Bitcoin Forum

Casino nowadays use different method on claiming bonuses. They now have unlock method which your bonuses lock and you can slowly unlock it through betting using the formula set by the casino.

Old method was just rollover requirements to unlock the bonus completely. There’s a pros and cons on each method since the new one can let you enjoy your bonus bits by bit despite its slower while the old one is a one time big time bonus if you unlock it completely.

What do you preferred? The slowly unlock using the casino formula or the typical high rollover requirements?

Both options are fairly similar in the sense that you must wait for a period of time or amount of wagers to claim the bonus fully.

I will go for the new option in line with how I prefer to gamble. I usually only gamble in my free time so having regulated bonus which unlocks over a fixed period without a wager requirement is a good deal.

I prefer the slowly unlocking of levels as this is the greatest benefit you can receive as a loyal player of that casino and the reason is simple, you keep getting bigger bonuses weekly and monthly which is what casinos give to players nowadays based on their loyalty, loyalty is measured in wagering and how much money each player spends in the casino. Of course I would prefer also if they could add to this formula, to the loyalty I mean, the fact that how many days you log in to that particular casino and how many days in a row you play there. If all of these are taken into considerations most likely most casinos would have a better user base in their platform, I know for sure that the user base is staying the same or in the decrease in the casinos I play as I see the number of persons online drastically down from the top levels from quite some time now.

It depends on the rollover requirements. Some casino offer low wagering requirements such as x5 or x10 which is far better than the current slow method to unlock bonuses.

The only problem on the rollover requirements right now is they set a bar that is too high which is almost impossible to unlock. I saw a ridiculous x100 and above wagering requirements as if they really don’t want to give the bonus.

I like the new method because it doesn’t have expiration on the bonus but I will still choose the old method if the rollover is not that high.

I agree, It depends on the rollover requirement. But, I kinda like the old way of having a turnover target you gotta hit to unlock a bonus. (Provided it is not set too high.)  Sure, seeing that huge number at first can be sorta scary.  But then it gives you something specific to shoot for.  And when you finally get there, that whole bonus amount drops at once and you can have fun with all of it right away no strings attached.   

The new way they’re doing it now, where the bonus unlocks bit by bit over time, I dunno, it rubs me the wrong way and  you end up always waiting around for that next little piece to free up.  And the rules they use to calculate it are so confusing - I can barely wrap my head around how it works.

I don't like being in a rush or too hasty, so I prefer the slow unlocking process of bonus because whenever you reach the required amount, it will unlock your bonus.

The rollover requirement will make a lot of gambler spend too much at a spot to enable them unlock the bonus which I don't see it as a responsible way of gambling. It means that whoever starts gambling in a responsible way by using only the amount that he can afford to lose might not be able to unlock the bonus.

Bonus is bonus for me but I will like the bonus to slowly unlock using the casino formula than the typical high rollover requirements. The reason I chose the first over the second one is because I do not gamble often. I think the second one would be good for those that gamble do often.

I like the new method of claiming bonus better. It fits my style as a gambler. It is like looking forward to playing each time because of the small bonus rewards that is attached. And with a proper strategy I can enjoy the gambling experience. It may not suit us all depending on our level of gratification. Some may want it immediately while some others like myself wants it in bits. Whatever be the case no one is more superior to the other. However I wish casinos gave us an option of choosing the type of bonus claim we prefer.

I like the one time bonus when you registered or deposit for the first time. Hating those unlock rewards wherein you need to play more and more its like they pushing you to spend or do more activity than your normal pace or limited time to do gambling. Well thats my opinion but surely others have others thought on this.

It will be great if you can suggest some casinos that are offering the new bonus option. It is a sort of wager free bonus that unlocks at specific times, a very good marketing strategy for the casinos.

Most will avoid a bonus with wager requirements, while others will try out a bonus quickly with no intention to use the website. This bonus style means the player uses the casino more often and has a higher chance to become a regular at the exhaustion of all available bonuses.

- Jay -

I don't like either, rollover or unlock, I gamble when I want and I don't force myself to pursue something in gambling, if I'm happy I gamble and if I no longer want, of course I don't want to do something I have principles in gambling.

I once met the rollover requirements on a certain site and I tried to bet, for me it was bullshit, the bonus was just to attract users without actually giving anything, so for now I let the bonus go and I never visited and claimed it. ,I don't care about that bonus thing.

Personally, I don't like both of them, I prefer betting for real, without any bonuses, for me bonuses are bedtime stories, I really can't enjoy them, unless there is a gambling bonus that goes straight into my account balance without any withdrawal requirements, that's great, if not then screw it.

I like the Rollover system for claiming bonuses. Although there are targets to be achieved, it is a bonus that we deserve to enjoy after all bonuses are claimed. For gamblers who play almost every day or every weekend, this bonus claim system is preferred.
The gradual open system will not be fun if the percentage that is opened and can be used is quite small. We can't really use the bonus for betting satisfactorily.

However, casinos have their own policies for distributing bonuses to their users. They run their business and of course, see how it is more profitable for them. Members who get bonuses are definitely happy, but maybe when there is a change in the bonus distribution system, there will be adjustments for the players.

Nice suggestion, I will compile all the casino based on their bonus structure method. I do have list in mind but I just want to find whether there’s an interest on this topic or none.

Casino like BC.game and Coins.game are some of the casino use this new bonus structure which can accumulate lock bonus and unlock it slowly every wager you made in the casino. I think some new casino use this format too.

Give me some time to prepare the list.

I don't like both slowly unlock and high rollover requirement because that will difficult to achieve for small gambler like me. I prefer not chasing the bonus because that will needs much money before we can unlock the bonus.
Maybe I like a bonus for depositing the money such as free spins so I can use that free spins in slot games. Although that will not gives me some winning or money but that gives me another spins that may gives me a chance to win.
But if I have to choose from that both bonus, maybe I will choose the slowly unlock bonus. I think I can achieve that bonus although I know that will much time before I can get that bonus.

I actually like how Stake.com is doing it when it comes to bonuses.

Weekly bonuses that was calculated through losses and wagers and the same goes with the monthly bonuses. Then, the VIP rank is not about the number of deposits you made or how much it is but it is also computed through wagering which means a lucky gambler could get a platinum VIP if he can play with his money for a long time. Then there's the rakeback which is computed for all your bets, unlike other gambling sites which only compute the bet you made in one slot provider or in every game.

I think there's no more that I would add to that but only the RTP trying to be fair, especially in casino games or original games. The bonuses are alright because I don't receive those in other gambling sites.

Rollover requirements is still the best for me because I can immerse claim the bonus 100% after completing the wager which is much easier compared to the new unlock system implemented of some casino. They have slow release of bonus since they use house edge of the games as percentage basis for the bonus release.

The time constraints is the only enemy on rollover requirements for claiming bonus since it typically only valid for 7 days or less to complete the wager. This makes player greedy on their bet just to complete immediately the bonus.

I prefer the slowly - I have several bonuses that are still locked in my casino account because I need to wager a certain amount first before I’ll be able to unlock them and the more I play the more the bonuses increase but still the amount I’m asked to wager is very very high and only a high roller would be able to complete it - small player like myself that usually just log into my account deposit small cash and then play surely won’t be able to complete that requirement… but in the case of slow rewards I won’t have to worry about unlocking all of them as long as I meet the requirement for that portion which should not be the same as when I’m using the high roller requirement - although time is an issue there but since I don’t gamble everyday it suites me right.

Typical high rollover requirements is for me. I do not have the patience to go slow and unlock it which will take ages LOL

They both have some positive and negative but I'll prefer the old method that all the bonus will be unlocked completely. Our lucks can be different too based on the different methods. With the old method I can use my bonus and gamble too and win a big sum than when I have to wait for them to be unlocked slowly and mightn't still account for something big. Being honest I don't like casino bonuses that much, I don't hunt for them but if I get them, I'll accept and use them. I love deposit bonus because I can control what I'll be getting to use for more bets  just by depositing a large sums and get the bonus then from there I'll see how the bonus will favour me. The new format is good for people that love it but I hope that all the casino don't just adopt the new method and casinos can have an option to choose between the both options and not just give us only one to be mandatory.

There's usually two varieties of bonuses that a casino will offer, generally to newer players and on non-skilled games like slots. They usually relate to the quality of the casino, as there are a lot of "fronts" out there with bonus promotions that are often almost impossible to unlock without spending far too much money. The kind that offer "deposit $1000 and get $1000 free" sound really good, but are built to entice players with very few meeting the requirements which can often be very time limited. Then there are other bonuses, like smaller accumulators or welcome bonuses that high quality casinos will use but they are much more attainable with many people winning money from them.

Rollovers are usually attached with a certain amount of wager (high wager) as a condition to be met by the gambler before eligibility which apart from the fact that it has a tendency of putting the gambler in pressure of gambling more often to meet up the wager amount it also doesn't favour those gamblers that uses very small (minuscule) amount of money per betting session so they could enjoy more time of gambling. I think the slowly unlocking process makes it more convenient.

each time I see a casino bonus that require wagering or has some limitations (like @odds bigger then a certain value) I just don't join this bonus.
Why? Because these kind of bets are forcing players to play more of what they want or maybe choose odds/event they don't like just to reach a bonus.
There are many casino/gambling site that allow people to use bitcoin and crypto currency. Each player can find the proper bonus... but as I suggest each time, don't look just for "high bonus" look for a bonus that fit with your gambling activity!

Wagering is required to get bonuses from casino sites. In this case there is a lot of amount to lose like I wagered $3400+ last month and got a monthly bonus of $11. something  so I think it's a very small amount because I spent a long time doing such wagering and also lost a lot. So I want the bonus amount to be like real deposit and that amount can be used as per one's wish. a bonus winner should be free to cash out or gamble as they wish. Only then will that bonus carry a high value and attract the gamblers

Well yes I also think in that direction my friend, it seems that the new method of slowing down claiming this bonus has its own purpose and reasons, most likely as you said that by slowing down the bonus then it requires you to come more than once because there is something you want to go to such as opening the bonus for the umpteenth time before all opportunities run out.
Indirectly of course I think this can be an encouragement for gamblers to always come, and in the process indirectly it can also make gamblers play more and lose more money. Basically the goal of the casino is to get bigger profits, so I think that maybe this is one of the new methods that can indirectly be a scenario to maximize their profits.

I have tried to chase bonuses on how to play elegantly and get results but it is not easy. But ambition spoils the mood until the money runs out. Now I prefer to play how money can grow and multiply. I always claim the rollover bonus once a month. I prefer the level up bonus because the prize is quite good or monthly bonus

I give total support to what you have said. Some bonuses are just too obvious and unattractive to gamblers especially those bonuses that are very demanding. I was about to unlock a bonus and I was told to wager all my deposit at once to be able to unlock the bonus, normally I don't like gambling with high stakes but that day I went for it, though I won the bet but wasn't satisfied with the option the gambling platform gave. Sometimes they also have to consider the emotions of gamblers and how they'll react to their bonuses, some bonus are not attractive at all, considering the procedure and what the gambler stands to gain after meeting their requirements.

Owning to the fact that I would prefer to gamble only once in a while, I think the new method of claiming bonus will be preferable for me because I will have to unlock the bonus gradually any time I gamble.

I don’t think I gamble enough for bonuses to matter. For that reason I guess I’d like to see casinos give away bonuses like free spins or something like that. Then it could be possible to hit a major jackpot without having to gamble away the old college fund. Getting a chance to play a game beats a $0.03 bonus in my opinion.

Both methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. With Gradual Unlock, we can enjoy the bonus slowly. This can make the game more enjoyable and give us the opportunity to withdraw winnings faster, even though the amount is small. On the other hand, high turnover will take longer to meet, but after that, we can get a big bonus at once.

The choice between the two is up to you. If you want to enjoy the bonus slowly and don't mind the process being a bit slow, then wagering requirements might be the best choice for you. For me, I like to chase big bonuses, even with higher risks, so I find high rollover requirements much more attractive even though it means having to wait longer.

Although both of them have their advantages, I prefer the new system for earning bonuses.  Getting those little bonus payouts along the way makes me eager to play again, like Im expecting a treat each time. Sure, some folks want that big payout right off the bat but Id rather take it bit by bit and ride the games longer.

The old one for me any day lol.

Sure, I am more likely to lose my bonus with the typical wager requirements but it does lengthen my session so I'm more likely to enjoy the night even with a small deposit. In addition, this is where I get more courage to increase my bet more than usual--when I'm playing with real money-- and it is more exciting that way lol.

I honestly hope the old one does not get phased out in the near future.. perhaps casinos could take a middle ground approach by laying out both options and players get to choose which one they prefer the most. 🤔

Slowly unlocking bonus money is a deposit bonus with an extremely high rollover requirement. I guess you think about BC.Games bonuses (and similar), when we do the math the wagering requirement is x400 (or x800) as I remember, we have a few nice comments about this one. "Normal" deposit bonuses come with just x40 (more or less) wagering requirements. But at BC.Games you don't have a time frame, I have +$17k ready to be unlocked... Casinos that offer "normal" deposit bonuses with x40 wagering requirement have a time frame, we have just a week (7 days, more or less) to finish it.

I like both, but I like to try some promotional bonuses that come with lower than x40 wagering requirements. But I can't remember the last time I saw something like that...

Looking at the old pattern its more preferable for me because there are times i would want to use the whole bonus at once because i needed that boost to help my game accumulate a better staking power but with the new style i wouldn't be able to get that done because this new pattern doesn't permits that, gabling with these bonus sometimes do help increase staking power to be able to increase winnings too aswell. with the new style, sometimes you may loose all of the bonus trying to use the bonus, but with the old pattern with one trial you will be able to get it at a trial, i know you may loose it too at a trial but if just feels better with the one time trial, just maybe it could be that this new pattern is a way to get the gamblers coming back over and over again.

I don't think there's that big of a difference really, though I like the new one a lot compared to the old one. Granted god knows how much I'll change my mind once inconveniences, if any, actually pop up later on. If I still used to gamble as often in the past then I'd prefer the old one since I'd wager a lot more, but recently I've only been playing every now and then so the new one seems to fit me a lot more. Probably great if casinos could make a player choose their method of redemption or something.

I like the slowly unlock.

Not everyone has that thing with the high rollover requirements and we do it the slow method for which is a guaranteed for those busy people.

I enjoy more the process with the slow one but that's probably just me while the others I am reading that they like the other one.

The high roller will be okay for me; it's better for me to just know that this is the number of times I need to wager that particular bonus in order for me to be eligible for withdrawing it than to be seeing a large amount called a bonus that will gradually be unlocked for me or won't even be unlocked until the given time, either I meet up with the deposit requirement or the sum amount that is required for me to wager before I will be allowed to use it, and then again, the bonus might still come with another extra wager requirement.

That is very true. As most can't afford to play as high roller, they would surely appreciate the slow unlock of bonuses or rewards. At least, with this scheme, they can already enjoy some benefits while they are playing and not wait for the time to reach the wagering requirements required for big rewards.

Whereas, it is understandable that for some high rollers, they would prefer to get the reward one time big time. As most of them don't care about the rewards as they are already playing what they have. Most high rollers don't bother such rewards as it is very low comparable to what they have been wagering on the site.

I also prefer the same, the slowly unlock which helps me to experience even small winnings every time I bet than going on high roller and lose also bigger chances of winning. However, it’s undeniable that we get to experience big thrills with high roller but know that the chances of winning is also rare, thus it’s okay for slow unlock and make more possible winnings even in small amount.

There's joy in the slow process when we gamble.

That's why if someone goes for that route, it's understandable and the same goes for the opposite one. No matter what you prefer on this on how you claim the bonus.

We all go back to the simple thing about this, every bonus that we're about to claim, they're not easy claims anymore because of some requirements that are set.

I prefer that slowly unlock ones over the high rollover requirements one because that's more stable and valuable for me then the other. It's always better to earn something slowly rather than going for it aggressively because with aggressive mindset there's chance to lose your initial deposit and that's not good at all.

I think the rollover method is very misleading and generally is avoided due to how many bad experiences it has caused to people that got introduced to gambling under such offer and then couldn't even withdraw their initial deposit.

So generally as a practice casinos that are seeking to build their reputation other than just making some quick money, they won't even bother adding bonuses that need to be unlocked.

Bonuses that you get based on how much you gamble are much more honest. I think Stake.com has some of the most honest and fair gambling bonuses among casinos in the crypto space. So more casinos are now following this example in terms of bonuses such as rakeback, bonuses based on volume etc.

I have seen a casino with none of these conditions for their bonus except deducting the bonus amount from any winning made with the bonus, which is fair. But for the two options given, I prefer the roll over style because that will make the bonus worth something if the conditions are met. I have benefitted from such before and it was a nice experience. I don't feel comfortable when bonuses are locked, it is like restricting me from using what you call bonus that I would normally gamble with without any emotion.

I'd say I prefer the high rollover requirement but it's probably because I am used to the high rollover requirements and I started to not mind the rollover requirements. perhaps I can try the bonuses that slowly unlock through betting.

For me, I will go with the slow unlock using the formula of the casino because I can get small portions of bonus over time as I am playing, so I need to make it consistent, and it seems I am not that always playing, this suits for me.
It can be less stressful also because you're gradually unlocking the bonus and enjoy it even you don't meet the full requirement.

My pick goes to the slow grind bonus they offer nowadays because it includes your progress in sportsbooks. It might take a while before you reach the level-up bonus, but it's a better experience as you're not pressured to go after it.

I mostly avoided those bonuses with high rollover requirements back then because there were a lot of limits that came with it and I barely had success clearing those bonuses. I remember the casino games were limited to slot games and some don't count 100% of your bet towards the wagering requirement.

Slowly unlocking bonus will be fine for me because I play gambling just occasionally and not chasing the bonus or any ranks. With slowly unlocking bonus, I will be there someday and not need in rush to gambling. Usually, when we reach a higher ranks, we can get a bonus from the casino.

But we don't have to play gambling too often just to reach the bonus. Casino know that gamblers like bonus so they will give the other bonus to attract gamblers return to their casino. We can get the other bonus and adjust with our financial so we don't tend to chase that bonus.

But if the rollover requirements is not too high, less than x40, I think that is good for me. I can reach that with some amount but once again, I am not in rush to chase the bonus. That will gives risks for me to lose that money.

I prefer the old method because we're free to do what we wants, we can play all at once or slower. While the new method, we're forced to play slow and we can't play bet all at once.

I think the casino do like that in order to prevent people to meet the minimum requirement to withdraw, it's harder to win when you only bet small. Usually people bet big amount in order to not wasting their time.

Everybody's choice, really. I like the possibilities at hand, and would go with a middle approach of sorts ;D Or leaning towards a slow one, simply to make the sessions more enjoyable.

Both similar to be, since you have to wait for a period of time, bonus claiming is all about timing, with some tasks, I don't blame casinos for this strategy though because this wrong out any type of bonus farming.

I don't have to complain in anyway because the casinos only do something that is manageable for their business so who I am to say they are doing it wrong? Or maybe because I am not a fan of casinos bonus, because casino bonuses seem too strict to me.

I prefer to use my money to gamble instead of running after any casino offers and bonuses.

They are not the same if you try claiming both bonus. As I explained before, the new version is much harder to fully claim the bonus but you can unlock partially whenever you place bet.

On the other hand, the old rollover requirements has less wager needed to fully claim the bonus but the only problem was you need to complete it 100% first with time limit that gives it an extra difficulty.

The difference is more an a matter of what kind of aggressiveness you have in gambling.

Gradual unlocking is much more better because sometimes the said Gambler may not have the amount required to rollover, but with the slowly unlocking formulas it could be much accessible and whenever one is set to gamble then he can do so, especially those who loves gambling at their spare time could find it very hard to meet up the requirement.

I don't like any of the methods because it is a bonus and it is supposed to be given to you as a gambler without restriction or condition to be met. But if am to choose from these two methods ill prefer the rollover method so that I can use the bonus reward to do whatever i want to do if the amount is up to it. I may also choose to continue gambling with it bit by bit on the platform. Maybe i can have a good win without any deposit from my end.

I personally would prefer to fulfill it slowly through betting because this can allow me to save more money when taking the bonus given by the casino, after all not every bonus will necessarily be worth it and I will only take what I think is worth getting.
Some bonuses are usually in relatively small amounts but require wagering requirements that may be much larger than the amount of the bonus I can get, this is the reason why it is better to consider everything about the bonus that can be obtained.
If only chase the bonus by completing all the high rollover requirements without considering the amount that can be obtained, then it will only be like we lose money in betting, we will still feel the loss even though we already have bonus given by the casino.

I don't like the new method. It is more like a trick for the gamblers to stay for a while because there is a bonus that is being unlocked little by little. While at that, they have to spend and spend. The casinos are like making the most of the their bonuses by dangling it always in front of the gamblers so that they will always feel the urge to play.

I prefer the old one. Make the rollover requirement 5x or 10x I don't care. I will make the most of the bonus that I got and when I make a profit, that is good but if I don't, then I don't care. I will continue to gamble at my own pace.

For me, I will say that I'm more comfortable with the "High Roller requirements" method of redeeming bonus, because though it has been the oldest, I still sees it as been the more convenient for gamblers, whereby a gambler will be able to deposit money, and if he/she is able to reach the needed wagered requirement within 2 to 3 days, he can withdraw his money, unlike the new method that is slow to redeeming bonuses. Because just as the old method did favoured gamblers very well, this new strategy is seen to favour casinos the most, due to delay, which could possibly make individual's gamble and lose.

Well like you said both methods are not bad but just like you it depends on the gambler and how he gambles. I believe am most familiar with the rollover type that's you get to unlock the bonus after a number of successful roller and I think most casinos make their numbers really high as some even get it up to the number of 15x rollover although the odds to roll it are quite small and relatable too.

Since I'm not a highroller and I wager small amount only but I do it regularly, I do prefer the bonus which can be unlocked based on my wagering activity.
I dont really like bonus which comes with high rollover because I feel that I'm being forced to wager due to the rollover and it kills my fun on gambling.
It is better for me to wager as I wish without any requirement that I need to complete so I can withdraw anytime I wish without completing any requirement.

Yes, we are of the same mind, although the amount of bonus obtained with the slow method is relatively small but at least it can save more of our betting session journey, and also as you said that chasing bonuses by meeting all the high rollover requirements also has the possibility of making us lose money and also without knowing whether we will get a win that is commensurate or not, and if it turns out that in the process we experience defeat then I think that even though in the end we managed to get the bonus, we still lost money in the process of meeting the requirements. For me, to be honest I don't really think about the bonus, for me the bonus is nothing more than something that only makes a gambler more enthusiastic in running his gambling session.

I agree with you and agree with what you said, maybe for me personally I prefer slow unlock because I can get it slowly and besides that, seeing myself who rarely gambles, if I really don't want to, I won't gamble even though I have thoughts of wanting to do it.
The key is to enjoy it, so even if you don't get a bonus, but with the basis of enjoying it, it won't be a problem. With those who may not be able to enjoy the game, they may have unreasonable thoughts when gambling.

"They now have unlock method which your bonuses lock and you can slowly unlock it through betting using the formula set by the casino." like being said that I hate this method really I mean this kind of bonus will make people to do gambling and sometimes the amount of bonuses wont cover it, I mean if you win that is gonna be fine but if you don't.

So if you ask me What do you prefer on casino bonus claim? Bonus that doesn't have rule in it and can be withdraw easily

I do really like the new pattern, unlocking it step by step would allow you to gamble moderately,  I take it as a form of recognition for moderate gamblers. You get to a point and some bonuses unlocks, you enjoy it and continue aiming for the next milestone. It's cool compared to the former that you'll have to do so much at a time and reach all targets before getting the bonus at all.

The new pattern would interest lots of people and buy the casinos more patronage since you can still get some bonus for doing Little, thereby encouraging you to engage more at your own pace and still get rewarded.

In most cases I dont care how I will get my bonuses, because I am in casino to gamble at first place, but not to hunt bonuses. Sometimes I am even against unlockable bonuses, because they only trigger to continue gambling. Sometimes I dont even aware that I got a bonus, if the casino does not send me a notification and I would have to go to account and check if there is something for me. However, I like the level system when you achieve different wager stages and receive bonuses and cashback.

I only play gambling when I have budgeted money, and it's not a big deal to qualify for the free bonus of a crypto casino that I will be playing.

Such gamblers in the casino who avail are the players who deposit a large amount of money in a gambling platform. So for my part, I don't experience that kind of claiming bonus because the wager requirements are high.

It depends on whether there will still be a rollover requirement after the bonus gets released slowly in the newest version. If I'm making a $100 deposit, getting a 100% bonus on top of it and it's unlocking as I go up the ladder in my wagers and it keeps adding to my balance without putting any additional rollover or wagering requirement on my balance, then I would surely prefer this method than the previous one where I would have to complete an enormously large wagering requirement to be able to make a withdrawal which normally isn't possible.

However, if there are still some hidden rules and requirements after the bonus keeps unlocking slowly then I don't think it is worth it. In that case, I would rather have the whole bonus at once, find a game, and try my best to complete the wagering requirement so that I can make a withdrawal before I exhaust all my balance.

Yeah, you are right about that.
Unlockable bonuses can sometimes make a gambler do continuous gambling just to reach it which honestly I did before when I was trying to reach the Silver VIP at Stake.com. I was at 90% and just needed $1000 of wagered amount to unlock it. I spent a lot of dollars just to reach it which I thought I could get back but sadly, I lost more than what I received.
But I do like the other bonuses I received when weekly and monthly bonuses came because there I received an amount that tied all my losses and somehow I got a bit of profit thanks to it.
Still, I would not recommend doing this kind of thing. It's not enjoyable, it's honestly stressful.

Though with that new setup you just need to keep playing even how small it is you might soon then reached the bracket and might unlock your bonus, though its not that quick as how those heavy gamers are doing it, they just deposit decent amount of money and keep on playing as they will get that opportunity to enjoy and take advantages of what the casino are offering for bonuses.

You just need to be active or more to say that you just need to know and understand how the they supposed to give thier bonuses and hit that to enjoy those opportunities.

I don't really mind the old or new way of claiming a bonus, because for a gambler what matters is what he can get from it, how big the bonus is, and considering how much he has to sacrifice to get it, whether it's a little cheaper or vice versa. I mean if you open a $10 bonus but you have to bet $15 then it doesn't make sense, obviously the casino still charges the gambler with a larger amount than what he would get from the bonus.

Well that's what I think is very important to pay attention to and consider, because it could be that someone spends more money just to chase a smaller amount.
So I also don't think there is anything special about the bonus if there is a requirement for a gambler to bet first, especially if the amount that must be bet is quite large as a requirement to be able to claim the bonus.

It means as you said that if a gambler has to spend $ 15 to chase a $ 10 bonus then it doesn't make sense, it makes me think that maybe this is a method that indirectly still only benefits the casino, although not everyone does not lose the amount of the bet that is the requirement but I am sure that most likely the casino will still make the percentage of wins always smaller than losses.

I didn't quite understand what bonuses you're talking about - bonuses for new players? I prefer to avoid them so that there are no suspicions that I'm a bonus hunter. If we're talking about standard wagering bonuses, then I don't really follow them, but I use them from time to time. I prefer cashback or free bet because naturally I use this bonus for a bold bet with a huge coefficient.

Honestly what I'm wondering if it exists out there is some sort of bonus that is just straight up, meaning you don't have to keep playing and betting to slowly release the bonus funds.  Is there any sort of casino that just has say "Deposit $500 and receive $50 in bonus bets instantly", something where the funds just become available right away?  It just seems any time I get a "bonus" there's always some sort of strings attached.

They have their reasons for doing all these, they go by the introduction of new ideas like this just to ensure that they have their customers remained with the use of their services on their platform which is a way of retaining what they have labored for, its not about giving gamblers their due bonuses is what matters, but seeing them having all it takes to remain on the platform after winning their heart..