment. promising for the future.

Polygon and NEAR Protocol are ecosystem projects, the probability of their closure is minimal. Moonbeam is also a good project, it helps to unite the Ethereum and Polkadot ecosystems, but Polkadot is more reliable. Although Moonbeam is developing well. Sandbox - I don't know what kind of metaverse projects will be popular, but so far it doesn't look that promising.

Yeah, that's actually a good take.

It's like the first basis when we look at projects but also, we need to consider that not all top projects can stay there for long. We're learning from the past and experiences that we've met.

On this case, we all should be careful and thoroughly do research before we invest in any crypto in the market. That's what we need to remember before we entrust them with our hard earned money.

hi friend, you should be able to make a wiser question.

I conclude that the question you make can have a negative impact on one of these coins, because the question you make wants the answer to which coin has the worst future, it can be said that the question can bring down the reputation of one of the coins itself

What did you mean maybe if we list the projects from 1-5 top, which one is on the 5?
Well, I saw the submitted pool and only 2 were. One of them said it is Polygon (Matic). I have a different idea about that, Matic may be on the top list among these 5 coins. But yeah, everyone has different thoughts and considerations.
Well, most of us are not voting because maybe those are still unpredictable. Those 5 projects are likely quite similar and may have a similar chance to survive in this market.

What makes you they don't have a good future??
is it because the price is down now?
because honestly I feel the 5 altcoins could be something big in the future.

At present, I see all of five project are really good to me. But, it is very hard to predict that which is dump or crash in future. If you want to ask me, which coin I invest? Without aave coin, I invest rest of them.

You could change the subject by enumerating from best to worst choice. Then maybe you will be the one to decide which is the worst according to every member's point of view.

Sand will be my best pick.
Moonbeam will be my least.

Something like that, but it's not the worst of all the altcoin that is created. Sadly we only have 5 choices and I am forced to put it in the last place.
But there are also different reasons behind it, like me, I am more inclined toward gaming platforms than developer tools.

Honestly, if I have an interest in buying altcoins right now I will be Moonbeam and Matic, those projects that people believe will have a very bad future will perform the best... Always do the opposite when people gives advice.

in my opinion all these altcoins you listed are high risk investments and I would venture to say that putting money in these altcoins is like investing in a hyip site where there is no guarantee of profit and the owner can disappear at any time. day. for example sand, it reached 8$ and today it is at 1$... you can already imagine that many people who bought this altcoin for the price of 8$ are very disappointed at that moment, my brother for example he bought it at that price and he is with great loss and to be honest I don't believe this shitcoin will have 8$ again. conclusion: my brother just wasted time and money buying this altcoin


buying altcoin is very dangerous

Every single coin one of the list you published is a good coin and each one can do well in the future. But among these Matic Coin will do better and already its popularity has increased a lot and it will gain reputation as a good coin and good blockchain network in future like Ethereum network and Binance Smart chain

You are asking a bit of an absurd question here when your list is all quality and potential projects and applications in many different segments of the market. And it's also fun to talk about the future. I'm bad with them. So far I've seen them very active and have their own supportive communities. Maybe you're confusing something with them, or somehow explaining that they're not just making statements.

Polygon (MATIC)  have a good future as a Chain provider. Transaction fees are very low on Matic Network.  So like BSC it is also widely used now. So Matic is steadily gaining popularity. On the other hand Moonbeam (GLMR) has also brought its own network to the market. Which is still not that popular.  But maybe in the future it can do something better.

How are we going to determine worse projects?
 * no used-case
 * questionable developers
 * not back-up with a reputable exchanges
 * no market volume

If one of them had fallen into such a category of mine, don't dare to invest and even have the plan too as for sure you will just lose your money. Choosing coins for investment really matter as this will affect the results of it.

I look at these factors before investment because if a project is not able to provide services, then it is difficult to stay longerin the market. Having a project that has good utilisation for the people, it will stay around despite the bear season and more exchanges will have it listed up with them in their exchange.

Isn't moonbeam focused on EVM compatibility on Polkadot? I'm really not bullish on DOT or the ecosystem and I feel that Flare and the internet computer offer better interoperability solutions.

He is asking which is the worst coin out of the five listed, which is a paradoxical question. And in my opinion, Matic is the most investment-worthy token out of the 5 tokens that OP mentioned.

As you can see, matic is doing very well and I believe that at the current price, matic is undervalued, so the potential for future development of matic is very high. I read a thread that predicted the price of the matic to hit $20 in the future and I believe that will happen with the matic as well.

Agreed. I'm not sure why MATIC is even on the list as a "worst coin". MATIC will likely hit 10 usd this year and 20 is easy next year. Projects like ICP and XRP will also surpass their previous ATHs.

Good point, we can't speculate which project is worst out of 5 coins list for future, project list is better hidden as speculating based on above points for next few years, we can't decide for worst project but you can do your research and analysis to sort the list of 5 coins, I excluded Matic and AAVE coins for the worst coin list above.

How do you expect anyone to know this? Who saw Luna crash coming? Crypto investment is risky so invest only what you are ready to lose.

Everyone must have their own choices for the worst projects, because not everyone's research and analysis results are the same. Therefore,
there is no need for other people's opinions to determine which projects are bad,  because it is not necessarily a project that other people think is
bad, for us is considered bad too. Unless we all have the same method of determining bad projects, although sometimes everyone has their own
method of determining a bad project.

As an example for me Shiba Inu project is bad and not worth buying, but there are some people who think Shiba Inu has a great future and is
the best meme coins after Dogecoin. So please decide for yourself the worst projects in our opinion, it will be much better to do. But for me
instead of looking for the worst projects, why don't we focus on finding the best projects, so our time is used more effectively. But if I had to
choose between 5 altcoins in the pool, I would choose Moonbeam the worst. My answer is simple, because I am not very familiar with Moonbeam
and Moonbeam is not included in the top 100 crypto.

Yes indeed we have to do research to find out because if you just speculate it will be useless,
do research and analysis in depth I think it will be better,
Besides that, it is also necessary to follow its development

All projects have developers and teams that continue to develop their ideas, I don't think all of the lists above will end badly, what I hope is that the top projects that have a lot of investors end up like Luna, because no one knows the future, what this project will be really lasts like Bitcoin.

out of the 5 tokens mentioned, I would probably choose Polygon to hold for 5 years. however, currently the potential of polygons is the same as that of BNB. I feel that people will choose Polygon after BNB. So, when polygons have also become an alternative that is often used, I think the price of polygons can reach a high price. I feel that this is like the position of BNB when it competed with ethereum a few years ago. it's just, although I think that this token can't go beyond the top 3 coins, namely bitcoin, ethereum and BNB.

Ethereum will become big cloud computing company with the usual censorship once they switch to POS

I could also see a huge potential in Polygon. Its function and purpose will always keep this coin alive. Lots of investors have been trusting and building up a good reputation for years. I believe that in 5 years, it could reach a higher spot and will always be trusted by more investors. Functional coins supported by networks will always have the advantage.

Polygon is very popular than others on the list and still useful in the current situation, so probably it's the only one that has potential in the future. I said this because I've been watching those alts that you've mentioned above and they are really affected and still useless till this days.. Unlike polygon that have network and very convenient like BSC so for sure it can help polygon to surpass the situation..

As the majority said here on your list, we cannot determine which of these currencies will have a bad or bright future, but at the moment they still have a good reputation in the international community, they can all be considered good as long as they provide updates and continue to improve their networks

That's a difficult choice OP, all projects at your poll can still have a bright a future although in the future it's possible to crash. Anyway I don't understand why you would throw one of these out, wouldn't it be better to keep them in your portfolio to lower the risk? Actually at there is 1 which is not promising Moonbeam but still a new.

if we choose which one is the worst and the brightest then it is a subjective opinion because the list of altcoins above is good, so you should consider analysis and research before engaging in risky altcoin investments. But you also add ETH and BNB to your investment list.

We can't really determine which project will fail since they are all working hard to provide good services but of course if OP has a limited budget and can't invest on those projects, then it can be more safe to invest on BTC and ETH since they are the best option. There's a lot of potential with the given list of OP, better to invest some and if you think the project is not doing well anymore, then you can just sell it and move into another project, maybe by this you can tell which is worst.

He knows that we don't have crystal balls to see what's coming ahead so he doesn't worry about our answers and he won't use this as a financial advice but he is simply interested to see what others think on those coins. About the luna crash, actually, there are people already who suspects that luna is bad investment for the long term because of its team which are already involved on a fail project.

Sometimes that is what you need, researching about the team to tell if the project that you are going to invest in is worthy or not. Anyway on the 5 coins in the poll I pick moonbeam or glmr, why? Well because this is the least that I know.

these are great projects that you listed, but i'm guessing the weakest is moonbeam, I mean it isn't as famous as the other from my 2 cents, meanwhile matic is striving that it has quite literally fought against the current bearish.
though it's still kinda difficult to decide which one of them are the least promising honestly, it's just a guessing.

It's weird that OP is asking about the worst project of those 5. It would be much easier to rank them from good to great. All of this 4 projects is good and has promising future since these project has done something and are continue developing like the sandbox. I just don't hear much from moonbeam, I've seen this project in my social media before and I think it's pretty new compared to the other 4 contenders and for me not deserving to join the other 4 project.

I really don't know how did you make this list. These are the most promising coins in the crypto market according to my research. So, a pretty baseless list in my opinion.

Among those 5, I barely heard anything from Near Protocol and Moonbeam, so I pick those two as the least promising. I mean Polygon (MATIC) has OpenSea as their backbone platform, eventhough it might has passed its prime time, but Polygon will still get something out of it. AAVE and Sandbox has a lot going on this year, many good news and good rumors, especially SandBox. Tho to be fair, I don't hold any of these 5 coins at the moment.

It makes no sense to determine the most unpromising of these coins, since it may depend on many factors that will develop in the market over time and which it is impossible to predict now. Therefore, I recommend distributing your risks and buying all the coins you specified for a part of your deposit.

Definitely, it is very difficult to judge which coin is the best and which coin is the worst of all of them. The criteria for evaluating the project will vary from person to person based on their knowledge and different perspectives. It can be seen that despite being in bear season, these 5 tokens are still updated regularly and are strongly supported by the community. So I can't say which will be the worst coin of them all.