Bitcoin Forum

Everyone will be cashing out money by now if this is true and gambling sites will go bankrupt.

What you explained is nothing more than martingale that many people on this forum have tried, especially when they are new to gambling. The end result is massive loss of money.

If I am not wrong, this is called "martingale" where a gambler double each bet (in case of a loss).
Well, I don't know how he has tested but this is one of the stupid think that can be done by a gambler since in the BEST option he will just recover initial wagering, in the worst he will loss likewise ALL.
It is really worth the risk? No of course no. Even note that he is gambling x200 starting from x1 in just 6 runs.
Totally crazy... this is not a strategy but just a lame way for betting. Also in this strategy they are not considering 0 (or 00). This means a clear 3% of negative chances not considered...

Honestly, I just heard about this strategy. But if we look at the basics, it's just a martingale strategy that requires players to keep doubling their bet size every time they lose. There are a lot of strategies out there & I've tried almost all of them, know how it went? It doesn't completely work. Gambling is a game of luck, no matter how much bankroll you have, if you don't have luck, it will all be gone in a matter of minutes, hours or days.

I'm curious to know how much data was fed to the AI during those simulations and what AI program was used.
Any strategy requiring you to keep multiplying your stake is not recommended and will not work over time; when you calculate several rounds of following this strategy, you'll likely discover that the gambler is already at a loss, despite some isolated wims.

The fundamentals of this strategy are well known and have been discussed already several times in this forum in previous threads. And even if you mention AI as a novelty, in fact, there is no need for any complex AI to check that strategy: a simple calculator online will do the work.

I think that you have more chances of winning if you simply go all-in to the red or black, than if you follow any strategy like the one described. Of course, exceptions exist, but nobody should trust in systems like these to make guaranteed money: they simply don't exist.

It seems that people who post "strategies" like this struggle with understanding how basic math works, it's an almost identical but even worse idea than the martingale "strategy" because you are going to lose your money at a much higher rate. The casino will always have deeper pockets than you and be able to outlast the highest bets that you could afford to make. You call them "units" but they are actually cents and dollars or equivalent currency, which hides the fact that you are throwing money into a game where any online guide will tell you the house has a built in advantage. So even if you did keep this double (or quadruple) down strategy going, they would still be taking a few percentage points away from your bet on each go. It's really poor form to call this a strategy, it's comparable to an army charging across an open field into machine gun fire - there's a tiny chance you'll win but it's more likely you'll get completely wiped out.

It won’t work. If you think this works, go try it and become a millionaire or even a billionaire. Erase casinos out of existence. Clear them all out.

Why don’t you do it?

Because it won’t work and you know it that’s why.

If it was possible to win like that, everyone would do it and casinos would go out of business. Since casinos are still operating and printing money, your strategy is crap. (Like every other strategy)

Seriously!. You believe the 99% success rate?

Don't trust that strategy because anything AI-tested is flawed. And there is no perfect way to test something that basically depends on luck and randomness. Online casinos will always have the hedge in long run not even the martingale strategy can help here.

Nope doesn't work. There are no patterns in roulette other than after the fact. He's certainly lying about it having a 99% success rate but even if he's telling the truth, 3,000 spins is a laughably small sample size. It's just noise.

You would need to test it on like at least 100,000 spins, 1,000,000 more preferably but none of that is necessary because roulette is the most dead-simple game in the casino to figure out the math. You don't need to test, it's obvious. Not sure what AI would have to do with it, basic math doesn't change because it's AI. AI is just a dumb buzzword for people who don't know any better.

Whoever told you that is either a scammer or an idiot.

People claiming to have a roulette system is as old as the game. It's real simple to prove it, just go turn $100 into $1,000,000. That would be very easy to do with even a tiny edge but nobody can because it's impossible.

That is plain stupid and AI is not mature enough to give us winning strategy, the ML or LLM are not enough feed to any of AI processors as of yet, they are all missing a lot of data from gambling and especially strategies in games of luck like martingale. We have talked a lot about martingale in this forum and in this very specific board and we have come to the conclusion, a huge majority of gamblers here that the only way martingale works is if you have unlimited balance and keep betting on the same outcome while doubling the bet. Another bad news is that in software controlled roulette like we play on online casinos there is no guarantee that if we bet 100 times on red one time it will come red otherwise we could have all beat the casino if we used a low enough initial bet, so real bottom line is martingale does not work unless used in perfect parallel universe where we have unlimited balance.

AI is definitely useful but if you start treating it like your personal gambling guru, that’s where things go sideways.

You really think casinos aren’t aware of those “magic” strategies? If they actually worked, people would be walking out of roulette tables rich every night. What you shared kinda sounds like a Martingale strategy and we all know how that ends for most.

I’d probably believe you more if you ran the experiment yourself and showed us it works... many times. At least that way, if it fails, it’s your wallet on the line not just theories.

It is interesting that the author describes the Martingale strategy, but does not name it directly. In addition, he does not know or hides the shortcomings of this strategy. And it is sad that artificial intelligence feeds the ignorance and naivety of the author. How can it be that the Martingale strategy is successful in 99% of cases out of 3000 simulated games? Even if this is so (although this is doubtful), in a real game, oddly enough, everything will be a little different. For some reason, real games are almost always different from those simulated in strategy testers. The first thing that will happen in a real game is a long series of seemingly incredible coincidences. For example, black will fall out 10-15-20 times. No matter how big your budget is, it will not cover such big losses. Unfortunately, this is reality.

This is a good with small profit if you hit before you ran your pot out.
This is a very good strategy to gain back what you lose and earn a little from it.
But you can't rely on this as the cycle goes bigger and bigger.
To be honest, i use this strat in color game or th 50-50 chancec game. but there was a time that i hit X for 7 consecutive times end with a bankcrupt.

This is the same as the martingale strategy and I am not sure that the success rate of winning reaches 99%, if it is shown for losses I might believe it, haha
basically continuing to double the bet on every loss will make you lose money quickly. For me this is not fun but ambition and maybe this strategy is only suitable for people with large capital.

In my opinion, this martingale strategy is very risky because we will continue to double the bet if we lose and hope to win the next bet, but if we continue to experience consecutive losses we will experience greater losses and this is quite bad for novice gamblers. For me, when playing roulette, I always use the same amount but alternately sometimes red and sometimes black and this is quite successful, I always get a profit even though it is a small amount, at least even though I lose it doesn't hurt me too much by not increasing the amount of the previous loss.

From a mathematical point of view, this "strategy" is nonsense. Actually, there's nothing more to say. Unless, why did the "Tester" "simulate" the games instead of testing them himself with his own money? Because he knows perfectly well that this is nonsense. And by the way, on what AI? If he used LLM, which are popular chatbots like GPT, Claude and others, then this can't cause anything but laughter, since they generally have a different purpose. If he has some kind of specialized model (like AlphaGo) for roulette, let him show this model on Hugging Face. If there is nothing like that, then this "tester" is just a charlatan.

So, do you have a link to this, or are you inventing your own story to promote in disguise your casino under different topics and bend the rules of the board? Seriously, tone it down a bit!

Don't you realize how stupid this looks, a representative of a casino asking on a gambling forum if Martingale works?
Seriously? Seriously?


The funny thing is that a 99% success rate is too low for martingale, especially such an exponential one as in this example, one wipeout and you're going to zero, you can win 1 million times $1 if you lose at one point 1 million, you're still going down to zero!
Martingale needs 100% win rates, on a loss on a single chain and it's game over, and nothing you have done previously matters.

So, no wonder this is written with AI by some 3$ per article freelancer, it's pure garbage!

In my opinion, the fact we even dare to assure there is some pattern to be exploited while playing roulette is a complete contradiction to the theory of chaos and the laws of chances and entropy, so I don't think there is any science behind this. I am more inclined to believe this is some kind of social experiment or deceit being pulled off by someone on social media for the sake of getting view from people who should be know better when comes to casino games.

I would not dare to try this or any similar strategy, not matter whether it comes from a gambling guru or an artificial intelligence, not even mention there are some martingale elements on it, which makes it extra dangerous for one's bankroll.

I assure you it doesn't work, this is the best way to lose a lot of money
it's called, if i remember correctly, martingale
you can't find a system to beat luck, it doesn't exist. Avoid using or sharing these systems that i assure you don't work. 100% not works and you lost everything

You said it right, because if there was really a method that worked, casinos wouldn’t be happy, and they’d go bankrupt in the long run.

But nope, that doesn’t happen. Roulette is still one of the most popular games in the casino, and it’s called a game of luck for a reason.
In reality, no strategy can truly beat the house, that edge is always there.

So its better to accept the reality and stop wasting time experimenting on a method that will never work.

If there were really patterns everyone would become rich in gambling, the problem most people have is that they try to make casino gambling a source of income. You might get lucky using this strategy but at the long run you are going to lose more than you gain from it. The person who said the success rate is 99 percent is obviously trying to get attention. People who advertise such things online are just deceiving people

So it's like Martingale, just longer. Use a series of bets in one amount, and then if it loses, add more money for the next series of bets. I doubt it will work, and it's going to be expensive in the long run. Also, everyone will be playing roulette if there's really a working strategy.

After playing different casino games, I don't believe in any strategy anymore. In online casinos, it is the losses, wins, and history of the gambler's account that will be considered what he might get next. If you lose 100 sets, you might get back 90 sets in one or a couple of bets. Somehow, the casino will make a profit using the house edge rule.

This strategy you have provided is a modified Martingale strategy. It consists of sticking to the same game tactics and consistently doubling the bet size.

Yes, this strategy is effective and in theory gives the player a chance to win. However, theory is not practice, and the map (as we know) is not the territory. Casino organizers are well aware of the Martingale strategy and will not allow the player to use it effectively. The main limitation in using this strategy is that it assumes that the player has an infinite amount of money and an infinite number of opportunities to place a bet. In practice, this is not the case.

That is why Artificial Intelligence recommends this game strategy. After all, Artificial Intelligence does not play roulette and does not know what is really happening in the real world.

Well, besides, when using the Martingale strategy, you need to increase each subsequent bet by two times, not five. If you increase each subsequent bet by five times, then your money will run out very soon. Your deposit will not withstand a long series of failures.

I don't even believe in some of these strategies because they only triggers to gamble the more with the hope of winning, while on the reality your chances of winning is far below that of losing, am not saying this to discourage others to use the same strategy or more, but we should try to understand what is at stake for us when we do so, that they are not hundred percent effective.

You need to know whatever pattern strategy you use and do there is no guarantee for you to win in the long run including pattern strategies The red/ black roulette you mean, I have often played a red/ black roulette game, there is no 100% guarantee for victory.

But you can try to do it, how you know you can be lucky in the Roulette Red-Black-Blalette game.
Very easy.
First: Choose the color you want to bet red or black, it's up to you which you want, wait for the Roulette ball to spin, if you choose red and then the ball landed on the color The red you choose, take your money to win and vice versa, if you're not lucky the next round you can change the color, the process is the same.

Conclusion: Every gambling game has a risk, especially when you bet, so there is no imagination to get a lot of playing roulette, for that playing responsibly Answer, if you are unable to lose back, don't bring any strategy in gambling, there is no guarantee you can win.

I don't really play roulette often but reading this almost made me believe that it can actually work lol... casino gambling doesn't have a pattern or strategy that can put you in profit... it's a game of chance and luck, when you play at the right timing you would get lucky..if this is something that can work a lot of gamblers would have made themselves financially stable with it... gamble for fun and enjoy the game

Success rate of 99% on 3000 times seems high suspicious since it’s less 50% winning chance because of the green(0) as potential outcome while we just talking about a 6 times lose streak here.

I encounter more than 6 lose streaks even on 60% winning percentage even if I bet randomly with the same manner of this experiment.

Casino will surely go bankrupt if the success rate of this strategy is 99%.  :D