Bitcoin Forum

My friend Will send goverment wich one i don't say the project to start teaching young kids in School about future of Money.like TRON USDT TRC20
Crypto is future when Youngi generation will start learn about Stablecoins.
Teach all ready your kids to keep their trx balance up If they want to pay with USDT tron Stablecoins.
Once young generaton will adopt Stablecoins knowledge we get to going and rock.
Stablecoins are here to stay and Donald trump Will approve them for the. World.

So young people need to be teached how to use USDT USDC and other Stablecoins it's our duty to teach them so faster they adopt the faster all move into Full crypto economy

Though I can understand the intention and purpose of this, it is vital to conduct a study first. What I mean is that we should know at what age and intensity should children learn about this things. As innovative as it to let our kids learn about this things early, there should be a well researched basis regarding this as it may cause issues (mentally and psychological) to kids if we push them to something that is too cognitively advance.

The future we know is cryptocurrency and for we to get it right before then there's a need to educate the young generation about these things but there should be an acceptable age range, as children they shouldn't be overload with things beyond their capacity. If we're talking about high school children that's to be taught about money use then the teachings  should be purely in the basics of cryptocurrency.
And it doesn't have to be so fast, as children it has to be a gradual process, one step at a time given how distinctive each child learning speed  can be, even with most adults they still find difficulty in the development of their knowledge on crypto.

Why should the younger generation learn about stablecoins? become slaves to corporations upholding capitalists and hindering their freedom? Don't be silly, stablecoins don't need to be deepened because the point is that it makes you not move freely with your finances and is subject to policy. You will be taxed, your finances will still be monitored, so what's the point in the future if you still don't have your own financial freedom?

What they can do with stable coin? They cannot earn huge by just simply holding it to their wallet. Then why choose if stable coin if you have fiat? We can widely use fiat anywhere we want compare on stable coins where we are able to do limited transaction with this. I may rather choose kids about bitcoin and other volatile crypto since high risk, high rewards and its good that they know how to handle investment struggles since it can help them grow.

If you think stablecoin adoption for young kids is the way to make them wake with economic and finances then you don't understand stabcoins. If you want stablecoins that badly, then what is the difference between stablecoins and it's transaction with you fiat(dollars) and invoices? Is there much different, has that change the economy so far, I don't because it's the same thing that is been circulate over the years, stablecoin is not what you need to get your kids ready but understanding the financial system of the government and how to escape it by investing early on yourself.

You can choose to gift your child some stablecoin and to keep it for years until they become of age but by that time, the stable coin will worth penny by the time they come of age, they will not have much to buy with it but if you have invested it and keep it for them, if they see how it appreciate over the years, they will grow with that confidence for the rest of their life, they will appreciate you for that route and gift because not every child get financial advice at their young age and that turnouts to be a problem when they grow.

I wouldn't be selective with investment for your child but in anything you do, include bitcoin for them, not necessarily only bitcoin but add a fraction of it to see how important it will be for them in the future because you are starting something big for them.

Stablecoins have significant potential for a decentralized economy model. However, explaining stablecoins to young children can confuse them. First of all, when explaining the economy to children, it is necessary to explain the economy through the existing system. When they will start their business life in the future, they need to know basic economics and i am sorry to say that economic relations in the world do not take place through stablecoins.

It may be thought that i am an anti stablecoin person, but on the contrary, i think that stablecoins and cryptocurrencies will open the door to decentralized finance that i have always wanted. For now, it is enough for stablecoins to fulfill their purpose. What is this purpose? To provide protection from the high volatility and loss of value in the market. But if stablecoins are fully integrated into the economy, governments will have the luxury of monitoring every transaction. This has many positive and negative aspects.

Donald Trump is not the president of the United States. If you are referring to him in the present, if he is not in the presidency, then how can he initiate that program? Maybe to initiate that program, he only has to move some things here and there (I hope you understand what I mean). And by doing that, he might accomplish the goal of enabling the teaching of BTC to younger people.

Just like El Salvador's new teaching program for young ones. This would be a great opportunity for all of us (of course, those who are young ones), but it will also be a great opportunity for the parents who are dedicated to the BTC or cryptosphere. But of course, if there is good, then there is bad too. That means if there are people who believe in crypto, then there are those who don't, and they will definitely not want crypto to be taught in schools. But to be honest, I will have only one suggestion for those.

You should at least have the opportunity, as in school only things will be told not to be forced on children. It must be added as an extracurricular activity that is optional, and kids based on their preference, interest, or approval from parents could join this, and those who do not want to can ignore it.

PS: You should check for spelling and grammatical mistakes using some tools maybe I do not know how but please correct them.

The economy is not moving towards stablecoin because it is just as pegged with fiat and that is more like putting the prospect of freedom of the young in doubt. The economy is heading in the phase of unconditional freedom free from any trade hitch in payment platforms giving you the choice to choose between preferred means of transaction and not just caging you to a third party model. The world is moving pass that stage and the young need to be more abreast with blockchain and cryptocurrency education. Moreover, trump is facing his allegations and he is not in Congress to legislate or pass any bill.

Its stablecoin. There is nothing to teach for that except how to send and receive using their wallets and which blockchain it uses. Stablecoins are just like fiat that just turned into digital using blockchain. But then we are up to this again.

What schools should be teaching is thorough economics, which we learn in trading from why money has value down, how a country fall once finance is a mess and a limited supply of currency is much better than government has the right to print. This is so that they won't mess up again like the people who created this financial system.

The general knowledge about bitcoin should be their (our) number priority to teach kids out there because having only the knowledge of trx and any other stablecoin may not give them a good representation of what bitcoin is all about. To me its advisable for upcoming age children or students should be more routed into the knowledge of blockchain technology as we knows it to be the future of finance and we should we be more careful while dealing with anything that relates it because mistakes are often made and we should be able to reduced and minimized those mistake by giving them the basic understanding on how they are being operated and used for their purposes.

Why not also teach them about decentralized bitcoin instead of only stable coins? If we want to teach our young generation we must explain the value of having financial independence, which can only be attained with bitcoin rather than a stable coin that is centralized and subject to manipulation.

Stable coins are fine in my opinion, but we need to teach our young generation the fundamentals of bitcoin and the blockchain before going on to explain the impact of centralization and the importance of decentralization in the cryptocurrency industry so that they can comprehend the motivation behind the invention of bitcoin.

Teaching the younger generation about crypto is very good and highly recommended as long as they are worthy of receiving it well, because if the generation being taught is still in elementary school it will also be more difficult to accept it because they still have to learn other important things in their life. But if you are so determined to teach them about it, you have to have enough time because after introducing them to stablecoins, you also have to introduce what networks are supported by stablecoins such as USDT and USDC.

I think this will take quite a bit of time because those who receive crypto knowledge also need time to understand it well and don't forget to tell them about the risks involved in crypto so they can understand this from an early age. Because often new people who learn about crypto often forget about the risks that exist in the crypto space, which makes them unable to stay in crypto for long when they start facing risks. Even though stablecoins are not cryptocurrencies that have more risks like other coins, they also need to be explained so that they can understand them well when they start learning.

Right, stable coins are certainly an important part of the crypto ecosystem and it is also important for countries which are going though inflationary periods, when their local currency is not suitable to be held in the mid or long term.

Also, what does Donald Trump have to do with the widespread use of stable coins and education for the youngest generations about it? Donald Trump is rather an economical dinosaur, who believes that blockchain technology is a scam, even if he actually held Bitcoin or Ether, he would not openly admit it.

Rather than helping stable coins and Bitcoin, Trump is probably going to push for people to ditch Tether and use the CBDC issued by the government of the USA instead. That is a long term plan, after all, Trump is not informed enough (and probably does not even want to be informed) to know of the importance of decentralization.  ::)

I remember another low-rank account that's also promoting stablecoins. It seems this new account belongs to the same user.

There's probably no point convincing you otherwise, but please know that stablecoins can't be the future because their existence is tied with fiat. If fiat dies, they too will die. If fiat evolves into a CBDC, it would lose some of its relevance. And governments would never adopt a currency privately issued and controlled by a foreign individual whose reputation is even questionable.

Also, Donald Trump can't dictate to the rest of the world which currency they prefer to use.

I don't think that's needed? I mean you don't see schools teach their students how to use the internet, and we all know how it is one of the top factors in trying to adopt a lot of new technologies nowadays. Let it stay the way it is, I hardly doubt fiat would disappear, or if it ever did, I don't think stablecoins would replace it. The way/method to use money would ultimately end up being taught by how their surroundings live their lives, kind of like a natural development at this point.

If, for some reason, they needed to use stablecoins, look it up. I don't think anyone below 16 would have a reason to, but anyone above would probably know how to look things up so I don't see a problem with just leaving it alone.

Is your country still don't have any digital fiat or mobile banking? I really doubt it.

Stable coin or digital fiat are only a payment mechanism, it's not something you get a lot money when you already understand and use stable coin. Even there's a country accept every cryptocurrencies as legal tender, if you're not working you will not make any money and you're be a rubbish for your country.

Why do I have the feeling that this forum user is an alt account of another guy, who was spamming the Economics forum with posts about stablecoins and especially the Tron blockchain. Is this an alt account of the forum user Shortmaster? Just take a look at Shortmaster's posts-all of them are a bunch of nonsense about stablecoins and praising the Tron blockchain. I don't know what's the purpose of the guy, who is behind those two forum accounts. Is he getting paid for writing a bunch of low quality posts here? I don't think so. Is he trolling? Probably yes.

Yea cryptocurrency is good but not stablecoins because they are centralised. USDT is fiat which is and every country has their fiat currency. The young generations need a decentralized currency (bitcoin) that is censorship resistance and a hedge to inflation and not stablecoins that is the opposite. Bitcoin is a store of value and will aprreciate in price with time,this why the younger generations should be thought so that they can have financial freedom from governments and banks. Not stable coins that can be affected by inflation and can be controlled by the government. OP,it is your choice to do whatever you like but dont come here to tell us to patronize centralized system because we want our privacy safe.

Wouldn't that be a bit confusing for children to understand fiat currency which is their local currency and stablecoins which is digital currency for online transactions only.
Preferably, kids should be thought about their immediate economy and expenses since they are very good at demanding  :D.

Crypto and stablecoins is something they will eventually come to understand gradually as they become grown up, Crypto revolution is just getting started, the world will embrace crypto as means of transactions and the majority of the world's population will adopt it eventually. I don't think it is necessary to introduce it to children at early stage, there is plenty of time to do that.

I can understand the teaching of bitcoin as something different from the modern economy of SWIFT and banking systems and a central economy based on the dollar as a global reserve currency and trust in central banks that save gold and dollars and print papers in return that promise to have value but USDT are they serious? USDT is a representation of trust in banks, in addition to the trust that there is $1 for every USDT printed, and this is completely wrong.
Teaching children that USDT is real and has value is not good and you should talk to them to stop.

I'd rather teach my kids to be strong holders of Bitcoin than teach them to keep their stablecoins. They will teach themselves things outside of Bitcoin because we have taught them about a better investment than holding Stablecoins.

But it's okay if you want to teach your children or the younger generation so they can also hold stablecoins. But don't forget to teach them about holding Bitcoin as their investment. I'm sure they will learn about crypto once they understand Bitcoin.

But we also have to adapt to their age in teaching these children. Maybe you can wait until they become teenagers so they can understand what you are explaining.

That brings us to the right age to put children through with blockchain, bitcoin and all the gamut of digital currency because some children are precocious enough that they can assimilate faster than others. So would you then say such children are not of a particular age whilst they are already asking such questions as they either see them on the internet. I think no need to wait if a child is already inclined in the way that they are asking to know about blockchain and you know they have that speed to learn and understand.

Doesn't the adoption of crypto introduce something entirely different when one begins to contemplate within the realm of cryptocurrencies? Perhaps children taught about USDT will gradually become comfortable using stablecoins for cross-border transactions. Subsequently, over time, they begin to delve into blockchain technology and explore other coins like Bitcoin, driven by their growing curiosity.

In my opinion, it's not a bad way to initiate children's journey into the crypto world, even if it commences with the less intricate steps involving USDT. As long as venturing into Bitcoin for the first time doesn't run afoul of government regulations, why not?

It only serves to confuse children. Also, I don't understand why you gave the stable coin example. If you want them to be economically good individuals, teach them the basics and then explain the options they will invest in. I think this would also be wrong because children learn and adopt things they are curious about more quickly. If they ask you, answer their questions and start teaching.

If you want to do something for kids, buy Bitcoin and Ethereum and keep them until your kids grow up, then gift them.

The first question for OP is, why not Bitcoin, and why stablecoin? Why teach about controlled shit when we can give them the chance for freedom? Stablecoins are 1 to 1 pegged digital money that is controlled the same way government controls the fiat money. Are you not better of by teaching them local currency? Why make things complicated?

As for TRC20 USDT stablecoin. Tron chain is shit, They have been doing some shady thing for a while now. I don't think your choice is the right one even if you stick to teaching about stablecoins. Do some research before doing that.

Teach them the concept of Bitcoin but not the whole complicated thing about Bitcoin. That way they will become more interested in it. And when they do, you can introduce them to Bitcoin. The thing that is built based on the concept.

Found it difficult to read your post but I understood what you were trying to communicate with your write up. You're making a mistake thinking stablecoin are going to be the future of money. You made the right statement when you said crypto will be the money of the future (crypto is the future) but that crypto isn't going to be stablecoin but Bitcoin. Bitcoin is going to see more adoption than stablecoin because soon people will begin to start losing trust in stablecoin as more of them begin to fail. I'm not wishing this on the community but we have so many poorly designed stablecoin that they have to fail soon to avoid cursing more damages in the future when they have seen more adoption than what they have currently.


I don't think we have to do that because they're not as important as bitcoin, our duties is to teach the younger generation about Bitcoin and not stablecoin. We haven't seen the best version of stablecoin and it doesn't make any sense teaching people about this poorly designed version but we have only one Bitcoin and this is how bitcoin is going to be forever so it's important we teach not just the younger generation but everyone about bitcoin. I don't understand where the misconception of adopting growing faster with the adoption of stablecoin is coming from, just as we have been lied to for years of adopting growing faster because of the increase in centralized exchanges all those are lies because adoption is going to come through bitcoin and peer2peer exchange.

Yes, that's true. But we should also be able to adapt the lessons to their age so that they are not confused. Maybe they can assimilate more quickly than other children, but organizing what we can teach them would certainly be better.

They can learn the basics of crypto according to their interests and what they can accept. If they get older and have mastered what we teach, we can increase the lessons until they are adults so they can use crypto well.

We can also learn together with them via the Internet. But we must adapt the lessons to what they want to learn first.

The question is why USDT and also why stablecoins? isn't bitcoin much better compared to that. The level of people's trust regarding decentralized economic models or in other words centralized coins like USDT is not much different from fiat and so where is the advantage. Also talking about Donald Trump and now to what extent his influence can impact USDT growth and how we make an assessment of all this. What needs to be adopted by the younger generation is how they can act on their own desires in making investments.

Bitcoin provides freedom and bitcoin provides a solution to the compilation problems faced by any currency. So providing education to the younger generation about bitcoin is much more useful than providing education about USDT. It is at this level that the younger generation's awareness must be able to sort and choose what is best to help them achieve financial freedom.

I would never agree that a complete transition to a crypto economy can be achieved so quickly, although adoption is already underway across the board and if countries still don't want it then it is unlikely that will happen any time soon. Bitcoin, which has been proven to provide a good difference, has not yet found a common ground in the a number of government's assessment and there are still those who prohibit it to date let alone USDT.

Stablecoins are no different from fiat money in digital form and using them is very simple for today's youth. As long as someone can use a smartphone, it can be used easily. Why do we have to teach young people about stablecoins, isn't this a waste of time? Instead, why don't you create an educational proposition about decentralized currency (bitcoin) for them? That's what the world needs, no one needs another version of fiat. Furthermore, I don't think stablecoins can last long as governments are about to launch their CBDCs.

If having stablecoin savings for your children is what you envision as an effective financial investment for them, then you are mistaken because when they want to use that investment when they are older, it will still be worth what you initially invested. You can only exchange your currency for a stable coin in order to prevent loss due to market volatility, you should be aware of what stablecoins stand for.

Bitcoin might be added as a top priority among the coins you purchase for them if you are truly interested in investing for their future needs. Given that it is for a long time, you will certainly see a return on your investment when your children reach that age. You are free to try out with different cryptocurrencies, but you must do so at your own risk. Additionally, a child's age dictates when you can start teaching them about financial literacy, you should not invite them to learn about earning money, managing money, and enjoying financial independence while their brains are still developing and fragile. 

You are right, bitcoin is much better and it should be bitcoin without a doubt, people could have some sort of different approach to this and that's understandable, they may think that USDT is better because we grew up thinking that dollar is the best currency but the day is not the same day anymore and Bitcoin is much better and if you are young starting to save up bitcoin while growing up will be great, even parents starting to save up bitcoin for their kids on their name is even better.

Raising a person is not cheap, even if they grow older, it's harder, even today at 30+ years old, if I ever face a problem the first person I will ask help from is my parents because they are my parents, try to avoid it as much as I can, but if I have no other option then they are the first one to call.

That is why we need more academics to conduct studies about this first. We cannot make assumptions based on examples as we are talking about a child's cognitive capacity here. We cannot risk to just push our children to learn something they either have no interest in or are still not capable of completely understanding as it may affect their cognitive and psychological health. A study of what age is suited for this type of discussion and formal education is neeed so we can have a well-based knowledge of what age graph should we focus on. We cannot just dive head first on situations such as this just because there are a number of children showing interest in blockchain, bitcoin and other digital currency, we need to have a basis of just how effective having an actual education and proper discussion about these with children of specific age group. I'm just saying that it is better to be prepared first before we let our desire of sharing what we know to children gets the best of us.

I do understand what you are trying to say in this discussion regarding this subject. Additionally, while it is a good idea for young people to learn about cryptocurrencies, we must also take into account the activities they should engage in while they are still young. It's beneficial that we start to educate them about this part of the future of cryptocurrencies and gradually introduce them to it. The most crucial factor is that we thoroughly instruct them when we observe in them a desire and interest to understand what we are doing in this area of Bitcoin or cryptocurrency business.

I agree more with the statement that USDT is not much different from fiat, because from what has been seen it is quite clear that USDT is a coin whose value is not much different from fiat currency so it is only suitable for storing value. Meanwhile, Bitcoin is a coin which, with all its advantages, is more suitable for use in investment because of its greater increase in value, although every investor does not forget about the risks when owning it. So both have very different advantages and are not really worth comparing.

Regarding education, it should be more directed towards Bitcoin than USDT because Bitcoin has long been trusted by many people with very real benefits, whereas for USDT there is nothing that needs to be understood apart from its value which tends to remain like fiat currency. So education must be directed more towards Bitcoin than others because when the younger generation already understands how Bitcoin is, they will definitely seek their own understanding of other coins over time.

And what's unique is that now when there is a shop or restaurant that wants to accept Bitcoin for payment, the shop or restaurant also wants to accept USDT as payment. This means that when Bitcoin starts to be accepted by many people in the world, of course USDT can also participate even though its use will not be as widespread as Bitcoin. And from what you said, I also see that when a country still doesn't accept Bitcoin in any case, USDT won't mean anything in that country either.

It is too early to teach to the young ones what are the ages your target to teach them? If it's below 10 sure they will ignore those better to specify the target audience because not all children may educate with this system must need to know the target audience properly.
There's nothing wrong with educating them because sooner or later they will discover this too and use it in the future it's for their sake too. At that time the cryptocurrency might probably already been adopted by some organizations and companies so they easily use the platform conveniently. Better make sure the provided information, tutorials, or guidelines to them is enough to understand the concept of it.

How will they think of something different, since it is basically based on dollar, and we cannot even guarantee that this link will continue for many years, and if we assume that it maintains the value, the coins can be frozen^[1] inside the wallets^[2], and can be burned. There is not an example of decentralization. I would be more understanding if we talked. About DAI.

If Bitcoin conflicts with government regulations, then USDT will certainly be, and you do not need to teach them to use real Bitcoin, but rather testnet coins. There is no legislation that conflicts with testnet.


[1] [2]  Most Stablecoins Can Be Frozen, Even in Your Own Wallets (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5204055.0)

Stablecoins are a part of the question of what kinds of money exist, so I do agree that they should be mentioned in school programs. However, they don't deserve more attention than, for example, decentralized cryptocurrencies, which present a truly innovative way of issuing and exchanging money. I also think it's important to give attention to fiat, considering that it's the most commonly used kind of money. All should be taught in balance, with looking at potential risks, positive and negative sides of things. Focusing just on stablecoins doesn't make sense to me.

I like the idea of teaching young kids about finance as soon as they are able to start to comprehend it.  But I don't think teaching them about stablecoins is really the best idea.  I personally don't think stable coins are the future, so I would focus more so on teaching them about bitcoin when it comes to cryptocurrency education.  But that is just me.

Maybe what OP is trying to tell is the practice of using Cryptocurrency as a mode of transaction. These young fellas will learn from scratch, and then go into the world of many roots of BTC. Instead of getting nimbled and getting wired up to everything, they will just start with the stablecoins. After that then they can later use other altcoins or maybe BTC itself.

The idea is putting the adaptation of cryptocurrency so that it will continue in the future by little by little education embeded by the parents to their children.

Regarding the issue of dollar dominance, it does have a large level of influence among other fiat currencies, but this does not guarantee that the dollar can maintain the value of the currency we have in the long term because of the problem of depreciation. Bitcoin provides a solution as a store of value and we can take this opportunity as a good investment step for the future. In old age, everyone wants to live in peace and quiet from the pension they get. As long as they are still productive, trying to take advantage of Bitcoin investment is very appropriate because we can enjoy the results in old age. Especially if we are no longer able to work due to age problems and maybe that's when we just enjoy the investment returns from bitcoin.

That's why holding USDT in the long term will be very different from holding bitcoin and everyone knows where the advantages of bitcoin lie if invested in the long term. There is no comparison between one another because each of them has different levels of advantages. The question is what can we pass on to the younger generation about the advantages of bitcoin and I prefer teaching this kind of thing when they can already be responsible for their lives. Teaching stablecoins to the younger generation is not a good idea because I personally don't think stablecoins are the future.

The education in question can be directed when they can understand the level of difference between the two and the idea may be able to explain how bitcoin has traveled from the beginning to the present. It is true that it is better to direct education specifically about Bitcoin rather than USDT because they can learn to compare the best assets which will then be placed in first place as the chosen investment step. If the education provided can be easily received by them then there is a possibility that they can also take a quicker approach because it is focused on the core points of what they are looking for.

Although not many shops or restaurants accept bitcoin as legal tender because some countries limit bitcoin only as an investment asset. I think the connection you mean is when we try to convert bitcoin to USDT and then to the Fiat currency of each country (correct me if I'm wrong). If we talk about dollars, maybe we don't need them now because to buy and sell anything in real life we can use our own country's currency.

Once they actually start to understand, get curious, and are capable of comprehending it then yes it is best to teach children about finance, the economy, and how the market works. It is, after all, things that they will be facing and have to deal with in the future so teaching them early (again, as long as they are actually at the age of understanding things that I have mentioned fully) is a good move. However, much like you as I think focusing on stablecoins is not a good idea as there isn't even an assurance that stablecoins will make it that big that we have to start introducing it to our kids, instead if we must or wish to share knowledge about crypto then I'd also go for Bitcoin.

Teaching young people about stblecoins to transact business in their various countries is a good idea, but it will be more easier for young people to first seek for crypto knowledge first so that they will know how favourable decentralized currency are to young people that embraced it in their society.  And anything that is under government control always have some government officials in that particular countries that will make the stblecoins more attractive to users to invest. Since many countries have seen the good side of the crypto as a something that can help a country economy to improve by adopting the crypto for their citizens to have the opportunity to acquire the knowledge.

We know the current world is moving towards cryptocurrency.  We all know investing in crypto currency is very reliable and profitable.  The sooner our new generation becomes aware of this relationship, the sooner they will master this system.  They need to know about stablecoins, USDT, USDC.  So that they can advance by gaining proper knowledge about this.  Also they should have their own interest. Because we know without their own interest they won't know much about this. We have to tell our new generation to explore the forum and gain knowledge from the posts made by the veterans.

That's the  same name that popped up in my head the moment I read his posts but I just didn't have enough evidence to call him out on it. Shortmaster and this guy have the same post pattern and they have a penchant for making ridiculous claims. There's another user I've seen with this kinda behavior... ::) Gosh, I can't remember his name!
I just feel there should be a rule put in place to automatically ban such who just come and spew rubbish here, but that would be restricting their rights to a freedom of speech, yeah?.

What else to say about bitcoin forum!  We all know bitcoin a is very reliable to invest. Everyone has  became rapidly in the world is involved with bitcoin.
 I hope our new generation will also get familiar with it very easily.  And we should inform our new generation about stablecoin,USDT,USDC also that can also useful in something in some cases. so that they can invest in it in right way.  But it should be communicated to them at the right time. 
We will not tell a minor child about this because they will not be able to bear it.  First of all we should educate children about economics.Also we can teach them to hold money in their wallets.

In my opinion, maybe somehow it will cause a little confusion among children below 12 years old. This is just my opinion. But for young people who are 13 years old and above, maybe they can be explained the basic usage of stablecoins such as USDT or USDC, which are almost the same as the dollar, that can be used for payment depending on the merchants who accept stablecoins, which are cryptocurrency. Just teach the young people little by little and don't jump right into this matter of cryptocurrency or stablecoins.

Economic and finance start when you start to invest in Bitcoin or your own business.

If you invest in stock, you're just make someone business become big and they're making a lot profit from you. If you invest in gold, you will make the government become rich since they control most of gold.

But, if you invest in Bitcoin, no one is manipulating the price. If you invest in your own business, it will make your business become bigger and you will earn more money.

People already know enough about the use of stablecoins. USDT or usdc are generally considered virtual dollars. Those who are involved in cryptocurrencies have enough knowledge about USDT or USDC. USDT or usdc is used by people as an alternative to cash. There are some users who also use these stub coins as their savings. However, instead of using a stable coin, you should use a coin that allows you to save and invest together. The value of stablecoins is always immutable the value of coins will never decrease or increase. Bitcoin can be a much better alternative than stablecoins as there will be a possibility of money growth along with the transaction facility through Bitcoin.

Why just the stablecoins if you can teach them related to finance, savings, budgeting, etc. stablecoins are just the same as the other currency coins better to let them know more about the market because this helps them enlighten what the real world with a good cashflow and savings can achieve the financial freedom. Also, crypto is better to focus with the Bitcoin first so they understand the other coin you want to introduce.

I believe that even the poorest of the poorest country have their own banks, so therefore they also have a mobile/online banking. Digital fiat are also a thing in this era so they might also have it.

You have a point there about stable coin and digital fiat but once we already have a knowledge on them, things are now going to be easy for us to earn these because there are now money making apps which pays using them. Same when we learn Bitcoin and Crypto, it then unlock a lot of possibilities or opportunities. Crypto being adopted as a legal tender are again won't directly give us a free crypto but it can also unlock possibilities or opportunities which can help us earn a crypto.

I do not agree that they are virtual dollars, if CBDC ever gets created by the USA government, that could potentially be a good virtual dollar, but this is more like IOU type of thing, (means I owe you) and you get dollar worth of digital things, but you trust a company and not a government.

So, if that company comes in and says that they are bankrupting, or just steal your money, there is nothing that you can do about it. They just took what is real, a dollar, which actually has a response in the financial institutes, and instead gave people something they said has the same value, but there is no proof of it, you just do it until they steal it. This is why I do not trust them and would never consider them legit.

I understand what you are saying, but young people shouldn't be forced to learn about cryptocurrencies. Instead, we should teach them about them when they are ready to do so, since no one should ever be forced to do anything in life. However, this kind of idea should be taught in contexts where it is accepted by the economy; we can't just start by teaching it in settings where the government has made it unlawful. Some communities which is not accepted may believe that you are about to impart harmful values on the next generation, so we should be aware of how to get into trouble.

There wasn't any stablecoin a few years ago. What happens after that? We have seen the emergence of lots of stablecoin!

The development of DeFi applications requires stable assets that can provide a stable yield for their users. Stablecoin can be beneficial for the DeFi application, but for the bitcoin-centric marketplace, it's just a mirror version of Fiat. Most of these stablecoins won't survive due to hard regulation and not enough dapps to fuel them. We should educate our generation of bitcoin, its history, technology and potential. Learning about stablecoin is not as appealing as bitcoin.

Right now people still have the option to learn about bitcoin at their own rhythm, but how long is it going to take before this is not optional anymore and people must learn about this market?

Look at smartphones, not long ago you still had the option to not use one and no one cared about it, however they have become so ubiquitous that now is difficult to live your life normally if you do not have one and know how to use it, and soon enough that could become the reality as well when it comes to bitcoin.

Well, if you have been paying attention on where economics is moving forward, then you may realize that smartphones and Bitcoin are not quite that of a good comparison.

Smartphones are actually very useful for the status quo and governments around the world, it makes very easy for them to know where you are, who you are, what you like/dislike and even more. It has come to a point where phones know more about us than other people.

On the other hand, since Bitcoin does not serve the interest of those in power, governments and big banks around the planet are likely to try to stop the advance of Bitcoin by providing "alternatives" to the people who are yet to discover and learn about crypto. I am talking about the CBDCs, the centralized evil twin of Bitcoin.

It reminds me when I tried to explain Bitcoin to some friend on the internet and they simply said something like: "Oh, so it is like Paypal then?"

There is still a very long path ahead and centralized obstacles to overcome.

Stable coins have a very real rival currently, namely CBDC. The government will definitely teach and encourage its people to use CBDC more. And one day we will definitely not be able to avoid using CBDC. It's just that I personally would also prefer to use stable coins. But about teaching children and families. I will do it at the right time. That is, when they need that insight one day. When they understand the value of money and how to maintain, save and invest. No need to rush. Because hasty steps will only scare them. And I'm quite sure that one day lessons related to digital money, including crypto, will be discussed in the school curriculum. Because knowledge related to crypto can no longer be contained. So there is no choice for the government but to teach it in the school curriculum. Maybe not now but it might happen in a few years.

I agree with you regarding your point on how rushing the younger ones to learn about the economy, finances, and digital currency (in this case, mostly about stable coins) might scare them. I've been pointing out how rushing such a thing can lead to an immediate loss of interest or pressure as it may still not fit the children's cognitive and mental capacity.

As for CBDC, I also agree with you here as it is truly most likely that the government will implement a formal setup of education or teaching regarding CBDC more than stable coins or any other cryptocurrency. The reason for this, according to David Edwards in his 2023 article, is due to how CBDC is handled by the nation's central bank (their value is stabilized and controlled by them). Hence, it is only natural that if the government were to introduce an educational module, subject, or course regarding digital currency it would be the one that the central bank handles, rather than one that they do not have any control over.

Link to the article, if you wanna know more about CBDC: eahttps://coinatory.com/cryptocurrency-articles/what-is-cbdc-and-how-it-impact-society-12394/?gclid=CjwKCAjw6p-oBhAYEiwAgg2Pgt8w1WjXyCQRTcl8kZXwebSjy849eBSmPOYhX39zTvu2Suis9D9__RoC7qcQAvD_BwE

That's great but, is Bitcoin so annoying that we all do things like that? If you are a conservative investor and like to take your profits, then now might be a good time. So, is Bitcoin buying, selling or holding? Look at the USD which used to be stable and is now unstable and you can convert their bitcoins into cash too.

You can feel your excitement, but the way you've put your words together is weird. In this case, TRON and USDT TRC20 are interesting topics. But you might be too hopeful to get your friend "Will" into the government (whatever that is) to push such an idea, don't you think?

I completely agree with your point that young people should learn about stablecoins. Without a question, the economy will become more focused on crypto in the future. There is, however, something strange and, oddly specific about the claim that Donald Trump will accept them for the world

What do you really think the educational system will look like? What safeguards should be in place to make sure that as young minds learn about stablecoins, they also learn about the risks and responsibilities that come with them?

Well it's not just stablecoins, but everything about crypto itself. There's just many to cover first before making your kids use any forms of crypto out there. The security, the risk, the methodologies, and the technical stuffs that they need to obtain first before keeping their hard-earned money into crypto.

I don't think every parents out there are going to consider this though. It is each of their own at this case. There are parents that do not fancy tech stuff involving their money. My parents aren't really a fan of credit card and I was not able to use it til this day as I don't want to be in debt. :D

Kids should not touch money too early as they can lose control and get distracted to many things in life. As kids, they must learn, focus on education and some soft skills that can be helpful for their life, interactions with other people. Money is not main thing and priority for kids when you are as parents want to educate them.

Cryptocurrency or Bitcoin can be taught to kids through funny games and I remembered there are some such games designed specifically for kids.

Each generation will be exposed to one or some big evolution and they are familiar with it. Then when they get older, something new, new evolution appears but as the elderly, they struggle to learn new things, technologies and see it hardly to use those things for their life. We saw our parents like this and soon our kids will see us like this in future.

I don't understand why it's now so important to teach our children now about Stablecoins. There already some threads here that want us to teach our kids about crypto currencies and their benefits. Don't get me wrong, if our children are interested and want to learn about it then we should encourage them and teach them about it. But if they are not interested in monetary topics like most kids that I know, it's hard to teach them. The problem with forcing ideas on to children that they not interested in is to make them hate it and never want to touch the topic. It's important to educate kids and prepare them for an independent life, but in my opinion, this should be done more general and not specific to stablecoins. Why not teach them about money in general and how to be use different form of payments in a secure manner? We should be open about all the different types of currencies out there and let our children make their own choices.

I guess maybe because stable coins are like the traditional currency that we use IRL. But yeah you are right. There are also lots of threads which concerns about teaching our kids to get involved with crypto ( non-stable coins ). Any of them are important but it's only optional for a while since we may only waste time ( judging on the kids capacity to digest what they have learned ) which we can use better on a more important thing.

Teaching kids is different from how we teach the adults. We need to use materials which kids love so that they will never be bored of the subject. Some might still dislike it but their interests can still change later on, so we shouldn't give up easily.