Bitcoin Forum

This topic is for sports bettors alone, don't comment if u don't have any experience about sports betting. The title of this thread is the first question and the second question is, how much can you risk in a draw prediction? For example, can you risk more than 80% of your balance on a single prediction that you expect to end in draw?

I do not like to go for draw. I prefer to select a team to win than to go for draw.

I can only use the amount of money that I can afford to los for betting. That would 1 to 5% of my weekly income as usual. But I will prefer to go for win instead of draw just as I have said before.

Draw game can be calculated based on the time of the match, let say when a game is already at around 70 minutes, betting on draw is most near accurate at this time since the timing for risk is almost gone and far spent, so if I can go almost 100% of my entire balance to stake in such match to win draw.

Sometimes I win and other times I lose betting in such line of bets, but if you calculate the ratio of my winnings vs the loses, then I can say that I win more than I lose using that draw format to bet.

The worst mistake to make as a gambler is to compromise your wager limit because you so much have faith in a particular game, so to answer your question, I can only risk the exact amount that I risk for other games on a single draw game; that's if I'm courageous enough to place a bet on it; if not, I prefer to use the option "either home, away win, or draw.There is always a second option in case the game doesn't end in a draw because draws are hard to predict these days for me.

Generally in gambling the more your picks the slimmer your chances of wining such game and so what i do is to make sure I'm as minimal s possible with my chances so just maybe my chances could increase and so when it come to high risk picks such as draws i make sure not to exceed a maximum of five picks but what i do really often is three picks if I'm predicting a draw at any time because i know with three picks my chances of accuracy is much higher than when its as much as seven and ten, with a max stake of $5

Betting on a draw from your own contest simply means betting on live games when it has reached the last 20 minutes of the game but I think the question raised in this topic is actually about betting on draw before the game and how many "draws" can a gambler bet at a time.
Now to the question asked, I enjoy betting single games as draws instead of betting more than one game. But earlier today, someone gave me four games to play as draw and I reluctantly agreed and staked them only to check later to discover that three out of the four games ended as draw

Haha, sometimes I totally forget that the draw option exists in some matches, especially when it comes to my favorite team and when the event is big, such as finals or very important between big teams. That’s probably why I lose a lot in betting too. It’s easy to get cought up in emotions and focus on one side winning, while forgetting about the middle option with much odds.
As for risking 80% of my balance on a single prediction for a draw, here I may say that is extremely risky. Draws are very hard to predict even with more chances, and while the odds might be tempting betting with such a huge portion of your balance on a single outcome could drain your balance out fast if it doesn’t go your way, beside the uncomfortable feeling of wanting any of the team to score, which means extra stress feom both sides.

Personally, I wouldn't risk more than a small percentage, maybe only 10% if it comes to betting draw, because of how unpredictable these matches are. Managing the bankroll. And finally I believe it is all about balance and picking the wisely not with greed.

I don't think I have even risk money on. A draw outcome before based on my own bias. I have played draws before but never on my own accord — I wouldn't naturally do it. My preferred markets are usually straight wins but if I'm uncomfortable with that, I just add the double chance if I'm not too confident with my picks.

How do you guys knowingly pick 3-8 selections from the market and just click the draw button? Feels unnatural to me because all teams have a primary goal of winning the game so why not just back winners instead of draws? Keeping an eye out for more opinions from other members on this thread.

That is too much buddy. I cant risk 80% on a single draw game if i want to bet on a draws. Its too risky irrespective of the winnings will be huge.

What i can probably do is to share the 80% on 4 draw games. I will split it 20% on each of them. And the reason for doing so is because i cannot bank on one to play but i can bank one out of the four to play, if not more of them will play. At the end of the day i may not win huge but i wont lose at all. My method is trying to mitigate the risk of losing. That is how i mostly gamble especially if i have draws to bet on.

I don't like betting on a draw, but in certain games that I see that have good odds, I prefer to bet on a draw or a win for team X. That way I can get at least odds of @1.40 to @1.50, if team X wins, I also win and if team X draws, I also win the bet. I think this is the only good bet when compared to simply betting on a draw. Take today's case for example, I saw someone in a certain thread saying that they would bet on a draw for the Poland vs. Portugal game and I told the person that Portugal would win. And Portugal actually won. Betting on a draw alone has a big risk of the person losing the bet.


I agree. That's why I don't bet on a draw. I don't waste my money betting on a draw. Now, in the market for a draw or victory for team X, I place a bet because it gives the person the possibility of winning even when team X wins or draws.

Doesn't like draws and very rarely even bets that end in a draw... I'd rather bet on both teams scoring than a draw.

I don't know why it feels unsure if I bet on a tie even though the opponents are equally great, but in my own hunch where one will win instead of a tie then it rarely bets a tie.

80% balance for a draw bet? This is never done... I will choose other options instead of a draw.

Draws should be the hardest thing to predict in sports betting, that is why the odd is usually high. I don't think there is any known methods of predicting draws that will give some level of confidence as there are many factors that can spoil the game, the reason I only play draw for as a risky bet not that I have confidence I would win. There was a time I was predicting six matches to end in draws, the plan was to use that to get a huge win that will transform my life. This plan failed woefully so I gave up on trying to predict draws unless someone predict and give me to play.

I don't directly with draws alone i do mixed my games most times those games doesn't happened to come out draw, while some outcome are draws like 1:1, 2:2 or 0:0. Like today match i booked at the morning time, about 2 draws which i didn't just purposely picked rather they played 'over" 1.5 and 'over' 0.5 which the outcome give me draw, but just naturally picking draws as options i don't do that because most times my results often come as either over or under which is likely to cut my games. As per the maximum amount i can gamble, to me i do have my limits and allocation to gamble with when the allocation is exhausted i don't go further dipping hands to my other funds to gamble anymore till the amount is refilled.

It's hard to predict draw games.

That's why even if there's a choice for draw, I wouldn't go for that. For some sports that has a long game like in soccer, it's possible but I rarely bet on that.

Or let's say that I'd bet on that, maybe just 5%-10% of my total bankroll I'd be willing to bet on but as I've said, I won't probably do that.

Aye! I don't joke with the selection of odds on weekend games A.k.a the coupon games... From several confirmed analysis, those odds are considerably the biggest and most viable odds in sport betting; don't get me wrong, there are so many big odds in game including the Un1(under one) options that may possibly bear like 15 odds( depending on the two teams involved)..

So let's assume it's a premier league game.. Manchester city vs arsenal (the evaluations are made regarding their current performances and squad) -- the UN1 option may have atleast 10 odds or more since there's almost no chances of this game ending in a draw. All of these depends on what position these teams are on the table, the league and the round on which the game is set.

I see alot of people dislike draw games, but if you can't predict a game to be a draw, then you lack the basics in prediction.

The chances of a draw are less than the chances of a win or a lose so why would you want to bet money on draws? I would not recommend it.

Here is an example of a well-explained mathematical calculation of the probability of a draw in a made-up match, which could also be applied to real-life sports betting: https://brainly.in/question/60356540#:~:text=Multiply%20the%20probabilities%20of%20each,Team%20B%20scores%201%20goal).

The outcome in this scenario is a probability of a bit over 5% that the match ends in a draw. That means a 95% chance of a no draw outcome.

In most draw cases, it's the confidence you have in both the football team and the players and their performance in the season that gives you the strong mind to pick up a draw game.

As for me, once the game is above two draws, I'm backing up, except I double bet it by alternating it.

Like the last match between Arsenal and Manchester City on the 22nd of September in the Premier League.

Guy, the match was a total draw for me because Arsenal is really a big and tough team, despite their flaws in achieving the cup, and on the other hand, Manchester City is topnotch.

Picking a win out of it was difficult, even when it might really not be a sure one.
With the confidence I have for both teams, I could go harder in gambling it, but it is not advisable to use 80% of your balance on that single prediction.

It's a game. 

Using "draw" is more appropriate for lotteries, not sports betting.


Betting about 80% of my bankroll isn’t something I’ve done before, but it's definitely not advisable if we're trying to play smart. Following proper bankroll management with discipline is key. If you're building a decent bankroll, 5% per wager is more than enough. It’s not a race to get rich quick—it’s a challenge to yourself to be profitable in the long run.

----------------
I didn’t catch it at first glance—OP should have mentioned the game more clearly.

Anyway, I’m more into basketball, and while there’s a "draw" option at the bookies, it’s usually called "overtime" in basketball. My bet is more exciting because sometimes I go for a team to win the first half and then draw. That gives bigger odds than just betting on a draw alone!

I'm not betting a draw unless it's for $10 or less and I have watched more than 50% of the game and see nothing that makes me feel either team has an advantage. Betting draws is a losing bet in the long run. I'm definitely never betting a parlay with a bunch of draws. Imagine betting 10 teams in a parlay all draws, the odds would probably be 100000-1. Massive win if you got lucky, but likely wasting your money.

It depends. If a draw is most likely, I'd be willing to risk more than 80% of my balance. Well, we're not even talking about how huge a bet is 80% of one's wallet. Perhaps a hundred bucks will do.

Lest we forget and get confused, however, which sports are we even talking about here? It's not specified and it matters. Boxing has a draw. So does MMA. Football, of course, has also a draw. So does ice hockey, and other sports.

In football, draw is a risky bet especially pre-game. The game runs for 90 minutes. A lot of things can happen. If you're betting live, however, the risk could decrease but so are the odds.

As far as i know for soccer matches usually draw has high odds and it is quite often the odds above to @2.00 for every single matches but i was rare to bets on draw option because this is risky bets especially if you were bets on the match strong teams against weak teams that the percentages to gets draw result from this match is very slim which sometimes below to 50% and sometimes i was predict and bets on the particular matches for draw option and usually for the matches between mediocre teams and my betting results to bets on this option is very poor so that's why i don't want to risky all of my balance when decide to pick draw 

1. This is not what you predetermine, it's what your analysis tells you to do. And so long as there is enough capital to cover your wagering in line with your gambling plan, I think the number is flexible unless we want to force a certain number out.

2. I gamble 10% of my bankroll per sports bet, so I stick with it whether it is a draw prediction or not.

I often bet on several types of sports and prefer safe market options such as Total Asian, Double Chance or absolute victory in full time and quite rarely choose the draw option which even risks an amount greater than half of the remaining money I have in the gambling site account.
Opportunity for draw prediction in my opinion will never be easy for gamblers to have, and in my opinion choosing bet with draw prediction is very rarely really possible for us to win, for example, in the Argentina vs Venezuela International match, everyone who bets believes in Argentina ability and they will very rarely dare to take draw in this match because there are still many opportunities for Argentina to win even though in the end the match really ends in draw.
On the other hand, the draw option only provides fairly large risk and is often ignored by most gamblers because the average gambler is much happier choosing favorite team and they not only get victory when their chosen team succeeds but also get satisfaction from the performance of the favorite team can play well and win.

Well, it depends. What you are doing is analyzing both teams and that is the right path to get a higher percentage of winning. You must know about the teams that will play against each other, that way you can provide an analysis that would possibly have a good result.

I have not yet bet on any draws because just like you, I feel like it also has a low percentage to happen but it's football and we have seen games that end up in that result. Still, this is a risk that a gambler should be willing to take because there's no assurance on it unlike betting for a strong team with a high winning percentage although the odds are way low for a decent profit.
Parlay-making will be very helpful in this kind of setup if you want to avoid "draw" bets. Pick all the teams that you think will win for a day or a week then wait for the result.

Well, 80% is definitely not. Sometimes I bet on draws in several matches, for example, in 6, and it is imperative that these be matches of very unequal teams, so the winnings will be greater. Approximately 10-15% of the balance for one such bet. Quite often, one bet wins.

A single draw is the maximum to bet on such bet. It is the most dangerous type of bet and the most difficult to get also in many leagues, it may look easier than others as the game results and I assume you talk about soccer here where draw can happen more frequently than in any other sport as the game starts 0-0 but very difficult to end like that. I remember though one time a guy back in the days in the year maybe 2003-2004 who placed 10 draws on the same ticket and won the maximum allowed by the lotto club at that time which was 100.000 dollars although the odds and the base bet permitted for much more. I have not seen someone being as lucky as him in these 20 years that have passed and I doubt I will ever will. So this is the most dangerous type of bet for anyone and I don't suggest it to anyone. I would not risk more than 5% of my balance even in a single draw.

If may understand you correctly, an already funded balance to my betting account or what? If yes then I can go as far of using 100% of deposited funds to bet on a single match or game that are proven to be trusted and correct. This is based on my thorough analysis to determine whether such game/match worth it. But doesn't mean I will always or regularly stake most of my games with draw as I am not too good at forecasting draw matches.

When it comes to sports betting Especially the ranking Risk management is important. I personally recommend not risking more than 80% of your balance on a single prediction. No matter how confident you are The state of sports is unpredictable. And while research and data can give you insights, But there is no such thing as It's a "perfect bet," especially when you're predicting statistics. This is one of the hardest ways to succeed.

Statistics are notoriously difficult to call. And although statistics give many results But placing a large percentage of your balance in a single bet may not be the best strategy that can be used for a long time. I think spreading your bets over multiple outcomes and games is more sustainable. So even if one or two bets don't go your way, Your entire balance is also not at risk. Personally, I usually risk only a small amount — no more than 10-15% of my balance — based on projected numbers. At the same time diversify my bets across different markets to better manage risk.


I completely agree that betting on statistics is one of the most dangerous forms of betting. And hearing stories like the ones you mention really drives home that point. Although it's great to hear that someone has had great success. But it's important to remember how rare these experiences are. Race betting can be very attractive because of the odds. Especially in football But it's definitely not something that will generate money on a regular basis. As you said Matches can start with a score of 0-0 but are often very tense before the final whistle.

Personally, I think paying dividends on 80% of your balance is too risky. And it's not something I would recommend. It's best to bet low — around 5% to 10% — to avoid big losses. The uncertainty of sports Especially when the results seem competitive. This means that you should spread your bets or invest in equal outcomes. while still taking risks to make amends


Actually, you are right that the size of your reserve in your betting bank account has much to do with your strategy or not. I understand the temptation to work just a fraction of your resources that is 100% within one match. That would come especially if you feel from your analysis. And, as much as it is always good to be a thorough analyst, But I believe some level of caution is needed.

Although the game looks believable But unexpected things can happen. Especially in sports where many factors influence the outcome. Personally, I like to limit my holdings to one particular bet. This ensures that I do not risk my entire balance. Although I am very confident about some of the results. It is about balancing the potential rewards with the inherent risks.

Also, if statistics aren't for you? Instead, focus on the betting markets where you are most confident and can predict success. Diversifying your bets can reduce risk and improve your overall performance in the long run.

does it have to be a particular numbers of draws on a single betting slip? If I'm led to include most of the games I'm selecting as draw, I just go on to do it without really considering the numbers of draws and playing and when I'm even including them on my ticket, I don't play a different slip that will contain all the draws while another slip will contain games that are iether straight win or over or under a particular odd.

Don't know how you Come about not using above 80% of your balance for a particular game but for me, my gambling budget is different and my amount per stake is also fixed. Just some selection is teams and games I'm a bit familiar with always solves it all and with that, even if things goes wrong it doesn't even affect me seriously.

Since it's hard for draws games to happen as predicted, I hardly have them in my games. But if the need arise for me to add draws, it doesn't exceed more than the two games. The rest of my bet games will be double chances of winning with either over 1.5 or under.

For taking risks in draws, I risk that separately with little money, not more than 5% of my weekly income. Before that happens, I have already programmed my mind that whatever the result be ''lose or win'', it's one of those things that a gambler meant to see from a gambler, never to put all hope in gambling for a potential winning.

I am a sports bettor and the amount of funds I bets on depends on my confidence on the predicted games.
When making my predictions, I don't consider the number of draw games rather I only picks the draw game (s) depending on the potentials of the teams involved.

Actually my aim is to bet and win and not to count how many draws I can pick and there is absolutely no specific amount of when I am betting on draw games.

Infact, if I must have a range of amount to bet on draw games, I would bet on least amount because draw games is one must inevitable predictions compared to straight bets or point spread predictions.

First of all, if you are willing to risk 80% of your balance, then it is almost an all-in bet. And one of the most important rules in betting is to not bet more than 1%-5% of your balance on one event, no matter if it is a win or a draw. So I would never even bet more than 1% of my balance on a draw, because I do not like to bet on a draw, because it happens less often than a win of one of the teams.

I wouldn't do that. I rarely bet on a draw. The odds are definitely good but the draw prediction always doesn't give me luck. I'm more comfortable with the BTTS option. or the choice to win on one of the competing teams.
Honestly, I rarely bet on a draw. maybe in one week, I will think about only 1 match that ends in a draw, no more. a draw is very difficult for me to predict. even in live betting on a match that has finished the first half with a draw score. I'm still not too confident to bet on a draw.

Betting on Draws are so risky and right from time, I usually don't like to bet on draw until yesterday that my friend persuaded me to stake on 4 games as draw. At first I had doubt but I just agreed to it and I used the $4 on my balance to stake on the game but the first match busted the bet.  I was not disappointed though cuz I expected that to happen.

I consider draw is the same with win and lose, so it doesn't bother me at all because draw is normal to happen. Example Portugal vs Poland, their head to head draw 3x and Portugal won 3x, so draw happen the same like Portugal win.

Except you mean the sports that draw very rarely to happen like MMA or boxing, I will not dare to bet draw. It's really dangerous to bet draw, it's better for me to bet parlay of 5 match instead of draw.

A prediction is far from the meaning of been precise, it is a complete guess, even if its based on past histories and data the future isn't always going to repeat, so you have no assurance that things will go your way, this is worst more than a blind date.

---

I am also a sport bettor and I don't take high risks like many people do, I risk very small amount of money, I make over 300 in dollars every month and I don't risk more than $20 on either sports bet or online gambling, this is what I can afford to lose.

---

Risking 80% of your balance on a single prediction isn't that bad if this so called balance is not from your bank balance, I mean everything you have, if you are talking about your gambling balance, like my $20 for example then you can risk it all in one go, either on roulette or sport match but once you lose the money I hope you will be able to walk away, because many gamblers who lost their whole balance always run after their losses.

Draws are not my cup of tea in pre-live so i'd say around 2-3 matches would be my limit while staking a maximum of 3% per bet. If it's through live betting or a promotion about draws, I don't mind placing several bets as long as it works and continuously brings in the profit.

Same, i'd rather go with a similar market like draw no bet and double chance than go with the draw straight up because matches can easily become unpredictable and it only takes one goal from either side to ruin the draw.

This is difficult, because in normal time 90 minutes there are many things that can happen. Football is complicated, let alone betting on a "draw" in FT time. Betting on a "draw" even just half the first half, does not necessarily result in a win. IMO, only a few gamblers dare to speculate on betting on a "draw". Even then, it has gone through careful research, analysis and consideration. Just imagine, betting 80% of our balance on a "draw" is not an easy decision. Except, in certain matches and we are very familiar with the competing teams. Or, other factors and so on. Several times I have bet on a "draw" result, but not with a large amount. We know very well, the odds given for the "draw" option are quite high. For me personally, the ideal is the total Asia or we usually call it Under / Over.

I don't bet on draw but on winning, how many goals to be scored and player that will score goal. I don't bet more than my budget for every game no matter how sure I believe the game is for me to win. The reason is because you might have confidence in the game and bet with big amount and the outcome turns out to be the opposite.

Risking 80% is abnormal when I am gambling because I might not have enough to bet on more matches if I lose the bet and it will make me lose the fun from other bets.

Betting on Draw is quite risky especially especially when one of the teams is stronger than the other.
Although betting on draw gives us greater returns, it often leads to losing the bet.
Most of the times when I have bet on draw, I have lost the bet and so I prefer placing bets when one of the teams have an edge.

Well I don't think many bettor will play more than 80% of their bankroll on any outcome, draw, win, Draw No bet or Double Chance to be honest. Except maybe if the bet has 1.01 odds, but I don't remember having ever seen such odds for a draw actually and I don't think it will ever happen for a regular soccer match.

It's even more than that because usually odds for draws are between 3.0 and 5.0 so for a 10 legs parlay of 10draws, the total odds would be around 4^10 that is to say around 1 million.

It's a bit of a random question, if you are willing to drop 80% of your money on a single prediction then why not just go all in? You seem to have enough faith that the bet will win, so your best expected value would be to max it out. I personally have only used a small amount, more like 10-20% of my account balance on these sort of bets, but it is going to be very unique to each individual - their personal financial situation, how often they gamble, how much is at risk ($10 or $1000?), whether they think they have some sort of knowledge advantage that is missing from the bet being offered and how much risk they are willing to take in general.

To bet on draw, you should not bet on a match that one team is strong or weaker than the other. If you do that, you are sure not to win the bet. To bet on draw, it should be on a team that you know that they are so strong and their defense is strong too. Meaning that they will never allow their competitor to win and their competitor will not also allow them to win too, vice versa. That's how draw work, bro.

I don't risk more then 80% of my balance on any bet. I might bet 5% on draw if it's a live game and near the end, but beforehand it's too risky.
Once before i had any system, i bet my last money on a draw of a boxing match as a hail mary and won 20x. I am not sure why i even picked that fight as i

I never won anything similar since, and these days draw is maybe an only thing i am not betting on.

I don't even risk up-to 20% in a game that seems so sure whether draw or not.
I believe what would go wrong Would surely go wrong and draws makes that very likely.
It's quite hard and risky picking a draw especially in more than one match in a row.
Never did or seen any that have done that.
I can only pick draw in a single match depending on the Team (can't bet Draw for Manchester City or Real Madrid)  and if i do
I usually bet would the mindset am trying my luck.

 Betting with the "draw" option isn't really my forte so whenever I try to I usually go with a 'safe' number of two draws because they usually have nice odds and when I combine the two, I will get a nice and tidy figure that I can stake an amount with. I've got a friend who usually picks like four to five draws and assuming out of ten times he picks draws, he wins like 5-6 times..
 

Yea I was just pointing out that it would be an astronomical figure and if someone was able to predict that sort of win it would be a life changing amount of money. It would be nearly impossible to win a 10 teamer all draws without rigging the games.

It might be worth the gamble each week to place a $1 bet on a 10 teamer and see if you could get lucky.

First of all, for me I think the draw market in sports betting happens to be one of the most difficult markets to bet on, I don’t know about others, and because of this, I hardly attempt going for draws, I’d rather just stick with my 1 or 2 ( Home or Away) market or even the Under/Over and the Double Chance. These are the markets I prefer to stick with.

Now down to your question, if ever I decide to push my luck further and attempt betting on draws, I’d only pick a few draws, at least 3 draws should be just okay for me. And concerning how much I’ll be willing to wager on draws,  I think 80% of one’s bankroll is way too much to wager on draws, except I only deposited that particular amount specifically for that game, and this wouldn’t exceed 10% of my gambling budget for the week.

I am betting on a draw only if I can see the odds are more likely even and when I already a lot of winnings currently, it's like I am giving away money when I try to bet on a draw  :D
So, the amount is extremely small like the minimum bet amount that you can do in a platform.

I rarely bet on a live draw because I think it's harder than betting on the victory of a club that is favored by most people, but usually if it looks difficult to predict, I choose the double chance option, namely the club wins/draws and I use it quite often. But the odds are only small and the profit is not much if I choose this option, I rarely bet on single bets and enter several other matches to be used as a parlay bet to get bigger odds, but sometimes my bets lose because of the other options, but regarding the double chance draw, I win quite often because the risk of losing is small.

I only go for draws when there is not much time left for the match to end. I know the odds will be less at that time, but still, I go for the draw. Generally, it is hard to predict if the match will go for a draw or not at the beginning of the match; hence, I wait for the last moment to take little profit from the match. Risking 80% of your bankroll is very risky. I can spend maximum 25% of the balance to fund the bet. If I face loss, then with the remaining balance, I will try to recover the lost funds first. We need to understand that the higher the return, the higher the risk involved.

Every weekend I sometimes bet on a draw. But that is very rare for me to do. And I will also never bet 80% of my betting budget every week.
I have a limit on each bet on each match, for example on a draw only around $5- $7. And on other options such as Asian total and BTTS usually bet more than $10.
The reason I do this is because the odds on a draw are always big around more than @3.00 and when betting in small amounts you can also get pretty good results if the draw prediction is correct. Unlike Asian total and BTTS which usually only give odds below @3.00

I ever all in my balance in a draw when bet Aston Villa vs Mu a while ago. It's not deliberate, it's just for fun and to have faith in my heart if the result will be expected. I never calculate my balance, so when my feeling tell me to bet in draw then I would not hesitate to do so. As we know, the odd draw is usually good and makes you will put the money as much as you want. Anything can happen in sport, even for the favored choices, there will be a small possibility will end with unexpected

Not more than one, sometimes none at all.

For real bets, I rarely choose a draw, I tend to go to btts, but if I choose a draw, it is no more than 50% of the existing balance, but for bets like in pools/contests, I quite often choose a draw and sometimes no goals with fairly high odds because if I am wrong, nothing is lost except not getting points.

Sometimes a draw bet when the top teams meet and the home/away odds are not much different then the draw option is still very possible to choose, if the difference is very far then rarely choose a draw in football betting.

The odds market you mentioned is often bet on, especially Double Chance although the odds are small but I like it when in parlay betting is done.
That the odds of the series are usually on average large so the chances of winning are small.

I do not usually add any draw to my main slip, I bet on that separately either just with two games on it. Understanding my discomfort first knowing it has lesser possibility of playing accordingly, I wait for the first game to end and if it is successful, I instantly will cash out, forfeiting the last game and just go with the profits from the  first game won
 
Since it's either two games or one in a slip, i would prefer to stake higher than the usual, I don't look basically on percentage calculations, I just enrol with as much bankroll I am comfortable using and able to bear if I lose.

Well, let me say it from the start the question is really, but really confusing!

How much can you bet on a draw? Well, obviously all the money you have on your account, and if that tops the limit of the bookie then what that limit is! How many "draws" can you bet at one time, again, it's a matter of the limit bookies have you can easily bet on 50 on a single ticket but it will be most likely useless since the multiplier will go above the maximum payout!
As for the second part of the question, betting 80% on a single match, no matter what you bet on, winner, asian handicap, goals, this is one thing no real bettor would do, what would be the point of it, draws have a maximum payout of around 6x and that's a risky bet, why gamble all your bankroll on it?

That's too high in my opinion, usually in my case it could be just around 20-30% of my initial capital that I will put on a draw. As we all know that the odds for a draw is higher, so it might be better if you just put a decent amount of money.

I've hit draws on basketball games if I my recall it, usually I go for it if I see that the teams are almost equal in terms of strength and so I will take a small risk big reward by putting some money on it. And then the game makes it more exciting specially if you watch and you have a feeling that the draw is a possible outcome.

Like some other members, I also don't bet on draw, maybe in some rare cases... but I like to play double chance or draw no bet. So even if I were to bet on a draw, I certainly wouldn't risk a very big bet. But if I choose a couple of games with a double chance then I can play with a bigger bet, the odds for a double chance are small as we all know, so without a bigger bet there is no real win.

Lately, I have mostly been playing on goals, and I like to combine the winner with the total goals as well as the total with both teams to score. That's what I find most interesting, and the odds can be very good.

You must play even that you feel confident even if these doesn't seems easy to get out. I would not just stick on a "gambling limit". I would just try to be and to win, in the easy and effective way that I may know.

Most effective bets (hence the more rewarding and the more risk) are bets on 0-0. Odds are bigger than @10. Exchange sites allow to sell these odds with bargain profit after few minutes of play.
Of course just one goal and the whole bet is a mistake and has no value....

Personally I think the most risky part of gambling is betting a game and expecting it to end as a draw, though I have seen people that love betting games to end in draw, lets me state it categorically that I won't be risking that much because in the game of soccer anything can happen, so why will use such percentage you mentioned to bet on a particular prediction when i know that it is just a prediction, not only a prediction, a risky one in that matter, in this kind of situation, I can only bet with little considering the fact it is very difficult for a bettor to be successful in his straight win prediction talk more of a draw.

Anyone betting on draw should consider many things before betting, though I never said matches can not end as draw but am only considering the possibility of it happening, the risk involved is too much to use such percentage range that you mentioned, so if I must take such risk, I will consider making use of few bucks in my balance to avoid regret if I lose.

To me draw games is the ever hard one to be predicted correctly for one to win it a bet because you never can tell when the both teams have equal capacities to be played draw.

And because even the bookmakers knows this tricking predictions, they decides to pump the odds to attract bettors.

I rarely bets on draws but in any case I do, I stakes with little amounts because I assume the winning possibilities would be lower than betting on goals predictions.

There may be leagues where draws happen more often than others, and there are also teams that play draws more often because they have a good defense and a bad attack, but I don't like to bet on a draw, I'm more inclined to use a handicap, which can increase my chances of winning, so I haven't bet on a draw for a long time. I tried to randomly select teams for the sake of testing, which in my opinion can play a draw, but the results were bad, a draw attracted high odds, but I couldn't figure out how to use this.

Betting on live match is not something I like to do often because of odd fluctuation. Moreover, you will not see reasonable odds to bet on again if a game has reached such minutes of play despite that winning it is not guaranteed. I don't know for others but I prefer to stake on odds that are worth even if I'm going to lose eventually. To me, it doesn't make sense risking on 0.1 or thereabout odds and still lose within that short time.


Draw bet is one of the most riskiest option in sports betting but it's actually fun. Advisably, it's good to split it one draw game per ticket but at times I do combine more than two in a single ticket. The chance of winning is always small but it gives the best odds. I have seen someone ticket with thirty draw bet on a single ticket and all played through except one that spoiled the ticket. I can't even pronounce the teams name on the ticket and I wondered how people bet on teams they don't know.

When two big teams meet in a brawl, it’s pretty difficult to dictate what the outcome would be, for me, I think that’s when it’s even more difficult to get a draw because anything can happen, such matches are likely to conceive  just one goal from either sides, that’s why I’d rather prefer to use the under/over or the double chance option, I feel more safer betting on those options since they are likely to enter easily

It's crazy, but that's the temptation in it. I don't like draws despite the high odds. The game is very risky. Last I staked on was 4 draws which gave above 40 odds.

Betting 80% of your bankroll on one outcome of a match is madness. It is a direct path to poverty. Let me remind you that a draw is only one of three outcomes of a football match in a single bet. In some cases, a draw has a more favorable probability if, according to statistics, such matches end in a draw more often. There is a conspiracy theory that bookmakers influence the outcome of a match. And, in their opinion, there are certain game scenarios in which a draw is highly likely. These are games in which equally strong opponents play and both clubs have many fans. At the same time, fans of their clubs bet on their favorite team not because they predict their victory, but because they support their favorite team. It is believed that in such matches a draw is more likely.

On football, I often bet on draw especially on team with close stats since it’s very hard to score if both team is focusing on defense or there’s no team that has a significant advantage in terms of attack capability.


Nah, this is suicide bet for me despite I frequently bet on this type of match I don’t dare to bet huge amount since the odds is still low in able to win this kind of pick. It’s more on just an extra bet and not the bet that I can place huge amount.

Specifically draws has been my usual thing while betting and most times it's always to my favour but of recent I had to discover that puting different games would play alot better than just draws, because back then I can bet on a game with let's say 5 with draws and maybe 1 or 2 on away but to think of it I do this when I'm honestly bored and feel I ought to win based on some predictions that are claim to be true, but keeping that aside I can't risk my funds with such huge percentage on sure predictions just like that, I don't do that it's always the money I can afford to lose .

You think is right for someone to entirely bet on 10 games all draws? This is crazy to say, for me is no no option since it's hard to secure winning, but during my selection I can pick an option that would either lead to draw and yet I still win, but picking draw as main booking game can be very hard and of course with such odds you mentioned there is very possibility of such person wins then the amount would be very high depends on the amount used to stake.

I have not predicted draw before because it doesn't suits my tolerance level, I can't imagine predicting a game to end in draw even though anything is possible, but it seems very hard for me, draw is one of the hardest option am always scared of, though i have seen people who can play up to 10 games as draw, I usually predict win or draw, over 1.5 goals and sometimes straight winning options, those are the options I feel more relaxed with, and it gives much peace of mind irrespective of the fact that am using am amount that i van afford to lose, one thing that is good to maintain is utilizing an option that you can be comfortable with, because we can not completely be out of emotion as humans especially when it comes to gambling. Yeah it can be funny.  :o

I don't know the percentage I can achieve in maintaining a "Draws" in sports betting, especially football, but I've done well so far in predictions and that's what I do if I bet at least five or ten games with different bets and different leagues.

For example: Spanish League, European League and other leagues in 24 hours if there are five matches with different clubs I will choose at least three clubs, I make draw predictions by looking at the opponents of clubs A and B and I also don't forget to monitor some of their matches at least a number ofpast month, for example, I bet in the fifth month of 2024, I take into account the results of the match in January, which is basically considering placing a tie bet based on the opponents of clubs A and B, usually in five bets I place (Draws) three or four wins.

Actually predicting a draw match is because we are confused about the two teams that have balanced abilities, inside us we become doubtful when we think one of them can win, then decide that the match will get a draw, for the use of money I have not dared to use more than 30% of my total balance to bet on bets that I think it will get a draw match.

Yes, I confirm, this scheme works in situations of fixed matches. The main difficulty is how to determine whether the match in the situation under consideration is fixed or not?

Here, in my opinion, you need to study the reputation of the coach. Here it is necessary to conduct a small detective investigation. If it turns out that the coach is a dubious guy who has already been involved in similar bad stories, then there is a high probability that the match is fixed.

The next step is to assess the popularity of both sports teams and roughly estimate the number of their active fans. Such an assessment will certainly be subjective, but it must be done. In general, the method is quite effective. Unlike such gambling games as roulette, a player who is well versed in all the intricacies of the sports industry has every chance of making successful predictions and making a profit.

The main problem here, in my opinion, is how, being a successful player, to look like an ordinary player to an outside observer. This is quite a difficult task.

I agree with you. I barely bet on draw, but on rare instances when I bet on draw is because I've known both teams to have equal field capacity, and equal team quality. So I'm not certain about who will do better at the game, because they have similar quality.

I barely bet on draws because I believe each team is coming out with their best to win, so betting on a draw is like saying both teams are not serious about their win. And we clearly know this sports games are a competition. But on a normal, I will not bet on draw. I will bet on the team that has more field quality, and more previous wins.

Then I barely bet with 80%. I have a specific amount of my monthly income that I use in playing parlays, and I try not to exceed it when I've exhausted my budget.

Understanding the fact that nothing is certain in sports betting wouldn't push you to make some irrational moves, no matter how sure you think a game might be always ensure you maintain a very moderate stake that's affordable for you to lose. A single mistake from players can alter the predicted outcome of a match even though the game has a high chance of playing that way. You must remember that the gambler is not in control of whatever happens on the pitch, so having this thought is supposed to make you more careful about how you make your final decisions.

Even if the teams that are competing are not balance, we can still expect a draw no matter what. That is what sports are or sports betting is, it's the unknown, we might see some upsets from time to time or even a draw.

So maybe we can put some side money on a draw, not huge bet, just something to bet on specially if we have this feeling that something might happen on that match and so it's better to put some as the odds is like 10x initially for a draw if I'm not mistaken.

You are absolutely right, mate, that was the last argument I hard with someone that said that the reason why we predict draws is because one team is stronger than the other. It's only a non gambler that can say such because like you have clearly defined it, we only predict draws if the both team has equal strength and we are a bit confused of the team that will win the fixture.

Well I don't think it's about the draw itself rather the games determines the kind of bet to be placed and this might also rely on the previous match outcomes from the various opponent you're about to plece your bet on.
I've actually seen a bet of upto 6 draws but I don't think it's quite common placing just only that some people actually take extra prediction by maybe a draw or win / draw or loose, I think that puts them on safer side than just playing only multiple draws though the odds might reduce but it worth it sometimes and to answer your question maybe 1 or 2 :).

I don't know bro but 80% of the balance for me seems a lot I usually do with 25% of the balance 80% is just like all in my opinion hahha. How many "Draws" can you bet on at a time? The answer is rare since draw in sport is very very rare and heck even in the card game like blackjack is also rare but it will there is still possibility tho.

But yes I don't want to risk more than 80% of my balance on a single prediction

Sometimes I bet on draw with the the average risk of around 10%. Draw  even in  in the level match   is  a kind of the  center of gravity  which hard to define owing to unforeseen circumstances which may happen in its course thus I prefer to not risk more sum  in a single prediction ^{(as I commonly loose at such betting, my biased ones are more profitable for me).}

We say that gambling is something that we are always uncertain about our prediction but draws is one of the most uncertain prediction that anyone will stake on and even if you want to stake on draws, it should be with a small amount and don't also add it in your accumulation because it can be the result why your game with cut.

I usually do not take part in any bet whether that is soccer or cricket. I usually take a side and if I think there might be an issue then I use the term if (or). And for draw I would never bet such an amount eg 80% of my investment/current balance. But if the current balance is too low then that could be the difference.

Calculation of predictions with draw seems very small to happen, most gamblers must have predictions that on average are win for one of the team and if they bet on draw they will definitely choose the safer one with Double Chance because it minimizes failure.
Regarding the actual bet amount without taking draw, it is also better not to bet larger amount of money, honestly for my own experience it is better to make more matches in one multi bet slip by getting big odds and that way can get decent win even for the amount of bets in limited money.
Besides, for some reason I also always lose more when taking draw several times, this is what makes not choose draw.

I like to bet on eSports but I have never bet on a draw. This is probably because the score dynamics are always very high there, and we can often see match results like 6:44, and this is not football where the final score is always low, like 1:2 or something like that. Therefore, in a football match it makes sense to bet on a draw, but in eSports it makes no sense at all.

You can placing any bet, draw, win, or lose but with one condition, you know how much money you can use. That will prevents you from the big lose and you will not gonna regret it but that is not like that happen. People tend to place their bet with more money and not thinks about the risks that they can get from gambling. Gambling is about uncertain no matter if we believe that our prediction can win so we can only try to analyze and place our bet based on our prediction.

I would bet on a draw only in one case, if I was sure that both teams (if we are talking about football, for example) have very similar results of victories and defeats in relation to other teams. And at the same time, the results of their previous meetings are plus or minus a draw. The difference is one point plus or minus.

But I have never encountered such situations in my career as a bettor. Betting on a draw is very dangerous.

It depends on what I receive from my pool friends. I have received up to four draws which all played out. But beyond playing them together, I still split them out and stake them individually just in case since there's no guarantee that I'll win them. It's a very risky prediction though since the two teams must be equal on scores at the end of 90 minutes and I hardly forecast them myself.

Draws are for high stakes, I can go for as much as $20 on a single draw game, then when combining them, I lower my stakes since the multipliers would fetch me something good if I'm lucky

It depends on who's gambling budget is, the lower the bet, the higher the amount of his budget a single bet.  For example if I have a gambling budget of $10 I would not hesitate to bet 100% of my budget on a single bet.  Many times it has happened to me that I put the entire amount of my budget on a single bet. many times I put it in Draw prediction. but the draw prediction bets are very difficult to win. but sometimes it is possible to win them at very big odds. and i also have the experience of winning big odd from draw prediction

I still wonder how the pools are being conducted because I have been given 3 draw odds by a colleague who always plays pool and out of the three draws 2 were successful. I split the game individually as I see it impossible to play all three of them in a single bet slip. The odds of failing are high. I think this is the best to split the game one for each stake and probably you might end up winning one or the three as the case maybe with luck. 

The odds for draws are about 3 odds or more. So, if you want to bet on draws then you get to use a decent amount of money that we can afford to lose. The reason why people don't bet on draws much is because the odds are not worth the risk. There is a higher chance of one side winning in a game compared to the chances of a draw. The bookers would have made the draws to be from 5 odds to 7 odds that better. 

The ways of the pool is another technique which is beyond our understanding and I like to keep it at that. My brain is filled with a lot of things currently and I don't even try adding understanding the pools to my to-do list.

As far as I get my games when it's out, I'm very much fine with that and yes it's better to split the games when staking them since it increases your chances of winning as against combining all

Very good op used the word expected and not that the gambler is certain about the game ending absolutely in a draw. I don't see why I would want to use  up to 80% of my balance to stake on any game, especially not for draw selection. I have been a sports bettor for years now and I can vividly say that among all the straightforward bet options/selections like home win, away win, it's draw that's the hardest to predict in sports games. And I that's why bookies usually gives it a big size odds because they understand that the chances to win with it are petite.

To be fair, you are only always expecting when you are gambling. No matter what kind of betting odds you place, you will only be assuming things based on a handful of data and track records. Statistics  is a gambler’s friend especially in sports gambling.

Sure you can predict draws but even with other betting odds, I do not think betting 80% of your balance in a single match is recommended. No matter how much you have studied statistics and how much you believe in them… you can only just assume things , Nothing is certain and betting 80% of all your funds can end really really badly

Anything can happen in live sports and sometimes a team may pull a miracle and go against all odds and what seemed to be a sure result may not be as sure anymore after

Honestly it seems very rare for me to bet on a draw, it can be said that it is the least expected option by some gamblers. I mean every time I bet on football, the options I focus on are only 2 (lose or win) measuring based on the strength of each team and often looking at H2H. So the draw prediction is only for the moment of the big team meeting, because as far as the beginning of the season where the big teams meet at the end of the season, I can put the draw option as long as the comparison of strength is thin.

Sincerely, draw is actually hard to win but sometimes this could likely achieve with some local league or up rising team with equal strength where scoring are equal or can be 0-0 and 1-1 such team that always has equal strength are rear to find. If it's under or over, something like go go no go it can be very easy to predict because there are more chance and likelihood that among the two teams one must score.

There are bettors who specialize in betting on a draw, but I never make such bets, because in my opinion it carries increased risks. I prefer to bet on clear favorites, even if I win, I will not get as much winnings as if I win a bet on an underdog or a bet on a draw. I am not ready to increase my risks so much, because I am not a professional in this field, nor a sports analyst, but rather bet for fun. If you think about it, I do not even know a single person from my circle who would specialize in betting on a draw.

But it differs in the magnitude of expectation for a draw selection and that of a straight home win or away win in a football game. Unlike where we have a favourite with high propensity to win in a game which will raise our confidence, it's not so with draw option as all you look forth with is that both sides keep playing at equal energy without any upset.

Even in local leagues draws ain't that easy to come by irrespective of equal strength of both teams it could actually end in 1:0 0:1 or worse case 2:0  ;D . Except you're trying to talk about those unpopular leagues that games are usually fixed but getting  solid informations about those particular games is another task entirely.

Betting on a draw does have a big risk can still be counted for a draw while in any favorite match the best result is that they want to win one of them.

I think someone who bets on a draw is very rare unless the team is strong, like in the Champion League between Barcelona vs Bayern Munich a draw is still very possible and some people might dare to make a bet.

Even myself if I only bet on $5 for a draw in this match I am still able to do it... for me this is still very possible.

Everyone or gambler usually have their strategy and game type preference and while you are not interested in draws prediction, many other gamblers are interested at it. People are tempted to bet on draws because of the high odds that comes with it. Staking with 80% of one's balance will depend on the value that is left in the account, for example, if you have just $1 or $2, you can just spend all on  the bet.

Well, with your question, it all depends on the capital involved. Personally, I have tried 100% but it's just around $30. But that is not for a draw. I always check the performance of the matches that they have done and see which team is higher in terms of performance. So it is quite hard for me to be on the draw because I always conclude that there would be a better team.

You could have multiple draw bets, right? It depends on the platform you use for your betting.

The most difficult option to bet is draw and that's one of the part in gambling were i see that people does not brag about unlike those other normal options were they can just predict and it happen the way they expected, however even on  every betting platform you will always see that draw has the highest odds among some other options and that's one of the aspect I can say that Luck is involved because even if the both team has everything equal does not still mean that they will draw, so is only by chance it normally come out but not by being certain as most people normally do on betting on direct win.

However if I'm ask how many games I can use on my draw prediction I would say one or two games, reason been that if I'm lucky the first and the second draw was successful I don't need to border myself on hoping if others will play the same way, and sometimes before those other games will get to the last minutes one of them had already disappointed, so draw is not an option for somebody who have an intention to win but when you win through draw option is as if you won a jackpot if you use a big amount.

Very rarely do I choose the option for a draw, although sometimes I expect a draw but at the same time I also expect a win for the team. Thus, I more often choose the double chance option for example for team A or draw or vice versa about draw or team B. But besides that, I also prefer Draw no Bet and thus, at least I personally am never confident in choosing a draw. Therefore, I more often choose the two options if in a certain match my personal prediction is to get a draw but for betting I prefer the Draw no Bet option and or also Double Chance.

I confess that I have seen few people posting photos of victories in games in which they bet on draws, perhaps because most people do not risk betting on draws, they prefer to choose other options. For example, I do not remember which day I placed a bet on a draw. But it would be very interesting if someone who bets on draws and has been successful came to this thread and posted their experiences, so that we could see to what extent betting on a draw can be better than betting on other options. There are people who only like to bet on goals and others on corners. I have seen videos of people who like to bet on corners and goals showing their successes, but I have never seen videos of people who only like to bet on draws.

I am ready to bet only on 2 matches in a row that there will be a draw, because I just hate when such an outcome happens in matches and accordingly I rarely bet on it.

I will never risk 80% of my deposit to bet on a draw, it is simply suicide. It is too much of a risk for this in my opinion. I think any match does not deserve to bet such a large part of the deposit on it. Even if we are three times sure, I would bet no more than 20%. In any case, I will never bet on a draw, it is too difficult for me to predict. Everyone has their own style and strategy in betting, I prefer to bet either on wins or losses in regular time.

I don't think draw is the most difficult option to bet on in sports betting. But its one of those few options that people put into consideration when choosing odds. Except those who play pools. Up till now i don't really know how that pool works, most of my friends are into pool betting and they are the ones who are more interested in betting on draw games. I get some little games from them at times , yet since them i has not been able to win any of the games. Indeed draws are very difficult but there are gamblers who are really lucky betting on draws, and they win big when they win.

Obviously, betting on more than 2 matches to be draw is a very risky bet. And the reason is because there is lower chances of the game playing. One seems difficult then think about three, four matches to end in draw is far way difficult. As for me, i prefer a maximum of two matches on a draw. The best is playing them one by one. If we have two draws we can place them each on a single bet. So that if one get to play and the other lose, we still be on the winning side.

Sometimes we can even see the draw score on matches where we don't expect the team to end the game in draws. In some matches, you can place a bet on them to end with 3 goals and above, and you will see them ending the match with either 0:0 or 1:1, and this could be matches that in the past, if you check the history of both teams, such could have not occurred. You will always see that one of them wins before the match ends, but gambling will always be gambling; the end result is always uncertain.

In any game that bet on, if am not so certain about the outcome after predicting home or away win, I can just select, home win or draw or Away win or draw. That's more favorable in my predictions than staking on draws alone.

My answer to this question is no, no matter how certain you think your prediction on a match is it's advised to stake moderately because anything can still happen at the end of the day. Soccer is filled with a lot of possible outcomes, a match that has the potential of turning out to be a draw can end with a different result. A full time draw option for me is very unsafe and anytime I decide to pick this option I always stake very low. Learn to apply risk management in gambling in order not to have huge losses.

Like yesterday i placed bet on live match that has started, I think about 2 matches already had 1-0 so from my view i thought it would ends on 1-1, i then picked about 5 matches which only 2 games ended up playing draws while the remaining 3 matches ends with 1-2, 0-1 and 1-0, making my bet to cut off. Although i didn't expect the match to end that way because from the look out of the match it would so slow that you would think the both matches would definitely ends with draw, inspiring me to have draws in all the options.

Yes it is better, so you can still make an advantage if the team you choose does win and for the amount of bets you make will probably be less.
I'll only bet on teams that I know and have analyzed, but some teams that may be strong enough, you start betting with a win or a draw if the opponent is also strong enough.

Yes, that's right, mate. If the team you are betting against is also as strong as the team you are supporting or maybe they have equal strength, that means that you can either say your favorite team will win or they are going to draw.

Well, the maximum I have done is 6 draws at the same time and on a single slip but that isn't advisable because draws are difficult to achieve and so gathering 6 games together predicted for a draw in one slip is just easy to be lost. Although I have also seen someone who had 9 draws in a slip that the potential winning was of course running into very huge money but he eventually lost out as one out of the 9 games ended in 4:0.

However, I think 3 draws together is reasonable. So one can actually split them in threes.


80% is very unreasonable. If you bet with such from your balance then you will be restive. You have to bet with an amount that when you lose you don't feel depressed. Yes, sometimes you see a game and you feel it is a sure bet but anything can still happen along the line.

I can bet with maximum of 5% at once.

Yea, 5% is actually wise but someone once said that if the balance in your account is very small, then you can still use it to stake at once in that prediction. Let's say for example, you only had $1 or $2 in your balance, you can consider using all because 5% of it can just be $0.05 and $0.1 respectively which can not bring forth any good reward if at all, all the games were to be successful.

I can only play draw depending on how far the two sides has come when it comes to goals scoring and conceding goals. Aside that I’m not a fan of draw bet I prefer straight win or lose or better still number of goals.

That will not still guarantee how successful your bet can be if you are only staking on draws. It actually take a very lucky gambler to win more than 9 draws.

From my one time experience of a draw I Forcast years back in 2017, I predicted 7 draws in single slip and only 1 game cut the slip
And that wa actually a first half,  and I could recall vividly about that scenario,  the list odd was about 1.92 odd,  all was a first half draw event, so I from that experience one can do way up to 7 different draws,.

Draws usually attract big odds, I think the least I have seen is from 1.7 and above, before the game would start, and not on a live match event. I don't normally use very big amount of money,  if can gather good 3 draw games , it will pay off without having to risk high.

Choosing a draw in football game is the most difficult prediction I can ever think of. I know a friend that's very good at spotting games that'll end in a draw but I still find it difficult to believe him or stake on his predictions even when more 75% of his draw predictions always end up as predicted. Personally I feel that one of the teams can pull up surprises and snatch wins when it's almost full time. That being said, whenever I decide to bet on the draw option, I don't see myself staking on more than one game.

I don't think there are a lot of gamblers who are willing to bet on draws and most of them will prefer to choose which team will win. This is firstly because it is difficult to predict the result of a draw and secondly because the percentage of matches that end in a draw is very small compared to matches that end with one team winning.
There is an exception regarding betting on live matches since the result prediction is linked to the timing of the match at the time of placing the bet. This means that, for example, if the result is a draw until the 80th minute of the match in a football game and no goals are scored throughout the second half, then the match is likely to end in a draw because the probability of a draw becomes almost equal to the result of a win for one of the two teams.

As for the amount of bet that I may place on the result of a draw, it will generally not exceed the percentage that I allocate to gambling, which is always amounts that I am not afraid to lose. It can be said that it will not exceed 20% of the total bet amounts considering that I always allocate a small part of my budget to gambling.

This sounds so much like a rhetorical question... Well, how many draws? Sure. I go by intuition and and say not that many but really you can't make sense from it statistically. It's not a 1/3 every time, it's more likely statistically speaking that the better teams keep winning so if you have this knowledge also it's much better than just betting on draws. I would say it's not worth to kvsess over the statistics especially for draws. Look into the odds because I consider betting in the draw option is just going to drive more money to a very margibal chance that gives bi permanent feeling to the player.

First, let me start by saying that I don't usually bet on a lot of games per time, I mostly will bet on one or two games per time, most especially if I was the one that did my own game analysis, I only manage to analyze one of two games and bet on those, in other not to burn myself out.

But on the other hand, when I bet on games I copy from other gamblers, I usually will do up to 5, 6 games per time, and in this type of games, I don't decided what to bet on since the bets have already been placed and I just copied it.

But all the same, on my own, I hardly bet on draws, simply because it's always kinda harder to tell if a match will end in a draw.
But then, if there be a match where I had to bet on a draw, I make sure not to risk too much money on that, maybe between $1 to $5 max on such.

Well, the outcomes for a football match are pretty limited: win, loss, or draw. With that being said, to me, drawing looks like a riskier option; I'm not saying it is, but I'm not often opting for it. I've seen some people choose it because I've noticed that it generally provides decent odds, but I haven't had my fair share of luck anytime I've attempted it. I usually choose to bet on two to three matches at most; that way, I can focus on achieving a few meaningful wins that will yield the outcome I'm anticipating, allowing me to further and more carefully analyze the situation. 

The result of the match is Win - Draw - Lose, this is a normal match but in the bookie odds there are so many odds options offered that even I myself have never tried all the odds.

A draw usually gives higher odds than the odds of winning or losing, so in betting the higher the odds the lower the chance of winning so a draw is still not safe to get in the odds.

I focus more on other odds than picking a draw.

Bookies offer several options that I still haven't bothered with yet; I'm only fiddling with the basic three alternatives, which you already mentioned as well. The lower chances of winning in soccer and in sports in general are a "trap." There are no guaranteed matches, and more often than not, I've been burned with what I thought was an easy bet. The previous weekend, in the Greek Super League, the match of Olympiakos, one of the best Greek teams, vs. Levadiakos, a new team that joined the League this year, ended in a tie. It was completely unexpected, and those who bet on a tie earned a great sum of money.

During esports especially with Dota 2 most of the teams need to do a round robin and make the highest score or at least passing score to qualify for the event so most of the games right there is best of 2 only so the chance is got a win game for 2:0 or a draw of 1:1, of course, higher risk, but the game offers a draw match so the option is just 33.33% win rate I do rarely make a bet for the map 1 or 2 match winner than do a draw bet because its too much risky on my side. Better to play safe if you don't know the performance of the team yet.

You are even lucky to have staked on 7 draws and only 1 failed. If I had 5 successful draws out of nine draws, I will definitely accept cash out amount because I know that all can not be successful. Draws are very risky and tricky, you better grab a good cash out offer when you can.

And does this topic apply to those who don't bet on sports (now), but have had similar experience in the past? :)

Although I personally have never bet on a draw (bet on one of the sides to win), if I were sure of a draw, I would be ready to risk even 100% of my balance. But it should also be noted what the odds would be for such a bet: I would hardly risk most of my balance for the sake of insignificant multipliers.

I don't bet on draw, and even if I have bet on draw, it might be ones and I am not sure if that game ended as predicted. However, according to the second question, I am not still sure how much I would bet on draw because it's very risky to bet too much money on it.
Risking 80% of the money I can afford to lose is one thing and risking 80% of what I can not afford to lose is another dangerous thing, so I would not risk 80% of what I can, and what I can not afford to lose on draw.

Once a sports bettor, always a sports bettor... ;D

---

As for OP's questions, I don't usually chase draws but sometimes I choose them, not for the whole game though but only for half-time settings. In general, I'm satisfied with my half-time draw results. Of course, it all depends on the competition and the teams. As I can recall, I chose it only 2 times in a parlay, 1 time I won, and the other time I lost. However, I never bet on more than 3 games in my parlays and when I choose draws, then strictly only 2 games. Fewer winnings but more safety.

But even though in terms of data analysis and the game of the opposing team is strong, some percent also depends on luck,
because there are also great clubs that end up losing because they underestimate opponents who they think are weak or below them.

But for some people even though the opposing team is strong they will only bet indeed, and it blinds them to pride, even though in the end their bets lose or even do not get any profit.

Such people who adore their beloved clubs too much will only lose money in the end if they don't make the bets they should.

I never placed any bet on esports and also I do not want to place on gambling bet as I think it is not a real game and is computer computer-generated game. As it is a computer-based game the result can be manipulated and the result can't on my favor.

Normally in gambling anything can happen at any given time that's why is always advise able to gamble what you can afford to lose but although sometimes you can see a game as draw but due to fear you wouldn't be able to use a huge amount of money to bet the game. Actually a full time draw option can be somehow for some people but for me I love playing full time draw because normally my best options in gambling is always draw and I use to play a single draw because playing a single draw is more better than playing 2 to 3 draws because once you play more than 1 draw in a betting slip the possibility of losing is always slim.

The draw option is probably one of the most unsafest selection In the market if you ask me...I can take the risk of playing a single draw game,  betting on multiple draws can decrease the chances of winning...my strategy for picking draw games is just to look for two teams playing against each other that are at the bottom of their league table, overtime I have discovered that those teams end up with a goaless draw or perhaps 1-1..This is just what I observed from my analysis,I am not saying it's a sure way of making draw selections... besides nothing is  safe in gambling.

I personally have not bet on a single draw before. Although I have included it in one of my games but haven't stake only draw as seperate game on a ticket because I feel the sense of high risk because draw is always hard to predict. If I want to even include draw iny game I usually make it a double chance game, by predicting it as 1x, 2x GG, 12, bts & 1 win or BTS & 2 win and many other. These are likely the kind of Games I play but not draw(X) .

E-sports is stands for all online games tournaments such as Dota2, CS:GO, Valorant and many more which is an official tournament played by real e-sports player.

I think you are pertaining on the old version of e-sports which is just a game simulation based on the program dedicated on the team. E-sports is now just like regular sports which you can bet and watch it live since it’s broadcast by popular stream channel like Twitch and Youtube.

I might not be a pro when it comes to draw matches, actually there are gamblers that do this only. They don't bet on any games other than draw options because they are good. With 3 games, you are guarantee of 30 odd on average and more because the odd is dependent on the previous matches the teams has played, if they have been playing draw in the past, the odd will be small and if it's rare, the odds is going to be bigger because they know that it's likely not going to happen.

As for me, I don't like it. If you draw matches in a bet, you will likely win other options 19 times before you win 1 draw bets but maybe I'm not skilled enough on how they played them but I always loss. What I do know is that some people that bet draw matches are wizard, sometimes I wonder where they picked their games from, they don't pick games frkm popular leagues, it's the unpopular games they bet the most.

We happen to share the same point of view on this subject, personally I feel that draws happen to be the most difficult market/option to bet on and if/when I’m making predictions, I would never dare to include it on my bet because draws are most unlikely to come. Just like you I can go with the double chances and that’s it, except maybe I just feel like testing how lucky I can be for that day, then I can pick just one draw to try out my luck, although I’ve been lucky a few times with such lucky shots but most times, it always ends in ruin lol.

I also thought that this is what they meant. But modern eSports are fair games with betting, and everyone can see every move of the players. No cheating, certainly at big tournaments. At small ones, I admit that there are fixed matches, but not all of them. It is for the bright emotions that I like the world of eSports, and there is huge money in this sphere of betting and games now.

Yeah draw games are more effective usually when the game is at the brisk of ending and you have so much fate in your favourite teams, then you're sure the game will hit at a draw then that's when you need to bet let's say about 20 to 30mins before the game ends. But sometimes a draw is less predicted cause you can define the position of the match between the two teams then betting with a draw on both of them can result to a loss, so it's better to switch between games while betting.

About how many draws you can bet, it depends on the site. Amount of game wise I know stale for example limits parleys to 20 games as far as I remember, this I got might be not up to date though since last time I made a monster parley is a long time ago.
Sites also put a limit on max odds or max payout normally. With draws having average odds of about 3x it only needs 13 games to reach odds of almost 1.6 million. No clue if a site would accept a bet with odds that high, the risk vs reward ratio is just really bad for the site. Sure it’s not likely that somebody wins such a bet but risking 1.6 million just to earn 1$ seems a bit out of place.

Yea, some players thought it wise not to bet on draws because of its high risk but some people that add it are doing so because of the high odds which means high reward. I don't do draw games most of the time but rather by best strategy is to compilation of just small odds which I think can possibly play as predicted.

Predicting draws is one of the most scaring predictions for me it can never give me any comfort if it happens I make use that predictions. However, it at all I will play a draw match it will be more better for me to it as a single, it is so wired how people compile up to 5 or even more draw together with the expectation that they will all survive to green, to me it i quite unrealistic and a very hard one at that, though I do see people doing that for as me I can never attempt to do that no matter how convincing it may look, I can play an option that will make not to have a good rest of mind.

Normally, placing bets on draws alone is very risky but there are some persons that do it and luckily profit from it but actually I don't support placing bet on Just draws alone. Someone can bet on Just one which is fine but staking on 3 to 5 draws is just too risky. Also, when betting on draws, it's just a thing of luck for the game to go in your favour.