Bitcoin Forum

Hi, I'm not sure if my account can be cosidered old member here or not but I want to ask something about actmyname's spammer tag.

Let's be honest, with basic neccessities being expensive these days, we all know that why most members here spend time engaging in this forum is because of those signature campaigns that pays money. Same as me, it's also why I stay active in this forum, to have a chance to participate in one of them and earn extra income.

Life's been tough since last year and I am grabbing any source of income or job possible that I can do. I was applying for a signature campaign then I saw this rule which automatically restricts me to take a chance to participate.

I want to ask if all campaign managers follow this rule? My account got tagged by actmyname during my early college years and my english vocabulary during those times is not that good and my knowledge about topics in this forum is very limited, I have no idea that I was spamming already in my posts.

My point is does a spammer many years ago will forever be spammer and won't be able to improve his posting quallity? I maybe was a spammer before but I believe my postings or the way I discuss to this forum have improved. I tried to contact actmyname in telegram which is provided on his bitcointalk profile (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=465017) to ask if he can remove the tag but he didn't respond. I'm not sure if that telegram he provided is active since my message had never shown a sign of being seen by him.

If you reached this point, thank you for taking your time reading this.

I hope this will not get me banned or get a red tag in this forum. I just want to get an answer.

Cheers to all and goodnight.

You asked a honest question, so no one is banning you or tagging you, that's not how the forum works.

The fact here is that the user actmyname has been inactive since   which he created his last post, and no one can tell when he's going to log in back on the forum. You are amongst his list of 1000 worst spammers (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4440941.msg39671422#msg39671422) of all time., so I guess it's really a special forum list.

For now I'll advice you just better continue to improve your post if you truly know that you have improved over the years. Then probably hope that the user who had given you that tag would log back in on the forum one day then review his trust on your profile and consider removing it after careful consideration.

Not all managers follow those rules; if I remember correctly, I think some members with such tags are in good campaigns now, as their posting patterns have changed.


Your past can leave a scar on you, but that does not define you. As long as there is improvement in your posting managers who look at your profile will hire you. Not all spammers are able to improve and develop themselves, but some eventually did. If you are very sure you have improved, everything is not all about English, then you have little to nothing to worry about.


The user in question was last active last year; many members are still walking around the forum. Those tagged will say, "It's just neutral." If you have tried contacting him, just focus on developing yourself; that's all.

You don't get banned for raising and speaking up about something that's given you concern, and I don't think any DT will also tag you for such; you are an old forum member who should understand this and grow a thick skin.

No. Of course they can improve. There's many examples of this over the years. It's quite typical that new users don't really care too much, and then change their mind as the forum grows on them, almost becoming a sort of second home to a lot of users here.

People in general deserve second chances. People develop over time, and typically learn from their mistakes. However, this varies from user to user, and I imagine most signature campaign managers would take this case by case instead of automatically ruling out users based on their past posting habits.

So, don't give up. Continue to improve, and if you contribute significantly to the forum, more than the noise you may have created before. People will notice, and generally be willing to forgive and move on.

actmyname hasn't been active in a while though,so getting the trust removed might be difficult. However, this is another point other users should take into consideration when evaluating a user.

Asking a question is never a crime on this forum, and unfortunately it's quite as "actmyname" who gave you this  neutral tag is no longer active on this forum, as he was last seen on 8th January 2024, which is approximately 16 months ago. While secondly, If are to check the exact reason why he tagged we could see that his reasons was that he claimed you were "part of the top 1000 worst spammers of all time", and until you are able to proof to the entire forum members that you no longer spam, then I think your case can be locked into amicably.

But however, I just checked your post history, and it actually shows you have improved on your post quality. But let's here what others has to say regarding this.. Because this is an action whose solution can only be provided by the forum administrator Sir Theymos, it's staff or the forum moderators.

I think this post belongs to reputation board.  I wish you the best in your appeal.  2021 - 2025 is quite a long time and worthy of a second chance.


 Not all managers follow this set of rule. Different managers come up with their own rule. My advice is you go about your usual post and contributions to the forum. I just believe the right judgement will be passed on your account as other users engage in your thread

People improve in their post content and behaviour over time. Judging from the thread I believe you have done your home work and learned from your past. Just don't be hasty in expecting a positive result but have a positive mindset the right judgement will be served.

And what's the final say and action you think the admin and forum staff can take in such case, or do you suggest the admin will have to remove the neutral manually from his end or what? If the person who gave the tag was active, the best thing is to prove to him you are no longer a spammer, and he or she will remove the tag. You move on, and the community in general will see the user's honest contribution and decide how to view the person, and the neutral can be disregarded.

Some of the tags I have seen especially the once giving by JollyGood it states that if he finds your post quality improved after the tag he will remove the tag.

I guess this is applicable to actmyname since from the time of the tag, you must have improved. Again not really all managers consider some tags from my perspective.

At this point if admin and/or global mods like mprep and Cyrus finds you worthy enough to remove the tags, they sure will but then the essence of the removal is not quite convincing to me but since it has been a long time I will definitely support the removal.

Yes, that's exactly what I think would have been the best solution, because since the main intention of the tag was to notify us that O.P was a spammer, and now that he has improved on his post quality and grammatical errors, it's only best if he/she is been given a second chance by removing it since actmyname is no longer active on this forum. But only if he can proof to us that he is still the actual owner of the account by requesting him to Signed messaged with any of his previously used Bitcoin wallet address.

Member actmyname is inactive for a long time and he was not writing anything in forum since 2023, so you probably won't get any reply from him.
But I wouldn't worry so much about neutral feedback you received from him, just improve your posting style.
You started being active again only few months ago so you need to be more patient.

I can understand how @OP feel, we can't just say oh it's just a neutral tag, it won't affect your profile etc.

We have to understand @OP isn't a top 100 users in this forum, same with me, hence it's not easy to get spotlight. I think @OP already show a good improvement, we can see users who sent merit to him aren't alt accounts.

I think if @OP didn't get two feedback (one is supporting scam and another one is spamming), he would get accepted in a campaign.

Unfortunately, you have to deal with this...

Actmyname spammer tag is an old one, and he hasn't been active in monitoring those users to remove people like you off it. If anybody must give a spammer tag, they should also make sure they're available to monitor those lists occasionally, given that no one stays spammer forever.

I used to tag gambling spammers a few years ago, and in less than a year, they were all removed. I believe that a manager who wants to do his job properly would not rely on an old spammer tags ( not saying it should be ignored); it only takes a few minutes to glance over a profile page.


If you can prove that they are not the same person as they were years ago, why not drop the evidence? creating unnecessary drama.

It is simple a thing to do out of common sense. Which is giving it sometime interval to see if actmyname would come online at least to share his thoughts on this matter. However, if it happens that he's still inactive as he's been out since 2023 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5544258.msg65410961#msg65410961) (such a long time) then the forum admins/staffs can use their discretion and arrive at a decision on this very matter as raised by the op.

Sure, that's if they don't get banned for plagiarism or some other offense first or happen to stick around long enough for the forum to grow on them (as you put it).  Note: I'm in this category of members, but I didn't come here as a shitposter looking to make money and sadly that's norm for newbies and has been for years now.  Very few new members climb the ranks and establish a reputation, because most of them aren't looking to do anything of the sort.  You might see things differently as a staff member, but from where I'm sitting things are as I described.


Nice catch there, Hatchy.  I remember that thread but damned if I would have remembered it much less found that OP was on the list. 

Not sure what OP is expecting, but that neutral isn't going anywhere unless actmyname returns to the forum and happens to revisit his feedback left on other members.  Who knows?  Could happen.

You still have a chance to getting accepted in signature campaign even you have that tag but it always depends on the campaign manager. Some managers follow/use about the spammer list/tag, but others might give you chance if they see that your posts now are better and or more meaningful compared before.

But to be honest, the way you post today if your posts look like you're just here to earn money (just like what you said in this post) and not really contribute to the forum, most managers won’t accept you. Even if you're not on the spammer list, low quality posts can still hurt your chance getting to any of the signauture campaign.

Yes, maybe you were spammer before but if you really want to improve, you need to show it through your posts. Join real discussions, avoid short replies and try to be helpful to others.

Most people are giving good advice as far as continue to improve and people can change, but always keep in mind that your past can follow you. Actmyname may not be active any longer but he tagged you for a reason and he was pretty respected as far as his opinion on scammers went.

With that being said, most managers are likely looking at every applicant they have an open spot for and should be judging based on what they see in the last few months. Post quality, merits earned, active, how many sections, and so on. We see the neutral trusts and read them, but they can be ignored. There is no rule that states if you have a spammer tagged you're fucked. Some managers do have in their rules that having a tag from Actmyname disqualifies you, or at least they did.

All you can do is keep improving and hope someone notices.

ActmyLame made me an Neutral tag. i am still in 2 campaigns with my alt Acounts.  F*** him  :-*

The best indicator of your change will probably be the amount of merit you have received. Do you think you are perfect compared to your competitors, applying to participate in the signature of the company manager whose rule you have voiced? In the end, managers are quite professional; they can judge independently and independently evaluate your skills despite the tags. Each manager sets their own rules. Your task is not to give up; your activity directly shows the manager your intentions to use the forum exclusively for personal financial interests. While you are not in any signature of the company, you devote a minimum of time to the forum, writing one or two posts a day. Do you think you are interesting to managers?

Since we can't delete/edit the tag, the best thing you can do is be so unique that campaign managers ignore it, meaning be active, collaborative and create high-quality posts (getting a lot of merits might be a good first step in the right direction).

I gave you 6 Merit as a second chance for you.

If you already consider yourself no longer a spammer, can you sign your previous address to prove that it is the same account owner?
For example, 174MLRWdivJbDzRfrZdRxBBbLXjEKsDHk2 is used when applying in some campaigns

---

This is a crypto forum, not initially a source of income. You have the wrong perception about this place

This is the result of campaign manager ignoring the DD on each participants and relying solely on tag or merit counts.

I think post quality and relevance of the board which user frequently posting should be the main criteria on choosing campaign members for specific project.

Example:
Why should campaign manager keep picking a member to promote a services that he doesn’t like or he keeps posting on board which the service is not relevant.

This merit counts that obviously from merit circle and positive trust from a backscratcher sugar coat with simple penny amount trade is being use as front to be easily accepted on signature campaign while the post quality itself is below average especially on gambling boards.

This is the product of campaign manager less DD because they are busy on multiple management project at the same time.

I'm afraid that the OP won't be able to sign his message or will get into some bad story by appearing in the reputation section. :)

OP, can you explain the connection to the Hidemyname account?



https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=3B9nWHjyWKxR5pyYm4qWEf3bwyzrj9vMAk

---

https://ninjastic.space/search?content=www.facebook.com%2Fjcmendezofficial



This company has a blocked account
https://bpip.org/Profile?p=notyours

---

Based on the two matches with the Hidemyname account, it is clear that you had other accounts.
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2025/05/24/Ua9SkG.png


OP, did you pick your biggest account to remove the tag from, or judging by your activity you have a few more and that's why you have such low activity?

Activity can not be a good indicator to find alts. To be honest I have decent activities, no activities, some activities, several times no activities, low activities. The forum sometimes does not interest me sometimes does. Activities depend on your time, interest, goal and including many other factors.

Goal is a major factor for activities. Someone's goal can become a legendary, someone's goal can be earning from signature campaigns, someone's goal can be sharing their opinions others can have goal like me (no goal at all. Recently I am reading interesting topics, ignoring major discussions, if something looks odd only then sharing opinions). I like this forum because I can express me when I feel I need to.

With that being said, OP is not looking an honest member.

There are unrepentant spammers, these set of spammers do not improve because they do not even acknowledge the fact that they spam. A spammer will only repent and improve only if he/she is remorseful and willing to improve.

But your own case is different because you are conscious and must have improved. There's only one case scenario that The septical chemist is always against; in his words "He doesn't believe that anyone who could make good use of the English grammar will degenerate overtime time and become a spammer, but the reverse could be the case."

Brother, if you know that you have made a mistake in the past, why do you want people to dig it? We often see people create a thread to remove their neutral feedback, but they end up getting a few negative tags. As far as I can see, lovesmayfamilis has already exposed your alternative accounts. It seems you have been on the forum for a while to understand these things and you know what you have done in the past. I feel like you will never come back to this thread again to reply lovesmayfamilis.

I would suggest you read more carefully what I wrote about activity and alternative accounts. You are not looking for a company signature to earn money, so your behavior can be absolutely anything. You can visit the forum whenever you want, or not at all. And to be honest, this conversation is not about you at all. But shouldn't someone who wants to advertise a certain company show the manager looking for people that he or she can be of interest to companies? Ask why managers don't accept people who have been absent from the forum for a long time.

I'm not saying that people are required to be very active, but often the history of posts changes dramatically from plus to minus and vice versa. Interest arises only in one financial sense: if a person is not in the company, then the forum is of little interest to him or her.

If we talk about signing a message from a Bitcoin address, then the OP was online several times but is probably again making up a story about slow Internet or something unique, since we have already heard a lot of similar cases.

Seemsame has been inactive since January. So until he comes online, it won't be resolved at all. If you have sent your DM, then he would get an email notification and might take a look. We can't change his feedback; he is the one who can remove it. I have changed a couple of feedbacks when they asked me to review their profile. So if anyone is tagged as a spammer and he behaves himself by improving quality posts, then feedback should be reconsidered. It would be second chances.

At the beginning my English was also too weak. But I tried to contribute to the forum. So I will advise you to focus more on contributing to the forum and improving yourself more. Since you created thread managers also noticed this, so they might reconsider accepting you if your posting quality is perfect. Also actmyname's rules aren't adding all the campaigns. Find the campaign reasonable for you.

actmyname spammers neutral tag reduced the rate of spamming in the forum as at when he was actively tagging spammers but for a very long time now he has been inactive to monitor the activities of spammers. However, some users who were spamming in the past have now repented and are no longer spamming which in such case(s), there tags should have been reviewed by actmyname and probably removed but since he has been inactive made it difficult for him to review his tags but that notwithstanding, it shouldn't be a prerequisite for a manager to consider as a campaign criteria for applying, if a manager accepts a participant and the user is caught spamming, the best will be for that user to be removed by the campaign manager.

Impressive that someone with just 113 merit would burst into tears over a *neutral* trust feedback. (the more they squeal, the more they have to hide)  ;D

Harden the Fk up precious petal.

You know this is not possible base on the standard. The only thing is to continue to improve and become better with time a good reputation will come and even the sig campaign managers will be interested in picking such users.

Hero account with 500 + 113 earned merit has potential for earning through signature campaigns.
It is quite obvious that the account changed hands. It seems like a fairly realistic scenario, where someone bought a hero account with 600+ merit, and in the end, it turns out that he has very little or no chance to monetize it and participate in the signature campaign.

Funny how often this happens, and every time it happens, its funny.


https://i.imgflip.com/2ypkik.png


https://i.imgflip.com/6lu3fh.jpg

---

Edit: I wonder when people are going to start learning their lesson here. If you do dumb or questionable shit on the forum, think twice before making yourself a target. Thanks to the amazing tools we have available at our disposal, we can quickly find out what you've actually been up to.

Magic in the reputation section. :P