Bitcoin Forum

Hi,

This is the official thread of BitcoinCasino.to (https://bitcoincasino.to/) - a comprehensive review and comparison website for crypto casinos.

Our ambition is to help players easily discover trusted Bitcoin and altcoin casinos by finding, testing and reviewing as many as possible of the operators that support cryptocurrency payments.

So far we’ve identified more than 1400 crypto casinos and the list is growing on a daily basis. As it takes some time to properly review a casino, we might not ever be able to catch up – but we’ll try our best.

In addition to our own experiences of signing up, depositing, playing, withdrawing and testing the support function we do keep an eye on the overall reputation among players and professional reviewers as well.

Now, we would humbly like to ask this great community for some feedback so we can improve the website further and make it even more useful.

@Players: What are the most important things that you want to learn from a casino review? What kind of content, features or tools would you personally find useful? What other kinds of improvements could we make to the site? We have just enabled visitor comments as well so if you agree or disagree about our assessment of any particular casino you can quickly and easily let your voice be heard on the site.

@Webmasters: There are several other great crypto casino guides and review websites that we deeply respect and appreciate. If you’re a webmaster and have an idea on how we can possibly collaborate and help the community together, feel free to reach out.

@Operators: If you haven’t already been reviewed you’re probably already on our TODO list. If you want to be prioritized let us know. Positive player feedback on this forum and/or strong reviews from other reputable websites could help expedite your case.

In addition to private messages here, you can also reach us through Telegram: https://t.me/bitcoincasinoto

Looking forward to any kind of feedback. If you know of any crypto casino that we’ve missed, feel free to highlight it in this thread.

If you’re new to the site you can find it here: https://bitcoincasino.to/

Thank you for your time.

---

Updates based on feedback
2023-05-27: Added a "+ BitcoinTalk Thread" in the feature list next to casinos with official threads in this forum.

I might had missed it, but did you ever mentioned from your site about how you review those casinos listed from your site? I was actually looking for it.
I commend you for having a very informative website. I like it, I think it'll be a helpful guide specially to new players who look for some guides.  Great job.

Welcome to the forum and good luck.

Only Fortunejack that is on this forum that I saw on your website. There are many gambling sites on this forum like https://livecasino.io and Stake.com but you did not mention them.

That's a good observation.

We actually have a double digit number of reviews live for many popular brands, including Stake (see https://bitcoincasino.to/reviews/stake/), that are currently not on the main list on the index page.

There could be several different reasons for this but the most common one is that we simply haven't talked to them yet (either due to time constraints on our end -- or someone not getting back to us when reaching out).

The good ones, including Stake, should hopefully all be up there very soon.

Thank you for the feedback!

Good luck to you - I haven`t looked at your site thoroughly (yet) but I will be happy to see serious sites providing honest information with regard to crypto gambling. :)

There is a section on the index called "How we rate and compare crypto casinos" and hopefully the reviews themselves should be relatively self-explanatory as well (if not, we definitely have to fix that).

Thank you!

Much appreciated, especially coming from someone who has contributed so much to the crypto gambling community like yourself. Keep up the great work!

You mean you want to talk to the casino owner first before reviewing the casino?
The high rank on search engines and number of hits a month will be a good data for a casino to notice your review site.

Nice layout though and navigation.I was expecting to read the review about the first BitStarz but was directly sent to a ref link.

Jackbit, Betplay, Winz and Fairspin are also on the list which have an ANN thread here on the forum. They launch their signature campaign too in the past that makes me remember them when browsing all the listed casino.

I’m also surprised why does top casino here in the forum like Stake, Duelbits, Sportbets and so on are not listed while a bunch of unknown casino is on the website. I think this list is useless to post here since forum user can’t appreciate all those casino that doesn’t have ANN thread here due to our nature of being cautious to all unknown casino.

We don't need to talk to a casino to review them but we prefer to talk to them before more actively promoting them.

If you click on the casino's name in the "Review" column, just next to their rating, you will be taken to the review.

We will consider if it makes more sense to link the logo to the review, rather than to the website, as well.

Thank you for the feedback.

Nice seeing this thread, I hope more casinos are going to be added, especially those that have ANN thread on this forum.

These are just few. What about Flush, Stake, Livecasino, Sportsbet, Duelbit, Rollbit, Roobet, BK8, Duelbit, Trustdice, Betcoin and many others. If you go to gambling board, there are still more.

We think that there's value to testing and reviewing as many operators as possible, regardless of if they have a thread here or not.

But as we'll be adding more operators we will definitely look into adding some kind of certificate or symbol to our lists to indicate that a particular brand is (or isn't) represented on this forum as well.

Hopefully that will make the list more useful to you and others.

Thank you for the suggestions. We'll have all of them reviewed and listed (if they're good, as expected).

Your review website has many types of contents for guests and it is good but I notice that your site does not have any part about Provably Fair Verifier.

You can consider to add it on your site as Review will be not fully completed and correct if you don't use Provably Fair Verifier to test games on a casino you review. It's important for Crypto Casino as gamblers can verify whether a game is provably fair. It gives more trust about one casino and provided games for their users.

Welcome on your forum introducing as a casino review site, we are very happy to see you here.

I've seen some of the other reviews about the casinos reviewed by this site, but I don't see some of the casinos that I often play here? Like Sportsbet, Bitcasino and Duelbits will you add this to your personal experience playing at the casino?

I'm waiting for more reviews but I hope that in the future there are more casinos on this forum.

Agreed that it's highly relevant but not as straight forward as reviewing some other things due to limitations in supported casinos and games. Will consider, discuss and analyze others implementations. Thanks!

OP, I was thinking you should atleast give us a pictorial excerpts of how your website looks like to make your thread look catchy based on your topic.  I commend you for the copper member account upgrade seems you really have a good managerial skills and you know how to abide by forum policies when you identify with any.

However, I know you are new here and I will advise you to take cognizance of casinos here as there are a million and one of them here with good reputation. This will add more feathers to your wings here.

Your website looks a bit dull and boring could you make the graphics and colouration a bit more attractive and sharp.

We are not kids you know. Why put up a blur and animated image of Jack. M. your supposed author or psuedo owner  if you may like.  It is even better you did not put any image there only write up than putting such there.

Good suggestion regarding a screenshot and yes, it currently does look a bit dull in comparison to some other sites out there.

Regarding authors and bylines it's tricky. If you skip it completely you'll have some people complaining about that. But if you go with full names and unedited profile pictures someone might risk real life abuse because they wrote something that someone didn't like. And if you do something in between someone will be displeased with that as well :) We'll see if we can come up with something better.

Thanks!

I just went to your site to check truly if you have reviews for 1400+ casinos just as you have claimed and indeed I found the list there, but something caught my attention.

For example, Duelbits.com I had to check the review of the casino I'm currently promoting and found several things I'll like you to clear up for me. First, I saw the name Duelbits.com but they was no link for the review it only just showed me the name, the license type etcetera nothing more.
Second, I noticed that most of casinos there including Duelbits.com have "untested" so how do you review a casino you haven't tested before? Is it based on what you saw on their website or what?

maybe he tries to chat with them but sadly they still did not reply/talked with them just like stake.com too, maybe the website need to talk with their representative to be able listed on their website.

We haven't yet tested Duelbits (as in creating an account, depositing, playing various games, withdrawing winnings or talking to their support) and hence we haven't been able to review or give them a rating either.

We have just listed them, along with other casinos we are yet to test and review, with the basic information we have collected so far (name, URL, year of establishment, license, crypto/fiat payments) as a freely accessible database to anyone who's interested.

Once we have properly tested and reviewed a casino we'll mark it as reviewed and, if the conclusion was positive, we'll add them to one or several lists with actual recommendations.

Can you explain the criteria you use to rank casinos on your website's front page and other lists? While I recognize some names, there are others that I am not familiar with and I'm not sure how popular they are.

On the other hand, there are casinos which are very popular but I don't understand why they are not on your lists. I guess what I am really asking is how you decide which casinos to include in the rankings?

I visited your website and I noticed many well known crypto gambling websites and casinos are missing from there, and I dont know most of the website listed right now.
Lets first start with Sportsbet that is most active in bitcointalk forum and it has best reputation here, than there is Stake casino also missing from your website.
Few more casinos I can remember and used before are Betnomi, Livecasino, Cloudbet and others.
You can find many of them if you search in forum Gambling board.

Great question!

So as many of you know several of the most well-known and highly regarded crypto casinos have been around for about 5 to 10 years at this point.

During this time they have been consistently tested and reviewed about by every imaginable guide and comparison site, and discussed in forums like this one, of course.

If we only reviewed and listed a handful of the top brands we would probably just end up rehashing a lot of known information without really bringing anything new to the table. We'd have no real raison d'être.

Also, if you study search trends you'll realize that the more mature a particular gambling market becomes, the more demand grows for new experiences (both games and sites). We're starting to see this in the crypto gambling space as well.

So we simply felt that there was a gap to fill here and so we've been testing and reviewing both established top brands and some new brands.

However the new brands haven't been completely random up to this point. Normally the operator/program has had some kind of track record with other casinos and several brands are fiat/crypto hybrids.

Having said that, we have heard the feedback loud and clear in this thread and going forward we will work hard to catch-up with many great brands that people are missing from us so far.

I saw like two casinos that running signature and Avatar Campaigns in the forum. Such as: FortuneJack with Winz. io. The op site is okay and one thing I also discovered in the website is, they are doing two projects at once. The project of casino website Review and their personal website of casinos gambling. And the op has to do more to create more popularity in the forum. The way they arrange the site is nice, though I have seen such service by other companies as well. But I am not hearing from them again. I am not even hearing from gamblingbro again.

Maybe they have not yet started their review on the listed casino but i was wondering if they would also do a comparison between their review and other review from other website as well that have already done some review on to getting a validated result when both are being checked or measured in a scale to give an output. I think this would be very much reliable and worth it if they attempt it. it is just an idea.





I noticed same too while going through the list of the casinos on their website. Then how were they able to get a review star measurement for all of them if they have the "untested" ticker on them. I too was  curious about the whole thing.


@BitcoinCasino.to can you attend to this as we await your utmost response.

Happy to hear that you thought that the website is OK, but I'm not sure which other project/website you're referring to? Just to be clear we're not casino operators.

That's correct, not started, as confirmed in an earlier reply. We will always want to form our own opinion based on our own experiences but it makes sense to cross check our final scores with some other reputable sites and reviewers, yes.

We could also consider mentioning others final review scores somewhere (without copying any of their original content of course), if we get permission to do that.


There shouldn't be any casinos listed as "untested" with a star rating anywhere. If you find one let us know so we can correct that. Ratings are for tested casinos only, of course.

I will also say this give room for visitors visiting your website to see and read the reviews. The comments and words should be organic and not edited by team to suit their outcome of course if that happens, you know how disastrous it would be on your website and supposed casino. so it would be in your own interest not to try doing such and lastly, this idea as i have suggested earlier would go a long way in putting your website on main stream if you can be able to compare reviews between various casinos and giving a unique result after going through various stages of  review scale measurement. The output would definitely be useful for gamblers to draw and make their conclusions and final results.

That would be nice. Your review should be based on your actual experience rather than just copying someone else's work.
It may take time to come up with a comprehensive review but this will give more substance to your project.
And newcomers may find it useful if you would be transparent and honest about your experience on the site.
There are a lot of casino and sportsbooks to review but you have all the time to do your work, unless this project is a solo one.
I also believe once the team will review the top casinos found in the forum, they will soon find out that they may have new set of top rated crypto casinos.

I appreciate that you have taken the feedback from this thread into consideration.  I agree that, by testing and reviewing both established top brands and newer brands, you will be able to provide a more comprehensive overview of the market and offer readers a wider range of options to choose from. Just be careful with casinos that have a dubious reputation or a history of problems. This is important because there are many scammers out there who want to take advantage of people and it’s your responsibility not to provide them with free advertising.

You can also use the feedback from this forum to find out which brands our members like most. I'm sure they will appreciate it if you included their suggestions in future articles!
Keep up the good work!

I really like OP's supper activeness in this thread it's a prove that they are ready for business unlike some sites that just come to the forum, create their ANN thread and then disapear or reply comments/suggestions here once every week. If you continue like this I'm sure you are going to get some more suggestions that will help your review site better than the current site.

Btw, I saw something it's not a big deal though but i was hoping you could take a look at it and see if it's just me or if it happens to others as well.
In the top navigation bar when you are using desktop in full screen mode, if you click on "More" > "Crypto Gambling" it suppose to bring out more options but in full screen the options are hidden.
Although it works well when the site is reduced.
https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/27/50dca1049b9ac8199f705fe7aeb5537e.png

It works well for me both in full screen and reduced size of my browser. It is missing for me if I reduced the size too much (50%).

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/27/b029c3ee9a415f516d4ffe4dc06166c8.png

---

Welcome to OP in this crypto gambling community, I havent explored your review site much I'm impressed it with the quality of your website. It looks simple but eye-catching and easy to navigate. Honestly I'm shocked to see that you have 1400+ list of crypto casinos. I have to bookmark your site to check what is new and maybe I can find new interesting offer from casinos that I have never used before.

I believe it could be related to the resolution of your screen. Personally, on my desktop in full-screen mode, I can see all the menu items without any issues. However, when I reduce the window size, I do encounter the problem you described.

Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. As mentioned we would want and need permission to aggregate ratings from others and we'd have to think a bit about how it would be best implemented (if we got it). But it would indeed be useful for players.

---

It's not a solo project but we're a small team and hence it takes time to do it properly. But we'd rather take our time than churn out generic descriptive (or even AI generated) content that some others unfortunately do these days.

Regarding our recommendations you're likely right; our lists will probably change over time. However, the most important thing is that players can learn whether or not they can generally trust a particular casino. Besides that there will always be subjective opinions about things like the look and feel of the brand, the game selection, various features, bonus structures etc.

---

We heed your warning and that's why we've enabled comments for every brand review as well. We'll look into any feedback we receive through comments, or through this forum or in private.

We will also look into how we can possibly incorporate player feedback from Bitcoin Talk directly into the reviews as well. It's not obvious how to fairly aggregate and present an "average" opinion but we'll give it a thought.

Thank you for helping us improve.

---

Thank you for the encouragement and the bug report, we'll look into this right away. As others have already mentioned it seems to be related to the menu going out of bounds at a certain resolution.

---

"Simple" and "easy to navigate" were two of the main things that we were going for so really happy to hear that that was your first impression. There are definitely more flashy sites out there but we think that our users care more about the actual substance.

Also appreciate the welcome messages and constructive feedback so far. Warms your heart a bit after putting in many hours of work to build something.

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

In the previous response the OP said that they haven't done any testing on Duelbits so it's only natural that there aren't any reviews on this one gambling site yet.
After all in this forum there are many gambling sites listed so it takes them time to do the testing and provide reviews on every casino that is on the list.
By the way, the idea that you convey is quite good where from each casino review site you can see a different and more real about the reviews in each casino.
Maybe this idea can be considered by the OP and the working team.

At first glance on the title. I read the name of this review site as Bitcasino. Even with after multiple scan on your thread gives me same impression that this is Bitcasino that makes me interested what’s inside.

The review site is neat and easy use unlike other low class review site that full of ads all over the webpage. It’s good to see that OP is active here and I hope to add more casino that is active here in forum rather than those that is not available here.

If possible you can create a category for casino with ANn thread on Bitcointalk and none so that it can be easily distinguished by readers since casino that active here is more trusted since they are easy to approach with casino concerns.

Yesterday, based on feedback in this thread, we added a "+ BitcoinTalk Thread" note as a feature next to these casinos in our lists. Hopefully that should make it pretty easy to distinguish them.

However, we could also create a separate page with a unique list that only includes casinos with ANN threads. We'll get to work on that.

Number 1 : Bitstarz? Seriously? This alone dismisses this site as a proper crypto casino comparison site frankly speaking. Anyone with a half-decent brain is aware of the fact that Bitstarz is a shady site through and through.

Also, I couldn't find any proper reviews when I clicked on various sites in the list. I recommend avoiding this site until these issues get fixed.

Next to the "Casino" column with the logos there is a "Review" column with ratings. The casino name below the rating links to the review. It should be easy to find but if it's not obvious we'll have to re-consider the implementation.

The current sorting shouldn't be perceived as the definite or final list as we still have many, many more casinos to review. We will also try to mix older and more established casinos with newer ones, as explained previously in the thread.

But now that you can hopefully find the reviews you can check them out and hopefully learn more about our reasoning.

Now regarding Bitstarz, our own experiences have been very positive and, as you're probably aware, most other major comparison sites (e.g. BCKings, Gosu, CoinGambling, BBC etc) have given them favorable to very favorable reviews so in that sense our rating is very consistent with the current consensus.

Having said that, we have read and noted the criticism that they have received as well. It seems like most issues are related to some players gambling from expressively restricted regions and occasionally getting issues with KYCs and/or withdrawals. However, similar issues have been reported on occasion with most of the larger and popular operators. Very few (if anyone?) with any substantial market share has zero complaints.

Our conclusion, based on the number of reports vs their overall popularity and usage (and the aforementioned other professional reviews), differs from yours.

But we have noted your opinion and respect it, of course. Thanks for letting us know.

Anyone who have been in the forum for years have read about BitStarz reputation and users  accusing them. And since you mentioned you first need to talk to a casino before you give your review I guess there is a done deal happening. Just an impression that others could also have.

But I can understand if its meant for users not from around here and the casino doesn't have withdrawal fee and some free spin upon registration. Still attractive to new users.

I checked the site on my mobile and I clicked on the reviews button in the drop-down menu which led me to the same list on the homepage where a couple of points were specified. Clicking on it led me to the site. Are the reviews just those points?

Bitstarz is regarded as a scam site within this forum due to definitive proof against them.

On mobile the column names won't be visible. Click on the casino name below a star rating to see the detailed review. The logo and Play button links to the casino itself, the casino name (in plain text) links to our review.

Since we take feedback from seasoned members here seriously we have just removed Bitstarz from our primary lists while we are re-evaluating everything that has been written on Bitcoin Talk about them up until this point.

Our review of them will technically remain live in the meantime but won't be easily accessible.

Does it mean you have indexed and ranked the casino based on your opinion? I mean, which casinos offer you the best affiliate commission, and you listed them on the home page. Whoever did not respond to you did not list them on the home page. You have listed 29 casinos, and I don't think I have heard those names except for a few (Maximum five). That's mean you got a better commission offer from them, and you ranked them based on your benefits. Would you mind telling us what kind of review we can expect from you? I've seen review sites ask for reviews from users and they rank them based on users review.

Welcome to the forum.
Your website looks good, and I hope the reviews are honest and unbiased as you say, but I'm surprised not to see some of the big names of the industry in there, like Stake.com which is the number 1 casino and sportsbook platform at the moment, and you say you've reviewed and added over 1,400 casinos accepting cryptocurrencies and I think you should have covered the top ones too in that.

Anyway, as a player if you ask me, I would probably want to know if a casino is trustworthy or not, I know my deposit will go through successfully but whether I will also be able to withdraw my winnings if I manage to get any is what a review should cover.

Good and very valid questions, thanks for bringing them up so we can clarify.

Our lists are currently based on a number of factors such as the review score, the click-through rates of the visitors, the conversion rate of the visitors, the freshness of the brand, the overall reputation of the brand and more. It's not fixed forever and we'll be moving things around based on both data and user feedback.

While compensation as a ranking factor could theoretically make sense the commissions usually doesn't differ that much and so it's more interesting to observe which casinos our visitors choose and ultimately stick with.

If we recommend terrible casinos the visitors likely won't convert anyway and so it wouldn't matter what the commission is. Plus, they would start losing trust in the site. That's why we're asking for feedback and take it very seriously.

We'll always be open to reviewing our methodology but we think it makes sense at this point at least.


With regards to our selection of brands it's been covered earlier in the thread but just to recap:

Since we have identified over 1400 casinos and are reviewing them manually we've had to prioritize the order in which we work through them. So far we've tried to mix some very established, well known and generally acclaimed brands with some newer and less known brands.

The main reason for this is that we wouldn't serve much of a purpose (in our opinion, at least) if we just listed exactly same brands as others.

There's also players actively looking for new brands and/or information about a particular new brand. In those cases we can offer more value than just review no. 387 of a brand that everyone already knows.

As for user reviews we think that those are a good idea and that's why we have enabled visitor comments on every review now. We'll consider to adding user ratings (e.g. 1-5 stars) as well but we'd need to make sure that they aren't abused by operators trying to boost their own brands (or shoot down competitors). So far it seems to work pretty well for Gosu (as an example) though so we're open to the idea.

Feel free to check out our existing reviews to get an idea for what you can expect more of in the future.

We have identified and listed the basics about 1400 casinos but not yet tested and written reviews of all of them.

As you say, you need to know (at a minimum!) that withdrawals will go through and the entire process of signing up, depositing, playing, withdrawing, testing customer support, documenting the process and formatting and publishing a review simply takes time for each.

We also want to cross-check with forums like Bitcoin Talk and other reputable reviewers so we haven't missed anything.

Happy to hear that you liked the look of the site. Stake will hopefully be added soon.

@OP, you have done a great job. The good thing is that you are publishing the review after testing a casino. Judging by the "List of all Crypto Casinos", you have tested and published the review of 40 casinos only until now. I hope the tested casinos list will be bigger soon. Anyway, I don't see the reason of keeping 'URL' column in that list. The 'year' column stands for the date of launch of the casinos, isn't it? There are some wrong date of launch of some casinos in that column. You should recheck the full list. I have only highlighted 3 casinos in the screenshot, but I found the wrong launch date of more casinos.

https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/27/92f89e77adde9643b6a8413869364b12.png

I noticed that many reputable sites are not listed on the main page for casinos that accept bitcoins :(
but above all 1400 casinos?!? I have not seen all these reviews/list, where I can find it?!?

If you want to test all 14000 ... (that is something really hard and complex to be done, sites can change their status, etc etc) you must be careful because you may encounter many scams and above all "selective scams".
Some sites could recognize and make you withdraw without problems meanwhile they are just scam.

Great job bitcoincasino's team!
Reviewing 1400+ casino is too much work, I didn't even know there were that many crypto casinos!
To be honest, I didn't take a deep look at your website but I can ensure you that i'll do it as soon as I can.
It's always a pleasure to discover a new reviews website.

First of all we need to understand is that if the casino is legit and have good reputation. A gambler needs a gambling site to be honest and fair in his games. Moreover the casino also needs to be good in customer support in case of any problems arise in the site. If the site requires KYC or they are allowed in my country or not, these information should also be mentioned in the review. At last if possible share any ongoing contest or bonus they are running and mention it’s requirements.

This is so basic since we can determine a casino is reputable easily since for sure all the discussion happen in the thread can be a basis to anyone since for sure people share their sentiments or experience to determine what is current status of the casino. If we look at here we can say that all post is positive so meaning Bitcasino is excellent on delivering good platform to forum users here.

If we compare to other one which is also well known scam casino their thread has been actively criticize and been receive a lot of negative post against them.

Thank you for highlighting these, their years of establishment have now been updated along with some others. The 1400+ list could have more inaccuracies but everything should be correct in the reviews since it's normally double or triple checked at that stage.

The reasons for discrepancies is that there's sometimes mismatches between various sources (About pages vs ANN threads vs third-party databases or other reviews vs domain registration dates that are actually later than claimed launched dates etc) but we'll make sure to quickly adjust anything that is inaccurate.


Agreed, and that's why we clearly state: "The goal is to maintain a complete database and source of reference, so we're neither recommending every single casino on this list nor implying that they are to be trusted. On the contrary, many of these online casinos are likely not to be trusted." on the 1400+ page.

We will keep testing and adding the reputable casinos to the pages which actually contains recommendations.


Agreed. Country restrictions will always be a bit tricky since some operators are allowing access through VPN and some aren't - but some of those who are might occasionally claim issues with it later at withdrawal.

We obviously try to test for this but since we never know for sure how and when it's being applied we need to cross check with more sources, like feedback on this forum and other professional reviews, to form a general opinion.

To clarify, they didn't actually review 1400 online casinos. What they actually did was compile a list of nearly 1400 casino-related domain names. Many of these casinos are no longer operational, and some of the domains simply serve as mirror sites for the same casinos.

So, while the number may seem impressive at first glance, you shouldunderstand that the actual count of functional and unique online casinos may be significantly lower than the stated figure. And when it comes to the reviews and full casino descriptions, it seems that there are approximately 40 available in total.

but i just wondering how they make the list for Best Bitcoin and Crypto Casinos 2023 because a lot of websites that from the list that i don't know.
is it just based on which website you reviewed first? or are there any other criteria?

I already asked them that same thing a little while ago. They don't seem to have any specific criteria, or maybe they just don't want to share them.

Here is what they replied:

I agree with you because reviewing of 1400 online casinos isn't a child's play and can't be done in a short span. In order to review a casino you'll have to test the review for 1-7 days depending on the structure and quality of the casino. You will have to test many of the games the casino is offering and you'll have to spend enough money for the testing. Even, if you are good at testing then still you'll have to give it proper time because in a review all the details are to ne added.

I don't even think that there are 1400 online casinos out there which are working and providing service. Because most of those casinos might be set to scam the people, and only few good ones in the list would be the legit casinos that are truly working to entertain and server the gamblers. The OP should list all those sites which are truly providing valuable services, and only those sites should be reviewed in the initial stage. In the top list only the best online casinos should be placed not the ones who have been known for their shady business.

I believe that the current selection has been explained in the thread but let me know if it's still unclear. We're also currently in the process of reviewing several more of the most well known brands so you should see them soon.


Yes, you got it right regarding the process itself. We understand that we currently miss several brands that really deserve to be acknowledged but we'll get to them as soon as possible.

We obviously want to avoid promoting anyone that is generally known for being shady (we're currently re-reviewing the feedback on Bitstarz, as mentioned) but we'll want to list some lesser known brands that we've had a good experience of.

Preventing shady casinos from existing and helping to showcase genuine and quality casinos I believe is one of the major reasons why reviews are done and I stand to be corrected if I am wrong but  from observations, I have seen a good review feedback from your website on a shaddy casino well known for their negative attitude and here you are telling us you talk with casinos before you review them and I ask you a question, who in the best place is better option asking questions about a casino? Are the casinos the ones patronizing their games? Who in the next place do you think should be able to respond to questions as regards to user experience of a casino.

Asking a casino some questions about their services is like you making them be a judge in their own case which is not right and you do not expect an honest feedback or response from them because they would want to seal up their loopholes making them look alright and reliable when in the real sense they are not. I think the idea of asking casino questions is not ok to go buy because you would never get an honest answer from them but rather public opinion for instance gamblers who have patronized the casino can be in a better position to say something. If there is anything a review site should possibly want from a casino I guess it should be their policies, terms and conditions of service. These would help set the records for them while the gamblers do the sayings on their experience with the casino.

If you're referring to Bitstarz, yes, our review was positive because our own experience has been positive. It's also one of the oldest and most popular crypto casinos and has been reviewed positively by most major review sites (BCKings, Gosu, CoinGambling, BBC), as we've previously pointed out.

If you choose any major crypto casino and google their brand name + "scam" you will find numerous claims, even if the casino is generally considered legitimate. Try it with Stake for example. Illegitimate claims can make it difficult to identify legitimate claims and popular operators all get them.

Having said that we have already removed Bitstarz while we're re-reviewing their particular claims.

Also, our reviews are not based on what a casino tells us about themselves but based on our experiences actually playing at the casino.

Hope that clarifies things.

The problem is you are promotin here in the forum which Bitstarz have known proven scam incident that didn't took care many years ago when they have a chance. You can refer here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=30726. for the reference of their previous scam accusation.

We respect your experience but even if the casino is working for you safely then you will ignore the fact that they have an active case. You are promoting a review site which aims for players to guide them on choosing proper casino based on your judgement. What if Bitstarz scam the person that you invite since they have a record of scamming someone? Would you take the blame?

All you have said is not in any ways a concern to me but for good opinion and Service delivery I had to make an input.
It is generally known about bitstarz to be a Scam casino but on your review site it fit a clear pass  meaning it has no issues. If I may ask did you really do a proper survey by also asking gamblers who have patronized the casino before because in only doing so, you can be able to get something tangible information about the casino to write about  but it seems you didn't looking at your response in you agreeing to removing it for the intereem means you did not  do due diligence before giving it a pass on your website.

Lastly, you said you write from your experience playing it as a casino then I do not think you can get a concrete information to do a review without looking outward to other gamblers who have patronized the casino. You alone can not get what it takes to get or do a clean review as it would be distorted and inaccurate. Do well to include other modalities for your review to be adequate.

Do not forget that a tree can not make up a forest likewise you too can not just make up a review on your own.

We did indeed do our due diligence and the consensus outside of this forum is that it's a solid operator, which is also the opinion of some members of this forum as well.

Quick case in point including some of the largest and most respected comparison sites, both general and crypto-focused:

https://www.askgamblers.com/online-casinos/reviews/bitstarz-casino (including 522 user ratings)
https://casino.guru/BitStarz-Casino-review (including 428 user ratings)
https://www.casinomeister.com/casino-reviews/bitstarz/
https://lcb.org/casinos/bitstarz
https://bitcoincasinokings.com/reviews/bitstarz/
https://cryptomaniaks.com/bitstarz-review
https://www.coinbuzz.com/casino-reviews/stars-casino/
https://coingambling.info/reviews/bitstarz-casino/
https://www.btcgosu.com/review/bitstarz-casino/

And so on.

We respect that there's a difference in opinions here (which should be obvious since we've agreed to re-review the concerns that have been raised) but our original review score was not really deviating from the norm.

Hopefully that's enough clarification about the original inclusion of this particular operator. Thanks for giving us some food for thought.

You are welcome OP. You see that is one of the reasons you and I are here so as to make inputs and genuine review so as to render services and to derive satisfaction from services rendered. Comments, reviews and inputs are part of the process of making and noting errors in every organisation. It helps the organisation go along way by molding them to the standard and taste of the society so they could stand out and tall in the society. You and your organisation are not exempted in this particular exercise too. It is nice you did the right thing by acknowledging the fact that you need things done accurately and properly. You have a good project to go by. I wish you and your organisation good luck.

Agreed. Thank you for taking the time to provide feedback and help us improve further.

I would like to include one thing here as you have already given the reference of other websites including BTCGOSU. Most of the gamblers and forum members have their trust on btcgosu. Therefore, forum members shouldn't raise questions here if they trust BTCGOSU decisions. 'efialtis' had published an article for Bitcointalk forum members after adding BitStarz review on the site: BTCGOSU adds BitStarz Casino (https://www.btcgosu.com/blog/news/btcgosu-adds-bitstarz-casino/)

Thanks for pointing this out. We trust the judgment of Gosu and proven authorities like Casinomeister, AskGamblers and Casino Guru as well.

Unfortunately there will probably always be some controversies associated with major casino operators so we'll just have to continue keeping track and re-evaluating as we go. That's our responsibility as serious casino guides.

By popular request from this forum and elsewhere we have several new additions like Stake, BC.Game, Flush and others. More coming soon!

Sorry for being brutally honest, bitcasino.to. But this looks bad. You are addressing the speech to students, so you need to use you instead of we. Saying that you are in need of money doesn't look good and makes you less credible. Just a friendly advice: replace "we" in the above quoted sentence with "" you". Am not an English native speaker, but this is how I interpreted it.