Bitcoin Forum

Your fee structure... I don't know why you call it low but if a project uses huge amounts such as 100,000 USD, then it starts to become noticeable. $3,000 is no joke.

Your terms and conditions seem to be incomplete. Take an example of this part.

I don't think the exchange rate fluctuation is a problem for the freelance market, and there are thousands of services that exchange Bitcoin to USDT.
I checked your site it is a template with some updates, not a service dedicated to providing guarantees or the user can easily submit his offers. You will need more development in the site and in marketing.

Is this your custom CMS written by a dedicated team of developers or does this website use a 3rd party software? If it's your own CMS, good job, it looks good, the interface is easy and I think that the user experience is good too.
By the way, making the platform is not as big a challenge today as it was before but the real challenge is how are you going to market it and make it popular? Consider that this is a crypto-oriented freelance platform and your audience will be much narrower than the audience of Upwork and Fiverr.
I wish you good luck, it will be a hard road to succeed.

I’ve been looking for a new freelance platform and decided to check this one out to see how it compares to others and what kinds of projects are available. However, when I tried to sign up, an error message appeared after clicking the button, saying, 'The phone field is required.' But the sign-up form doesn’t have a phone field to fill in.
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/02/bSdXG.md.png (https://talkimg.com/image/bSdXG)



Another thing I noticed on the homepage, in the recent jobs section, is that the dates seem incorrect.
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/02/bSutD.md.png (https://talkimg.com/image/bSutD)

I noticed while browsing that most of the job postings are from Bangladesh, so this might be a new website, right? If I could make a suggestion, I think it would be good to improve the user interface a bit to make it more attractive to users and, of course, to make it look more legitimate.

@RedR00t

• Will you rely on an automated escrow system or a real person will be behind it? If it's the latter, who are the escrow providers on your platform?
• What's the deciding factor on whether to charge a $1 withdrawal fee or $2?
• I get why a month-old platform like yours has fake listings, but I think you're overdoing it ^{[a couple of fake or rather demo listings would be more than enough]}!
  ^{- While you're at it, you might want to get rid of the "fake stats (https://archive.is/70u5d#selection-545.0-571.29)" as well!}

The service is a script that was purchased and not modified properly, such a technical failure makes trust in the service difficult and almost impossible.
Also, focusing on USDT is useless if there is no escrow or fake reviews.

You're absolutely right. Taking a closer look, their site sure looks a lot like that Xilancer script demo from CodeCanyon (https://xilancer.xgenious.com/home-page-one). I guess using something pre-made isn't inherently wrong, but you'd think they would at least customize it up more instead of leaving big chunks of the demo content there, and makes me wonder if they really care about having their own reliable service instead of just slapping together something generic for a quick money grab.  

https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/03/bMA0o.png https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/03/bMSmT.jpeg

The owner do not even bother to correctly modify the script because of this, visitors who will research on the status of the platform will find out that so many information are not correct.
One of this is the number of jobs created and number of verified clients When the platform is just a month old, how can he accumulate that number of jobs and verified clients in just 42 days?.
OP should correct the entries; people will not trust a platform with deceptive information

Case closed, left neutral trust although I think account deserves negative trust. If @op continues to promote that site, I will turn it into negative.
thanks

And you think leaving @hugeblack a retaliatory negative tag is going to help? In fact, it's just going to worsen the whole thing about yourself. Firstly you seem to be someone controversial even in the past (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5077726.msg48523508#msg48523508)

I also have a feeling you have a habit of sending fake feedback using your Alt accounts with is untrustworthy behaviour

First: If there is constructive criticism, I welcome and appreciate it. If there is a software problem, it can be resolved. Ultimately, I am establishing a business, not wasting time.

Second: The issue you mentioned has already been addressed, and I provided evidence and pictures to clear up any misunderstandings. I have no obligation to accept something that is unacceptable to me based on a comment alone.

Third: What evidence do you have that I created fake accounts?

Fourth: I have not requested anything from anyone here, either publicly or privately. This is simply an announcement of a new service launch, and everyone has the right to accept or decline participation. I have not forced anyone to do anything! I do not understand the reason for this unjustified attack.