Bitcoin Forum

Regs are the main problem with making new business. Many of the regs are useless, designed to protect us from things that almost never materialize. Because of this, they slow the operation of advancement down, while making money for the reg-promoters.


Trump's promise to dump federal regulations (http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/365525-2024-07-17-trumps-promise-to-dump-federal-regulations.htm)

---

https://www.wnd.com/2024/07/trumps-promise-to-dump-federal-regulations/
This week, Donald Trump will officially become the Republican nominee.

Soon he is likely to again be president, according to the most accurate predictions, which come from people who put their money where their mouths are – people who bet. They currently give Trump a 67% chance of winning.

President Joe Biden's chances have fallen below 20%.

This is good news to those of us who fear America is gradually being strangled by ever-increasing regulations.

Trump promises to get rid of bad rules.

"Remove the anchor dragging us down!" he said. "We're going to cancel every needless job-killing regulation!"

Trump was a developer, so he knew about the thicket of rules that often make it nearly impossible to get things done.

But Republicans routinely talk about deregulation and then add rules. The media called George W. Bush the "anti-regulator." But once Bush was president, he appointed thousands of new regulators.

Trump was different.

Once in office, he hired regulation skeptics. He told government agencies: Get rid of two regulations for every new one you add!

But they didn't. Growth of regulation slowed under Trump, but it still increased.

Still, I think Trump's anti-regulation attitude was why stock prices rose and unemployment dropped. He sent a message to businesses: Government will no longer crush you! Businesses then started hiring more people.

Of course, the media weren't happy. Reporters love regulation. The New York Times ran the headline, "Donald Trump is Trying to Kill You"!
... (https://www.wnd.com/2024/07/trumps-promise-to-dump-federal-regulations/)

---

8)

Needless to say regulations are necessary, they keep a role within the market and the politics of any country which calls itself to be civilized. Problems begin to appear when when regulations start to pile up and most of them do not serve a real purpose, just to increase the friction and make businesses to cost more to operate within the legal frame of the country.
I am okey with regulations, as long as they remain within a reasonable limit, because if regulations start to shrink and businesses, corporations and the rich get to do whatever they want in order to increase their profit, they will not care to put people at risk for the sake of those profits.
They would stop investing as much as they used to in industrial safety protocols and tools (because it is no longer necessary), they would also stop testing food and water sources in order to check for contamination in them, and so on.

Fair regulations stop companies from abusing their position.

There is a place for regulation. But it seems that the bureaucracy grows and the regulation grows right along with it. Many regs are just silly, or should be implemented on an individual basis rather than overall. Like drivers licenses.

8)

Are you implying people should allowed to drive a vehicle without having to go through the process of getting a license? That's funny. Because when you talk about cutting regulations and bureaucracy, the first thing which came to my mind was the usual stuff one is supposed to do in order to open and register a business, for example, so instead of doing a lot of paper work, one can start doing business quicker and easier.
I believe driver licenses are necessary, though. I could not expect someone to be bestowed a car without being trained in the slightest on the rules they are supposed to follow to prevent accidents.

You seem to be kinda behind. People in the US absolutely do not require a license to drive. It's in adjudication of the meaning of the 1st Amendment. It's called The Right To Travel. There are people across the US doing this, even though they might wind up in court now and again. They win, but they still get dragged into court another time. Gov just doesn't learn.

Drivers licenses don't stop people from speeding, etc. And they don't stop accidents. They are simply a money-maker for government. Licensing doesn't necessarily have to do with knowing the rules of the road. One can learn those without a license.

8)

EDIT: Even without the Right to Travel, anybody can beat a traffic ticket (and lots of other things) in court. All they have to do is stand unrepresented (stand present)... without an attorney and without representing themselves. Then, require to face their accuser as American law allows. Their accuser is listed on the indictment as THE STATE OF SUCH AND SUCH. Since the THE STATE OF SUCH AND SUCH won't/can't get on the stand when it is called, case dismissed.

Do you think he can stop the war?

You understand, he promises one thing, but he will most likely do another.

At this point of the game, that is a constant when comes to leaders within the western hemisphere. Even Biden promised to stop the drilling of oil in the United States and he could not do so. Trump promised to build a giant wall in the southern border and yet, he could not deliver (whether because he did not actually mean it, or he was not allowed by the establishment).
Many Latin American countries are also an example of politicians who promise a lot of things but they won't deliver anything, for a variety of reasons. This election cycle in the United States won't be different, both Trump and whoever ends up being the Democrat nominee will under deliver on their promises.

Trump started the wall. But due to Deep State warring with him, he wasn't able to finish it in a timely manner. The question is, is the wall still relevant? Another is, will Trump continue it when he gets into office this time?

8)

Why would not be the southern border wall be relevant? Republicans want immigration to be a political problem as long as possible, so they can continue to use it as a issue to be "solved" during their political campaigns. I have read that alledgedly there was a project of law for immigration which was discussed in a bi-psrtidan way and it did not get approved by Republicans because Trump torpedoed it, he needed the border to continue to be much a mess a possible for him to talk about it.
That is an example of how bad the quality of the leaders is in some parties... Even if Trump wins and restarts the building of the giant wall to "solve" the problem, he is likely to receive a letter from his fellow republicans not to complete the wall, otherwise it would be a problem less for them to campaign on next cycle.

Do you have proof of that, that Trump needed the border trouble? After all, it was the Biden team that wanted the illegals, to get them into a voting position so they could vote for Biden. Or do you think that Trump really wants Biden to win?

You are really twisting some political thinking in one direction.

8)

commiting felonies much?  :o


Driving without a driver’s license or driving with a suspended or revoked license is illegal in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. In most states, the first offense is a misdemeanor. If you have multiple offenses, it can be a felony

https://www.carinsurance.com/Articles/driving-without-license-penalties-by-state.aspx

Not talking about driving. Talking about traveling by right.

You own the comb in your pocket. You take the comb from point A to point B. Travel by right.

You own your car. You take your car from point A to point B. Travel by right. No driving involved.

You can do it because 1st Amendment adjudication says you can.

When you decide to drive, get licensed.

Driving and traveling by right look almost the same. Be firm in your understanding of traveling by right before you do it.

Note that this is not a Federal thing. It is a State thing. Trump doesn't have anything to do with driving regs.

8)

Make America Great Again!