Bitcoin Forum

As for sports betting, I sometimes recall such an interesting analogy: a predatory animal in the savannah that hunts gazelles. Imagine a leopard or a cheetah that hunts a gazelle. The leopard could run aimlessly after gazelles all day until its strength leaves it and it does not catch a single gazelle.
But no predator does this. The leopard chooses situations when the gazelles allow the predator to get quite close to them and only then attacks.
You may ask, what do leopard tactics have in common with sports betting? In my opinion, there are also similar situations in sports betting, when one game becomes a little more predictable than others, but for the bookmaker this is not so.
What are these situations? These can be very different matches.
1. Situations in which a sports team has no motivation to win. When a victory does not fundamentally change anything for this team.
2. When equal teams meet, but one of them has more injured players.
3. When a team is demoralized by frequent losses.
4. When there are a number of factors that make it difficult for this team to win: playing against a strong team, playing away from home, problems with the coach.
----------
Can you write your own situations in which the outcome of the match becomes a little more predictable and this is not always recognized by the bookmaker?

Experience.

Maybe the best record is being hold by a young and inexperienced team but they are super athletic. However, if they will face a team that has so much experienced, maybe they are already out of their primes but they could have that one last game in them to push themselves very hard and win. Usually this experienced team will try to proved that they still have it and so they are going to do anything in their capacity to pull that one big upset.

I’ve never heard this term Leopard tactics in sports betting before but I will admit I look for situations like this sometimes. However, I’ve learned in these sorts of situations games can sometimes be even more unpredictable that normal. So typically when I’m betting a situation like this, I tend to take the underdog and hope for an unexpected outcome.

 The leopard tactics is a strategy only know by those with long time experiences in sports. Most times the Coach have most of these ideas and tries to implement them on his team so they could be victorious. There are many similar situations like this, for instance in a match when some players have received various cards and are being warned by the ref. Let's say one read cards has already been issued to the opposing team. It would break their formation and leave a bigger chance for the other team to go into their defense strategy.

5. When there are some idiots playing, usually these idiots can influence their teammates.
6. When people judge the teams based on the experience and history instead of the current performance.
7. When the teams are fighting for shitty trophies like FA Cup, DFB Pokal, Coppa Italia, Copa del Rey etc.
8. When the referee is very known as a robbery.

And there are many more thing, as long as they're playing to get the most prestigious trophies, all of the teams will all out.

Actually, bookies always have way to gain an advantage in every sports match that they include in the betting options, bookie calculations will be much more accurate than gamblers and of course bookies can also do unexpected things like reversing or changing odds.
I think any tactic in sports betting can't really go according to expectations, the most important thing is how smart the gambler is in determining the betting options about what is chosen and bet on.

So far, the conditions like that that I can get are when in match it shows that half the game is over and the advantages of each team playing can be clearly seen.
This is condition that always makes it easier for me to have predictions and bets that are easier to win.

All that you listed above have all been noticed by the bookmakers and they are using it to know the odd that they will let the bettors to choose from in a way it will not favour the bettors. I do not also see how this should be seen as a leopard tactics because the more chance you have in betting on those betting sites, the less money that you can win which is a disadvantage in long term.

I am going to use the Boston Celtics standing as an example for this. They won 64 out of 82 games in the 2024 season before they became champions and they almost didn't lose in the playoffs.

Now, considering one gambler is a big fan of them and didn't even bet for any team, is he a winner? Yes, even if the gambler took the money lines only.
Their range is about x1.10 - x1.30 in most of their games it goes way below when they are up against a super-weak team.
The playoffs on the other hand were the most profitable one because the lines changed considering those teams who played there were not that weak anymore.
Still, it's like betting for the stronger team in a whole season and I think they became an underdog for just a minimal amount. There are injuries that happened to them but it's not that large of an effect.

Sport betting is a little more difficult and fun to predict than games you apply your training and expertise to win. If you're an expert in playing games like Ludo. It becomes a bit easier for you to gamble and win because you probably have an idea on your opponent already. Unlike sport betting where you apply the leopard situation because you literally derived your stakes from your instinct and most probably the strength of the clubs in competition. When smaller clubs play with bigger clubs, you expect the bigger and much experienced club to win particularly that they have a more experienced manager and a stronger squad depth. When placing a gamble, these are some of the things you consider including their past games and the current stats of both clubs in comparison with one another.

when you're looking from a distance, the general assumption is that the weaker team always comes with a mentality that they've already been beaten even before the game started but in reality that's far from the case. Even. Though you're an underdog, you always have the believe that you can win your opponent even when it's glairing that he's better than you in all ramification, it might not have paid well for most instances due to the obvious reason that the big clubs always have quality players but there isn't a thing as a game you're sure that will go in favour of a certain game because one is less experience than the other

During the last champions league, I know that a lot of people didn't imagine Dortmund to get to the finals in the manner it eventually happened and that's how unpredictable games can be. Even teams in the relegation zones that keep loosing most of thier matches aren't happy to find themselves in that position and are actively working too hard to break out from that position. They've always been underdog but still find ways of winning matches even against a more superior and popular opposition.

The worst of it all is when two players are given red card from the same team. That is a lost game already as long as the red cards was not given towards the end of the match.

If two players are given red card in the first half, it makes it impossible for such team to win the match be it a weak or a strong team. Shit happens in matches and that is why as a gambler consider that you can lose your bet easily than winning it in order for you not go gamble for profit.

I think this rarely happens because bookmakers are experts and usually smarter than us. What I’ve noticed from my experience is that when I think the outcome is easy to predict, I often end up betting on the wrong side based on the game’s result. In short, it’s really unpredictable, which is why the majority of bettors or the public lose most of the time^^^the betting odds (point spread and totals) are very tricky.

You state those examples and while it is possible that bookmakers may miss something in their calculations, they are fully aware of all the scenarios you listed. Not only that, they have many thousands of games that are instantly analyzed in order to determine the odds when those parameters are true. Take games where the team has no incentive to win, like they've already won the league for the year - the bookmaker knows that the manager might field a weaker team so there is less chance of star players being injured or giving newcomers a chance to shine. They'll drop the odds with that in mind and I've seen weaker odds on such games. What I do see sometimes mispriced is in play games, with scenarios like 10 man teams who are ahead yet the odds are still heavily against them.

You have already mentioned the obvious ones which gives an added advantage to the users for betting.
This is a nice strategy I would say but you know that it doesn't work always.
I have been using strategy at times and used to place my bet in the last few minutes of ending the match.
While I won many times, I also lost few times when the match totally turned the opposite side in the last minute.
I guess it was just my bad luck but otherwise it's a nice option to try out.

Rest assured that bookmakers factor all of these into the odds that are presented, whatever that can affect the outcome of the match and can be discovered easily by a little research goes into the odds.

- Jay -

We have this scenario on our national team on Basketball. The chosen coach keep choosing the players that has strong connection with(favoritism if you may call it) without considering much the skills while putting on bench and allocate less play time to players that has real skills but has no connection with the coach.

The result is a disaster on our national team. I keep winning that time by betting against our national team. Luckily, this coach was already replaced and we dominant again basketball on SEA region and might compete on higher scale league.

This is an exciting topic, knowing that bookmakers cannot predict 100%. It's like in Formula One, where the rain changes outcomes because of the unpredictable weather and what it could cause in the race.

Psychological factors are also something to consider because those people might feel pressure from their team captain or something.

Situations where a team continues to change their coach almost every season.
when the team keeps selling off their key and important players every time to make more money.
when a team just signed new players and are trying to get them to adjust to the teams pattern and style of playing.
when a team get a red card or even more on the same day on the pitch on the same game at same time.
when an injury prone player who is a key player gets injured while playing a game.
when the coach is having issues with some of his players and sometimes the management.

It is very difficult that the bookmaker in this case the casino does not know the same information as you do,unless you have some insider info in some lower leagues in any major leagues you start in disadvantage compared to the bookmaker as the bookmaker has a team working on information and checking every little detail before placing their odds,if you have noticed,odds increasing or decreasing as we get close to the start of an event shows the information that the bookmaker knows and act accordingly to such information.The number one statement,the motivation you never should play any team who has no motivation whatsoever.The third point is one which can make you money,if a team has lost in a consecutive ways chances are high they will continue to do so,in this case I would bet against that team.Number four statement is most of the times irrelevant and does not impact the choice.

Whether I have a Tactic or a Situation when I place a sports bet, in my judgment for now I place a normal bet like most people do, my guideline is on a strong team, even though on the field the results are different.

If I'm not mistaken, sports betting bookies are like that too, they lower and raise the Odds 1x2 score, based on the team situation, sometimes they are very quick to change bets where the first team situation has a lower percentage chance of winning, be it the condition of the players, the field and other factors that they believe do not create good opportunities for that match.

However, the situation that I often do to open sports bets and to make it easier for me to win is that I usually place bets in the final minutes of the initial match, In such a situation I can monitor both teams how they play on the field and also the players, usually situations like that make me often successful, even though the odds I take are low, but I am satisfied to bet.

The bookmakers will not miss a situation like this, they are like having a machine that always knows which teams are experiencing the problems referred to above, the bookmakers will affect the odds given in this market, of course we can determine whether it will be accurate or not.

I still remember when a few seasons ago Liverpool had injured players this affected the game to decline so I bet against the flow even though the bookmakers offered favorite odds on Liverpool because I chose the underdog team which in the end won the odds.

In short, it is very rare to find something like this can be bet correctly, tried for several times but the results failed because it could not be predicted.

In the situations I have seen, bookmakers place odds on teams from leagues that are not popular, mainly in games from some Asian leagues or in games involving national teams from Africa or games from the Brazilian top league. But there are not many cases in which bookmakers place high odds and get it wrong. That's why I don't focus on that. I choose games that involve teams and players that I know so that I can make a better analysis of the possible winner, the possible number of goals that can be scored. When it comes to games involving my country's national team, bookmakers place very high odds, because in the past my country's national team was extremely weak, but today it has good players, but bookmakers don't know these players, that's why I'm happy to bet on my country's national team every time and make a profit with their victory.

No, I haven't used that Leopard tactics in sports betting, to be honest, it's the first time I'm even hearing about that term. I often avoid placing bets in the matches where prediction is hard and that way in very few matches I face some losses.

However, if that Leopard tactic is working for you then I believe there's nothing wrong in use of it. I believe it's more like a strategy than something that could harm a bookmaker and If I'm not wrong there's no restriction in using a strategy.

Most of the bookmarks are even more active to list or knows all these because it one of the factor which makes them knows what odd gonna, most times you would feels is gonna end as you think but it does end up the other way round making it too hard for gambler to understand it. But we should also know and note that there winning still depends on chances which we can never be sure of those outcomes.

I don't know if it's only me but I'd been amazed at how bookmakers are quite comprehensive in creating odds. It seems odds are released after all things are considered. Yeah, there were times when I thought I saw something that isn't observed by the majority of bettors and even including the bookmakers. Only to find out in the odds that they seem to have noticed what I noticed as well. Or perhaps the odds have already adjusted according to the latest developments as bettors are probably quick to take advantage of anything especially unexptected factors like injuries.

To be honest I think I don't fully understand your analogy with the leopard tactic. You mean they only invest their energy in situations profitable for them? That is to say they only "play" when they have an edge against their prey. I'm not really sure about that, because they do hunt for eating, or feeding their children therefore it is not something optional they can do wherever they want it's something necessary for their survival. Do you understand what I mean?
Considering the examples you have cited, you are very unlikely to get any edge from them, all those parameters are already taking account by bookmakers.

First time knowing about the leopard tactics in sports betting and I must say, this is an interesting and a very ideal tactics to influence our winning. When we talk about having some skills in sports betting, I believe what was meant was using the leopard tactics to our advantage. The ability to study the teams involved, know their strengths and weaknesses which makes the match easily predictable, then use the information at your disposal to place your bet. This may not guarantee a 100% win, but it will go a long way in influencing one's win and it is way better than betting without any actual plan which places one at the winning side. This is not something meant for professionals only, anyone who understands a particular sport can use the leopard tactics.

It is a job to bookmakers to create odds, so you should expect them to be really good with it. If a sport betting company has incompetent bookmakers, it will surely affect them, gamblers like you who are quick to observe, can take advantage of them. Bookmakers are very informed, and there will rarely be any situation that you observe that they won't observe too, or haven't observed already.

I remember last season when points was deducted from Everton in the premier league and they were threatened with relegation, the danger of relegation pulled the players together and made them give their all to ensure it did not happen. Some activities and situations in a team that they face together can increase their bonding and have good positive effect on their performance, although it can still go sideways because that possibility will always be there.

I know what you mean, but the explanation is a bit awkward, because IMO you can't profit from the following points.


1. How do you know that? Are you a part of the team? Do you have insider information? The media can tell you things they want you to hear and be aware that if you can read the article or watch an interview, everybody else can.

2. When key players are injured the bookies will not give you a good deal. Everybody can see that the team is weakened and will not bet on it.

3. Same as above.

4. Again bookies will not pay well for that. You will have to bet a lot of money for that bet to matter.

All these you have pointed out are not kinda new to sports bettors as it's common that it's a part of what we call or refer to as analysis we make between teams before making decisions on which option to go with for or against any of the two teams. We look at their head-to-head, recent results from other matches with other teams. All of these and more are requisite to making predictions that is with high probability to play instead of going in blindly or out of guess work. But relating it to leopard hunting tactics it's the first time for me on hearing this and am trying to find how it connects.

I am having hard time understanding the leopard tactics and sport betting and reading the replies many people felt that way too.

All the questions you asked will be taken into consideration and then only the odds are decided so the outcome can be all the possible outcomes but most favorable one will be the one with less odd and that's what most people will bet on but this often proves that all the stats are useless on the particular day when the one that everyone hoped will be lost give their best and make a history for themselves.

This is the first time I heard about this strategy or tactics in sports betting, and from its name you can know how it is working on betting, leopard who is an animal that hunts smartly, carefully and get his victim and in this case for betting is a good outcome. That’s true, sometimes in lower leagues where bookies are not very good in studying or knowing how the teams are playing, compared to someone who’s focused and have knowledge about both team playing, this makes a great opportunity for a good outcome.

Most situations where a team is not playing well due a very obvious or clear reason that lead the player to not play well or manage to win, especially in famous and known leagues, the bookies are aware of them as well and they study these situations before giving the odds to profit with a smaller margin. That’s why you need to chase the good opportunity and take your chances. However, gambling stays the same and there is always luck involved.

Me too, but it sounds fun and if it's working for somebody - that's the beauty of it, I agree ;D Maybe I will invest some time in the future to read into it. Time will tell.

This is quite new and unfamiliar to me but I will definitely look into it and see how it will help me out in this new football season, basically everything about this strategy is to do in-depth research on both teams, no 2 is very valid I agree with that, the team with the most injured players are more likely to lose the game due to their poor formation, no 4 is also a good point, when a team has a losing streak of five matches there's a very high chance they might lose their next game..These are very thoughtful points, you are very experienced

Yeah, and if indeed there are rare times when they release odds that seem to have missed certain factors, the market would be quick to notice and would certainly take advantage. Sooner or later, the odds would eventually adjust to all the circumstances. So there is only a small window to take advantage of odds with certain discrepancy so to speak.

However, I don't discount the possibility that certain bettors see things differently. Some bettors even see an 8.00 underdog to win.

One scenario that I can think of is a bit similar to this, instead of them playing to win, they're fired up to spoil the chances of the other teams. Bookies tend to lean heavily on teams that have something to play for (playoffs, seeding, etc.), and certain teams struggle to perform under pressure.

We also have newly formed teams who empower themselves through momentum, at the start they don't look as impressive because they're losing or struggling as expected, but after a bunch of wins, they suddenly snowball to becoming one of the teams. We could say they're overperforming or improving at an unexpected rate because bookies don't easily favor new teams, unlike well-known teams who've been on the scene for several years.

I guess the bookmakers are very smart these days, and they use good odds providers in their casinos. They are always aware of these types of situations and instantly modify the odds according to the situation. Still, if you want, I can quote you a situation where the winning probability increases without the bookmaker noticing it. Imagine if a strong player from a team gets injured and goes for rest and a substitute comes in place for fielding. Then in the innings break it is found out that the player has serious injury and won’t play the rest game, then a new player who is comparatively weak will play in place of him, and now this team has the low chances of winning. This is a situation that can happen in a cricket or football match, and the bookmakers will be slow to act on the changes. Here the gambler can take advantage like the leopard.

Yes, this is a good example. In general, I think that bets made within the match are more "leopard" than bets made before the game. Yes, the game for a simple bettor has few advantages over a bookmaker. In fact, what can a simple bettor do better than a professional bookmaker? As a rule, only if he knows his favorite team better and has more information than the bookmaker. And as a result of live betting, we can take advantage of the slowness of bookmakers. However, this is hard work and it is very stressful.

A good example! I may agree, that it's a hard-style option to monitor each situation with different factors and prerequisites at hand (which change constantly, thus swinging the odds), but the possibility is there for everybody to try it ;D

Didn't thought of it as a leopard tactics but I just see that sometimes there are situations like this when you agree within yourself that  , "yes! This bet is a sure game because of the situation. " Sometimes, it could be when a very good player is added to the team and also when the defensive players are people that have have always made your previous prediction to be successful. Then the other ones you listed are quite a good criteria in having a great assumption for the success of one's prediction.

I was confused about how this metafor is even applicable, but i guess to simplify it: It's basically making a decision not bet on every game, just the games you think you have some extra knowledge about the weaknesses. Which i thought people did already. Why would anyone bet on a game is they know nothing about what's going on with the teams? Are people really making random sports bets?

I thought this would be just common sense and everyone who follows sports would analyze teams all the time. And that's the very reason they are willing to put money in, but maybe i was overestimating how much work are people putting on this. For someone like me, i always thought that lack of knowledge is the major thing that prevents me making bigger bets. Because i don't follow most sports closely and everyone else who does has edge that i don't.

I Google to explore this Leopard tactic but it yield none, but its worth discussion this based on our observation and experience and inside buzz, monetary rewards is a big factor when two opposing team is equal on strength skills and depth while the other team was promised with huge bonus and financial perks.

The other team that was not offered will lose their motivation knowing that the other team is getting a lot while they are not getting anything from their management.

Honestly, i just heard the term leopard tactics in sports betting. but when i read your post, it was interesting. it's just that in reality bettors who like sports especially football, there are some basic things that must be known and involved when trying to research and analyze a match. well, you have conveyed the points that we always involve when betting and researching a match. for me personally, there may be similarities with tactics like the leopard expression. so here's the thing, before choosing a bet, i usually first look at the match schedule for several leagues. of the many matches offered in betting, the most ideal in my personal opinion is what i should choose to bet on. i mean, if a match does not provide the ideal probability in my betting version, honestly i don't hesitate not to bet. even though it's a big match, for example involving two strong teams competing. I try to be objective in choosing bets, as well as the odds provided by the bookie. not only aimed at choosing a team, but also seeing the much more ideal probability based on our own understanding to bet. honestly i don't like low odds, so other alternatives are my choice. with the condition that, after going through research and analysis results. one or two matches that we choose, is better than choosing many matches but ending up losing.

Well, I currently have no idea of any thing to write down to support the ones you have already listed, so, let's just assume you have mentioned it all, but I will just chip in my thought as regards to your idea generally.

Let me say that based on my betting experience, it's rare that a team will have a better chances of winning a game and the casinos won't know about it, did you even realize that casinos usually have their own sports speculators who spend not only time, but also money in researching and coming up with well detailed analysis of how a match will likely end, this is how the casino usually come up with what is likely to be the best odds to list for a team in an upcoming match.

In situations where an underdog comes on to beat the favorite, rest assured that even the casinos themselves didn't see that coming, it's only by luck, like we saw in 2023 world cup where Saudi Arabia beat Argentina, no one, not even the casinos expected that to happen.

It's interesting that it happens sometimes when the thing you didn't have a name for actually has a full terminology for it. We all learn something new each moment we live and communicate ;D

To be honest I'm not entirely sure on your example of the leopard tactic. Are you saying that they only try in situations where there is a clear advantage, as opposed to how they would only hunt if it was appropriate? I don't feel this has anything to do with equality, because hunting is essential to their survival, not just a choice based on values. The examples you gave do not seem useless to you. Many of these things are already calculated by bookmaker right. You get what I'm saying? Also I had thought that this was an argument based on the idea that everyone did a bit of research into the sports teams, and that was why they were willing to place a bet. I may be over-estimating how much research people actually put in. I had always thought that the main reason I did not like losing much money was that I did not know a great deal about the individual sport I was watching. Those who know a lot more about the game appear to be having an advantage that I do not have.

In order to implement this strategy you need to have a deep knowledge of that sport. Also you need to have interest in that sports because without the interest you won't be able to dig deep into the details. The more details and inside news you know the better for the leopard tactics. I knew most of the details mentioned by the OP, but this term leopard tactics is a new one for me but it really suits here. One need to be patience and stealth like a tiger in order to get close to a win.

I have come across a lot of betting strategies but I haven't seen this one before. In a nutshell leopard betting system is capitalizing on the strength and weaknesses of both teams. Playing away from home is also a major factor, in most matches the team playing from home always have an advantage over the away team, this is something that can help in your analysis. When a team has problem with their coach the unity of that team might be in disarray and this might affect their game play. After reading this I think your points on this are very reasonable