Bitcoin Forum

Hey everyone,

I originally posted this on Stake’s own community forum, but—surprise, surprise—it was deleted without explanation.

https://stakecommunity.com/topic/109701-stake-censors-users-blocks-withdrawals-and-now-stealing-monthly-vip/

Stake clearly doesn’t want users to know what’s really happening behind the scenes, so I’m sharing it here instead.

As a Platinum III VIP player, I’ve had $70,000 in wagers and $2,688 in deposits, but my monthly VIP bonus was shockingly only $6.57, when the base for Platinum III is supposed to be $30. This isn’t just a one-off mistake—Stake is withholding rewards from its loyal players.

On top of this, Stake has:

• Put my account in withdrawal-only mode without any notice or reason.
• Censored my posts in their chat and deleted my threads on their forums.
• Banned me from Reddit after I started exposing their shady practices.
• Despite reaching out to their support and complaints teams multiple times, my issues remain unresolved. It’s clear that Stake is going out of their way to silence anyone who raises valid concerns. I’ve even filed a formal complaint with the FBI due to the seriousness of these issues.
  

I’m also genuinely worried about my safety since I’ve reported Stake’s founders, including Eddie, and their involvement in a fraudulent crypto empire. If anything happens to me, Stake should be held responsible.

If you’re a Stake user, especially a VIP, be aware that they may block your account, censor your voice, and steal your bonuses without hesitation. Has anyone else faced similar treatment with Stake? It’s time to hold them accountable for their unethical practices and ensure this doesn’t go unnoticed.



https://talkimg.com/images/2024/10/16/8j6iw.png

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/10/16/8jRu9.png

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/10/16/8jzxo.png

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/10/16/8jt4a.png

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/10/16/8jTNN.png

I appreciate your update, but let’s clarify a few things. I haven’t stopped wagering, and my activity level is more than enough to justify the base VIP bonus for Platinum III, which is clearly stated to be $30. What I received—$6.57—isn’t just a "reduction," it’s blatantly unfair given the wagers and deposits I’ve made. If there were changes to the terms or calculations, they’ve never been communicated to me, and that’s on Stake.

Now, regarding your point about censorship, I’ve always treated support staff with respect. My posts were deleted, my account was restricted, and my voice was silenced because I raised legitimate concerns—not because I was rude. Stake’s reaction to criticism has been consistently evasive, especially when users like me start asking tough questions about their practices.

As for Eddie’s comments on streams, those don’t change the fact that there are written terms that users rely on. If Stake wants to operate in a transparent and fair manner, they need to honor their commitments or clearly communicate any changes—not just on streams, but in their official policies.

The real issue here is Stake’s failure to honor its promises and silencing users who speak out. I’m simply holding them accountable for actions that don’t align with their own policies.

As a Platinum III VIP player, I’ve had $70,000 in wagers and $2,688 in deposits, but my monthly VIP bonus was shockingly only $6.57, when the base for Platinum III is supposed to be $30. This isn’t just a one-off mistake—Stake is withholding rewards from its loyal players.

[...]

You can try to pm their reps or post in their announcement thread and see if someone can or will help you.

Stunna (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=81292)
Symphonized (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1928906)
Ann thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2072589.0)

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/10/18/8BsgT.png

It’s clear now that Stake has no intention of addressing the core issues here, despite the publicity effort made by Symphonized. This feels more like a PR move rather than an actual attempt to resolve the concerns I’ve raised.

As you can see from Aleksandar's response, Stake is refusing to provide any additional amount for my monthly VIP bonus, which contradicts what others have received at similar VIP levels. Even though they claim the bonuses are automatically calculated and “fair,” the disparity in payouts and lack of transparency indicates otherwise.

I appreciate Symphonized notifying the staff team, but without Stake admitting their mistake and addressing these inconsistencies, it looks like nothing will change. This is not about demanding special treatment; it’s about fairness and being treated equally compared to other users.

The calculation rules of their bonuses are very opaque afaik, and they change them whenever they want without noticing users because as it is one bonus they consider they don't owe anything towards customers about it and they can give it as they wish, to whoever they want. What Eddie has said according to the post above is quite suprising because usually when they suspect a customer to have several accounts they lock all his funds and they ask him to fulfill an endless KYC procedure as we've seen in many cases here. So if he's true, and one of your picture seems to confirm it, it would mean their multi-account accusations are just excuses used to try to keep funds of those customers actually, it would be serious.

True that they are changing the bonuses, they actually did that a lot over the last 2 years. Still the bonuses normally are quite good and if the calculation is right then there is nothing to complain about. What exactly is going on in OP's case, nobody knows. It's always hard to get insights. But obvious there must be something wrong.
Also, I don't know what you mean by "his picture seems to confirm it". The agent just made a mistake because normally they have several support chats open at the same time. So whatever he told him was meant to be for somebody else, he obviously said that himself. About multi account accusations, normally they don't just keep your money but but the account in "withdraw only mode", and one the withdrawal was made you can't use the account anymore. Sure, we never know if the multi account things are true, but that's for any casino since not 1 single casino would show their ways of detecting such accounts, for obvious reasons.

Garbage snipped

For anyone actually interested in the truth, I recommend checking out Stakeexposed.com. Stake, and particularly Eddie and his team, won’t be able to get away with their fraudulent practices for much longer. Eddie and his crew are headed to prison – that’s the inevitable outcome of their scamming and exploitation of users.

IMO you shouldn't intervene in cases regarding the casino you're promoting with a referral link into your signature because you're not objective, and even look a bit biased actually. Could you point out a case where this casino as just put the account in "withraw only mode" and kindly let the customer withdrawing all his funds without asking anything else after being accused of multi-accounting? I am very curious about that tbh. In the last case we've seen here(the one where you've asked the OP to promptly lock his thread before giving more informations), the customer had to threaten them to sue the big bosses in Australia, to be able to get his funds back.
Here it's the same with this customer agent, right after talking about his boss, the agent poorly apologied and claimed to have confused him with another customer while what he said was apparently in line with previous Eddie's statements according to you.

You feel a bit confused to be honest. I can voice my opinion (regardless of my campaign) and I also said that it's true the bonus amounts decreased over time. I am a 4 year player on stake, have platinum 6 level and I know what I am talking about.
And about the "withdraw only mode" I actually know 3 persons personally that had this happen and they have withdrawn, just so you know. Also on the stake forum you can read about cases like that. Do yourself a favor and check it out.

And, I didn't "promptly" ask the OP of a different case to lock it, I just did because that's what people here are supposed to do. If your case is resolved you are supposed to update and lock to avoid further spamming, that's how things are handled here. You are in no place to judge me about my signature. I am nobody to blindly defend sites, never was never will. I said that in the case we are talking about there is definitely something wrong with the calculation, didn't I? Also it's a fact the support agents have several chats open, sending a reply to the wrong person happens and it happened to me so often actually. That's why I reacted to your reply, because you didn't take this into consideration. Cheers

Honestly, I wouldn't have talked about that if you didn't quote me to defend the casino while wearing its signature (with ref link) and while I wasn't even talking to you. I personally think people should stay cautious with what they do and they say when there could be a conflict of interest in their position, even if they are very fair and honest but it's just my personal ethic and I don't ask anyone to share it. If you are platinum 6 (ie 10+ millions wagered afaik) you are a high roller, so you should be concerned about all those issues reported here because one day you might face them too, and it's nice to tell us here how Stake normally handles multi-accounts according to what you've seen around you but it would have been interesting to tell it on other threads where people are not treated this way IMO. Anyway I hope kingbj21 will be able to know why his bonus has been decreased.

I see that you've resorted to personal attacks instead of actually addressing the issues at hand. Calling me a "frustrated kid" or assuming that I'm just trying to blackmail Stake for a bonus only reveals your ignorance about the situation. This isn't about losing money I couldn't afford or trying to blackmail a casino—it's about holding a company accountable for their unethical and illegal practices.

You seem to be confusing a genuine concern with personal grievances. If I were defending Stake, I certainly wouldn't be wearing their signature or promoting them. The fact remains that you are still ignoring the key issue: I had a significant deposit and wagering activity last month, which entitled me to more than just a $6.57 monthly bonus.

This isn’t about receiving "free money" as you call it. The monthly bonus is simply another form of rakeback—a reward for the activity I’ve already generated for Stake. For the record, I received the exact same amount for my weekly bonus—$6.57—just before the monthly bonus of $6.57. This points to a deliberate reduction in what I should have rightfully received, and other users have agreed and pointed this out, even on Stake's own forum.

I know where you have this
@Shishir99,

You seem to have misunderstood from the start. I never received $474—that was an estimated bonus based on my activity, which Stake failed to provide. What I actually got was a mere $6.57, which is a fraction of what was expected. Stake has literally stolen the money I rightfully earned by not providing the proper bonus, and it’s disappointing that you missed this key point from the very beginning.

This isn't about personal attacks; it's about raising awareness of unethical practices. If you’ve now come to understand the seriousness of the situation, that’s a start. But make no mistake—Stake's actions here are not acceptable, and it’s crucial to continue pointing out these issues until they’re addressed fairly.

Where did all the Stake defenders go? It’s awfully quiet now. Shame on you for supporting such a deceitful company, one that actively engages in unethical practices and tries to silence anyone who speaks out. Defending a company like Stake only shows complicity with their behavior. The truth is coming out, and Stake won’t be able to hide behind its deceit much longer.

IMO they just think your case is closed because your topic has been tagged as resolved in the thread listing the scam accusation cases along with your other threads regarding this platform. I don't really understand why but I guess the reason belongs to a personal conflict between you and the owner of the listing. But in order to avoid misleading the users you should clearly mention in the OP of the thread or in its title that the case is still unresolved or ongoing as clinexrino did for his own IMO [UNRESOLVED]Rollbit SCAMS money from restricted players with 0% chance of lose (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5504738)

After much thought, I believe it's time to focus on peace and understanding. While I’ve shared my concerns about certain platforms and their impact, my intention now is to promote awareness and peace. There are many layers to the gambling world, and I’ve seen both good and bad through my experiences. However, it's essential to evaluate the consequences before diving in, especially with platforms that have complex operations and hidden agendas.

As we move forward, I hope others find peace in evaluating their choices and actions. While my path has led me away from these platforms, I wish everyone the best in their journeys. Peace and awareness are the first steps to creating a healthier mindset, both in gambling and life. Stay aware, stay strong, and remember to always take care of yourselves.

Are... we talking about me and my list here in place of "the thread listing the scam accusation" and "the owner of the listing"? If so, then rest assured that [once again] that thread is not authoritarian, I will not abuse the list to my own agenda simply because [borrowing your words], "a conflict between you and the owner of the listing".

It was marked as resolved due to the OP's own written statement, on Stake's ANN thread


Was it a wrong interpretation that the case can be marked as resolved by OP wanting to focus on peace and understanding? Move forward? And, though his path let him away from these platforms, he wish everyone the best in their journey. I'll more than happy to change it given an insight from other party.

One thing that I think I need to say though, is that I find myself really surprised that you thought I will do such action, that I will abuse the list for a personal annoyance toward someone.

I've seen your other post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5504738.msg64928555#msg64928555) on Cinexrino's thread, I won't reply on both topics to say the same thing, especially overthere while I haven't posted before and I think it's a bit off-topic on top of that.
I saw this case (and the other ones from OP regarding this platform) were marked are closed and resolved in your lists, I was surprised since I still see OP posting angry messages and serious accusations against this casino here and in the ANN thread of the platform. So I looked at this topic and the other one regarding accusations of illegal activities in India, and I didn't find anything showing those accusations have been addressed and solved. I deduced from this, it was related in a way or another to the open conflict between you and him, and you've decided to close the case so as to not have to deal with him anymore. I guessed you've chosen the "resolved" option because you've considered having made enough for his cases, but unfortunately users having no clues about your conflict with him could think those accusations have really been adressed and won't bother to check by themselves further. So I suggested Kingbj21 to do the same as what Cinexrino did in order to signal his cases are still open and not addressed.

@holydarkness, 

Your repeated attempts to deflect and trivialize the seriousness of Stake’s unethical practices only expose your alignment with their tactics. Let me set the record straight, because your narrative is misleading at best and complicit at worst. 

1. 100 Days of GDPR Violations – Stake’s Complete Disregard for Law

It’s been 100 days since I submitted a formal GDPR data request as a fully KYC3-verified customer. The law is clear: 
- Maximum Deadline: 30 days, extendable to 90 in “exceptional circumstances.” Stake has exceeded this without providing any valid justification or update. 
- Data Access is a Right, Not a Privilege: Stake’s delays and obfuscation show contempt for GDPR, transparency, and its own customers. 

For 100 days, Stake has: 
- Ignored my legal rights. 
- Closed over 30 support tickets without meaningful resolution. 
- Claimed endless “escalations” to phantom departments that produce zero results. 

This is a textbook example of GDPR non-compliance, and I’m escalating this with regulators. By downplaying this issue, you’re defending clear violations of international law. 

2. Mislabeling My Case as Resolved 

You falsely marked my case as “resolved,” using my reflective post on awareness and peace as justification. Let me be unequivocal: 
- That post was about moving forward personally, NOT about Stake addressing my grievances. 
- My accusations against Stake remain valid, unresolved, and pressing. 

Here’s the ongoing list of unresolved issues: 
- Fraudulent VIP Bonuses: Platinum 1 members receiving $0.10 reloads after wagering millions? This is both insulting and fraudulent. 
- Withdrawal Blocks: Arbitrary restrictions without explanations or timelines. 
- Illegal Operations in India: Stake uses unlawful UPI payment systems to target users in jurisdictions where online gambling is banned. 
- Rigged Games: Evidence of predatory practices across their platform, especially in blackjack and other casino games. 

Your claim that personal conflicts don’t affect your decisions doesn’t hold up. By misrepresenting my case as resolved, you’ve misled others and undermined the purpose of your list. If you care about fairness, update my case to “in progress” or “unresolved” immediately. 

3. The Stake Circus Crew 🎪 

Let’s talk about the cast of characters enabling this circus: 
- Eddie: The master manipulator, building his empire on deception and stolen funds. 
- AHOYBRAUSE: The sycophantic fanboy, more invested in defending Stake’s reload crumbs than addressing systemic fraud. 
- You, holydarkness: The so-called overseer, selectively blind to the mountain of evidence against Stake while silencing dissent with bureaucratic maneuvers. 

Instead of holding Stake accountable, you’re performing damage control for a company that flouts the law, mocks its customers, and rigs its systems for profit. 



@Saint-loup, 

I appreciate your objective observations. You’re absolutely correct that my case being marked as resolved misrepresents the truth and risks misleading other users into thinking these issues have been addressed. For clarity: 
- Nothing has been resolved. Stake’s GDPR violations, fraudulent practices, and predatory systems remain unaddressed. 
- Transparency is vital. Mislabeling my case damages the integrity of dispute-tracking systems and leaves other victims without recourse. 

Your suggestion that I clarify my case’s status is appreciated, but the responsibility ultimately lies with those maintaining these lists to ensure accuracy. 



To Stake’s Fan Club and Defenders 

To the die-hard apologists clinging to Stake’s narrative: 
- Stop gaslighting users who bring forward valid concerns. 
- Recognize that defending a platform built on deceit makes you complicit in its actions. 

Special shout-out to: 
- AHOYBRAUSE: Your blind loyalty is as laughable as Stake’s “provably fair” claims. 
- HolyDarkness: By silencing dissent and misrepresenting cases, you’ve aligned yourself with a fraudulent empire. 



Call to Action 

To the broader community: 
1. File Complaints with Regulators: Stake’s GDPR violations alone warrant severe penalties. 
2. Expose Their Practices: Share your experiences and evidence of their fraud. 
3. Demand Accountability: Don’t let Stake and its enablers continue unchecked. 

To @holydarkness and @Saint-loup: This isn’t just about my case—it’s about exposing the systemic issues with Stake and holding them accountable. You can either stand for transparency and fairness or remain part of the problem. 

The storm is here, and Stake’s house of cards is coming down. 

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/01/10/O1YGN.png

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/01/10/O1fya.png

https://talkimg.com/images/2025/01/10/O1yKo.png

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5524433

And have you provided them with the verification they asked; a photo of yourself holding your govt. issued ID as well as a piece of paper proving the ownership of the account which data you requested in the manner that they specified?

I have already completed KYC verification on your platform, providing comprehensive identification. Therefore, I find your additional request for identify verification redundant and obstructive, especially given the sensitive nature of my existing concerns regarding Stake's operations.

Furthermore, I want to make it clear that I will not be sharing any further verification or documentation with a company that I consider fraudulent.

The answer to your question is in the screenshots, are you not able to see it?

[...]
KYC Requirements Already Fulfilled: My identity is confirmed through your system. Asking for redundant proof undermines the entire purpose of KYC.

Privacy Risks: Stake has already demonstrated a lack of transparency, so why should I trust you with even more personal data?
Legal Compliance: Under GDPR, data subjects are entitled to their data without excessive hurdles. Additional proof is unnecessary when my identity is verified.

This is yet another delay tactic. If Stake was serious about compliance, it wouldn’t use frivolous verification demands to withhold data from users.
[...]

@holydarkness, 

Your repeated attempts to deflect and trivialize the seriousness of Stake’s unethical practices only expose your alignment with their tactics. Let me set the record straight, because your narrative is misleading at best and complicit at worst. 

1. 100 Days of GDPR Violations – Stake’s Complete Disregard for Law

It’s been 100 days since I submitted a formal GDPR data request as a fully KYC3-verified customer. The law is clear: 
- Maximum Deadline: 30 days, extendable to 90 in “exceptional circumstances.” Stake has exceeded this without providing any valid justification or update. 
- Data Access is a Right, Not a Privilege: Stake’s delays and obfuscation show contempt for GDPR, transparency, and its own customers. 

For 100 days, Stake has: 
- Ignored my legal rights. 
- Closed over 30 support tickets without meaningful resolution. 
- Claimed endless “escalations” to phantom departments that produce zero results. 

This is a textbook example of GDPR non-compliance, and I’m escalating this with regulators. By downplaying this issue, you’re defending clear violations of international law. 

[...]
- HolyDarkness: By silencing dissent and misrepresenting cases, you’ve aligned yourself with a fraudulent empire. 

[...]
To @holydarkness and @Saint-loup: This isn’t just about my case—it’s about exposing the systemic issues with Stake and holding them accountable. You can either stand for transparency and fairness or remain part of the problem. 

The storm is here, and Stake’s house of cards is coming down. 

[...]
 - HolyDarkness, you might want to step off the stage before the spotlight turns on your role in this farce.
[...]

Obviously you aren't smart enough the differentiate between normal stake account KYC and what the support asked for. At KYC you send a picture of your ID for level 2, that's it. They clearly ask for a picture of him with the ID in his hand and the stake username on a letter. It's not so hard to understand this simple question they asked. But yeah, of course for you it is.
Why do you even bother to answer holy when he didn't even spoke to "you"? Oh wait, of course he spoke to you since blackyjacky and kingbj are operated by the same person, yet another proof.  ;D

@HolyDarkness  

Ah, HolyDarkness, the self-appointed defender of Stake’s crumbling empire. It’s almost admirable how tirelessly you perform, but let’s add some clarity to your confusion:  


1. Stake’s GDPR Comedy Routine  
You’re here trying to sell the idea that Stake’s GDPR violations aren’t violations because they’ve invented extra hurdles for users. Spoiler alert:  
GDPR isn’t a Suggestion: It’s the law. Stake doesn’t get to “personalize” compliance by adding selfie requests to delay requests.  
Already Verified, Still Ignored: I’ve done KYC3, but now they want a selfie with “Stake Rules” scribbled on a Post-it? That’s not verification—it’s a gimmick to buy time.  
Reality Check: Stake isn’t a bank—it’s a gambling platform known for cutting corners. Your bank analogy is as solid as Eddie’s promise of fair play.  

No matter how you spin it, Stake has had over 100 days to comply and failed. That’s not my fault, nor does it absolve them of legal liability.  


2. The Eddie Playbook: Lies, Loopholes, and Larceny  
Let’s not kid ourselves—this is classic Eddie Hearn management:  
Fraudulent Reloads: Promises of loyalty rewards that vanish faster than a gambler’s bankroll.  
Rigged Games: Stake Originals? (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5517523.0) More like live theft. The evidence speaks for itself.  
Illegal UPI Transactions: Stake’s gleeful disregard for Indian banking laws is just the cherry on top of their compliance failures.  

Eddie’s built an empire on deception, and the cracks are showing. Stake is one regulatory investigation away from a full collapse.  


3. Clowns in the Audience (Yes, That’s You)  
HolyDarkness, your attempts to distract from the real issues are as transparent as Stake’s rigged odds. Let’s break down your role in this farce:  
Loyal to a Fault: You’ve hitched your wagon to a company that’s burning bridges with customers, regulators, and anyone with common sense.  
Ignoring Evidence: Both my case and BlackJacky’s are publicly documented, independently verifiable, and damning. Yet you cling to your denial like it’s a life raft.  
PR in Disguise: Let’s be honest—you’re doing more damage control for Stake than their actual team. If you’re not on Eddie’s payroll, you should demand back pay.  


4. The Bigger Picture  
This isn’t just about me or BlackJacky. Stake’s fraud impacts thousands, if not millions, of users worldwide. Their shady practices:  
Exploit Vulnerable Gamblers: Stake doesn’t just profit from addiction—they actively fuel it.  
Mislead New Users: Glossy ads and influencer promotions hide the reality of rigged games and nonexistent support.  
Dodge Accountability: From Curacao to the UK, regulators are catching on. The clock is ticking.  

By defending Stake, you’re aligning yourself with a sinking ship. Don’t say we didn’t warn you when it finally goes under.  


5. The Last Act  
HolyDarkness, you’re playing the fool in Stake’s theater, but the audience is no longer amused. The evidence against Stake is overwhelming, and your attempts to deflect only amplify the noise.  
- Stake’s GDPR violations? Documented.  
- Their fraudulent practices? Exposed.  
- Your role as their cheerleader? Embarrassing.  

The regulators are circling, and Eddie’s show is running out of acts. You can keep juggling excuses, but when the curtain falls, you’ll be left holding the bag.  

So enjoy your clown shoes while they last. The spotlight is shifting, and when it lands on Stake (and you), there’ll be no escape.  

Sincerely,  🎪👑
KingBJ21  

It is not me being confused, it is you being confused... or deliberately pretend you don't understand, but I'll choose to give a benefit of doubts and think that you simply misunderstood the situation.

My Challenge to Stake’s Defenders: If you’re so confident in Stake’s integrity, prove me wrong. Meet me at the blackjack tables, or better yet, have Stake release my full betting and transaction history. I dare you.

I've seen your other post (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5504738.msg64928555#msg64928555) on Cinexrino's thread, I won't reply on both topics to say the same thing, especially overthere while I haven't posted before and I think it's a bit off-topic on top of that.
I saw this case (and the other ones from OP regarding this platform) were marked are closed and resolved in your lists, I was surprised since I still see OP posting angry messages and serious accusations against this casino here and in the ANN thread of the platform. So I looked at this topic and the other one regarding accusations of illegal activities in India, and I didn't find anything showing those accusations have been addressed and solved. I deduced from this, it was related in a way or another to the open conflict between you and him, and you've decided to close the case so as to not have to deal with him anymore. I guessed you've chosen the "resolved" option because you've considered having made enough for his cases, but unfortunately users having no clues about your conflict with him could think those accusations have really been adressed and won't bother to check by themselves further. So I suggested Kingbj21 to do the same as what Cinexrino did in order to signal his cases are still open and not addressed.

My case is also unadressed, hence I am trying to find a support on my flag to try to get to spotlight. I am getting muted in this forum since the day I have written about rollbit. I deserve my compansation but sadly “if razer doesn’t respond” or I don’t get enough support on my case; my case will be counted as resolved by holydarkness. Even if it isn’t.

[...]

And why should it be marked as unresolved? Because the case didn't end well from your side? If we may turn the situation, shouldn't the case be marked as "resolved", given they've gave you explanation, got it retried, gave you an even longer explanation that justify their action?

I am still with "in progress" due to what I show you on my last post on your thread. Depending on Razer's reply [or no reply], I'll wait for a month [suppose he stand firm with both of his feet] to see the general consensus of the DTs on your flag. And will mark the case according to their ruling. As I said, this thread is not authoritarian, it is not up to me to decide what status is on what case, nor the accuser's. It follows the forum's decision.

So, to make things simple, by January 31st, if the case is still open due to no-response from Razer, and your flag is active, which tell us that the DTs think you're the one being wronged here, I'll mark it as unresolved.

[...]

My case is also unadressed, hence I am trying to find a support on my flag to try to get to spotlight. I am getting muted in this forum since the day I have written about rollbit. I deserve my compansation but sadly “if razer doesn’t respond” or I don’t get enough support on my case; my case will be counted as resolved by holydarkness. Even if it isn’t.

1. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the (European) Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the Union or not.

2. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to:

(a) the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or
    
(b) the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the Union.

Two things: one, it would be advisable to keep a discussion about your thread in your thread, we're going OOT here.

Two, I can understand that you're trying to get a support from someone who currently questioning how status are made on my list. Though IMHO you, accidentally or not, put me in a bad place and add more seasoning to the pot during your attempt, I would appreciate if you tell the current situation of your case as what really and currently happens.

holydarkness does not and will not count your case as resolved as per his sole decision, as what your paragraph seemingly try to depict. And yes, it isn't resolved, that's why he refused to comply to your original demand to mark it as unresolved because Rollbit's final call is not what you preferred it to be, despite my attempt to get it retried second time by contacting Razer about it, and third time while I once again reach him and wrote to ask for his re-re-reconsideration.

During this time, while we wait for Razer's reply, you wrote and asked for your case to be marked as unresolved because you believe that is the appropriate status, and I explained why I can't do that as well as --and this is the most important point-- I'll leave it to the DT to make the call. DT, through the flag. holydarkness is not the one who "count" it as resolved, he let the DT use their voting power through your flag.

Why one month? If you perhaps curious? It's because DT are usually rather quick to jump into action if they found and deemed a wrong has been made. You've announce your flag uhh... pretty much everywhere. I believe the DTs are already aware of it, some [if not most] already gave your whole situation a read, and if they deemed Rollbit is the one at fault here, they've most certainly already support your flag.

But, just in case that some are busy and wasn't able to read your whole situation yet or needed time to decide... end of January.

Rather different than what your post conveyed, isn't it?

Hmm, not a fan of this user (sorry, but I am honest) but these words are actually on point and describe this whole dilemma perfectly.
If you offer something like trading an so on you simply can't make a short notice maintenance and strip the user of their ability to actually trade, there is no excuse for that. You either announce it before hand (not just 10min) or you simply stop the possibility to trade a fixed time before the maintenance starts so that no user has a disadvantage.
Of course he is asking for a reimbursement, I don't understand why there is even a discussion about that. Ignoring him is such a bad example and not acceptable. I hope this gets resolved but looking at the history of replies from Razor in this forum I wouldn't count on it.

Hello holydarkness,

Two adress your two things;

One, it is correct that I should keep away from my disccussion in other topics however; just because 2 DTs opposed my flag it doesn’t change the fact that it is a solid argument or not. 2 of those DTs both didn’t even read my accusation; owlcatz didn’t even finish the first paragraph. He abused his DT power by admitting that he is opposing the flag because he believes I am a degenerate to open a huge position like that.

Secondly, DaveF gave examples from ToS which Rollbit already ‘accepted the terms ’ by compansating players which falsifies his whole argument of ToS which Rollbit lacks any responsibility.

My case is far from over, even if Razer admits or not.

You say 1 month rule is put by you; for what? To pressurise me to silence?

THIRDLY, you are taking everything personal; please don’t. My message is to the whole forum who went silent for my case. I have and had no intention to disrespect your actions in this forum and won’t have one.

Flag has nothing to do with a case being resolved or not. That flag was opened by me to spread awareness on my case and rollbit. If you deem to act on it, you should demand every accuser to open flag and wait for it to solve; to finalize a case as resolved or unresolved. I have seen a few flags here. Please go ahead to my threads and count the supporters and a few ‘fake’ opposers.

Altough we had our differences, your friend AHOYBRAUSE said;


He was talking about Blossom15’s comment. This summarizes everything perfectly.

I thank AHOYBRAUSE for his genuine comment, I have found in my original Maintenance Scam thread.

That’s why I opened a new thread about it. To summarize. As Shirshir99 said in my last post; No one is reading long texts.

People can oppose or not support the flag and still believe I deserve compansation. If you make my case unresolved due to the flag, you will silence me; which makes Saint-Loup’s opinion valid.

[...]
Why one month? If you perhaps curious? It's because DT are usually rather quick to jump into action if they found and deemed a wrong has been made. You've announce your flag uhh... pretty much everywhere. I believe the DTs are already aware of it, some [if not most] already gave your whole situation a read, and if they deemed Rollbit is the one at fault here, they've most certainly already support your flag.[...]

If... by some miracle, or as fate will it, a new evidence or incriminating situation arise or other case happen that make the DTs reconsider the old flag that you raised in the past, that they did not support because they couldn't at that time but can at that future time due to the development of the situation, you can always nudge me.

One, it is correct that I should keep away from my disccussion in other topics however; just because 2 DTs opposed my flag it doesn’t change the fact that it is a solid argument or not. 2 of those DTs both didn’t even read my accusation; owlcatz didn’t even finish the first paragraph. He abused his DT power by admitting that he is opposing the flag because he believes I am a degenerate to open a huge position like that.

While I don't think your case will reach some sort of resolution based on discussion on this forum (same goes with OP's situation, to bring things back on topic), you can still go one to have some sort of career here. There's probably more discussion about bitcoin gambling and casinos here than any other single website.

Hello nutildah,

First, the reason why it is not going to be resolved (in your words) is not because the case isn’t solid or worthy; it is because of how sold out some people are in this forum. Plus the soldiers of Rollbit Razer attacking me and de railing my topic. I will keep on pushing, don’t worry about it.

Secondly, ‘you can still go on to have career here’; what do you mean by this?

Tetaeridanus.

Dude. Nobody, and I mean 100% nobody knows me, or even cares about anything I ever have had to do with casinos. I don't gamble online. My signature may signify otherwise, but that's called a signature campaign. I'm not required to gamble to earn BTC from posting here.

BTW, it doesn't even matter that I'm on DT2. I would be on DT1, but I self-excluded myself long ago to make my life here easier without constant pms and such from whiny little fcks like you about any kind of ratings or opinions etc etc. I never asked anyone to promote me to DT2, it just happened. So that said, https://www.reddit.com/r/trailerparkboys/comments/13s0w1x/fuck_off_i_got_work_to_do/

Secondly, ‘you can still go on to have carreer here’; what do you mean by this?

Tetaeridanus.

What I basically mean is to participate in discussions, grow the status of your account, and learn to use the forum for your own betterment, which many of us have over the years, in some way or another (not necessarily thru sig campaigns).

While I wish you a fair resolution for your own issues, don't let your losses eat you up so much that they define your personality.

What I basically mean is to participate in discussions, grow the status of your account, and learn to use the forum for your own betterment, which many of us have over the years, in some way or another (not necessarily thru sig campaigns).

While I wish you a fair resolution for your own issues, don't let your losses eat you up so much that they define your personality.

I feel like this member barely cares about his forum position. A person who can open a $44K position in a casino must have some hefty amount in their wallet and they barely care about a few hundred bucks which they can earn if they spend time on forums. I mean, the point is, if someone can earn a few thousand dollars a day by doing trade, why they would waste their time on a crypto forum and try to build up their account?

I have supported this guy's case and I expect you to visit his case again if you have some free time. Rollbit is at fault and I believe they should work with this guy to solve it. I understand they had no intention to scam, but they are responsible for this user's loss.

Many people abstained from showing their opinion, I thank for your actions. I hope nutildah looks at my case in his/her free time and sees the reality of my situation.

I don't think he/she did, because they believe it is invalid; seen from the comments above.

My thoughts are it seems like you have a valid argument based on the information you have provided, but we're not going to be able to help you here. Your best bet was holydarkness and it seems he did everything he could (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5520613.msg64796660#msg64796660). He does this kind of thing on behalf of complainants out of kindness, and isn't paid for it, BTW, and doesn't hold a special title or capacity on the forum.

I originally posted this on Stake’s own community forum, but—surprise, surprise—it was deleted without explanation.

Stake clearly doesn’t want users to know what’s really happening behind the scenes, so I’m sharing it here instead.

Actually I said the opposite:


Unfortunately not much has changed between now and then. However, if you strongly believe that you have been wronged, I wouldn't let it go, seeing as how its a pretty large amount of money. To bring things back on topic, your case seems much more reasonable than OP's.

@tetaeridanus, you claim to be a victim, yet you undermine another victim's case by saying "not enough evidence"? Let me make this crystal clear: this isn’t about comparing scars—it’s about addressing a collective problem.

Here’s the reality of my case:

Stake refuses to provide my data under GDPR, blatantly violating legal obligations.
Censorship: They’ve silenced me across platforms to hide their fraudulent practices.
Stolen bonuses and missing wagers: My rightful earnings and transactions have been conveniently erased without explanation.
What more "evidence" do you expect? A signed confession from Stake? Stop dismissing my efforts to expose these wrongdoings—it’s insulting to everyone trying to shed light on this corrupt empire.

To Stake and their enablers: Accountability isn’t optional. The cracks in your empire are widening, and no amount of spin will stop the truth from coming out.

@tetaeridanus, if you’re not here to stand in solidarity or contribute meaningfully, kindly refrain from spouting unhelpful commentary. Stick to your own case and let this thread focus on what matters.

The fight for transparency and justice continues—whether Stake likes it or not.

I believe the author and I consider this casino to be the most natural fraudulent garbage dump.They will deceive you so much that you won't even understand how it happened.Scammers of the highest level!

There’s been no update from either holydarkness or Stake on this matter. For a billion-dollar company, it’s downright shameful to withhold a user’s rightful monthly bonus and face zero accountability. The silence speaks louder than any defense.

Why do you expect an update from me, exactly? The update should come from you or Stake, not me. And... speaking of which, addressing your post here (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5481683.msg65483170#msg65483170), remind me again what attempt had you exhausted to get this resolved? AG? CG? GCB? Licensor?

The side effect of being put on ignore is... each of your threads are grayed.

The side effect of having so many threads against a casino is... people lost track of which is which and what is where and what about.

The side effect of being put on ignore and having too many threads is dot-dot-dot.

He has five spam threads on Page 1

WILL SOMEONE BAN THIS SPAMMER??

I am sick to death of having my thread and everyones real thread pushed to oblivion by this guys absolute trash!

This is making bitcointalk look like a fucking joke

If you consider threads about Stake's illegal and criminal activity as a fucking joke, then you are the fucking joke and not Bitcointalk!

Btw you owe me 50k, only you and BlackJacky use the phrase "sickhead"

But of course an AI Extortionist won't pay.

Reporting all your abusive messages

And yeah, this is 100% the same person (BJ and KingBJ). It's impossible to find 2 different people that both have the same difficulty to understand simple math, probabilities and sense, IMPOSSIBLE. But hey, at least we have some decent entertainment out of his tirade

Okay dick head, fuck off from my thread you piece of shit.

You can find more proof about Stake's VIP bonus scam here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5546279.msg65467782#msg65467782

Undisclosed - the issue is not a monetary scam per se, but a misleading system that tricks users into wagering large amounts under false pretenses.

Even the OP of that thread says its not a scam:

Mark the case as scammed,

because you and I both know AG, CG, and GCB are either partners in crime or hopelessly incompetent — even they’ve admitted as much in their own responses.

So don’t play the referral game. We’ve exhausted those channels.

Let me also remind you, each thread I’ve posted addresses a separate abuse by Stake:

One is about withheld GDPR data.

One is about Rigged Games especially about their originals.

Another covers ghosting verified users post-deposit.

One shows how Stake redirects UPI through illegal vendors.

And this one? It’s about a monthly bonus arbitrarily denied, without notice or due process.

So no, this isn’t noise. It’s a pattern — and if you're too jaded or indifferent to track it, that's on you, not me.

If the side effect of being ignored is grayed threads, the side effect of ignoring evidence is losing credibility as a neutral mod.

Don’t worry, I’ll continue to document every ignored complaint until someone has the courage to say it plainly:
Stake stole from a user. And no amount of dot-dot-dotting will erase that.

Wait... so that's all you do? Document things? And... spam threads? You didn't do any attempt to get your case resolved, not reaching to a mediator, pursuing legal path, writing petition, or whateverm and yet you summoned me here to give an update? What?

Write that apology or get fucking incinerated! 😎

Moving Forward
I’m not here to spam or vent

[...]
Write that apology or get fucking incinerated! 😎

I appreciate your response, holydarkness, and I’ll address your points directly to clarify my efforts and intentions.

[...]

Thanks for engaging, even skeptically—it keeps the conversation alive. I’ll keep documenting until there’s a resolution or someone steps up to call this what it is: Stake.com taking advantage of users.

[...] I’ve even filed an FBI complaint because this isn’t just a “whoopsie,” it’s a fraudulent crypto empire screwing over loyal users. [...]

Holydarkness, you’re really reaching with this “death threat” nonsense over my “incinerated” line—come on, it’s a figure of speech! 😄 It’s like saying Eminem’s out here committing crimes because he raps about them—we’re in 2025, let’s not play literal word police while the real crime goes unchecked. Dyno8050’s been slinging “fuckwit” and “cockwaffle” at me like it’s open mic night, bullying me for daring to call out Stake.com’s shady ass, and you’re silent on that? Where’s the fairness in letting these sig pawn trolls tear me apart while I’m fighting for what’s mine?

Dyno8050’s been throwing around “fuckwit” and “cockwaffle” like it’s a comedy roast, bullying me for speaking out, and you’re saying that’s just popcorn entertainment? I’m the victim here, getting screwed by a shady casino and harassed by their forum pawns, while Stake gets a free pass to keep stealing bonuses. If the rules matter so much, how about some fairness—call out Dyno’s toxic behavior too

Lengthy AI Spam - Trimmed

Dyno8050, I’m done with your nonsense—you’re making zero sense, and I’m not wasting my breath on your baseless accusations anymore.

If anything, what I said was one of the most logical things written in this thread.

[Image snip]

Holydarkness, I get that you’re curious about the complaint I filed, but let’s be real—it’s got my personal details, like my full name and account info, which I’m not about to splash all over the internet for every troll to see. 😐 I am sharing a screenshot of the confirmation email, if that’ll satisfy you— But honestly, the details of my complaint aren’t the point here. [...]

[...] and if there’s any resolution—especially from the complaint I filed—I’ll let you know right away. Please update the thread status on your list when you can. [...]

@HolyDarkness is clever, makes the update on her fantasy list dependent on the findings from the FBI, but the FBI doesn't investigate VIP bonus scams by operators abroad!

What does tne FBI investigate?

"The FBI investigates a wide range of federal crimes and threats to national security. This includes terrorism, cybercrime, public corruption, civil rights violations, and various forms of organized crime and white-collar crime."

Despite of this, the hard proof of Stake's VIP bonus scam is published in this thread and there is no need to wait for the FBI.

Wait.. you do aware that you actually and indirectly saying that kingbj21 lied, right?

Because... I simply following the information he supplied, namely him filling complaint to FBI [even provided with supporting evidence of screenshot of the said complaint] and I am waiting for his update as he'll keep us in the loop with the result of the investigation.

Based on what you propose here, there is no investigation,

so was that information fabricated? By kingbj21?

And how exactly this [once again] turned into my fault?

[...]
Did kingbj21 receive a confirmation from the FBI that they are investigating his reported VIP bonus scam?

[...] and if there’s any resolution—especially from the complaint I filed—I’ll let you know right away. Please update the thread status on your list when you can. [...]

Because you make the updating of your fantasy list dependent on the outcome of an FBI investigation, which can take years, while the hard proof of the offense is already posted in this thread and you could update your fantasy list immediately.

Oooppss...?

Will do that once FBI come with their findings and conclude their investigation. Not sooner, not later, exactly right after you update us with the result of the investigation [on the Sunday of course, that's when I update my list]. So, to spell things out for you: update us with your FBI pursuit, and I'll reflect that to my list. Without it, there is no basis to update the current status to any other label. Understandable? Good.

??? ::) :P ;D :D ;) :'( ::)

@holydarkness, You’re spinning my words into knots, cherry-picking what fits your script while dodging the real fight. I never said the FBI’s probing my missing monthly bonus—that’s your leap, not mine. Those bonuses? Just bait for high rollers like me, a Platinum III VIP who dumped $70,000 and $2,688 into Stake, only to get $6.57 when $30 was promised. Stake’s empire thrives on hooking losers, then mocking them on livestreams—something you conveniently sidestep.

My FBI complaint targets bigger fish—organized greed, not just my payout. I won’t spill the details or evidence; handing criminals the playbook is a rookie move, and I’ve seen enough fallout to know better. You want proof? Look at Stake’s mandatory KYC rollout—universal, sudden, paired with one-time bonuses to mop up years of sloppy, shady dealings. Pressure’s working, but don’t give me a pat on the back; they’re scrambling, not reforming.

New games and fixed originals? Sure, progress. But we need independent audits, transparent disclosures, and ironclad safeguards—not backroom tinkering. Instead, I get your deflection, your referee act between users and casinos. You’ve admitted you don’t gamble—never felt a six-figure loss or an account lockout with canned support replies. So maybe you’re less a voice of reason and more a curator of optics, not solutions.

Own it, and I’d respect the hustle. But playing neutral while sidelining victims? That’s damage control, not justice. Maybe launch “Holy’s Arbitration Service”—might outshine casino support. Until then, you’re part of this ecosystem, not above it. If you won’t back the real complaints, at least quit tripping up those of us shouting them.

Thanks. — KingBJ21 Still standing. Still loud. Your list can choke on it.