Title: User btc-room101 cannot be trusted Post by: ABCbits on November 13, 2022, 12:44:32 PM User btc-room101[1] recently woke up and and made lots of posts/threads. Aside from violating forum rules (mainly spam, off-topic or multiple posts in a row), he also made these ridiculous/non-sense claim without proof.
His history isn't better either.
For these reasons, i believe user btc-room101 cannot be trusted. I'll leave feedback to this user and recommend all reader to do same thing. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2038954 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2038954) [2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5420649.msg61280427#msg61280427 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5420649.msg61280427#msg61280427) [3] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5076779.msg48283107#msg48283107 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5076779.msg48283107#msg48283107) [4] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5077421.msg48315568#msg48315568 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5077421.msg48315568#msg48315568) [5] https://web.archive.org/web/20200501221519/http://www.inflection.top/ (https://web.archive.org/web/20200501221519/http://www.inflection.top/), scroll down to the bottom of page. [6] https://crypto.stackexchange.com/a/9754 (https://crypto.stackexchange.com/a/9754) [7] https://datascience.stackexchange.com/a/16641 (https://datascience.stackexchange.com/a/16641) [8] https://web.archive.org/web/20181206214734/http://www.inflection.top/faq.html (https://web.archive.org/web/20181206214734/http://www.inflection.top/faq.html), under answer of question "What is the safest ...". Title: Re: User btc-room101 cannot be trusted Post by: DaveF on November 13, 2022, 03:56:39 PM What I don't get is 4 years ago @gmaxwell more or less pointed out that he was distributing malware and yet the account was not banned.
Spamming junk and posting things that are basically spam or wrong is one thing, but once he crossed the line into malware / virus linking I don't get the lack of banning. I guess if enough people tag him with negative feedback (and those that left neutral change to negative) sooner or later he will leave and not come back. -Dave Title: Re: User btc-room101 cannot be trusted Post by: 1miau on November 14, 2022, 02:56:12 AM I've tagged this Account as well and reported him in Lafu's topic against malware in addition: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182222.msg61288733#msg61288733
Even if the Account isn't hacked (which doesn't seem to be the case here, same writing style and topics like previously), I wouldn't trust him and his "BTC hacking tools"... Been running rng on my bitcoin hacking racks for +2 years now, works great ??? ???Increased my find of lost bitcoins 2x by using real random numbers and random seeds https://github.com/room101-dev/Grand-Ultimate-BTC-Hacker Not suspicious at all... ::) Title: Re: User btc-room101 cannot be trusted Post by: TheBeardedBaby on November 14, 2022, 09:31:41 AM As I understand the account was only accused of possible distribution of infected files, but there was not a proof posted.
I think this is why the account is still around. Title: Re: User btc-room101 cannot be trusted Post by: BitcoinGirl.Club on November 17, 2022, 09:39:25 AM @gmaxwell actually only mention possibility that he's distributing malware, hence why he's not banned. Based on the possibility we can not send negative feedback too, that's my opinion however I see there are many negative feedback already left. I am not defending the user but I am trying to figure out the best course of action. When I am in doubt, I believe in leaving a neutral feedback but sometimes it becomes negative inspired though.Title: Re: User btc-room101 cannot be trusted Post by: DaveF on November 17, 2022, 12:16:19 PM @gmaxwell actually only mention possibility that he's distributing malware, hence why he's not banned. Based on the possibility we can not send negative feedback too, that's my opinion however I see there are many negative feedback already left. I am not defending the user but I am trying to figure out the best course of action. When I am in doubt, I believe in leaving a neutral feedback but sometimes it becomes negative inspired though.It's not just the fact that he may be spreading malware. It's the fact that he is also deliberately spreading wrong / false information. I don't mind the FUD by itself, but combined with telling people the wrong things does leave open the possibility that people who don't understand may be harmed by his statements. Sooner or later letting people like him stay around is going to cost someone their BTC. -Dave Title: Re: User btc-room101 cannot be trusted Post by: BitcoinGirl.Club on November 17, 2022, 02:03:29 PM @gmaxwell actually only mention possibility that he's distributing malware, hence why he's not banned. Based on the possibility we can not send negative feedback too, that's my opinion however I see there are many negative feedback already left. I am not defending the user but I am trying to figure out the best course of action. When I am in doubt, I believe in leaving a neutral feedback but sometimes it becomes negative inspired though.It's not just the fact that he may be spreading malware. It's the fact that he is also deliberately spreading wrong / false information. I don't mind the FUD by itself, but combined with telling people the wrong things does leave open the possibility that people who don't understand may be harmed by his statements. Sooner or later letting people like him stay around is going to cost someone their BTC. -Dave |