Bitcoin Forum

Most casinos set withdrawal limits and this is usually perceived by some gamblers as bad practice. However, after seeing This post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5501089.msg64256834#msg64256834) by lovesmayfamilis (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1982152) about a gamble winner who died of heart attack when he won jackpot of $4 million, I am having the feeling that setting withdrawal limits and procedures for heavy winnings might have some life saving merits. Assuming the man was subjected to gradual withdrawal process, I believe he would have grown mentally to handle such amount of money because it was stated that the excitement from the winning was the cause of his death. There could also be other benefits such as helping the gambler not to spend the money lavishly if it comes in bulk.

This is the reason I felt we can discuss the merits and demerits of casinos setting withdrawal limits. What is your opinion?

I do not think this is what discussing. If I win huge amount of money, I will prefer to withdraw the money at one time. If I am not able to withdraw the money at one time, I will continue to withdraw the money every 24 hours until I finish withdrawing the whole money. I will prefer gambling sites not to have withdrawal limit at all as long as I am verified on the gambling site.

99.9% jackpot winners will prefer to get what they win at one time, no doubt about it but of course casino will have their own policy/rule about such special situation.
Million dollar is decent amount and I'm sure most casino will not let their player to withdraw it at once, but maybe they will process it based on their own policy or based on agreement with the winner.
These days almost all casinos have withdrawal limit, there are even some casinos with so low withdrawal limit because maybe they have so low bankroll, that's why they need to implement it to keep the bankroll stay healthy.
When it comes to merits bs demerits of withdrawal limit then we need to see it from different sides, first is from our own side as player and second is from the casino's side.

I think that when casinos place withdrawal limits they have to do it fairly. for example if a casino puts $500,000 as a withdrawal limit and that casino allows people to deposit any amount of money, they don't put deposit limits, so that casino in a way wouldn't be being fair, because someone deposits 1 million dollars at the casino, the deposit is immediately credited to the casino account, so that person loses everything. the casino won't complain because the guy shouldn't have deposited 1 million dollars, the casino won't complain because the guy lost 1 million dollars. everything will be fine on the casino side

but if someone deposits 1 million dollars, plays and wins and ends up with 3 million dollars, but wants to withdraw and sees that the maximum monthly withdrawal is $300,000 per month, in that case the person will be frustrated and it is unfair what the casino would be doing with that person. This is why it is necessary for the casino not to set a maximum withdrawal amount. I know that casinos are a business and they don't have unlimited bankroll money, they need to see how much bankroll they have to pay people, if a casino has 50 million bankroll, they won't be able to pay someone who wins 100 million, but even so you can place maximum values ​​on bets, in this way preventing someone from depositing 1 million and not being able to withdraw 1 million

Really? Have you not seen people bashing casinos for setting low withdrawal limits? Do you think that assuming there was a withdrawal limit in place for the case being discussed in the post in question that it wouldn't have helped avert the death of the gambler? Well, it might be your opinion that the topic is not worth discussion but I doubt majority of the people here will think that way because deposit and withdrawal limits are part of the major things people check when registering in a casino and somehow they are used in rating casinos. I feel that such discussion will help gamblers understand the importance of setting those limits by the casinos.

There are other people who have died from the excitement of winning big jackpot even in offline gambling but I don't think trying to safe customer's life would be the reason that a casino would set limit for withdrawal. Although it has started to be the way most are going but I would say that those who have ridiculous withdrawal limit are obviously doing that to manage their funds. Like for example using one of the biggest in the business as a reference point, I don't think stake has a withdrawal limit for customer. So if you have stake being able to pay whatever you have won, then those limiting customer's withdrawal are obviously not having sufficient fund to go round incase their jackpot winners. It is more of managing funds than protecting customers from being harmed or dying from winning excitement.

Withdrawing all the money I have won have nothing to do with my sickness or others. And probably the man has been winning small amount all the while and he has been withdrawing it and when he won the $4 millions, he knew that it is his money and the shock of the big amount amount killed the man and not others.

This has been happening to many people and I don't think there is any merit of limiting my withdrawal because at that that I will like to withdraw all and use it to start a project and I can't withdraw half and come later and face the same problem of withdraw so I will like to withdraw all.

The points you make are true from a positive point of view, at least withdrawals are done gradually and the casino gets a higher percentage fee than if you withdraw all at once. Let's say a withdrawal of $4 million is made 4 times, if each withdrawal costs 1% it will be 4%, whereas if the withdrawal is made 1x you only pay 1% to the casino. On the other hand, setting withdrawal limits is a casino way of ensuring that your money is not withdrawn too quickly. Casino want you to keep playing until your money is theirs. No matter how big or small the amount is, the casino still wants you to play until you forget everything.

From the story that stirred this your very post I don't think it was as a result of a withdrawal limit issue that led to the death of the gambler rather, the jackpot amount when mentioned to him that knocked him off his feet. However, withdrawal limits in gambling is very crucial to every gambler as it's one major criteria they look at before deciding to make use of a casino.

Almost every gambler will prefer withdrawing their money at a go without limits than having limits set and this is why many gamblers would rather use a casino with high withdrawal limit irrespective of how high their deposit might seem too.

Going further, I think the reason why withdrawal limits are set by casino's towards gamblers win it is done as a way of mitigating against money laundering. With a delay in subsequent withdraws of 24hrs to each withdraws more time is provided to run a quick underground investigation about a particular account suspected to launder money to be true or false suspicion. Etc.

It seems to me that the lower limit on withdrawals is set to minimize the share of commissions plus so that the casino balance is not used as a wallet for regular spending. As for the upper limit, it exists rather due to the pressure of regulators who are looking for AML violations (or tax evasion, which is important in the case of a big win), so casinos withdraw large amounts in stages.
As for me, I have not encountered the upper limit and have not experienced any problems with it, but I would like to  ;D

I think the rule is set for AML purposes so that criminals can't launder their money at the casino. It is usually accompanied by KYC level 3 or 4, allowing for withdrawals with much higher limits. Another reason could be to protect the casino in the event of jackpot wins. I read somewhere that they can negotiate for termed payments if they don't have enough money.

Withdrawal limits won't be a problem for most players since they lose anyway, lol.

All I know is The reason why casinos have a withdrawal limit is in case there are a lot of winners with large amounts and they cannot sustain the payout it has nothing to do with the narrative on your thread that you could suffer from a heart attack.

This limit will benefit the casino to maintain their finances; the demerit is that gamblers will prefer casinos to play on casinos with no limits; I don't have a problem with withdrawal limit as long as the limit is high; I just withdraw my money daily, but I need to control myself from being tempted to use my winnings to play in the hope of adding more, that's already greed.

It's different when it comes to the lottery. You might want to get all that money first or else if you die there would be trouble for your next of kin at how he will get what's left of your money that is being handled by the lottery management.

In casinos or online gambling sites, the withdrawal limits are there to avoid congestion in withdrawal numbers. It will be a big problem for them when most of the queries are just about the withdrawal time on when it will be received.
Another reason is to avoid spam withdrawals which could destroy the system. This is actually considered an attack on their website and might become troublesome in the future.
The only good thing about it is if you are a gambler, you may control yourself if you are trying to get greedy so that you will still be around the withdrawal limit. It will help you avoid betting more.

Casinos set withdrawal limit and max bet amount for the only reason which is to prevent money launderers from abusing the system and no one really wanted to restrict their withdrawal capability for the sake of something that is not going to happen often.

Another reason is to protect the casino's bankroll from busting.


Regarding that thread, you may also have to read this reply cause it is likely a false information that's misinterpreted in way to get attention.

Whatever the reason is, it would be better if we could withdraw all our winnings at one time.
Problems can happen at any time, what if the casino goes bankrupt and suddenly closes its services? What happens to the remaining withdrawals that we have not received?
Not to mention the tax issue which is quite confusing if the payment is made in installments.

If someone cannot manage their finances/money management, whether they receive everything directly or in installments, the result will be the same.
And the opposite could happen to what you said, there could be someone who plays continuously and loses all their winnings because they can't withdraw the entire balance.

It makes sense that after you have won you need to start withdrawing your money gradually. The man in mention perhaps might have had a Blood pressure issue or something wrong with him all along. Winning such an amount gets him so excited and anxiety increases his heart rate which may have caused his death. The death has nothing to do with the withdrawal amount or the Casino. The casino has shown you the amount you won and has allowed you to withdraw any amount you wish to take from your winning.

There shouldn't be any withdrawal limits unless the player is breaking any rules. If won a big amount and I need that money immediately, then I want my money in my bank account as soon as possible. If the casino can't let me withdraw my money then it means this is a shit casino or they don't have the money. Either way I wouldn't play in a casino like that.

Usually they block the withdrawals when the player wins big and then they do an investigation on the account in question to see if the player broke any ToS or some shit like that. If the player did no wrongdoing, he should be able to take his money to where ever he wants when he wants to.

Casinos will never set rules and restrictions that will not be in their own favour which are sometimes not in favour of the gamblers. One of the reasons casinos set withdrawal limits is to ensure that gamblers come back to the casino. A gambler that has no control over himself will try playing again so he will win more money. Unfortunately, the outcomes of such desires in most cases don't end well.

Again, giving out large sums of money to a winner might not be favourable to the casino because large amounts of money leaving the casino can disrupt operations in the casino as the casino may lack funds to run the casino. Casino operators are smart, they will make sure withdrawal limits are imposed on all gamblers.

Aside these two reasons stated above, the laws regulating casino operations in a country may demand that certain amount of money is not been paid to any gambler. This they do to ensure fraudsters and criminals do not use the casinos to carryout their operations.

Personally, I would wish to withdraw everything I won immediately but if such limits exist, I'll make sure I withdraw at intervals until nothing is left.

The man did not die but he was only collapsed and was unconscious after his win was proclaim to him. I don't think that it will be wise for Casinos to have withdrawal limit for any reason, because they don't have deposit limit. If you win $1m and you can withdraw it at once, it is better to do that.

If the casino has withdrawal limit, I will withdraw the highest amount that it the casino's limit and withdraw again the next day. I feel that those casinos that have withdrawal limit have a reason for that because I don't think that it is because they will not have enough to pay their winners. Asinos make more money and what gamblers win is peanut to the casino.

I do not really see any advantage gamblers may get with withdrawal limits, since even if they could avoid incidents like the one you bring forward, which I do not believe possible as that person presumably died when they won and not at the moment of withdrawal, it will still be nothing but a band-aid, since each one of us needs to take care about our health so finding out about an important news is not enough to kill us on the spot. Still, I understand the need for casinos to implement those limits, as it allows them some extra time to investigate if there was something fishy going on and catch scammers they would otherwise miss.

Withdrawal is not the problem here the main issues is the generalized winning and not withdrawal, okay fine, even though it was said that he would be able to withdraw 100,000 dollars per week and 400,000 dollar per month it didn't still change anything. The major cause of his heart attack was the news that suddenly breakout that he won that amount, you know even when driving it's not advisable to pick or make calls because you could hear some news that are very shocking immediately you collapse. So the death was a as cause of good news and not restricting him from withdrawal, anyway even as that it may likely help but still the news is very shocking mostly when you don't in any day expect such thing could happened and it came as surprised to you.

From my observation, I saw the clib of the thread you are taking about in X platform and it was a physical casino and not in online casino and with that I think the withdrawal is going to be over the counter payment or direct payment into the player bank accounts to avoid been rob on the way if he decide to walk away with cash but if this happens to be an online casino, he wouldn't be allow to make that complete withdrawals and he maybe put under some scrutiny check before withdrawals will be allow because that's a big amount of money.

As for the reason why online casino set up withdrawal limit could be as a result of liquidity, it will kill the casino when all the customers decide to take out all their balance and the casino might become illiquid when they allow withdrawals at once.

Another reason could be because of security reason, setting a withdrawal limit can stop someone from withdrawing everything on your account under 24 hours so you can have enough time to contact the casino to freeze your account until you were able to recover the account.

I don't think I'm the only one who would say that what the OP is saying are two different or unrelated things, I know about the case of the gambler who ended up dying because he saw himself hit that huge jakcpot that made his heart attack recur and died, but for the withdrawal problem that is another thing. The cause of the death was due to the shock of a big win that he had never won before, he couldn't believe the result, and it made the dopamine levels in the brain system increase drastically when witnessing that he was really lucky at that time which indirectly made his heart disease recur.

I understand that most casinos have withdrawal limits, but that's another thing that's not related to death, logically no matter how much you win, can't you just gradually withdraw small amounts under the withdrawal limit? Sure. I would say that it makes more sense to say that "it's better for casinos to implement win limits" not "withdrawal limits" mate. ;)

Maybe you did not understand that story very well, but the excitement from winning is what usually kills, it was not the excitement of having received the money but just the announcements that he has won such an amount of money. So even if there was a withdrawal limit on his account, that would not have helped. Withdrawal limits for some casinos is to make sure that a gambler does not just clear out all the amount of money that they have in the platform sometimes it is to make sure that this gamblers come back to try to gamble more.

It's the opposite for me lol.

If withdrawal would take months to be completed, I'd be too anxious waiting for it. For instance, there's always a chance they'd stop paying at some point, perhaps makes excuses like KYC trap. All crypto casinos I play on has curacao license and similar as well. While it does provide an easy entry for users, there is no powerful regulatory body that oversees the scene.

As for controlling the cash flow, I'd rather time locked my btc myself and/or do a time locked deposit in an insured bank.

the thing is that in gambling if you have the opportunity to win a bigger amount of money and it is a money that you have never seen before you might have a shock based on it is your first time experience of winning such amount of value of money even this occur when someone loses money through gambling so I believe that the things that happen in such way is for people who have not understand the opportunity and the also they advantages of gambling fully because when you understand that the gambling can make you to be poor and the gambling and also make you to be rich at the same time I don't think that you will feel such heart trauma when you come across or when you experience such

Most winners with that amount will agree to follow all of the KYC policies just to get the money. But the problem is what if they can't provide all of it?

Then, they have to go with the gradual withdrawal of it through the limit that has been set to them and they will understand why they need to do that.

It's because they're also being tracked with the regards of how much money gets in and out through the casino. They're so strict that even they can let go with that for an instant, they won't do that for the safety not just of their user but their entire business to comply with the regulations of the government.

Having those limits in regarding on how much a gambler would really be withdrawing? that would really be a sure NO for most gamblers. Why? They would really be having those impressions that locking up some funds or part of those winnings will really be considered to be not a viable or sensible act to be done by a legit site. Yes, they could really be having that such concern but it would be great if they would really be making it as an optional thing and not something that would really be that enforced out absolutely. I do prefer on having that bulk winning withdrawal rather than on having those gradual basis. or in parts on which
this would really be rather giving out that kind of impression and thinking that the site you are dealing with might not be able to pay up those winning upfront on the moment that you do request it.
Pretty sure that majority of us would really be having that the same liking and preference when it comes to withdrawal aspect.

Odohu, I think you are missing the point in the story that you referenced. Withdrawal limits wouldn't have saved the man. He already had a bad heart and the news of him winning the jackpot of $4 million was what "killed" not that he could withdraw the money all at once. I think that withdrawal limits are very important both on the side of the gambler and that of the casino. With withdrawal limits in place impulsive spending is curbed. While for the casino, withdrawal limits ensures that the casino doesn't become bankrupt. They would run out of cash if everyone who one could withdrawal all their winnings at a go.

When, I think about casinos setting withdrawal limits upon their gamblers, the first thing which comes to mind is that those casinos want to avoid running out of liquidity and keep the money of their gamblers into their platform as much as possible.
Though, after reading about this unfortunate case, I think setting withdrawal limits onto casinos could help, so reckless gamblers won't end up spending that money as quick as they would if got it all in a single hit. Though, I still believe setting withdrawal limits would only be beneficial to a relatively small percentage of gamblers who actually need them.

One would also need to take a look at the percentage of the money which those gamblers are allowed to withdraw and evaluate whether it is fair enough.

I think withdrawal limits are pretty normal.
That's why if a casino requires Know Your Customer verification from the start ib my opinion they are more honest.

Because imagine winning anything and then not being able to withdraw it because it ends up your country or ID is not eligible. This happens quite often actually...

I would say so long as you know what the casino requires it's a honest practice. But if rules change after sign up or if it is not obvious from the start then surely it's not something that I would consider a honest practice.

In your given case an example of a person having a heart attack from winning a huge amount of money, I believe it is irrelevant to the merit an demerit of a withdrawal limits.  The heart attack were triggered even before the person can withdraw his won money so it is not related to whether the person can withdraw the fund in full or in installment.  



The merit for a casino in setting withdrawal limit is for self preservation.  It is only advantageous to the casino and not on the players who won the amount.  For the player who have to undergo pains of multiple withdrawal request and the wait for several days to months due to the withdrawal limit is is obviously a demerit to the casino.

Well it not entirely a bad practice for centralized casinos to set withdrawal limits this is because some times those limits are set by the regulators who gives the casino the guidelines of operation, for example when you want to withdraw above $5,000 from some casinos, you are required to meet the level 2 kyc so anytime you chose to withdraw amount above $5k you should know that you are doing so with having it at the back of your mind to provide extra documents to get verified.


Aside from that limits, I think any other deliberate limits set is against the players right and also attempt to withhold gamblers money unnecessary and only scam casinos does that act.

He won after winning, not after withdrawing lol. Withdrawal does jack with regards to someone experiencing the extreme adrenaline that people have when winning. It only serves to control people by letting/incentivizing them to play with the money they won instead of withdrawing it outside in which the latter means no profit (and just loss) for the casino, the former means the casino can potentially get back the money they gave out to the winner.

As for any merits well, I don't really see any. At least in the user side. Heck I can only see the only reason for a limit to exist is what I said earlier, so that the money stays in the casino and the players be tempted to play with it than withdrawing it.

True, I think there are fixed rules and regulations in the casino to set a limit on withdrawals because if there is one withdrawal with too much money, it is subject to question. They of course need to see if it is really from the platform or if the gambler did anything bad or suspicious in order to win that huge amount of money. It is part of the protocol, I guess, and as the government is involved in the casino to set limits and as the government is involved in the casino to set limits and regulations, the platform needs to comply with the government by setting a limit on the withdrawal process. And I think even though there will be a limit per transaction to withdraw, you can still withdraw the remaining. Maybe after some time or there might be a cooldown before you can withdraw again. Let's be aware of this kind of stuff in technology. It's normal because if they let anyone withdraw any amount they want, they may be affected. Imagine if many gamblers cash out a huge amount of money, then it will have a bad effect on the platform.

I thought the same thing, he died after winning... and this is not the first time I hear about something like this. Extreme adrenaline is dangerous for people with weak hearts, and winning big money can raise adrenalin to the roof. Bad things happen, it's simply life.

But when it comes to withdrawal limits I don't see any good sides as well. If casinos allow people to play big and they have big prizes they should be able to pay all at once if someone wins. That would be fair. Holding someone's winnings and paying out in parts is not fair.

Though I know that withdrawal limits can have some merits in certain situations, I don't agree with the point you have mentioned where the guy collapsed after winning a huge amount in a physical casino. I know that things like these can happen to any person who has heart conditions or other diseases, but I don't think this is enough reason for casinos to have withdrawal limits on the money someone has won because not every gambler would have the same health conditions.

If I'm all healthy and have the capability to contain the happiness and excitement that I may get after winning a huge amount, I would like the casino to pay me in full so that I can use that money for something good. I wouldn't be able to start a business if I'm getting $20,000 a month after winning $4m.

People will choose to withdraw at one time, because we don't know how long the casino will survive. We also need to count inflation too, the value of $100 today would be different in the next year, so the gambler is in loss.

Using that illustration, someone win $4 Million, if the casino only allow $100K per month, it means he need to wait for 3 years and half in order to get all of his winning.

Having withdrawal limits only give benefits to the casino.

the guy apparently didn't die. if you read further into the thread lovesmayfamilis posted you'll see a member post an article where it says that the guy didn't die but just passed out because of the excitement of winning $4 million and is now recovering from the incident.

overall, yeah, withdrawal limits majorly benefit the casino as it protects the casino's assets from big withdrawals that could affect their day-to-day operation.

It would really be just that common sense. No one would be on their right minds that they would really be making up some withdrawal in small parts on which if ever the casino
do make out some option or recommending on having that kind of withdrawal method or ways then i dont really believe that they are really that been in concern
with their gamblers but rather they might really be not that having those kind of money that they could be able to pay off those wins directly or in bulk
and on this case then it would really be making out some possible issues that might be raised if someone cant really be able to withdraw their winnings.

Most of known and big sites or platforms that we do have today on which they would really be able to release those funds or withdrawals without any issues.
The only thing or problem that i do saw is on the moment that they do require with KYC..

I don't see any merits in casinos setting withdrawal limits. The customer should be allowed to withdraw any amount of money he wishes from the platform at anytime. Of course there is always a withdrawal fee involved, so nobody will be crazy to withdraw small sums of money, considering they will have to pay a transaction fee equally or more expensive than the sum they are attempting to cash out.

This mechanism by the casino is already enough to prevent gamblers from spamming the network with small transactions and causing further issues and losses for the platform. If there are any other preventive measures to forbid gamblers from withdrawing their money from the website, I think it's a bad move by the casino, which I would view with suspicion and mistrust.

Gambling is hard enough already to make profit from, so the minimum casinos can do is to make the withdrawal process smooth and easiest as possible for gamblers.

If it's related to someone who died because they won the jackpot, I don't think it has anything to do with withdrawal limits because, in reality, that person hasn't made any withdrawals at all because they only found out that after winning the jackpot, that person had a heart attack. Unless, the person has made a withdrawal and is holding all the money from the jackpot he won and then died. So, these factors will require withdrawal limits, but basically withdrawal limits are about avoiding money laundering practices. Because after all, when it comes to gamblers, as far as I know there is only a limit to the maximum amount of money that can be bet.

The excitement of the winning caused his death but I don't think he made his withdrawal before the incident has happened. For such amount of winnings, one would first have to check his gambling account to confirm I guess that was where he got the surprise shock that had lead to his death. It doesn't really relate to the casino setting withdrawal limits. It might help in some way just like you said but not really. You will still see the amount on your betting account but then won't be able to withdraw which I think will even caus more health issues.

Yes, it is true that what caused the death was because of the significant excitement in the situation that made him overreact which made his heart rate increase dramatically, meaning that the death was not caused by withdrawals but was caused by significant excitement.

For the problem of withdrawal limits applied by the casino, yes, it may have its advantages and disadvantages, where one of the disadvantages may be that when a gambler manages to win a big win, he will not be able to withdraw all his funds at once because it exceeds the withdrawal limit, but of course the withdrawal can be done repeatedly with smaller amounts until all your winnings are cashed, and for the problem of death it has nothing to do because it is clear that the cause is due to the significant excitement caused by the big win.

Basically, the man was opportune to withdraw the money he won from the jackpot, he only saw the winning amount and was dead because he haven't won such a huge amount of money before. As that day was his first time to own a million dollars he was shocked and out of happiness he died. I really thought that if the victim knew about such limits on withdrawal or winning he wouldn't have set it because he won't want to will only small amount of money. No gambler will set their potential winning to a small amount and even if there is any, it's just few of them.

Well for one. It keeps the gamblers going and stuck inside the casino, sometimes even going so far as to already waste the money that they already won from the games inside the casino. Which is also partly the reason why these casinos set withdrawal limits in the first place.

On the other hand, it makes it so these casinogoers are more wary of the money they spend inside the casino, cause if the casino I’m in is holding money withdrawals of up to 10000 bucks, you can bet your sweet bippy I’m not gonna spend that much gambling or even deposit that much money in one go, even if it’s money that’s disposable.

Although honestly, Despite this I think the latter is a stretch and there is literally little to no benefits out of casino withdrawal limits. So take it how you will.

I don't think it's right to have limit on the particular amount one can withdraw from a gambling casino if they can accommodate for that same amount of money, the way I see it is that what we can make deposit of should also be the same proportion of what we can withdraw in other not to make it looks shady on them that one side is being sided than the other, gamblers will not like having withdrawals issues when they are making use of a casino after which some have already managed in meeting up gor KYC requirements then to discover that they have limit to how much they can withdraw, this could be disappointing.

Regulators may force you to pay taxes or simply prohibit you from playing for one reason or another, they also have disadvantages. But you have an excellent mechanism for being on an equal footing with the casino - the institution of reputation. Each casino values ​​​​its reputation, so it is not profitable for them to unreasonably refuse or delay payments; any such case that becomes public can seriously harm their business.

I did not really get you right, do you mean that the casinos would had set up sequential withdrawal method based on limitation or setting up winning limits? Because as stated, it was not the case that the man died at the course of withdrawing the funds but as a cause that he was overexcited with the huge amount being won.

But in anyway, I don't have ideal if the casinos do have withdrawal limits as I have not hit huge amount of money before. I may also not like that ideal if there is such because it would be assumed that the gamblers don't have full control access over their funds in their casino accounts and so also, if we think other way round, it will be assumed that the casino is logically tempting the gambler to gamble with the funds in the accounts.
Let us also believe it that lot of gamblers only funds their accounts when they want to gamble because they knows that they will keep gambling as long as they have money in their wallet to gamble with.

Also, let us understand this that some gamblers do help themselves to maintain responsible gambling by not entrusting their savings or huge amount of money to themselves otherwise they would have it all for gambling.
So, they are either entrusted the funds to someone else or they makes immediate utilizations with it so that they don't lavish it all in gambling.

So, if the casinos would have this withdrawal restrictions in the case that a gambler won huge amount of money and the gambler falls under this categories of such tempting gamblers, of course they may end up loosing it back to the casino.

Casinos and sportsbooks set withdrawal limit for exactly the same reasons why exchanges in crypto and protocols in decentralized finance choose to set limits on withdrawals as well. I believe it has to do with the fact that very large withdrawals will have a cascading effect on their net balances. That, along with the fact that they might be under some regulations to keep withdrawals to a limit. For KYC, there are bigger limits for higher KYC verification levels. I believe that is the standard across the board.

If you happen to play on big casinos like stake, they have large withdrawal limits. It means, they can accommodate big wins. However, do take note as you are classified as a high roller account, you should also see to it that you are high likely to complete their kyc requirements. You won't get agitated if you need to leave some balance in your account if you know the site is a reputable one. This is the advantage of playing on a trusted site. You won't have problems leaving some funds and withdraw it in the succeeding days.

For some small casinos/bookies, they are setting withdrawal limits as they can't afford yet to operate with big bankroll. Hence, to avoid bankruptcy, they need to operate on a limited budget. This one is a better approach rather than not paying big wins to their players. It can easily give them negative feedback among its patrons if they have withdrawal complaints.

I think you won't even think of withdrawing it all at once 'coz it is somewhat a given idea that you will withdraw it partially, even with lotteries. What will matter more during that moment is that you won the jackpot prize and for sure you'd be on 'clouds' figuring how things went . Either with or without withdrawal limits, I would be fine I guess as long as I will have the assurance that I will get everything that I won.Well yes, preference. But Imagine pulling the whole amount at once and transferring it to your bank (Assuming that you are in a country wherein cryptos aren't widely accepted), won't it alarm your bank? Taxations? And questioning the amount and all. This is why I prefer partial withdrawal.

From the story don't you think what actually killed the jackpot winner is the fact that he won this money and not that there were any withdraw arrangements made... if anything I wouldn't be surprised if the winner  had some medical condition like hypertension which could have lead to his passing???
And btw, don't you think if they introduced withdraw limits on  these big jackpots..this would make them unattractive to play as people might be playing for the big money and not receiving partial payouts.

For argument's sake let's say these withdraw limits were set by a casino, don't you think the real winner here is the casino themselves as it allows them to stay in business and continue being liquid especially that in the business world delaying a payment is good for ones financial position   :P

it is not only the players that need to be making profits but also the casino that is why as much as possible they try to keep the players and their money inside of the platform which is of course an inconvenience to the players but there really is nothing much we can do

Unless the withdrawal limit is too unrealistic then I have no complains because that is how they operate

I don't think a withdrawal limit could have changed the situation of the man who died from winning life-changing money, because what caused him to die was shock or disbelief that he won such a large amount of money.
Withdrawal limits only make it limited to taking the money at once but still the money he will get is the same amount, so if there are players who are not mentally strong enough to receive large amounts of money they can still lose it all, or die of shock, what's more, the withdrawal limit is only valid for 24 hours. or if it takes longer 7 days or 1 month but he still wins big money.

Casinos implementing withdrawal limits is normal, even exchanges do the same thing, and as far as I know for crypto casinos will process payments to their users via hot wallets and casinos certainly won't put all their funds in hot wallets that are vulnerable to being hacked, so they apply restrictions and of course, there are other considerations.

Players who win large amounts can of course be constrained by withdrawal limits, but I'm sure only gamblers with large capital can win large amounts and they can't play in small casinos because maybe they are not constrained by withdrawal limits but end up where the casino cannot pay out their winnings. and the casino ran off with the player's money.

I think that setting withdrawal limits to a certain extent are fine, because they not only protect the casino from misuse as they are also a protection for us gamblers. Winning a big jackpot is the dream of most gamblers and in that case I would expect that the majority of gamblers would like to immediately withdrawal the majority of the winnings. The casino protects itself with limits as it wants to verify that the winnings are legit and we as gamblers know that even if someone else hacks our gambling account, they won't be able to withdraw all our funds in a single day. Most bank accounts and credit cards have withdrawal limits as well and I don't see any big issue there either. As long as we know about those limits in advance we can plan accordingly and don't face any issues.  Which makes reading the terms of service so important. The casino will not randomly choose withdrawal limits to prevent gamblers from taking their money out. These are usually fixed policies in place and we can read up on them before. Just because we won't be able to withdraw all our winnings in a single day, doesn't make a big difference. It might even be beneficial to us, because we don't have access to all the money directly and will not fall in a spending trap. Having a large amount of money quickly in our bank account could lead to a surge of unnecessary spending which we might regret later.

As long as they keep paying out winnings, even though we have to withdraw them gradually, I don't think it's a problem, we just need to be patient and wait every day to make gradual withdrawals. The reason is that they (the casino) must also have a reason why they enforce this in the withdrawal terms and conditions and we should also know what the withdrawal limits are.

Regarding the situation where someone dies because of getting a very big win, I think it's just a coincidence and it has nothing to do with this. The reason is that what the OP said is also just an assumption, and if we trace it to what happened in the news, the person died of a heart attack, perhaps extraordinary excitement was the trigger.

I think we all know that there is always a limit from a casino regarding the amount of money that can be withdrawn, and again as long as the casino is paying it is not a problem even if we are slow to make a withdrawal.

There is a reason why they still limit you despite the fact that you are verified. There is a chance that a casino employee might do something wrong and let his/her friend to win or etc. To sum up, there is a chance that someone might violate the rules inside and artificially make someone win. So for casinos to protect themselves from such events, they set withdrawal limit. Basically, they let you to withdraw the amount they can afford to lose on each customer that sends a withdrawal request.

Sorry OP but I think it has nothing to do with that gambler who died, I mean he died right after seeing the results of his game which ends up hitting the jackpot and there maybe no withdrawals yet that occurred. You still got a point that may be having a withdrawal limit might save someone of spending their money recklessly but for some, I think they will only feel that it was a hassle.

On some casinos that I play, they have a withdrawal limit but there is also a writing which states that: 'you can withdraw 50 times, 100 times, and so on... per day', so we still can be able to bypass the restrictions given, easily. Anyways, I think they are only built in order for them to avoid being questioned by the banks, authorities, regulators, and the likes.

Well, setting a withdrawal limit is not a solution to this problem because, as long as the gamblers know that they are now the rightful owners of the huge money they have won, they will still be extremely happy and can still die from their state of overexcitement. 

One advantage I can point out is that setting a withdrawal limit will limit anyone (a thief) from withdrawing every dollar that a gambler has in their account. For example, if you have about $20k in your casino balance and the daily withdrawal limit is $500, and a hacker gains access to your casino account, they cannot withdraw all that money at once because of the limit, and once you realize that there is an unusual withdrawal from your account, you can quickly reset your password.