Bitcoin Forum

The most essential power of any individuals, organization, industries, churches, government, and nations is truly rely on the wings and Caprices of economic power.

Political power is good but political power can not survive without good economic power, political power is irrelevance if there is no good economy situations of any firm. It takes the economic power to build every other aspects of life.

Even government can not operates effectively if they lack or suffered economic kwashiorkor. Smooth organization operates as a function of good economy situations. When you economic power is stable and dignified, the evidence of Man's labour becomes very easy.

I think "means to produce" might be a better term here.

A good economy and the emergence of a strong political power normally stem from being able to produce something. It is normally either food, good transport links or exports.

totally agree, economic power will be able to bring everything that can move to achieve the desired goal, it is believed and it cannot be denied. but it must also be remembered that economic power cannot move if there is no political power to accompany every step that will be taken. it has been proven that there are still many developing countries, with political power capable of making all submit and cannot be evaded by this political power, everything is regulated and directed according to the wishes of those in power who have political power.

On the opposite it is not that way rather the other way round at least in this modern situation. Political power is now showing to be more powerful than economic power. Political power covers also decision making. So whoever has political power can take a decision against he who has economic power which is the money. In the real sense to have economic power, you have to involve in some kind of business or investment but that investment area can be rendered useless, unimportant or just very little profit that will be frustrating to the business owners by the decision made politically by those in power or parliament. It is a simple analysis that can be made broad and reference to our daily economic life in different countries. If there are no good economic policies for investment and businesses to grow then they will remain stunted.


No, it is the government that make decisions for business environment.

It is not necessary that governments sometimes use the economy as a weapon, as they force societies into extreme poverty, and therefore they are ready to accept any kind of basics as economic successes for the government. In countries, providing a loaf of bread is a political and economic victory for the government, and providing medicine and others.

So it is a weapon in both ends.

You are right that basically the economy is the main pillar that must be controlled properly, in other words a strong state is with abundant economic power and proper management. The role of politics is to play its role where mobilizing the economy needs to ride on and this is where politics does its job properly with diplomacy to outside regions or countries to have good economic relations. So that cooperation is established to achieve a balance with each other.

We cannot compare economical power to the political power because they all have their own influence and scope they covers by making change to occur through the economy, this all begins with individuality contributions towards the fast growth of the system put in olace by the governing authorities, when we adhere strict to the planning and partke in every efforts centered at improving the economy, power won't be vested on one side.

In theory we can can see a lot of influence the economic power has on society but practically the political is the machinery that control the way the economical should go. I use my country for example, the government introduced a redesigned fiat currency notes thereby given a policy order to retrieve the old notes in addition to a cashless policy that place restrictions to limited amount of transaction daily. All of these policies and procedures have introduced a lot of controversy from different quarters of the economy. To cut the whole story short, it exposes a lot about how economic power is derived through political power as the political controls the economical.

It's been known that the West is financially sanctioning different countries because they own the widely used financial system. But with the existence of economically powerful countries like China, the sanctioned countries already have options to whom they could ask for loans. It is the world we know today.

When a country is able to provide for itself and provide products from its resources like China, it becomes independent. And will start investing in other countries and gain political allies. And just like an individual who has a good steady job and is financially independent, he can think of the welfare of his family.

Many countries were unable to dispel the recession and resulting inflation due to weak sources of economic income, political power is closely related to economic strength and even the smallest source of economic income is supporting everything, without economic strength everything else would appear weak and dysfunctional.

It can be concluded that the economy is an important foundation for a country's journey, without strength in this sector, the country will look so weak in the eyes of the world.

Economic power can never be matched by political influence, because countries will look strong if their economy is at an established stage. The government will not be able to operate if economic resources are not healthy and vice versa all the things you mentioned must go hand in hand, because all this support is needed by the government in carrying out the state system.

Definitely. A good Government will always want to take its economy to a Production economy which in turn strengthens that economy. An economy that is not able to use its resources for optimal productivity will certainly reflect in its relevance within nations and that too affects its political power or relevance.


I think you are looking at it from a micro perspective. In a broader sense, Say a country that doesn't have any resources and really doesn't generate much revenue, what type of political power could they possibly have amongst their pair nations  ???   

When you refer to economic power, you refer to the availability of money, because you cannot talk about the economy without mentioning money. No matter the kind of power any government has, they need finance to execute whatever is planned and finance to also manage things. Money is powerful and any country that has unlocked how to stay in abundance of money is usually a powerful and influential country and can afford to use the influence of their economy to improve their military power and political influence. I agree with you that economic power is perhaps the most important.

This is so true, most especially, this last part, this is something many of us have experienced I believe, working hard in a country where it's economy is shattered will take more than triple effort to at least, see a little result of one's labor.
This I believe is one of the reasons why many people leave their country, travel to other countries in search of a greener pasture, if the government of a country can achieve a good and a stable economy for its country, I tell you that 50 percent of that country's problem is solved, this is also same for churches and other organizations.

Because the economy is the biggest force in life, that's what makes the economy the main key in a life. Even now colonizing is no longer in the form of taking up arms or war, but with the economic power of a country it can "colonize" more subtly. With economic strength a country can have diplomatic cooperation and that can make a country's politics even better.

I think this is very evident on those countries that have been destroyed by wars, specially WWII. There are countries in Europe that are devastated but was able to recover in short amount of time, maybe they have  good leaders, but still though they have to produce something within inside and transform it as their best assets and then export it somewhere else. I still remember my history teacher in HS about this one, it is still the people and how they are going to produce that will help countries to recover from devastation and I think still applies up to this day.

While I don't think money is everything, money is indeed king, that is, if we talk of power. As unfortunate as it may seem, money can actually buy you almost everything. That is true to the level of individuals, organizations, countries.

Political power only follows money. So from local politics up to the national and international politics, economic power is the king. With economic power comes political power. While that may not be absolute, it is easily observed around to be the case.

if you think about it, life in this world does require economic stability.
politicians also work for economic welfare, traders, businessmen, employees, and even presidents.
everyone wants to prosper their respective economies,
if you think about it, everyone is very individual, but to achieve all that sometimes it takes strong cooperation.

Economic power is the wheel of other forms of power because without it other forms of power will be impotent. The other forms of power need financial power to function which is why other forms of power always want to attract economic power. But it is also important to state that political, economic religious, social, and others at interconnected and interdependent. If the political system in a country is bad, the economy of the country will also be affected negatively. When religion promotes peace and justice, society will be a better place.

America survives as the strongest country because their economy is very strong, they have the confidence to play global politics because they control most of the world's economy, the economy is the basic force to increase influence and power over everything, someone with a strong economy will easily get the trust of other people because he is seen as capable of managing the wealth he owns, as well as countries and organizations if they don't have a good economy it will be very difficult to process and develop or implement the vision and mission they create.

I think the saddest part about this is the fact that there are so many nations that could grow and be better, there are hundreds of millions of people who could live a better life, and only thing between their goals and better life is the corrupt officials and governments.

There are governments who prefer to keep the nation doing not so great, because if you turn the nation into a great place, then they will ask for more, and constantly require to get better. Whereas if you keep them at low, then you teach them how to be grateful for even the smallest things while you personally get super rich. That's why it's obvious that we are talking about a worse world than we could potentially have.

We might see it that way but behind the scene those who have the economic power has great influence over the one who has the political power.  Politicians are supported by wealthy merchants, and obviously, money works here. Because Politicians know that without the support of merchants, the countries economic power will collapse and with it the Political power of a country will also get affected.  I do agree that the strength of the economy dictates how influencial its political power is.


The truth is they just made it formal by having the approval of the government but it is the wealthy people who are dictating behind the scene.

Status of a country's economy shows how good the governance is there. And as we know, even the first world countries today are feeling the problem regards to the situation of their economies. But despite that there have been troubles, the best of the best would find their way to recover and be back to their former status. A leader that has a political will to serve its people should be the first and foremost reason why he's in his position, without the support of their constituents they can do nothing for sure. Going to the actual power from a country that uses economic power, we already saw it happen to Ukraine and Russian war, where world leaders have placed economic sanction to Russia.

If the government is strong and honest- the country progress. In our country - the government is very corrupt.
Yesterday I read in news - UAE passport is the most powerful passport in the world. They have built empire on sand.

The economy has a big influence on politics as well as society. Even though economics and politics are 2 different things, they both work independently and have their own goals. But in the development of economic and political systems mutually support each other.

 So, in essence, economics and politics influence each other.

Exactly, economic power creates political power. Do we see any poor countries in the world that have strong politics? The US is the country with the largest political power in the world because it has a leading economy in the world, in recent years, China's economy has also developed strongly, and their politics is also increasingly influential in the world. While poor third world countries do not have any significant political power. It can be seen that the economy is what determines everything.

They are supposed to be independent from each other so those that are rich do not manipulate the laws to benefit them unfairly, but obviously this never happens, politicians by default are looking for power and the rich are looking for the influence of politicians, so very quickly they make a deal and both of them join hands and begin to move the country and their citizens towards their desired goals, however despite their power this cannot last forever either as they cannot ignore their population for so long and still hope to remain in power.

The strong political power can come first and adopt free markets, from which a good economy will follow.

Venezuela was able to produce oil but their country sank into debt once the oil prices crashed and there wasn't enough money being generated in the private sectors. Of course Venezuela was an attempt at a socialist nation which had shunned the private enterprise entirely.

Israel early on in its development was a free market economy by technicality but rose to participate in the global economy once they began to adopt free markets by decreasing social welfare. Benjamin Netanyahu in the late 90's was a proponent of such principles.

I think having a good economy could be done by selling stuff to other nations, that is the biggest and most important thing for any nation. Look at USA, they end up selling so many stuff, because they are rich with not just resources, which they do have, but they are rich with companies who sell a ton of stuff to the world.

Look at biggest companies by marketcap it is apple, google, Microsoft, Amazon, hell even Berkshire Hathaway, tesla, NVidia, Exxon, Facebook. All of these are American, and yes there are a few Saudi oil company or TenCent or something like that here and there, but overall USA has the biggest advantage, and that is why it is pretty important to sell stuff to the world, take money from them, and bring it inside your nation.

Economic power is something beneficial when we talk about the growth and development of a setting, individual, and country but the level of economic power depends on raw materials/skills, physical capital, manpower, and entrepreneurialism.
However, 99% of the economic kwashiorkor of every country is caused by the government's naiveness in decision making on raw materials and printing of more fiat currency every year.

This is all about governance and I think has nothing to do with political power, but relating to the progress of a country because of good governance, we can see that the economic power of a country will increase which opens the door for stronger political power.

As how the economic power defined:

With this definition, we can say that a strong economic power is a sustenance to a stronger political power since a country with a strong economic power doesn't have to compromise in terms of political power just to have economic support from a foreign country.

The most important economic strength must be driven by people who are actively working or investing, and of course state policy is very important to help people become prosperous and able to compete with other countries, my country currently depends a lot on imported products so people often complain about it and often create new problems such as prices which is very expensive.

I'm just trying to add just about your description of the above. and yes, Economic power is a key factor that leads to human progress and development. Economic strength means the ability of a person, group, company or organization to get value for money with the attractiveness factor. Since then every individual has enormous power over other individuals which is seen in the form of economic power.

Economic power is necessary for every other thing we say has power. Whoever the perpetrators, be it the community, the government or the business world, must focus on creating and maintaining economic strength by increasing our income, consumption and investment. A good economy always gives us peace of mind to fight and work for other challenges in life.

More like the only real power

Political power is essentially a way to coordinate, direct and finally take advantage of the economic power of all agents in a given population

Military power is a way to protect economic power, and also a consecuence of said economic strenght

The economy is indeed an effective power to be able to compete, without strong economic power the country will rely on debt and if it fails to pay then state assets can be sold, this has happened in many countries and the latest is Sri Lanka, economic conditions are very chaotic, crime rates rising, unemployment is out of control and many rich people are choosing to leave sri lanka.

But, how can we attain a good economic power if without the help of the items that he listed? Financial is also one the item that is needed in order to have a strong economy. I am not talking about printing more money alone because that can make the economy weaker. They can print more money but as long as other factors are also strong. A good political system is indeed important as well.

We need a good leader in order to make that possible so we people must vote wisely every election and choose only the knowledgeable and non corrupt candidates. Last but not the least is religion but each religion are the same. They only promote one thing which is peace.

Nah, the most important economic strength always starts from the government. You can't expect people to invest or actively work on the economy that won't bring them something and this is the reason why some under develop countries barely see foreign investors who are willing to invest in the country or establish a business that will boost the country's economy.

In terms of economic power I would like to see more discussion on topics like peak oil.

The author of Jurassic Park used to be famous for writing about these types of issues. If I remember correctly, Michael Crichton famously wrote that there might never again be an advanced civilization on earth after World War 3. There are no longer supplies of oil near to the surface which can be extracted with simple mining equipment. Many supplies of metal ore which were easy to obtain in the iron age have been depleted. If we had to rebuild civilization all over again. We could have difficulty or impossibility attempting to do so. As many of the resources we would require are no longer as easy to obtain.

If there ever was a scenario where the world was hit with mass EMP which regressed us back to a pre electrical era. I think its something people might want to discuss as the implications and consequences may not be as widely known as they were in the post 1970s and prime eras of peak oil concern.

I think when a person manages to handle all the economic requirements and needs, as in they have enough to never worry about money ever again, then they could actually contribute to the world and make it better. If you end up with people all around the world who hate what they are doing and just focus on working to make money and survive, how could they make the world a better place, they wouldn't be able to.

However if they do not worry about money at all, sure there will be millions, maybe even billions who will just sit back and watch some movies and do nothing, but there will be so many more people who will develop and improve the world we live in as well.

The backbone of any prosperous country is its economic might. Devoid of it, we are but mere shadows. Nevertheless, our administration continues to disregard this pivotal factor of our community. They allocate funds towards aimless wars and overblown bureaucracies while our financial system flounders. A revolution is in order. We need leaders that are cognizant of the significance of economic power and will strive to enhance it. Our policies should endorse start-ups, cultivate ingenuity, and initiate employment opportunities. It's time to reclaim our economic power and allocate it where it rightfully belongs - in the hands of the common people!

Everything starts from the economy, a person's influence depends on the level of the economy.
If you go into a warung, and find a group of people talking, you'll see how different the way they talk is. If one of them has a large wallet, he will stand out from the rest.
Likewise with organizations that have sufficient financial support, surely these organizations have a big influence in their environment. The state is also the most important part in terms of economic power, because economic power can influence political power. If economic power is strong, political power is strong, then the cooperative relationship of an institution, or a state can run well, because when talking about politics, this cannot be separated from interests.

I think the difference between what makes a strong country and what makes a politician elected are not overlapped, that is the reason. If you have a very strong economy, you are doing great as a nation, but then you do not really need a great leader, you could do fine with just some "government worker" type of position at the very top. How many of us know who the leader of Russia is? How many of us know who the leader of France is? Ukraine is? USA is? UK is?

And then once again think of how many of us know the leader of Norway or Sweden? You may know personally, but if a poll was made, I guarantee you that those two would be the least known ones for sure. Which is a proof that a strong nation doesn't create a big leader and that's why leaders try to keep avoiding building a nation like that if they can.

What happens is that the economic growth is no longer real, we see the stock market going up all the time but this is happening not because new companies are being created which generate a new source of tax revenue and new technologies, this is happening simply because the government is printing money and those at the top are earning a fortune by doing absolutely nothing, so the middle class and the poor do not benefit from such economic boom and this is causing civil unrest all over the world.

agree with the opinion of colleagues above all, that economic strength is a pillar to be able to determine the direction and goals to be carried out. it is not even surprising that with economic power someone will be able to regulate a policy that will be desired even with actions that may violate the rules that are not appropriate.
Unfortunately for developing countries the ability of someone with economic strength supported by large companies, can buy the rules according to his wishes. so it is not surprising that it eventually gave birth to dictators in policy, where many ordinary people became victims of agreements between politicians, policy makers and those with economic power.

Obviously. The stability of an economy depends largely on the means of the independent nation being able to produce more of wha they consume other than that, you would end up building the economy of other nations who produce the bulk of what you need. It's that bad.
Surely, your economic power tells about how relevant you are as an independent nation and youe got your military power there for support and ensure supremacy of the state in the eyes of a invasion.

Somehow, many nations especially the developing and underdeveloped onces fined themselves at the offensive end of this. With the world far ahead of them and the need for new innovations which could often by acquired through trade rather than produced, they find themselves buying more, rather than producing more. Even the resources within are hardly produced into finished products.

Economic strength is increasingly important at this time, there is no need to use the military and weapons to subdue a country, but by giving debt, slowly state assets will be owned, this is done by China by providing loans to many countries so that China's economic power is getting stronger and harder to beat.

it's right as you said because everything we live today must start with good economic strength, whatever plans we make even though it is so strategic if there is no economic strength then all the strategic that is made will be in vain, nowadays many countries are in economic crisis to the point that people find it difficult to meet their needs and many crimes happen without caring about others all this because they are under pressure from the economy, Then the biggest problem right now is unmet economic stability.

Do you think China is not strengthening its military bases? precisely by strengthening its military China is able to secure its territorial territory. Do you know how the history of colonialism began when a country had abundant economic resources but was not strengthened by an automatic military that was easily enslaved and easily conquered? The role of both is important, even though in this day and age the war is openly criticized. See Ukraine and how Russia treats them. Russia has the military power to suppress Ukraine's economy which is still under the Russian military base.

But military force is still needed because we often hear from online or television news that war troops are flies in the territory of a country. And even though the official authorities have denied that this is just training and checking regional boundaries, it is still a show of military powers. But indeed, China has used loans to many small countries because China has been eyeing the resources they have found and wants to master them. By providing these loans, China can get many results so that China can control the country. However, developing countries do not want to simply comply with requests from big countries because they are trying to develop the potential that exists in their countries so that they can be even more advanced.

In my opinion, this is only a small part in terms of defeating many poor countries, because rich countries will definitely not take debt from anyone even if they are repeatedly offered by any party. So the losers here are countries that are still poor because they need money to build infrastructure within their countries.

And make no mistake that a country that is able to pay off its debts wisely and on time cannot be considered a loser because the country must be considered strong because it has the ability to pay off its forests. So that economic power only looks big for those who need a lot of money, whereas for the rich countries in this world, it is considered normal.

Economic power is important but doesn't always translate to or correlates with political power. Fortunately or not, it's not so simple. The USA and China are both politically and economically huge, and that might incline to talk about these powers as interrelated and about the need of economic power to back the political one. But in terms of economic power, Japan is the world's third economy, but it's political power is almost nonexistent. Russia, on the other hand, has a smaller economy than Canada or France but seems to have more political power, mainly by posing as a representative of the former Soviet Union and by doing things countries nowadays don't allow themselves to do.

when you have a large account balance, everything you do and think will run optimally and that is natural, but in an organization or institution, expecting their economy to be supported strongly in my opinion is very unethical, will they work not optimal just because the financial power in their organization or institution is weak, therein needed the loyalty.  and when it comes to a country, we will continue to see countries that have a weak economy will be left behind and oppressed, so every country must manage the resources they have to the fullest so that there is no inequality.

The economic crisis has taught us how bad it is these conditions and even all stakeholders will experience the effects of the crisis this is without exception the people.

1. The poverty rate has increased from the impact of the economic crisis due to the absence of a source of income.
2. The government will find it difficult to meet the needs of state spending which will result in bankruptcy.

If these two things happen, then the status of the state/government is not in good condition, unstable economic strength is not always a sign of an economic crisis, but if this happens for a long time the impact of inflation will destroy the economy. In the end it will affect other sectors as a source of state (Income) revenue. Therefore, economic strength is the most important source for the country in maintaining stability.

the point is if groups or individuals have a lot of money then they can control the situation or anything that has to do with money.
and this happens in any part of the world without seeing the differences between them because every country has a system that is almost the same.

not only individuals but groups or companies that do play an economic role will freely arrange everything according to what they want. because everything can be arranged with money to make a deal without interference. agree that this happens in almost all parts of the world but it is more felt in developing countries, so it is not surprising that in these countries there are many small kings growing who are able to regulate all policies, without anyone being able to touch them.
it is even possible that there will be businessmen and leaders who become dictators, to put pressure on small communities without being able to put up a fight.

I have to say that it is definitely a situation where excess economic power always requires a bit of a military action in order to provide proof of it at the same time. Not just to get some lands and provide more economical growth, neither Taiwan nor Ukraine would make these nations so much richer that it worth a war over, no the fact that they are in a war, no matter where it is, was the reason why they are showing how strong they are economically.

Doesn't mean they are right, we have seen how Russia got economically screwed, they expected everyone to be silent like 2014 and that did not happen this time around, which is why it's such a trouble.

All countries compete to become a global economic power, countries that have strong economic power are of course supported by good human resources, without strong human resources it will be difficult to realize economic power, apart from competition between countries on the other hand there is also competition between regions, they form unity to be able to fight the economic power of other regions.

Yes, both of them are not the same but I think political power is more important because a country is run by politicians right? And if they are great at doing their duties then we can expect that the economy of the country will also become more powerful.

I agree that Japans economic power is great but this wouldn't be possible if the political power they have is weak or non-existent. Maybe you just miss calculate them? Or we don't only noticed it because USA and China are mostly in the headlines and people are mostly focusing on them in terms of politics. Russia has more political power than Canada and France but they don't earn it a fair way. That was still unimpressive.

The case of Japan is interesting, both the US and China are interested on increasing their influence on their regions and all over the world as well, however Japan has always been more concentrated on their domestic affairs so they may give the impression they do not hold as much political power, but the truth is that they simply choose not to use it, while Russia which has never been one of the top economies of the world is willing to exert its influence by means which are thought to be illegitimate by the international community.

Economic strength is an important force in running individual organizations and governments. Many countries have disbanded due to economic collapse, for example Sri Lanka. This also affects the amount of debt with other countries.

The economy is a resource, which is a backbone of strength and a source of strength for political or state activities or any organization including the family which is the lowest organization. The economy is a measure of strength, how capable it is to manage and develop resources, both human resources and natural resources, which provide a higher selling power output which is used to mobilize the organization so that the vision and mission go according to purpose.
I totally agree with this, the economy is a great power and weapon to defend and attack.

Politics can manipulate the economy, but the risks to themselves are also great. The only thing that can defeat economic power is nature. Natural laws that humans cannot even predict and fight against can cause the economy to weaken. Call it during the pandemic yesterday, how everything got messed up. The economy is indeed the main strength of humans in order to survive on this planet, but economic cycles that involve natural resources, if not managed properly, will actually have a negative impact.

I think all aspects to support progress or development rely on economic power to a large extent.
even a mature plan must be based on sufficient economics so that this can be realized.
good economic conditions will certainly show progress or a different level than worse economic conditions.

I believe in economic power that describes an individual or group that is more advanced and better.
no need to look for examples that are far away, compare a child from a rich family and from a poor family, a child from a rich family gets access facilities, and a more advanced education,while the number of children from poor families is minimal, but that doesn't mean he can't become rich, it's just that their start is very different.

Politicians will say it differently. This is because they know the political controls the economic. A man who pays the piper calls the tune. Politicians know all that. We've billionaires struggling to get into top political positions for the sole aim of controlling the affairs of government in policy making. Whatever political decision a president embarks on is binding on the economy.

The problem is not being able to look at everything negative that's going on and negate the things that have helped run the economy in the long run. Not only now, but since ancient times, if the economy wants to develop, it needs an executive apparatus to help it operate. And everything never lasts forever, when it develops to a certain extent it will also degrade in different aspects, the most obvious is the problem of human moral decay, and easy to understand see the economy love less.
Therefore, the relationship between politics and economics is relatively complex and affects people's lives. To achieve a prosperous and stable economy, political decisions must be made in a careful and intelligent way, and the economic situation must be managed wisely and effectively.

I agree that economic strength is indeed an important foundation for all other forms of power because with weak economic strength, individuals will continue to struggle to meet their basic needs, let alone build a stable financial future. This can lead to a variety of negative outcomes, ranging from debt and financial instability to poor physical and mental health.

On a larger scale, organizations and businesses rely heavily on economic power to compete in the marketplace and achieve success. And of course, when we turn our attention to governments and nations, economic power becomes even more important. Without a strong economy, governments struggle to provide essential services and meet the needs of their citizens. This can lead to social unrest, political instability and even the collapse of entire nations.

Economic power is the foundation that underpins all other forms of power universally and is essential to individual and collective well-being.

it is difficult to imagine a country with a disorganized economy that will be able to provide support for its people to be more prosperous, because the economy will clearly provide the country's ability to prosper its people. no one will be able to move the wheels of government as well as possible if it is not supported by a good economy so that it is able to provide impetus for the movement of all sectors. so the economy is the basis for providing movement for all sectors needed for the government to run well, without it it cannot be expected because the state must always meet those needs first.

Until whenever economic power will continue to be the main force for all sectors of life.
Politics governs government, organizations and others, but without the economy all these sectors will be stuck and can't do much
So we are not surprised why the economic war has a greater effect than other wars.

We can see and feel the role of the economy so far in managing the world, which we don't need to explain one by one.

Economic power is currently an important force. Many countries are trying to become an economic power because world economic competition is very tight. Some countries that have economic power, such as the USA, can easily dominate other countries' economies, so that it becomes an advantage for strong countries.

Economic power relies solely on the money, the statement used by many people, which is completely wrong. The true power of economy is driven by two factors: basic needs fulfillment and psychological effects. Most economic processes can't be predicted by using only money vectoring, since money is just a single aspect of motivation. So the power is not in purely economy control, it's also in psychology control through addicting people to money. Usually money and products in economy are considered different things, but the real deal is that money is also a product - highly psychoactive product.

Bro, that comment you made about the power of economic stability was some next-level thinking! It's like the backbone of all power, you feel me? Politics might be important and all, but without a solid economy to hold it up, it's just a house of cards waiting to collapse. When the economy is on point, people can achieve anything they put their mind to, whether they're individuals or whole nations. But real talk, economic power brings the good feels. When people are making bank and living their best lives, it spreads good vibes throughout the community. It's like a domino effect of pure satisfaction and good energy.

When a country establishes a relationship with another country it has the goal of something to get. In addition to the relationship that leads to politics, there is another relationship that is larger to be achieved, namely strengthening the economy.

The economic stability of a country greatly impacts welfare so that a country is willing to give debt and owe other countries with built relationships.
Therefore, economic strength will focus on global competitiveness.

what you say can certainly be true and also not forever that if all education is ensured only for families with an established economy, but simple families can also get a good education if their children really want to try to make up for their deficiencies to continue learning and increasing their knowledge. because in several countries there are already free schools for all citizens who really need it, so if it's about education it doesn't seem to be a problem, only in developing and underdeveloped countries, of course it will make a difference.
but when it comes to matters of life's necessities, it is clear that it cannot be avoided that those in the good economic group will definitely get what they want.

most countries would try to invest into something that their country needs, for example manpower and food which is highly needed in some other countries. there are also circumstances in which a country can produce raw materials like ores, stones and salt, which is why up until now although it destroys nature or some non government groups try to stop mining.

Yes, economic power is what will decide everything, when you have a strong economy and a lot of money, your power will be very strong. Economic strength is a measure to determine who is the strongest, it is not only a measure between countries but also between people.

A nation without much economic strength is lacking behind and cannot be recognised in terms of national statistics of states of the world that are doing well it is better if we build our nations economy and not only the political area
A nation which has big economy has advantage of tourists and investors to come over to settle within and operate in there different area in life

If the economy has power, success comes. The government of any country uses the economy as a weapon. Where power does not work, the work can be completed with money. So in today's society economy importance and power are the two most effective things. Economy is one of the few fundamentals that make up or govern a country.

So they must of an alternative way to raise their economic reputation to provide more opportunities to their citizens. This is what commonly happens in third world countries, that they need to rely on alliances or follow under someone's wing. Whether the economy like it or not, there are those 3rd world countries who had a rapid rise of population and in order to cater those excessive man power they must seek for opportunities outside the country, this why diplomatic relations in other countries are made and is also needed.

Well, that can probably be a good example of how economic power can actually strengthen an individual, a group, or a nation. A nation with economic power tends to get better and quicker development within the country, and a country that develops fast tends to rise higher in almost every aspect and the competition out there will start noticing them.

If we talk about an individual, someone with economic power is obviously superior to someone who has no such thing backing them at all. Just like you said, a rich person can easily climb the ladder of success way quicker than someone without riches.

I agree with you mate and I guess this has been one of the major reasons for the massive migration by citizens of my country to other countries and at some points if the government of a country makes the country and it's economy more welcoming, then I think it will go a very long way to encouraging it's citizens to stay back.
There are countries with greater opportunities outside and though I haven't left my country yet, I'm sure that if my country can create an enabling, then it's citizens wouldn't have to look outside for greener pastures.

It is true that diplomatic relations between countries are so important because it provides many benefits,
Apart from student exchange work, this is of course part of the diplomatic relations,
the more countries have diplomatic relations with other countries, the better it will be.

Diplomatic relations between countries do have benefits in particular and from what I read on a site called materiips.com (https://materiips.com/manfaat-hubungan-diplomatik) that the benefits of diplomatic relations between countries actually have seven benefits. And I think it really needs to be maintained by every country in order to advance the country in several sectors through these seven benefits, including:

• Preventing the Damage of a Country. The cooperation of a country can also be a defense to deal with various possibilities that can damage the culture and things that are contrary to the ideology of a country.
• As the Development of Cultural Values. Support efforts to foster and develop the nation's socio-cultural values in efforts to overcome all forms of threats, challenges, obstacles, disturbances and international crimes in the context of social development
• To support the implementation of political policies and foreign relations that are used for national interests, especially for development interests in all fields.
• Support efforts to increase national development
• Peace and security between countries, believe in supporting efforts to maintain and restore international peace, security and stability.
• Improving friendly relations between countries, to avoid conflicts that occur. The existence of cooperation that occurs will strengthen the relationship of a country.
• Improving the application of science and technology and overcoming things that can damage culture.

As everyone knows, economic power refers to the ability of individuals, organizations, industry, governments and nations to control and influence the production, distribution and consumption of goods and services. Economic power is very important because it provides the necessary resources to build and sustain other aspects of life. Regarding Political power, in my opinion although it is important, it cannot survive without a strong economy because Lack of economic strength can cause various problems, such as poverty, unemployment, and social unrest.

Diplomacy between nations? Fascinating, folks! Those seven advantages you mentioned show how diplomatic ties can make a country great again in many areas. Imagine a world without diplomacy?

One of the chief boons of diplomatic relations is averting potential damage. It's astonishing how nations can collaborate to address challenges that menace culture and contravene a country's principles. Moreover, diplomacy aids the nurturing and growth of socio-cultural values within societal progress. Plus, politics and foreign affairs? They're key for national interests, especially for progress in every field. Diplomatic ties boost national development and keep relations friendly, avoiding nasty conflicts. Thus, let's make diplomacy a top priority for the benefit of all nations

Yes you are absolutely right economic powers has the ability of countries, businesses, or individuals to improve their standers of living, individual can take decision by their self if financially someone is not dependent upon their family or partner then no one can suppress them same thing applicable with countries as well it increases their freedom to make decisions which beneficial for them and reduce the ability of any outside force to reduce their freedom. For example India is exporting oil from Russia after knowing that Russia is a big enemy of US. If India was Economically weak then India can't take this steps we can see economy power here.

I agree with you that and I know that we are in the era where things do not exist alone. Are always interwoven. Just like you have pointed out, economic and political powers are interwoven and are dependent on each other to thrive. In my estimation, political power is the gatekeeper that checks the excesses of economic power. A typical example is the case of introduction of a new currency in my country by the governor of the Central Bank. It caused untold hardship among the citizens. People couldn't feed. While the old currency was removed from circulation, the new currency was scarce and was in the hands of only few people. This was were political power stepped up. The head of the Central Bank was taken to court by the political institutions(elected governor from different states)and the court passed a judgement that both the old and new currency should be used¹. They therefore brought back the old currency into circulation and things have now returned to normal.

1. Read more here - https://tribuneonlineng.com/supreme-court-judgment-on-naira-swap-agf-cbn-governor-should-resign-apc-nwc-member/

You're right OP, that is why many potential government prefer to pump huge amount of money on their economy so that their citizens will experience some positive changes in the economic power in the country. During the pandemic that took over one year and some months in the world, made many countries to be serious with their economic power because they thought they have what it takes to get it right at the moment until many industries started folding up because of the poor economic power in the land. Economic power and political power are very important for any government to embrace to ensure their citizens enjoy steady deflation from the land which is the wish of every humanity in the country.

Yes, I really agree with you, that indeed in every growth and development something must be supported by a good economic level, both individuals, organizations, industry, government and others who need funding in the operation of their work, of course, need funding as a tool for operational sustainability in implementing the vision and its mission, we cannot ignore it and again if an organization or individual who has a strong economy he will easily implement his wishes and have great influence, therefore the economy is very important to be a component that must be strong in the course of activity.

These days, it's hard to tell where one item stops and another begins since everything is so intertwined. Money in politics? They make a stunning pair and cannot be separated. But here's the thing: when money gets out of hand, political power swoops in like a superhero. As in the case of the Central Bank governor who was prosecuted for tampering with the new currency. A true hero, trust me on this one! Bringing back the old currency is another topic I'd rather not discuss. A mighty swoop of force, indeed! This demonstrates that when called upon, political power can pack a devastating knockout punch. Tremendous!

The sad thing is that even in the most developed nations, there are parts that get a lot less attention. I believe that the world we live in is an unfair world and people who already have money has the key and people who are not rich will have to work all their life and maybe retire or maybe not retire. In the end we are not going to see that change anytime soon, any nation that tries to change it faces a lot of backlash.

For example, when you want to try to bring the gap down a bit, they call you a communist and they try to ban you from politics in some nations. When in fact the only aim is to make sure that people who do not have enough could all have enough if we just tax the rich a bit more, only people who are bothered with that should be people with billions, not people with nice houses, there is a big difference.

it is true that economic strength is a benchmark in every aspect, a small example like from economic strength we can find out what a person's true nature is, how he interacts with people whose economy is weak and people whose economy is strong

I agree with your initial statement, so I paid attention to it.
To support your argument even further, I will point out that without economic power, which is the foundation upon which political power is formed, it will be challenging for individuals, groups, businesses, governments, and entire countries to achieve any worthwhile aims and objectives.
Consider for a moment that during the COVID-19 era, the nations who suffered the most in terms of being able to offer relief supplies and palliatives for their inhabitants were those that lacked the economic might of their governments.

You can understand thus why I concur with the OP's first premise.

this is only the outside benefits of countries doing alliances and diplomatic agreements, but somehow like those cliche stories we read online that they are taking advantage of weaker countries to demonstrate their power is literally real. nowadays saying that they'd be giving opportunities to lower countries are just false promises to exploit manpower from countries that are not allowed to participate to higher economic competition. more money means you can dominate the economy and you can dictate the next move of the decisions taken in different countries.

A country who will be economically strength, he also be strength from all aspects .Those countries that are financially prosperous have leadership in technology, industry, business and world politics. The point you mentioned is that all the countries that were economically strong during covid19 got the vaccine on time. Countries that are relatively financially weak have received it later. In each case the economy has an effect. However, to develop a country economically, it has to develop in many areas, the most important of which is business. Those who are able to expand their business quickly will achieve economic prosperity quickly. It can be same at domestic or international level.

Borrowing from the words of Karl Marx that, those that owns economic power has a great influence on the political Will of the society and by extension they influence the decisions making as it affects the society.
For any government to have the capacity to control and wield political authority then it must also be self sufficient economically, must have the capacity to go into economic relations with other countries of the world .

Today we have rival and warring opposition groups within states fighting for occupation of certain geographical areas, it's not because they love to fight but because they want to take control of such area due to either a natural resource such as gold, crude oil, gas, etc that's found within such location and whosoever gain control also gains economic power  with a tendency of capturing political power. In real sense of it all, political power is nothing without a correlation with economic control.

Economic power isn't everything, but it sure is a hell of a lot of other things.

Just take a look at China, it's one of the countries that are frowned upon by many, due to their weird ordinances and their extreme communistic approach, second only to North Korea. Although compared to North Korea, they prosper. Why is that the case? Because they are economically-capable. The whole world can go against them and they wouldn't budge from their seat. But that isn't to say that they can do something about it especially if a global conflict is to happen.

Whatever man, TL;DR: Economic Power is a good power to have, but only up to a certain extent coz countries could always band against you and pound your land to the ground with nukes.

Yes.  I fully agree with you. 

Once I was playing computer strategy with my best friend from school.  My friend and I took turns being the supreme ruler of a fairy-tale state.  I was the supreme ruler of the state for 5 minutes.  Then my friend was the ruler of the state for 5 minutes.  Then I again held the highest position of the Emperor and made management decisions for the next 5 minutes. 

Very soon I realized that it was not enough just to fight the trolls, orcs and other fabulous creatures that were constantly attacking us.  It is necessary to develop the economy of the state (develop agriculture, build mines, residential buildings, make food supplies, accumulate gold to pay for mercenary troops).  We must also prepare for war.  So I made the decision to become a peacetime ruler.  Within 5 minutes, I actively developed the economy, and my friend, in the time allotted for him to play, waged wars with the orcs and actively won. 

As a result, we defeated all our enemies and built a powerful state. 

So I realized the importance and necessity of building up economic power.

Economic power can also include a country's ability to influence global economic policies, set international trade rules, and attract foreign investment. Countries with strong economic power often have a significant impact on the global economy and can use their economic influence to promote their national interests and many more.

In my opinion, economic power comes before political power. I mean if a nation wants to have political power, it should have good economic power firstly. That is what China tries to do, as we can see their political power increasing and that is due to the developed economic power they have been working on for years. More specifically, China has been providing loans to some nations, especially African nations, and using these loans to control the power of these nations, as Africa is full of gold and other industrial minerals. However, the way China is dealing with other nations is much different from the way the USA was dealing, and that explains why the USA is falling back in Africa and the Middle East.
We can simplify the matter by coming back to human nature. A man first strives to stay alive by eating and drinking, then when he finds himself comfortable, he starts to search for additional power that satisfies his ego. We can apply the same thing to the relationships between nations.

It all depends on the goals of the state, if only the members of the government want to prosper, then they may not develop the economy - they will always have money themselves.
The same cannot be said about the population. But if good people are at the head of the state, then they will take care of the population that will live in prosperity. But a bad government only needs to be able to pay for the services of the police, which will shut up the discontented. But this is only in undeveloped countries.
In the end, it all depends on ourselves. If you are dissatisfied with the current political order, you can save up money and leave another country.

Economic power is the source of everything, if we talk about economics we are talking about everything, because it all depends on our economy, the height of our economy is the height of our dignity, the low level of our economy is also low in dignity, that is for those who look at the economy, but things that can change all of this also depends on the economy, covering all aspects, whether among politicians, businessmen, or civil servants, all covering the economic realm, as is currently known, economic power is able to influence all aspects, in political circles with economic power it is able to gain power in in the world of politics, among the people it is also like that, with our economic power we are respected and respected by them, other people are also respected, but the way of respecting people who are influential with the economy is different.

Productivity precisely,a productive country is a prosperous country.The ability of any nation to flourish in its economic activities,makes it possible for citizens to live a healthy and improves standard of living.

Any country with a good economic power is. capable of handling a smooth and steady purchase of more and better goods and services to meet the needs of the individuals in the society.

Individuals increase income and gain economic affluence when they're productive,in the sense that they produce something vital that will continously enhance an overall quality of life.

People use the barter system for their needs. That is the things that people have over their needs take other necessary things in exchange for those thing. In the evolution of civilization the exchange of something instead of something changed and the system of exchange through money became prevalent. So money is the main source of all earthly power. Nowadays people are constantly running for money. Economic emancipation is paramount to dynamize or improve our world or our state or society. We see that the more economic mobility there is at the individual or state level, the better off the individual or state is. So a good economy plays a key role in establishing a strong political system or state system.

A great nation is a nation that is good at saving its people with its pro-people fiscal policy even in the midst of a deteriorating global economy with more financial instruments and the elimination of monopolistic practices and oligopoli has long been indicated as one of the causes of the fragility of a country's economy.

Previously, during the past Covid pandemic, many countries were difficult to get up and stand tall again and are now facing the pressure of international economic turmoil, coupled with geopolitical conditions, wars that have not subsided in various places and inflationary pressures, which are enough to increase the burden on society in general.

Money is power.  Whether you do politics, do business, work in a good organization, money will always keep you above everyone else.  The better your financial status, the higher your status.  We can never deny the influence of money in our life.  Money helps a powerful person retain his power.  Even the king of yesteryear has no honor without money.  So everyone should think about improving their financial status.  Strengthen your financial position.

We've been sold this idea: productivity is king. More productivity, money, better life? Wrong. It is, in fact, a trap. We're concerned with output, thinking our value depends on how much we contribute to the economy. For what? Few extra bucks? A fleeting sense of accomplishment?

This whole productivity thing...it's brainwashing. The cycle of work, spend, repeat consumes us instead of living. Talk about economic growth, rising living standards. That hides the problem. A system structured to enrich a few rather than improve our lives is taking our freedom.

No conspiracy theory here. Our eyes are on it. We're told our tireless pursuit of productivity makes us successful and valuable. In reality, only the wealthy benefit from our fixation. We must wake up and oppose this worldview that pits our well-being against abstract progress. Consider what better implies here. Time to stop the cycle

In the past, someone who needed something, of course they would look for someone who needed the item they had to be able to barter in order to fulfill the item they wanted and now that time has passed and now money is a legal means of exchange, of course nowadays everyone people will try their best to be able to have a job that gives them income in order to meet the needs they need and currently someone who has money will of course be able to have the things they want because if someone doesn't have a lot of money it will certainly be difficult to meet their needs. them and this could lead to crime among those who have a lot of money and this of course will have a big influence on the situation of a country, so it is important for every country that wants to develop in a better direction to be able to have good economic strength so that they can developing in a better direction than before.

Yes it is an eternal truth that the economy plays the only role in meeting any need including the basic needs of people and it is this money that sometimes leads people to the brink of destruction. But whatever the factors of economic development or strength of the country seriously help to protect the individuality of the country and the nation or the people, for example, it maintains economic stability by controlling the rate of unemployment and the rate of inflation. However, it will be possible to maintain all these economic balances depending on the extent to which a country is full of human resources and natural resources. Suppose every country concentrates on these good aspects of economic power and regulates production distribution and consumption by accountability and law in that case it will surely reach the ultimate level of success.

Economic power and stability is the distinguish ING factor that separate two individuals, countries etc the quality of life you live is a function of your economic power, infact life generally revolves around economy and the economic power brings respect and influence to a person and country those countries controling the world today are countries with good economy