Bitcoin Forum

If a new casino launches an announcement here in Bitcointalk what are the requirements or criteria that will make you trust them?
Within six months after they launched their announcement here 

Launching a review and signature campaign?

No complaints or scam accusations?

Very responsive representative here?

Good reviews from casino review sites?

Please vote and tell us why this is your choice all reasons are valid points but if you're going to pick one that will be the best answer what will it be?

For me, it is the reputation that is so important for them to build. Without it no gamblers will show interest on their platforms. Launching signature campaigns and reviews does not guarantee for the gambling casino to be successful but no complaints and scam accusations also plays a big role to be a reputable casino either online or offline and for me that is very important.

If there's only one pick it should be no complaints or scam accusations, for a new casino to build its name, reputation should be at the top of its priorities, they should make it a point to address all issues however small the issues are, if they are good at addressing issues it will have a snowball effect and they will likely be recommended by their users, they can do review or launch a signature campaign but they should first make it a point to look on their community that their experience is good and with no issues.
Everything follows once a casino prioritizes reputation, they will have good reviews from casino reviewers and once they launch a marketing campaign they will be welcome.

Since we are in this forum, I'll choose "No complain or scam accusation".

When we trust a gambling site, it always based on their reputation, if they don't have a scam accusation after 6 months of operation, that could only mean that they are an honest casino in providing their service.

I think most of the answers here are the -No complaints or scam accusations?-, but for me, I choose a different answer, and this is ""Launching a review and signature campaign". My reason on choosing that is very simple, for a gambling site to be able to launch a signature campaign, they should be liquid enough to pay for the weekly promotion the active members here would bring to them, and a liquid gambling site could signify that they are operating profitably and that would link to their good reputation.

In addition, by looking at the gambling site with signature campaign, it's quite appealing to the community, so this could mean they really mean business here.

I would have preferred ranking these four choices from most to least important. The least would have been would have been choice #1 while the most would have been #4.

Launching a signature campaign is more on pure marketing and that's a small factor in building trust in my opinion. Individual review campaigns are better compared to signature but I still prefer the good feedback from reputable and independent casino review sites. They most likely know better when it comes to the ins and out of a casino so they are more equipped when gauging a gambling platform's trustworthiness.

It's just not realistic for casinos not to have complaints and accusations since not all players are honest.

I voted for "no complaints or scam accusations", why? these are some of my reasons.

1. running a signature campaign is not the first time to do by casino, because I believe that before a company decides to hold a signature campaign, there must be an announcement first. From this announcement, even though there are only a few members, there will definitely be those who try to register and provide reviews.

2. If there are several complaints from this review, then it is possible that the CS quality is less responsive. allegations of scam, clearly this could be the start of a negative image for the casino. Therefore, seeing that there are no excessive complaints and is free from accusations of being a scam, then I will be sure that this casino is safe to try.

3. Being unresponsive in forums and live chat certainly indicates a lack of professionalism in solving problems. but the first time, complain is important to know how they are solved every complains.

4. Reviews from external websites can be fake reviews, maybe because they are paid to give positive reviews. reviews from forum members who have tried and not complained can be more valid.

What I mean is a valid scam complaint we all know there are cheaters, opportunists, and blackmailers especially for new casinos if they can address the complaint right away and prove that the accusation is not a valid one, just created to extort or cast doubts on the casino, then the complaints will backfire against the complainant.
The community is wise enough to see who's telling the truth we have seen some instances where the complainants are just making it out to look a new casino bad.

Talking about complaints and accusations, of course there is always a complaint at the end, because no casino can guarantee that it will always provide good and excellent service without any interruptions. To be precise, they only try to provide the best service, so that their visitors can remain loyal and loyal to visit the casino. And speaking of accusations, currently online gambling is quite popular and has a lot of fans, and the increasing number of gambling sites from day to day makes business competition in the world of gambling very tight. so accusations of fraud leveled at one particular casino are normal. But even so, this greatly affects the reputation of a casino.

And I can trust that the casino is really safe to visit, when the reviews on the casino look pretty good, because good reviews can, in a small way, convince someone to trust that casino. But to ensure this, we have to actually visit the casino. and after that we give an assessment about whether the casino is good or not.

There is no way a casino will have no complains and good reviews can be bought for the marketing of the casino. What I think should be considered the most is how long the casino has been in the business and is still responsible for making people earn on their platform.

The longer the casino operates and has solved complains, I think it can be trusted. But there must be truth to the casino the is promoting here in bitcointalk. The community appreciates more to those casinos who are also joining the community since this is almost like a partnership with the crypto community.

Having a signature campaign here with huge marketing funds as well as having an active representative here makes me easily trust a certain casino. This is what I do when I discover coins.game casino which is so far a very good casino due to its rewards. I never encounter major issue on this casino due to their helpful support.


I doubt this will be helpful as solely reference when playing since the casino is just new and I’m sure even the review site is just tested it few time before they publish review. You need something that will assure you that they will not run like marketing funds that show how serious they are on their business.

a valid complaint can be seen if the complainant has all his proofs relating to the said complaint. if not, some are just ruining the reputation of the casino. i've seen that several times here in the forum. if the complaint is not valid, then, should not count for the negative points of the casino.

i am also in this option, if there is no to little number of valid complaints, then i guess, i would go for this casino. other factors are just secondary, and if those other factors are satisfied by the casino, it can gain positive results for the casino itself. this is why i can say the poll results for now is what the general sentiments on this query.

For me one of the most important aspects of trusting a casino is interacting with the community in meaningful ways, so running interactive promotions that are lead by experienced community members us important.

But more than anything else, I want a proper implementation of provably fair games. You don't really have to trust the fairness of a casino if you can verify it yourself. As kf trusting a casino with bigger deposits it's good to have some time pass without accusations and resolutions to any issues that might arise.

This will depend on how you will be benefiting or utilizing the casino because they're not going to have the same answers depending on your purpose. Say for example you're planning to use their casino and you will be playing there then it's in your best interest to know if they're not involved in any scam accusations or any hot issue that are damaging to their reputation, sure it might be a problem if you're watching out for them to launch a signature campaign but that can't be that important at all because 1xbit still found some success doing a campaign here. But since it's all about trust, I don't think it's going to be worth your salt to think that the casino launching a campaign and immediately gain the trust of people, look at 1xbit again.

Launching a review and signature campaign is not a metric to say if that site is trustworthy or not. Well, the rest of those choices can be but not that one. It happens in the forum already and many of them turn to a scam after receiving and hearing complaints about it. Besides, the review and signature campaign serves as market promotion to gain popularity and to let the community know about this project, scammers can do that. Even having no complaints and a responsive support system, these things still never give us assurance which is why we have to act cautiously. Well, at least having things gives us some hope and fate. Reputation really matters...

there had been platforms launching campaigns in the forum that turned out to be scams which this option is not to guarantee the casino is trustworthy. they may not have had the intention before but when the business didn't go well. but i don't know if a casino can determine the success of the casino after launching it after 6 months, it could be a premature decision.

there is no way to tell whether a casino is a scam or not we only know it is a scam when they have done it already. they'd have that burden as long as they operate.

Launching a new signature campaign is for advertisement, thus it will not be a good criterion to trust a casino. And some casinos have performed below expectations after launching a long-term campaign. Casino reviews are not always reliable because anybody or institution can review casinos.
My first choice will be fewer complains and fewer scam accusations. I said less because it is not possible for a casino operate for six months without complaints or scam accusations. This is when my next choice will fall which is responsive representative. How they handle these complains and accusations will determine the level of my trust in them.

Definitely complains are part of development because at the end what really matters is how best the casino is able to meet up with the demands of their clients and comolans are like feedbacks because it can also be a way for the casino to keep improving their feature and fixed bugs and also to explain some other features to their customers.

Although complains is different from accusation or scam act which are left unresolved by the casino which will give them a bad image in the end,  but if the casino can manage those accusations and get issues resolved it goes a long way to provingprove community of reputable there are at the end of the day.

My vote goes to having a representative because all it takes is one bad experience from a user to start a scam accusation and they could shed some light on those accusations and even fix them. This doesn't mean i'll immediately trust any new casino once they have a representative. It still depends on how well they can deal with different cases because i've seen others that started with a representative or community manager and still fail to increase their reputation. With a representative, the players get a bit of reliability knowing there's someone they can reach out to and forward their problem.

In my personal case it would take both a very engaging and participating representative here in the forum, who takes special attention on solving any doubt or problem any User and gambler could have about the casino, it would also would convince me not to see any scam acusation or massive serious problems being reported about this casino here in this forum.

The reviews of a casino in any centralized webpage, where comments and posts are regulated, opens the window for manipulation to happen.
A casino launching a campaign of signatures her does not immediately equals to a better reputation, actually there have been shady services here which have tried to fool newcomers using signature campaigns and similar devices.

Some reviews here in Bitcointalk coming from reasonable members are more worth it that any Trustpilot-like webpage could offer to us. Though, I understand there are better webpages which do not allow shilling and completely dedicated to casinos.

The most acceptable phenomenon in the forum was the trusted background of the owners and bankroll never being the trusted gambling site.If the gambling site had the funds for the gambling advertising like review and signature campaign,it mean that the gambling site would have enough funds to handle such campaign.So the gambling site will have the funds for the players who have win the game in their gambling site.This was the basic reason why many trusted gambling site hosting the signature and review campaigns in the forum.It also help to the visibility of the game signature in the forum,this help the gambler to use of that gambling site.

In my case it depends on 2 scenarios. in scenario 1, if I am a participant in the casino's subscription campaign, I will have to trust the casino during the period in which I am part of the casino's subscription campaign, after that I would just spend playing with little money until the casino has more time operating, even if it had been running for 2 years, I wouldn't put a lot of money into the new casino if I had a lot of money. As I always follow my responsible gaming rules, I am always very careful not to use too many casinos, I only use a few casinos so that I am not putting money in that I cannot afford to lose. Now in scenario 2 where I have never seen the casino before and never participated in the casino's subscription campaign, I keep doing research on the internet to see the casino's reputation

and in the research I do, I look for negative comments about the casino and I'm not interested in the positive comments about the casino, because most of the time the positive comments are fake and don't reflect reality, when I see that the casino has a lot of negative comments and I see that in this forum there are accusations of scams, so I use the casino and I prefer to continue using the old casino which is more reliable. The truth is that using a new casino is not easy, and the person needs to be very cautious and not put too much money into the new casino, I always give exe advice, but I'm always shocked when someone comes to this forum to complain about a new casino and I see that this person deposited a lot of money, I'm wondering what kind of courage this could be

I chose a responsive representative, getting complaints and scam accusations is inevitable at some point and having a responsive representative will be a great way to address those issues. I want to see a representative who properly handles and acknowledges issues that might be presented to them. 

good reviews from casino review sites and launching a review and signature campaign is not really a great way to base someone's trust in a casino.

I very much rely on the good reviews from trusted members in the Bitcointalk community. If a casino does not have a good reputation here, then I will not even look into it. It is just too risky. And casino review sites are absolutely not trustworthy in my personal opinion, since many of the reviews can be easily faked by some anonymous "reviewers". Also a good community management shows that the casino is trying to communicate with their members.

But if the casino has even one justified scam accusation, which is unresolved, then I will also avoid that casino.

I agree, an active representation here to handle issues and critic will help for credibility. And in my eyes, if some established members write a positive review (i.e. Efialtis with BTCGOSU), than it further helps to increase the trust in a new casino as it is based on their own opinion and not biased (or paid by the casino).

The points you mentioned are consistent with each other to create my perception that the new casino platform is credible.
About positive reviews on websites, can you trust them 100%? of course not right.
Therefore, to determine whether it is good or not, we also have to look at other factors that are interconnected.

But if asked to choose one, the most important point for me is a fast response from a representative, not a template answer that we often encounter on gambling sites usually.

My definition trust comes with my satisfaction and other people satisfaction without any form of cheating anyone. Most of the things you said aren't necessary to trust a campaign like for instance, a casino can launch a signature that will last the time they want in the Forum only to disappear one night. I have run over some old threads in the reputation board with similar situations.

I think Scam accusation is normal, anyone can disagree with a casino and open an allegation against them but when it becomes a normal thing, then they need to be call to order. 1xbit was guilty of that, they made every player looks like a fool, log them out of there accounts and refused to make ammendment about them to date, I think I will go with this this one.

A representative doesn't mean anything, it's just like a person a person that can represent a company, even an account can be bought here to do that and it can end up badly if things escalate badly.

Good reviews might give some intail but if a casino has the intention of pulling a scam, they are going to do it in a way that they will hide somethings from the public, this is not enough to trust a casino. I think out of the options you gave, scam accusation in the long run matters a lot.

That's what most people chose, but there's a catch. What if the casino doesn't have many clients?
They start small, make an ANN thread, first week they only get 5 people to test them out, next week another 10 or so... They try to be fair towards their first clients, offering bonuses, rakeback, free rolls, because they want positive reviews. In the first few months there's only 100 people who played there and none of them were scammed... Doesn't mean the casino isn't planning to run with the money when it reaches enough traffic. We all know casinos that looked fair at first and then did an exit scam. The scam accusation forum is full of them.

There's no single point that makes a casino look trusted. I'd say all of the points listed by OP are important.

Even the best of casinos or sportsbook still get some scam accusations here on the forum and even outside the forum. One of the reasons to this is due to the fact that, you can never satisfy all customers and not all customers have got the best intention for the casino or sportsbook neither will you find everyone of them playing within the terms of service. So yeah, having tjis at the back of your mind, you will always find those scam accusations popping up.

Where I would peg my stake is;
There customer service and approach towards issue resolution.
I think these tells the most of a gambling site that is determined to stay long in the business. It’s not just about the game offerings but, the attention you give to ensuring proper reputation and representation of your brand. Having a good name could be everything and not just on the forum but as a brand to all.

Launching a review and signature campaign
Launching a review and signature campaign is at the bottom of my list. A review campaign has only one time clients most of the time. A signature campaign is just an advert. It doesn't measure a casino trust or not.

No complaints or scam accusations?
Yes. This is more like it. Zero scam accusations is a good indicator of a reputable casino. Reputable casinos have trust.

Very responsive representative here?
Yes. I have a problem, I send a message, you respond quick. You automatically gain my trust. And not just my trust but loyalty when it is consistent.

Good reviews from casino review sites?
No. Anyone can write a review for a few bucks. I'll take their reviews with a grain of salt.

In trusting a new casino here I'll go with all the options except for the last which is about reviews from review sites many of those reviews found under review sites are actually not what they mean in terms of sincerity as they are a lot of paid reviews in the interest of the casino. But above all I'll holding on to their reputation which everything op mentioned falls under it, when a casino has a good reputation there's no other thing to be worried about regarding their services from deposit to withdrawal and all the rest.

We have seen scam casino's launch and run signature campaigns.

Yes, this is critical and important. No scam accusations, and quickly resolved complaints is a sign of credibility and seriousness.

This is a good criteria, because an active representative will be quick to answer to any complaint from any one here in this forum.

Reviews are good, but they cannot always be trusted.

You mentioned a couple of important things and I will go over them first.

Launching a review campaign would be more trust-engendering to me than launching a signature campaign. If a casino pays for getting scrutinized, I think that is a good sign.

No complaints and scam accusations, I think that one is a no-brainer although it requires some thorough perception from the users when they see a scam accusation as that could as well be unjustified or a smear campaign against a new competitor.

Responsiveness is always important although this leads me to my next point: if everything works flawlessly, obviously the deposits and even more so the withdrawals, responsiveness becomes kind of secondary. The best would be if no issues arise in the first place.

Depending on the standing of the casino review site, then yes it would be very valuable. If the review site itself has a great reputation, it surely reflects positively upon the casino if it's a good review.

Review and signature campaign are a good thing and is part of the overall advertisement. They should be able to attract new users to try and experience the platform.
There can be complains but how they handle is more important. Specially the newer ones need to be very cautious about your image in early days. Even a few stupid users with their stupid complains may play against you.
Responsive representative is a part of overall customer service and that includes response to complaints.
Review from casino review site doesn't hold any importance as we know it's buyable. Better to focus on trustpilot reviews.

Honestly, I'd rather try a casino that has a signature campaign on this forum. Why is that? because when a casino tries to carry out promotions seriously then it can be a reference that the casino has high dedication in developing its casino. So I felt that was enough to get me interested in trying their casino

Apart from that, I also usually read feedback written by other members on the ANN thread. Then what is the user interface of the site and also how many games do they have. After trying it I will know how the experience at the casino is, if I am comfortable then maybe I will continue playing there and if not maybe I will just try and not go back there again.

Isn't having all of them makes people convinced if the casino is legitimate? ;D

No paid advertising, no scam accusation, responsive, good review = low traffic.
Have paid advertising, have scam accusation, responsive, good review = people will give a time for the casino to resolve/make a decision.
No paid advertising, no scam accusation, not responsive, good review = some people might call them unprofessional.
No paid advertising, no scam accusation, responsive, no good review = looks fine, since people trust the reviews more in this site instead of third parties. :D

I voted for: No complain or scam accusation

I mean they can run their signature campaign here in the beginning or even for months then suddenly when a Scam accusations is raised against them, they didn't close it even if there is a overwhelming proof that it seems to be a scam to us.

And suddenly that campaign will disappear as they've lost their reputation already.

I chose "No complaints or scam accusations", because 6 months is enough time to be able to prove how the services provided by the casino platform are, whether they are good or bad. Later this will be proven by the large number of users who complain or open threads about scam accusations, if there are very few complaints and the representatives are very responsive in handling user complaints, I think that will be enough to convince me to use the casino.

If I could choose all of those options, I would choose them all because they are requirements so that we can start putting trust in the casino. If one of those options weren't available, I would have waited longer to see the response from friends here and to read further reviews.

But the best answer is "No complaints or scam accusations" because this will give a sign that the casino is on the right track and they can continue to promote the casino. And that will make people start to trust the casino because the casino can maintain its business well. Additionally, if there are no complain or scam accusation, the casino is always trying to be honest with its members.

Launching a review and signature campaign maybe a plus factor for me but doesn't give much weight since anyone can operate a that campaigns so that they can market their casino very well.

What's more important for me is they don't have complains or scam accusation since it can determine that they are good casino since no people claiming something about bad experiences happen to them while gambling on their casino. Also very responsive representative is good addition to have since this could make all question answer more faster and they can give some confidence to people that they will be taken care if there's issue will happen to them.

Good reviews can be manipulated so I don't give much attention on it especially if they have given good feedbacks on unreputable sites.

Positive feedback and a quick representative response will usually be good for making me try gambling on a new site, although sometimes to test it I have to use less money than usual so that when I get cheated I don't feel like I've lost a lot of money on the new site, deposit process and fast withdrawals are the most important thing in my opinion in assessing new casinos that appear on this forum because it is also impossible for new casinos to get a fast reputation in just a few months.

It takes time to make a casino have a good reputation on this forum, it's not that easy, only six months can get enough feedback, but everyone has their own views in assessing whether a casino is trustworthy or not, especially if the casino is active in holding campaigns on this forum such as campaigns. the signature also looks good to prove their seriousness in promoting their site on this forum.  ;)

all options are valid and needed when it comes to searching new casinos but for me, I prefer the no complaints or scam accusations, because that means they build a good reputation and trust from their users, I know that choosing and trusting new casino will be very risky but again, once a casino build their good reputation, users will be the one who verify this in the long run.

DT members using it and promoting it? I think that should be one of the key factors for me, if people here who are legendary accounts and been here for a long time and like..properly legendary accounts not in just membership status meaning but like emotionally quite known figures on this forum, and they write something like a promotion of that website, like they approve of it and they used it and they liked it? Then I could give it a go and trust it a bit myself. Thats the initial start, I have to see someone reputable to suggest a place, after that I get in myself and if I face no issues at all then I keep growing more trust towards it, if I face any issues then I just bail out and not use it.

I voted for vote number 2.
No complaints and accusations of fraud, that's very important isn't it, despite the lack of marketing signature campaigns and lack of response from representatives if the casino doesn't have any complaints then that's what I would believe maybe some people voted number two rather than the other.

Actually not only focus on complaints but others are also important for casinos to balance their advertising marketing with other needs, but I think every casino must always have complaints but support can help solve the problem then it is also important for their casino reputation.

I don't really believe in good reviews, some say it's paid for by the casino to get a high rating.

For me it's all about having no red flags before I would consider gambling with larger amounts at a casino. When it comes to new casinos I tend to be more cautious now then I was before the online gambling boom in 2020/21. It's nice to see competition in the gambling industry and being offered new promotions from time to time. But what does even the best promotions help if the casino disappears overnight and all my money is lost. There are so many well established casinos around today that I want to make sure a new casino is legit before I would really consider gambling there. Having scam accusations are a huge red flag and I would make sure to double check all the available information before trust the casino. Especially if there many customers having the same negative experience with the casino it's better to stay away.

The first thing first is the reputation they have built in that very short time, I know that six month is still very young for new casinos but some did very well in a very short time, I will prefer to choose from the list of online casinos through this forum than out of this forum, meaning that, if I have to use a new online casino today it must be available on this forum.

Who doesn't like a online casino with good responsive representatives? This is something that every online casinos should have, customers can face some challenges using the platform and the only way the problem can be solved is talking to the customer services, if ignored I will prefer to avoid using such online casino.

I should be fine to use any online casino that's not a scam, if it's scam free and they have fair gaming system then they are welcome, every other things like how they advertise is normal, because if they won't use streamers and do some adverts they will have low traffic, I don't see anything wrong with this move.

Within 6 months is the time for them to be able to develop and feel the competition in the gambling business, of course when there are things that allow for shady or scams, they cannot be seen in just 6 months.
All the casinos that are now shady or scam casinos initially ran well so there was no suspicion that they would become casinos full of manipulation and scams.
Everything will be visible when it takes more than 1 year when they fail to develop rapidly and the profit income is not much greater than the expenses incurred in building and paying all the team.

But there are also casinos that can look good from the start, namely by looking at how the customer service is and how enthusiastic all the customers are, whether there are complaints that result in the casino cheating or not.
Personally, I don't really like using or making new casino my favorite, but when a new casino appears, I always try to play there several times with the aim of testing and adding new experiences.

If six months after a casino launches its site and doesn't get any complaints or scam accusations from anyone, I think I can start to trust the casino. Maybe I will try to register myself with the casino, but I am not going to deposit any money yet and still want to wait a little longer to see the response from others. If more people are satisfied with the service provided by the casino, perhaps I will deposit a small amount of money to check and test the casino. And if there really are no problems during the trial period, then I will use the casino as a place to gamble. But I also won't deposit a larger amount of money to avoid losing a lot and things I don't want.

Would be plausible but that's not really the big deal there, I think the clean slate in terms of reputation is something that will trump that promotion thingy because that means that their gambling operation is running smooth and there's no way that you're going to be experiencing anything bad in there.

Launching a review and signature campaign on the forum is a promotional initiative for the site, it doesn’t make me trust the casino. I would be convinced if the casino has a long standing campaign history on the forum because that would mean they have solid reputation around here but for a new casino, no.

In my experience, scam casinos care more about promotions than resolving problems with their reputation. So definitely a casino with zero complaints or scam accusations would be my top pick.. There are many scams casinos online, you can see a lot of threads on scam accusations pertaining to mostly withdrawal problems and so on. As a precaution, it’s important to check for scam accusations on and off the forum.

Loyalty is such a bitch. There will be those who will try to take them down but it's all about reputation. Wise members here will not fall for such a trap so I bet they will be protected by gamblers who think they are a good gambling site in the long run.

What they must do?
Keep the reputation high. I've seen gambling sites that have ignored what people will say and I think that's a red flag. They may be cheap players who only play for cents but they must be seen and taken care of or it could ruin everything. What I am saying is, that every gambler should be important to them either they are poor or not because that will tell how much they are caring for every customer in their midst.
There will be gamblers who will fake their identities as cheap players because they are testing the reliability of the gambling sites so everyone should be answered with their queries especially if they are new to the industry.

A very responsive representative is what I like to see. Not that they'll create an ANN Thread and will just leave it behind, it's still nice to see if there's a representative that will constantly communicate with the community with their updates and promotions.

In any business, marketing and customer service is very important, creating an ANN thread is their way to communicate and build a community, so that's what I like to see. If they communite, it means they value the community a lot that they considered one of the reasons for their current success and in the future.

It would appear the casino only haave a few funds for the marketing that's why they are limiting their promotion time to six months. Are they able to ascertain whether the casino will be successful or not after 6 months?

The decline i business is faster than the growth. Due to the competition in online casinos, the marketing of the casino actually shouldn't stop because once they do, the rest of the casinos who are keeping their visibility to the public are the ones going to keep gaining clients. Once Stake halts its campaigns, they will see the effect in less than 3 months.

No business could ascertain the success in the future as it's a risky venture, they take risk and hope to succeed. Marketing expenses are just funds they have to risk and hope it will result to building a community and attract gamblers to play and hopefully be loyal. Running a casinos nowadays does really requite a lot of funds, that if they want to stay competitive. And this budget for marketing or promotion is not only in a limited period of time as even these successful casinos now are still doing promotion, it seems like it's already part of the business operation, without that, a casino will be dull looking.


It's on how these promotions are being manage, as there are casinos who spend a decent amount of money for promotion and yet they didn't achieve the expected result, so it's also a gamble on their part.

When choosing a service, company or organization to work with, people choose the ones they trust the most. And how does this trust come about?
I would simply say from reputation. If a company or organization can create a good and strong reputation overtime, people will definitely prefer to use them from time to time. therefore I believe if a company can build that in six months especially with positive reviews, fast and reliable transactions, active and responsive customer service they will definitely earn the trust of their user or customers.

I cannot speak on behalf of review campaigns, those do look to be fine but I think it is not as valid as signature ones. However, if we were to talk about signature campaigns, it is not just about making money, it is about the fact that you are not going to find any other marketing that would be as cheap as signature campaign and also get your name heard by the same amount of people.

The people here can be rich crypto investors, not all of us are like that, I am not rich for example, but bitcointalk has a lot of people who have dozens of bitcoin and more, some have hundreds, few even have thousands. So that means, by spending just like 2-3 thousand a week, which should be cheap for someone who wants to build a big casino, you get to market your casino to people with millions of dollars in bitcoin and willing to gamble.

This can also be a criteria to be a requirement with review campaigns and signature campaigns where the majority here believe that this casino has done good enough even though this is just a mere advertising marketing on forums

It is also important that there are no complaints or accusations of any kind, because one would think that when there are frequent complaints and accusations that gamblers will usually avoid problematic casinos.

Representatives who provide fast responses are better, when there are cases they can explain and provide solutions to problems more quickly and this is usually what is expected in forums when the casino has a fast response representative

Not too sure, because some of the reviews have high ratings but don't match the existing solutions

It's a good signal the casino is committed in building their reputation inside the gambling community, investing a budget there. It's not the solely reason why I would trust a recently launched casino, but it would definitely add positive points to final evaluation.

Well, this a tricky point. We can't prevent any casinos from having complaints or scam accusations against them. Even reputable long lasting ones face this issue in a daily basis. What we must pay attention to is if those complaints and accusations can be proved and are legit. If there are robust evidences the casino is operating in a shady way, of course it would be a decisive factor to completely delete the platform from our gambling alternatives. Some people don't take it too seriously, because they think to not be going to become the next victims, but in fact, they can be the next victim of a casino doing selective scam, anyone is prone to. So stay away.

This is another positive point which enters in the same category of review and signature campaign inside bitcointalk forum. Also, it would be very helpful when replying to complainsts and accusations, as mentioned on the previous question. So, issues can be solved and cleared faster, not giving any margins to doubts and mistrust among gamblers.

Reviews are always a must when picking a casino to deposit and play. We have to read opinions and personal experiences of another gamblers to decide if it worths accessing a casino platform or not. However, we have to make sure the review site we are visiting is a reputable one, just like the casino we are looking for... There are some shady reviews websites around which exist just to make income from traffic through ads. These must be avoided, because they don't add anything important and considerable to our knowledge.

For new casino to gain trust, here is what it should do:

1) running a signature campaing and competitions are a must. We have already lots of casinos, but in first pages of gambling section are those who spend funds on promotion

2) hire a manager who will be on the forum or telegram. There are never any good when gamblers tall with each other or with wall abou the casino.

3) simply be active and respond to everything on social media. I know it is hard, but each gambler likes individual attention. Even if a casino gives a gambler a like as a respond, it matters a lot.

If casino follow these steps, more likely I would trust it and make a test deposit.

Launching a review or signature campaign shows that the new casino wants to attract gamblers on Bitcointalk to their casino therefore they won't scam anybody as it'll destroy their reputation on the forum and the managers will guide them so I can trust a casino that have a signature campaign on the forum. From the signature campaign, the casino will be reviewed by many trusted gamblers on the forum and they'll give their review if the casino can be trusted.

Good reviews from sites outside the forum cannot be trusted as they can be fake rating, casino can buy good feedback from the rating site so they can have more players and scam them. If a crypto casino isn't on the forum and very active as well I don't trust them. All crypto casino have to be here so they can communicate to those individuals that use their casino through their announcement thread on the forum.

of these options there is no guarantee that the casino will continue to run without problems because some time ago there were casinos that ended up being fraudulent.
but even so, at least 2 of these choices make me a little confident that the casino is worth using because with an active representative we will never be afraid that if a problem occurs we can always solve it through the representative and on the one hand, all of this must be supported by reviews or good reputation from other customers so these two options can provide some confidence but will not deposit large amounts before the casino has been running for a few years.

I'm sure most of the people on this forum will say the same thing because they always prioritize reputation and also responsive representatives in the gambling section. many new gambling companies have active representatives, but after the casino grows bigger, these representatives become lazier and dont seem to want to reply quickly.
what is certain is that as long as the casino reputation is good, it will be worth using for fun.

Its a no brainer.
No complaints or scam accusations

If we do able to see a casino which doesnt have any scam accusations or issues when it comes to withdrawals and fairness of the games then we can really say that it is really that something that people would really be trusting it out not for the span of 6 months on which even on a couple of months people would really be having that kind of trust but not on the sense on having that full trust but at least it would really be something progressive. We do know that people here on this forum would really be that always skeptical when it comes to new services or platforms on which it would really be just that normal that they would really be having those hesitations and observations.

When something is really that an odd thing or actions been done then the community would really be easily be able to spot on, on which it would really be just that normal that you would really be that
comments and feedbacks would really be something real time and something that you could be able to read up whether its positive or negative and this is
the beauty on having this forum.

I agree into this one, this is what most people would be looking upon on which if there would be no complaints for a period of time or simply even if they do have experience
some technical issues but they had resolved out immediately then it wont be hard that they will be getting trust soon. If this one is really that connected with some
trust related issue then this is where problem do starts and  sooner or later this site will die or wither away because community is really that highly reactive
when it comes to scam on which same as you said. Once proven then you would be dumped down.

It all starts with a very good representative. That is what they are assigned for and to inform the community that they are cooperative and very open to suggestions, details, and improvements and being heard whether you're not so big or big on this community, that's what makes people too attentive with the newly launched casinos. I think reviews and signature campaigns are also helpful because it's about giving them exposure to the community that they are in.

But if it's about trust, it shouldn't just be good reviews but also bad reviews. What they need is an honest reviews from the known people that are on this thing. We've got a few people that are into this matter and they give honest takes from the casinos that they are part of. About no complaints and scam accusations. It is rare to see a casino that don't have these problems. It's always a matter of customer that they will expose some problems that they've faced with these casinos but in the end, they won't be justified and caught lying.

And that's the same position for the newly launched casinos and also for the old ones, so basically as long as there are proofs that they've been wronged or false accused or actually faced a problem that they shouldn't, it's all about black and white proofs, left and right not just about accusations with words without valid proof.

It may sound a little strange but my answer wasn’t listed in the options. I actually think a good celebrity endorsement goes a long way. That’s because with all the laws surrounding casinos and endorsements I would assume that the celebrity’s management team did their homework to make sure the casino was safe and legitimate for users.

Having no scam accusations and a responsive representative here in bitcointalk would certainly gain my respect to these casinos but certainly not trust. Trust is something that I will never really give to any platform at all. And that means I will not leave any money in the platform when it's not really needed. I'd just deposit something when I want to play and get it when I'm done. I'll entrust these guys to run the casino business smoothly, but not 100% with other people's money. There are some established casinos that just went down without any explanation with people's funds, and if that isn't something that one should be wary about, then I don't know what will.

All are essential in building a reputation but for the first thing is when they are introduced or their marketing activities is managed by the reputable member of this forum.  If a reputable member of this forum manages their campaign, it means there is a slim chance of the casino scamming their player unless, they had this plan ahead like some casinos that turn rogue after some months they are managed by the campaign manger.

There is no casino that does not have scam accusations, the thing is how they handle these accusations.  If they have proved that these accusations is false than that would be a big plus for them.

Most of the review sites are plagued by shills except for some reputable review sites we know in this forum. 

Certainly reputation is the most important thing.
Even a casino with several years of presence here on the bitcointalk forum but with a bad reputation will not have my trust.
The absence of serious complaints or always refuting complaints with concrete evidence or consistent reasons is the main reason for me to trust a betting site. Although, in the case of a new casino (the OP said 6 months) then it is expected that there will not even be a serious complaint involving money that has gone up, account banning or withdrawal problems.

Obviously, the constant presence of a representative here on the forum is also very important, mainly to resolve any problems and also to answer bettors' questions.

We can grow to become useful or struggling with modern world because there's completely no such actions of helping or trusting a casino whose main objective is providing and serves as a medium for gamblers to be able place wager on games. Trust is the core basis for any human being to give to any casino, definitely not a casino because they're full of volatile results. Remember it's gambling and we can never trust a casino, I can overheard some group of gamblers planning on saving their money on casino, to me I personally wonder what such of irrelevant and unwise choice that's been carried out in that manner?

So far this is what the community wants for a casino to establish if they want the community to trust them, reputation ranks high a casino with no valid complaints or scam accusations will have the support of the community, although there are scam accusations that won't hold coming from false accusers, so the casino representative should be quick to address all issues, especially for a new casino, if the accusation is not true it will be expose.

Launching a review and signature campaign   - 5 (17.2%)
No complaints or scam accusations   - 17 (58.6%)
Very responsive representative here   - 6 (20.7%)
Good reviews from casino review sites   - 1 (3.4%)

If a casino launched a review campaign you should know that its all about money, people will give the casino a good review to get paid and that has no single truth in it, signature campaigns are still cleaner and better, it's a form of advertisement to members of the forum, anyone who seem interested can check the casinos out.

Complains and scam accusations can be found online even about big online casinos, like stake or Fortune jack, if care is not taken you can easily believe them, the little that I really went deep on are from people who broke the rules of the casino or try to cheat the casino and they get banned for it, out of their freak out they tend to tarnish the image of the casino, do not always believe every complains you see online, do your own research.

The longer a online casino have been operating the more reviews you will find online but most times you won't get to know a casino until you try it out yourself, the most favourite casino you use can be what someone hated the most, experience are not going to be the same.

Not every accusation is supposed to be true, most of the accusations against casinos are violation of terms by users and claiming casinos cheated them but the priority should be there should be no unsolved accusation if there is an actual one that is posted with all the evidence. Every site may have bugs or issues but their dedication towards fixing it shows they want to keep their brand clean and which is what I will look into over reviews, signatures, advertisements, giveaways.

Yes, it is true that the presence of casino representatives in this forum is really necessary to solve every user problem. The sooner the problem is resolved, the faster the casino's reputation will grow among the people in this forum, not only in this forum, at least also on their site there is also service support. very responsive to every problem, sometimes the casino always ignores it which makes it difficult for its reputation to rise on this forum.

If only casinos knew that they would definitely struggle to serve their customers well. Any complaints from the public on this forum can be resolved immediately by communicating with each other through their representatives on the forum. New casinos must learn how to improve their reputation on this forum. Sometimes there are also many gamblers who being on this forum always reminds new casinos that the interaction of casino representatives on this forum is very important and needed.

Many people voted for No complaints or scam accusations. I think this makes sense because complaints could prove that the launch of their casino was carried out with incomplete preparation so many things were carried out which were disappointing and could be detrimental to players, but I have a different answer, there is number one, namely Launching a review and signature campaign because in my opinion by conducting a review and also a signature campaign they really care about all suggestions and criticisms on their casino which they can immediately develop if there is still something missing and also by promoting on this forum it proves that they have a budget and that It's quite important because we often see new casinos that turn out to have very limited funds and end up becoming scam casinos because they can't pay out the winnings their players get.

It makes sense to vote for no complaints or scam accusations, some new casinos easily misbehave with their customers and that's why I always feel skeptic when it comes to brand new online casinos, new casinos are known to be the most fraudulent ones as they don't always tend to run the business for long, they are most times ready to go down with customers funds.

I honestly get attracted to new online casinos after a long period of months, I will like to see what they can do after some time in operation, but still I can't avoid one fact that almost all casinos are the same, it's only the customers services and presentations that are different, this is why I don't bother looking for new casinos.

When a problem occurs, how sooner the team solve the problem adds a better layer of trust on such casino, this is one of the most effective ways to build reputation, I will go with how fast problems are handled and also how strong the casino rep is.

But it isnt fair just to value casino by having or not any scam accusations. Some people are just stupid and blame casino for everything possible. A guy has lost - not his fault or unluck, its is because casino is scam. Guy registered with ip from restricted country and cant withdraw - casino is a scam. A guy sent btc to ethereum address and now casino cant help him - of course this is due to casino being a scam.

We must be very selective of what we consider as scam accusation. Just having a topic or post is not enough to blame.

All the points OP mentioned have a weight. After thinking for a while about voting for a "Very responsive representative here" or "Good reviews from casino review sites".

It's good to have a casino representative here on the forum, many times we saw how helpful that can be. But since BTCGosu I will not register and play if it's not Gosu-approved. It's different when professionals test the casino and when we amateurs try it.

Perhaps they try to promote for 6 months to see the results. If the results are in accordance with what they want, they will continue to carry out other promotions. It is natural for casinos to conduct tests on their casinos to see how attentive gamblers are.

Marketing plays an important role in a business, so business owners will consider many things when promoting. Business owners may want to try a few promotions first to see how they develop over a few months. Business owners will try other promotions if they feel the casino needs to get the desired results.

This. One of an indication that the casino is not shady. It takes time to build a reputation. So if within 6 months they can prove their platform is not scam, it's the start of slowly gaining the trust. However we know it's not just the basis and anything can still happen in the future. Thus, it's a must that we always read the reviews of the gamblers playing on the particular site to see if there's a new issue and for us to become updated.

Well, some reputable casinos don't have an active rep here. But it's a plus point for new casinos if their representative is responsive to address the questions and problems of the gamblers.

Complaints and scam accusations can be made up, but they can also be common. Meanwhile, issues that came from the casino itself is more natural, therefore we need a responsive support in order to address our issues quickly. And like you said, a responsive support can also clarify things if the complaints that they are getting is legit or not. If more and more people are complaining, the owner will also do their best in order to solve the issue and ensure that the issue will not re-occur again after some time.

Good reviews can be honest. But what is questionable is if the review is too good, that is close to being too good to be true. It's also a good thing if the casino has a review campaign, as it allows user in the forum to give their honest review. While the signature campaign can give the users an added confidence, especially if the casino has no known bad records.

I would say A/B test is the way to go, not asking people what they would want. I mean it is logical that you could ask people, but that doesn't mean that what they say will be the same as what people will do, it could be different.

We could all be here and say X, and then when Y happens at a casino people rush there, it is not that easy. Sure signature campaigns mean a lot, it means you are going to get in front of a ton of people, many of them are rich, and that means something, and sure if there are no scam accusations that's good, how could having many scam accusations could be any good?

And sure, having a very active representative would help, well if they are a good representative of course, if they hire a bad one, it is not good, and sure good reviews on good review sites should be good too. I do not think that a casino should pick just one, they should aim for all four, why would you want to limit yourself, they are all important things.

What people say will be different because each person has their own opinion. But asking people is to see what they have to say about the test so the owner can think about what to add.

If there are indeed allegations of fraud, the casino must immediately take care of it and resolve all cases to restore its reputation. A casino that really cares about its business will continue this because it is concerned about its reputation. If they can clear up and resolve the issue properly, the fraud charges will surely go away, and the casino will regain its reputation.

Casino representatives who interact actively with people must provide maximum service to their members. They can also get good reviews because they provide maximum service.

I went with the  "No complaints or scam accusations" option because that's one of the primary things I lookout for before trying out a nee service or product irrespective of whether or not it is a casino or sports bookie.  The overall feedbacks from the others that have used such product or service is a key indicator of the kind of experience I stand to get as one of their newest users.

But that is for an aged casino. If it's a new one with little to no feedbacks from users, then a review and signature campaign is a metric that I would look at. If they're willing to have users review their service with the goal of perfecting their service, then I'm in. 100%.

I will go for "Very responsive representative here" because the casino as a Bitcoin casino sites must had been examined, trusted with good reputations before it could had been authorized to be associated with the Bitcoin and Bitcoin is a reputable digital currency that has keep to maintain its potentials so it is termed that Bitcoin of this platform can not afford to indulge with any form of activities from other sectors of Organisations or institutes that may compromise their integrities so.... As long the casino is linked with the Bitcoin operations then I will accept that it is reliable and trusted.

So therefore, this platform is operations as to circulate the the existence and the potentials of Bitcoins is not only based to be spreaded by its positive potentials alone but also discusses about the biases such as the markets volatilities of depreciations and appreciations. So, it should be assumed that the casino would also the flexible to discuss about its both negative and positive potnetials here so that they don't only stream to again the attentions of the masses on the base of stricken to offer success winnings on the gamblers so, it is sure that they would also enhance to breed responsible gambling amongst the gamblers.

I think all four is important but I chose the no complaint or scam accusation as the top one in priority

1. No complaint or scam accusation - If players aren't griping about the casino, it's likely doing something right. It can be through word of mouth or in socials.
2. Good reviews from casino review sites - When the pros say it's good, it usually is. Good reviews mean the casino's got the green light but sometimes there are fake reviews right?
3. Very responsive representative here - If the casino folks are quick to reply, that's a win. Nobody likes to wait around.
4. Launching a review and signature campaign - It's cool that they're making noise, but actions speak louder than campaigns. Let the real player experiences and reviews be the main show.

yes, I also chose this, because that's what I think you need to pay attention to when getting to know a new casino, also actually with the reviews, what's important is not important, in my opinion that's also what you have to pay attention to in the same case, because with a new casino we really have to pay attention to it first. just so that undesirable things don't happen, because with many casinos there are also those that duplicate other casinos but with the aim of cheating, and I have experienced this where the winnings I got were not paid.  This is what makes me more careful in choosing a new casino. one of them is by looking at the "No complaints or allegations of fraud" option.

and also people's different choices make it a consideration for me personally because with different thoughts I  can see the reasons they choose other options and with that I have enough knowledge to get to know new casinos.

It is just part of marketing and it has nothing to do with trust or reputation, so I will not use this as a thing to consider.
Of course campaign without payment issue will bring good effect but the main point is on the service itself.

Complaints and scam accusations are common thing, I'm sure all sites received some complaints and maybe scam accusations as well.
So it should be looked up deeper about the cases and check how the casino respond to the complaints and scam accusations.
No complaints or scam accusations here in this forum does not guarantee that a casino is safe.

It is good if casino has active and responsive representative here, at least it gives players positive point of view but as the other above things, it is not the only thing.

Depends on the review sites, because there are so many review sites that do give rating just because they get paid by the casino or they are offered with some benefits.

My opinion, I'll trust a casino if I have tried it myself and I have no significant issues while playing in the casino.

Reading every review we find on this forum is highly recommended to find out the casino's advantages and disadvantages and whether the casino is the one we are looking for. If there are no complaints or accusations of fraud against the casino, that can be a consideration for us when using the casino later. But we still need to wait to see how more people respond to the casino to feel more confident if we want to use the casino for gambling.

We do have different choices, so we have different considerations too. By reading the reviews or seeing the casino directly by visiting it, we can know or feel if the casino is the casino we are looking for or whether we need to look for another casino.

Definitely, it will be all of the above for me, but if like the op said, that we choose one that is most important, then I think that, that would be that there is no complains or scam accusation against the casino for the entire first six months they have operated, though for me, this is not an automatic way the casino gains my trust, I will still be very careful while using or playing on such casino, for I believe that alot of us here can relate to the fact that some online gambling casinos do close down and run away with their user's deposit even after having operated seemingly savely for over a year.

So, in the nutshell, only times tells which online casino can really be trusted, judging from how long they have operated successfully and how efficient they have been to their customers in all those years they are online.
For me, I think six months is too short to completely give a new online gambling casino all my trust, even when they have no scam accusation yet..

It can't be just one out of all the options. It's a combination of all the options and more that makes a casino trustworthy.
What if they have very responsive representatives yet they don't have good casino reviews?

I'm not saying the casino has to be perfect in every aspect, but every aspect has to be good. I said they can't be perfect in every aspect because no matter how well they handle their business, there must always be a complaint or two about their customer service, scam accusation, a negative review, etc.

So aside from "launching a signature campaign on the forum", we need every other factor before a casino can be trusted.

I think all of these answers are the best, because what you mentioned is a parameter that can be used as an indicator of how good a new casino is in managing its casino, both in cs services, games, and no complaints are something that is important in my opinion to calculate the assessment of a new casino that runs 6 months, only one is not so important in my opinion, namely holding a signature campaign, but holding a review is something that needs to be done, because the signature campaign is only a marketing process.

One interesting thing that needs to be added is, bonuses, membership bonuses are important to keep a casino to keep its customers playing and find it much more enjoyable if there are many bonuses.  ;D

For me,  six months is still very small to know the real character pf a new project,  we should give the mat least a year or two to be able to see their true colour because of a casino really mean to manipulate their ways,  their could go for six months faking things and bringing in all the mentioned characteristics, but at the end could still end up as scam and most times those kind of casino will just do a exit scam on their loyal customers.

We have seen a few of them who exitbitied such characteristics here in the forum for a while now,  so for that, it will only take a long time of proves and actions to really call a casino as reputable or ve able to trust them.

not only that, in my opinion, with accusations of fraud or the many complaints that exist at one casino, of course this will also be a consideration, because with so many complaints it will certainly raise a lot of questions about the casino, whether the casino is not trusted or what, how. so in my opinion, looking at and reading reviews at a new casino is quite important, because even though there are no complaints or anything else at the casino, it doesn't necessarily mean that the casino is a trusted casino, maybe it can be deceiving too, so we have to be smart to choose a casino, I myself don't know how to distinguish which casinos are really trusted and which casinos are deceiving.

That's right, by looking at reviews or coming to them directly maybe it will solve someone's ignorance and doubts about a casino, if they really want a casino that matches what is expected,  of course they must be willing to research every aspect of the casino so that they can make them know whether the casino is suitable for them or not.

If there have been some complaints or scam accusations about the casino and there is no answer from the casino or casino representatives on the forum, we should leave it immediately rather than later if we also experience problems. From the reviews we get or visiting the ANN of the casino in this forum, we can see how the casino performs and if they have representatives who are also active in managing the casino, that can add value. We can include it in our list. Later, we also have to check the casino directly to look for other information and find out whether the casino is the casino we want. And with the help of reviews from members on this forum, we can find that the casino is trustworthy and is slowly working to gain its reputation.

Checking the casino will give us more information so that it can be considered when choosing a casino. This can also prevent us from choosing the wrong casino because with so many casinos nowadays, we have to be more careful in choosing the casino.

I voted this and tbh this one was the obvious answer. If you've been following the forum and you don't ever see any complaints about them for sure you'll trust them. Actually, if there were a second option to vote for was having a good representative here that always cater the customers need and answers every question or we can simply say they have a good customer service.

- Having a signature campaign wont really be a solid indication about legitimacy but somewhat having one isnt really or comes that cheap, this is why it is really that coming into our mind
that scammers would really be making use of their funds on this matter if they were scamming users at the start.

-Having no issues would be a solid criteria because having without these things does signifies that you are really that doing your service well.
Recognition and suggestions would really be just that only possible until these things been proven out.

-Being acitve and attentive is really that a plus.You would really be seeing possible odd situations if things turns out to be odd and unusual on which we know that this community is reall
that doesnt fall into this one.

-REviews can be faked, this is why i do prefer on having real time feedbacks and words from those people who do actually be abel to use.

Against the tide, for me my minimum trust for a casino is being good for that duration, if you used their site for 6 months very smoothly or if you encountered an error or problem and they fixed it as early as they see it then they have got my trust on their site and their team. I know casinos are subject for us to be skeptic because it is all about money, but some are just starting out truthfully and in 6 months they can prove themselves just all right.

Yeah, complaints after complaints but who are we to judge? if it turned out that a complaint has been resolve it shouldn't count as negative review.

You forget a casino with the intention to scam its users can play the long con and stay for two years before pulling the plug. These ones are the scammers that rake the big pots, because they have more users gambling hugely on their casinos. If a casino ticks all my boxes namely the ones listed in the OP, I would have no problem trusting them. Do not be mistaken my friend, I’m not trusting blindly but cautiously.

I forgot to mention the masters in the games of scamming this one can stay for a very long time and obviously time it is the gamblers that should look out for them to avoid failing as victims if not there are online such scam casinos that already made attempts in this forum to promote their platform but with the help of forum users we were able to exposed and dispose them out of the forum,  although their site is still live and operational up until now,  for that gambler need to look out for such casinos and avoid them no matter what the offer they bring to the table.

You have created a poll where only one option can be voted, in my opinion the first three out of the four options you have given are necessary for a new casino gaining trust. I excluded from option number four because some review websites show paid reviews.

Potential scams into this forum are easily that being spotted by the members that we do have into this place on which i dont really have doubts if ever there is really some scam platform or service
on which people around would really be telling if they have seen something odd and would really be giving some warning to others on which it would really be that resulting that people around
would really be that having that kind of awareness about on things whether its a legit or scam site. This is the beauty of this forum because each member are really that in concern
towards other peoples condition specially into those newbies. This is why reading up feedbacks and suggestions on this place is highly recommended.

I prefer to play on a casino known as reputable one as they won't ruin their image just because of small amount of money.
For a new casino, it would take time to gain their credibility as high rollers won't just spend money on a new one.
But as long as they have no existing scam accusation, I believe they have the chance to gain their loyal patrons.
They should also take a look on how to entice new players in their platform as they need to gain the trust of the gambling community.

If that happens, it should definitely be left behind, because I have experienced it, where the winnings I got were not paid for, even though I tried to communicate with the existing staff it didn't change the situation for the better, they instead locked the account I had. That, even though previously they always paid the winnings that I withdrew, but for some reason they didn't pay my winnings the last time, maybe they were fed up with my account which always got winnings hahaha ;D.

I think what you have to pay attention to at the start is every review that evaluates the casino, whether the casino chain is good or bad, because if it's possible the branch is bad, it's better to look for another casino that is trusted, and if you really can't tell the difference between a trusted casino and a fraudulent casino. , I suggest just reading the reviews or asking other people about the casino we are going to, as much as possible we have to be careful so that nothing undesirable happens.

Them launching a signature or review campaign here is already taking care of the other questions.

No complaints or scam accusations? If they launch a campaign here that means that they're trusted and that they've got the reputation to vouch for their casino.

Very responsive representative here? Having a signature campaign means that they need to have a responsible representative in the forum since questions and issues are needed to be asked and addressed.

Good reviews from casino review sites? Launching a campaign here is a good thing for them because that means they've got the money to back up their reputation and most casinos with big budget are pretty good places to do gambling and in turn good services and with those good services come good reviews.

Alright alright, please answer my question, why 1xbit's account get tagged instead of receive positive feedback? why the accounts that wear 1xbit's signature get tagged too? don't make a double standard e.g. exception to 1xbit, 1xbit was a scammer etc. The fact they've launched multiple campaigns and pay their participants accordingly.

[open] Restart of 1xBit signature campaign - new signatures and more spots! (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5367666.0)
1xbit.com signature campaign (over) (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5339884.0)
1x₿it.com | Super Six Signature Campaign ⚽ | Up to $100/week (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5447897.0)
[1xBit.com] - Sports - Signature Campaign [OPEN] (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376183.0)
1x₿it.com | The World Cup Adventure Signature Campaign 🏆 | Up to $100/week (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5422457.0)

REQUEST FOR ATTENTION OF: All 1xbit Signature Campaign Participants (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5347222.0)

The reason why I stated earlier is that to know how serious a casino is with their reputation it has to do with the time they have spent in building that reputation and how well they have dealt with issues as their risen along the line.

If as a gambler you can establish your judgement based on that understanding of taking the time let's say those casinos that have already spent at least 2 to 3 years in the building and establishing a reputation won't run away with your money when you play on them since they have a long-standing reputation to guide at that point.