Bitcoin Forum

Altcoin (ATC) brings the best features of Bitcoin to the Ethereum network, offering holders an alternative digital currency built on the most robust ecosystem in the space. Altcoin is Ethereum's answer to Bitcoin, as it provides the same fixed supply of 21 million, allowing for ATC to serve as the store of value asset and digital cash for the Ethereum network. ATC is completely decentralized, with a renounced contract, no VCs or team tokens, and no control over it by any centralized entity.

Twitter: https://twitter.com/altcoinerc20

Website: https://www.altcoinerc.org

Contract:
0xd4FB1BC9D4bf32Cda273A7764457aF89004cE445

Chart:
https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x75c14d8fdec653fe0228cf69902b3195b3c1965c

Since you are comparing this to BTC and Ethereum then you guys have a lot of work to do. If it is an Alternative to Ethereum and Bitcoin then it should have its own chain but for now, the project is on Ethereum, this is a concern to me. Looking into your website it is all these common information you get from different shitty projects out there and nothing new to make me say this could be different this time. You need to show substance to make people believe in your project and this is what I always tell people quality projects will always shine and rule, do not chase price

The truth is that, trying to compare the acclaimed coin with Bitcoin or Ethereum is a dead at arrival thing and as a matter of fact this is a big red flag for investors who already know and have had experience with such coins in the past and who promise unrealistic promises and at the end pulling and exit one on investors who gulf there trust for coins.


So instead of focusing on trying to compete with an already existing coin like Bitcoin, why not channel the energy on improving your platform in other to provide a better alternative and serve the purpose you created the coin?

I mean just because something has the same skematics as bitcoin doesn't make it bitcoin lol.  I can clone bitcoin in a couple steps and call it whatever I want.  I mean I wish you luck if you have good intentions but calling something altcoin to me sounds a bit on the edge of not putting too much effort into the very minimal things involved.  Just a hunch though

So what do we call this one, the btc and eth killer?  ;D
I think it will be better if it has a vc and team tokens but at least has a real unique feature other than being a copy clone of btc or eth, (it is had to tell).
Having a 21 million supply does not make it a worthy opponent, there is much to do than just having similar supply. in other for this project to prove it has the both qualities of these top coins, it needs a stress test to prove that, then you can boldly say it has the "features of Bitcoin to the Ethereum network".

Didn't think much about the name huh? Altcoin, is another altcoin that's gonna be an altcoin of the century.

Honestly, how many of these projects have been saying that they're bringing Bitcoin to this, that network and had all the features and could even beat bitcoin.

What’s the advantage of this project over Bitcoin and why do you need to compare it?
Is this under ETH network and a new project to kill ETH itself? I’m still confuse why many developer still want to compare their work to Bitcoin and claimed to be a better option. I can’t see any positive reviews about this project, can you share more details about this one and probably convince us why this project is worth to try.

Probably because the name Shitcoin was already taken...  :D
 

Unfortunately, too many of them.

Yeah. It never fails to amuse me when I come across these feeble attempts. So, they claim to be bringing the best features of Bitcoin to Ethereum? And the only feature they mention is a limited supply of 21 million? I can't help but wonder, what happened to all the other Bitcoin's features?

Yeah, that makes sense.  :P

And eventually, all of them will turn into vanish.

Based on what I see its another shitcoin in Ethereum chain, there's no feature that can differentiate this token from all the shitcoins we have in the past and in the present, if you are different then why not create your own chain and for the lack of good name you come up with a generic name.
Everything I've seen on the site, its features, and so-called advantages I have already seen in so many shitcoin, so I consider this an altcoin shitcoin.

Another shit scam token. It's funny how a garbage token developer called to bring bitcoin features to the ethereum blockchain. It if you have now knowledge what bitcoin is and it's better if you are not even issuing this kind of shit scam token.

It's no more than just a shit scam token that selling the name of bitcoin. What you have said above was actually BS.

There's no need to bring what owned by bitcoin to the ethereum. What features of owner by bitcoin? Payment system? Are you kidding me?

There is no alternative solution in my point of view, in fact it would only add more unnecessary transactions on the main network.
This is just another low end project that is also trying its luck on hype like memes. I would even better trust WBTC if I had to choose.

I appreciate the effort, time and ideas you've put into this, but it's completely useless, mate. Take a look at how people here respond to the tokens you created, there really isn't a positive response and that's true. My advice, value your time to think of revolutionary ideas for the advancement of the crypto industry, not like this $ATC. The website of $ATC also looks so simple, if there's no money to develop a project, don't do it, mate. It will be useless in today crypto era.

To be honest I don't like Altcoin naming. It's like taking the long-used term Atlcoins in cryptocurrency and then you apply it to your project. This sounds like a lot of meme coins bashing names on well-known coins.

In the past, there was also a project called Islamcoin. And I immediately thought something like this was very unethical to do.
I'm not saying that your project is not good just that I think your project is not suitable for me.

Sorry but this is my personal opinion.

It is stupid to think that Bitcoin has value only because its supply is equal to 21 million, or that any limited supply means that the price or growth will be an example of Bitcoin. You have a problem that everyone who wants to deal with Altcoin (ATC) will need to buy Ethereum, which is built on top of it, so it is impossible for it to be better than Ethereum, which is like saying that Bitcoin is better than the Internet.
You can compare Altcoin (ATC) with Polygon or any smart contracts built on the Ethereum blockchain.

Something like this with limited views on btc and eth isn't even worth competing with shitcoin meme, OP doesn't feel embarrassed to share it here for people to criticize the poor quality product and get spread in a professional manner.
I think OP shouldn't be upset by people's words either because it's absolutely true, be more realistic and if you're part of that give up the thought of taking advantage of these, please Be more serious with products that have been and are being developed properly, don't just turn yourself into a stalker like that.

I seriously have no idea whats the point with all these shit coins generated for the sake of imitating the already existing coin, moreover the name itself I guess it couldn't be more generic than this current name right?

Usually they do that to gather peoples attention. But all crypto enthusiast knows that there is no more better than those coins especially when a new one released out of nowhere claiming that they are better without giving any context on their claims. Much really better for them to stop comparing there created coin to Bitcoin since.if they do that many will got turned off about their statement and  provably people will just ignore it because people might just thought that this is just another shitcoin created by ambitious dev.

Nice shill but a token gain popularity by accident and more of a coincidence approach on the market. There is no difference of this to other shitcoin or memecoin since its really a token created with a description similarly with bitcoin? So what the heck every token can be a store of value as long as it has demand. But the details itself wont be enough to let it grow like bitcoin especially its just created so easily. Someone could deploy a contract with the same tokenomics under different name.

I'm not sure if the people who bought it actually did research on the mentions the OP mentioned surrounding this thing. But to be honest with me the marketing of a project like this is not the first time I've seen it, and admittedly it's just a shitcoin that likes to hype about the potential, if possible learn to get addicted to it. Research some memes to reposition yourself as to what they're doing and what they want with the people who will reach your product.

Nice name. The marketing team probably decided it was free publicity if they used the word Altcoin for their coin. The site could use some improvements. The header image is even blurred for some reason, plus the design seems bland and boring. Just screams of "this coin was made to shit on you and take your money" type of thing, which most altcoins do, but hey, at least they do some effort on the website design. Yours doesn't.

In my opinion, altcoins (ATC) do not have funding from venture capitalists or tokens for development teams. This indicates that this project is not related to the interests of certain third parties or internal groups that can influence decision making or project control.

From the name of the coin to calling it the new Bitcoin, it seems like you didn't put so much effort into it. I'm not trying to diminish your hopes or discourage you but this is poorly done.
Why name an altcoin "Altcoin". I would like to know the inspiration behind it. It's like naming a school a "school"
I went through the website and it didn't look like anything special. It's just the same stuff we've been seeing all the time with different projects.

it always baffles me how these shitcoin could always come up with the shittiest idea ever like if you even put slightest creativity to your project you will most likely not gonna be giving name like altcoin which is
on its own already looks like a joke since what creative souls out there gonna name their altcoin, just "altcoin" which is pretty silly.
i'm just gonna point out that this coin will not gonna succeed, after all from the naming itself already means its a joke.

most certainly, those big venture capitals are not gonna be throwing their investment money randomly like that. if they see this project the first thing come up to their mind would be nah this definitely not gonna get any investments.

This is the very first thing I thought as well, the OP wants to make us believe their coin is an alternative to bitcoin and yet it does not has its own chain, so I find their claims to be completely out of place.

Also we have heard before about developers promoting their coin as being better than bitcoin or ethereum, but this is the first time I read someone claiming that their coin is better than both at the same time, something that is ridiculous taking into account those are the two best coins we have on the market.

Wait. Do you mean a project on the ETH network but has a fixed amount of 21 million coins? If that's the case I don't find anything good about this project. Sorry. I can say good because it is a fixed amount. But what can be expected by giving the same amount as Bitcoin? I think the application of Bitcoin is still too big even when compared to ETH.

Claiming that you are an alternative to bitcoin had been done repeatedly already and most of them had been treated as a shitcoin and most of them are dead projects right now. I believe that if you want to do a real project, don't make a bitcoin alternative since it's been tried several times already and no one successfully achieved it. At least make your own blockchain and not do it on ethereum chain which is actually defeats the purpose of being a bitcoin alternative. I honestly don't think that this project will get some funds in the public if ever you make a crowd sale or other type of sale.

Even if the supply of BTC is not exactly 21 million, it will still be valuable because it is the first crypto. There's even cryptos out there whose supply is so massive but they still have a good value. It means, the supply is not all.

The OP did not say that this ATC is better than Ethereum but he is only saying that it's a good alternative to Bitcoin. Maybe yes? Because that is what altcoins in general are good at. They can supply the missing functions of Bitcoin, that some people are looking at. There are lots of altcoins out there and it's too early for now to praise this ATC coin the OP is sharing to us but we will watch it. Let see if it will still be relevant after some time.

Another decent alternative to Ethereum and Bitcoin, but not having the same properties as these 2 major cryptocurrencies. It is funny how different shitcoins try to parasitize on famous projects and refer to them. Altcoin (ATC) is not the answer, it is a parody and a copycat, call things by their proper names. The beauty of bitcoin is not that it has a fixed supply of 21,000,000 coins, which you copy in your project. Its beauty is in complete decentralization, which you definitely do not have, because Altcoin (ATC) has a developer, who can control the project, including for his own purposes.

Altcoin (ATC) concept may sound very interesting and I think this claim is overly ambitious and will generate skepticism. As you may already know, Bitcoin and Ethereum have established themselves as the leading cryptocurrencies with strong track records, strong ecosystems, and widespread adoption. I think that's light-hearted, if you want to say about (ATC). For example, there are advantages or innovative solutions offered by this Altcoin so that it differentiates itself in a crowded market. that's all I think is enough.