Bitcoin Forum

why bitcoin started just like this

before spreading bitcoin the author should have given every human being in the planet 1 BTC

but it turned out that only the ones who knew about bitcoin could buy or get it even for free

but how about the majority who didnt even knew about bitcoin

and now the situation is even worse there is a huge Gap between extremely rich and extremely poor

is this what the author of bitcoin wanted? an unfair distribution of wealth?

he knew how impactful the bitcoin will be

The fact that you think there is enough Bitcoin for everyone in the world to have one shows that even now, you don’t deserve a Bitcoin. Do the work, starting with research to understand what Bitcoin is and what makes it valuable. They say everyone will buy BTC at the price they deserve and you aren’t ready to buy yet…

it doesnt matter how much bitcoin there is, distribute by 0.01 at least or wherever

there was no fair distribution

that is just playing around with numbers

What you said are nonsense, especially from what mentioned above of having BTC each...

Of course, those who don't know doesn't deserve it, you can't have it if you don't even know what is it.

Who cares, anyone who does not even try knowing and understanding bitcoin doesn't deserve to have one.

That's a delusion of those lazy and poor, both in finance and mindset. Rich people works their way up there, it doesn't happen overnight.

Unfair distribution of wealth? Satoshi left with bitcoin below $5 in value, those who hold, wait, come, deserve those bitcoin today.

those who dont know didnt even have the chance to know about it, or it was too late

its the responsability of those know know, as it is an impact on the whole world regardless of country

so as i see they didnt even cared about it, but the consequences may be not the best

Who is willing to work and process from the beginning they will get what they deserve,
If Bitcoin has to be associated with how rich and poor someone is not appropriate enough because Bitcoin does not choose the government which must be used as a source of assistance and such.

Satoshi Nakamoto was not a social service that thought of a fair distribution of Bitcoin for everyone,
but he created Bitcoin as a platform that provides decentralized payments with Bitcoin.

I don't know why OP says about the gap between rich and poor, when who is willing to work and work they deserve to get rich because of the process.
This is like imposing that those who don't have Bitcoin should be given the same amount without working, without effort and just like beggars.

alright let the rich become richer, and poor get poorer

random people got bitcoin because they were "lucky" to somehow know about it, others who didnt know could make the same effort, but they were unlucky

so its a gamble at the end?

you dont want to admit the facts...

I don't think that's Satoshi's obligation to do that. And even if the supply can cater to everyone, still it will be useless since those who are not knowledgeable will just laugh on it, while those who are real knowledgeable will definitely be more patient to hold their coin as long as they can because they know it will become a blast in the future.

Unfortunately, bitcoin has only limited supply. So first come first served. Those who don't know nothing about bitcoin should not be hodling then but should DYOR first prior to entering the market.

If you're Satoshi, will you don the same.

I hope you could remember that bitcoin is being mined, we don't just earn it freely, we work towards having it, I don't see a verdict that warrant giving what you have toiled for just for free, what free things has the governments given us.


But unfortunately, not all that where able to know it then consider it, some have acted negligence and now which they never did.

Those who know nothing about bitcoin do not deserved to have even one. Simply because they won't be able to take care of it and grow it in the long run, but only those who actually have high knowledge about holding Bitcoin.

even the stupidiest human in the planet deserve a bitcoin because he is part of our world and as a human being should have it

if he dont know or dont care then teach him, show him what it is about and how important it is

make the world a better place, not the worst place



Bitcoin is a Global event, so its effect are world-wide, so the distribution should be world-wide

Facts of what? Lazy people become poorer? Yes, that's correct. What do you expect, someone will shower them money and make them lazier? I don't even think someone on their right mind will do that. Poor minds, ideologies and actions make them. Let them work and discover what they have to discover.

You're really bent on defending your statement even when it's contradicting to what we already know. How do you teach someone about something he's not interested in? People who own Bitcoin today invested in it because they saw the value it offers and went further to know more about it. Owning Bitcoin can't be forced in anyone.

It's impossible to teach the stupidest human about Bitcoin in the planet about Bitcoin, when he or she is unaware about the basics of life. Owning Bitcoin requires a certain level of knowledge and that's why it's not for everyone.

there are no Lazy people, everyone is part of the system

but the creators of bitcoin decided that only a specific group of people is chosen to have it

and thats it

no need to say "lazy" "poor" or other nonsense

its been decided a long time ago that there will an "Elite" group


because my statement is correct, your "knowledge" is a delusion

you divide people by "smart" and "stupid", but that is not the way it should be, we are all human beings

but in your vision there are "people" and "monkeys"

comon are you for real?


this is a way to make the world a worst place where only an elite group will have the power

and it seems that is the main goal of the creators and those who are close to them

the system is so well made, calculated to almost perfection

and you say they didnt knew whats gonna happen and how it will affect the surroundings?

My joy is that, you are just a newbie and as time goes on you will definitely understand what class of asset bitcoin belongs to and the need to meet a certain level of knowledge before you can own and hold bitcoin as an assets.

From your statement, you sound clearly as someone who lack the basic understanding of Bitcoin, but glad that you will learn along the way as you keep interacting with other members of the forum and sharing ideas about bitcoin.

What i will advise you is that, you should unlearn that wrong assumptions you have build about bitcoin, because having such mindset cozld and will hinder your learning process and how you adopt concepts that can help you in your bitcoin accumulation journey 

the basic knowledge is that you just have to be lucky to have bitcoin back then when it started - this is true as hell

now its a little too late now to accumulate bitcoin


PS:

and besides, before having knowledge about something, you have to own it

you will not have knowledge about something you dont have

so this is why they should have distributed it fairly, this way everyone or almost everyone could knew about it and learn even more

but you are skipping this part, blaming me of my lack of you knowledge...this doesnt make sense, you sound like you dont live in this world

Looks like you don't really understand how bitcoin works. Based on what you want to happen, it's not Satoshi Nakamoto's problem. Even if he wanted to give everyone 1 BTC, how would he even do that? I guess will be the same what he wants to happen. Also how could he distribute it to every single person? And when you say everyone, do you mean even newborns?

Also, if bitcoin was distributed that way, do you really think it would have become as successful as the Bitcoin ecosystem we have today?

Nah, you are misinterpreting the whole purpose of this digital currency, you seems to view it from a centralized point of creation, the invention of Bitcoin was actually the recreation of bank operated by owners.

There is no specific elites that was chosen for getting some piece of Bitcoin, everyones are the elites, no race, just pure love.

You are missing the real meaning behind this op, you just have to be stay here and learn more.

Pure Love for the chosen ones haha

others will suffer in hopes of finding bitcoin by searching bitcoin puzzles and other things

its decentralized for everyone, but very centralized for the chosen ones

i dont know why you prefer to be blind to obvious things

I believe it's just totally marketing, like how you advertise your product. So for Bitcoin, we will have a limited supply only. That's the best explanation why we need to own Bitcoin.
You can own even less than 1 Bitcoin, even a fraction.

So for me, there's nothing wrong with those phrases.

What do you mean by lucky?
This is not an airdrop, If you want to get lucky to get Bitcoin for free you appear in the wrong year,
But if you ask about those lucky they appear in the early years of Bitcoin appearing, get Bitcoin easily with Faucets, Giveaways and so on.

But if you ask now, you're just a desperate person and just say "Pickle people are luckier to get Bitcoin"
Even though those who have a lot of Bitcoin until now, they held Bitcoin when the price was even underestimated, but they hold it until now at an unthinkable price.

The rich get richer because they know how to work with money and the poor who remain poor they don't learn how to work with money and upgrade their skills and potential.

---

It is the mindset of wanting to be rich but without working and going through a long process.
Here I even anyone who has Bitcoin or has ever owned Bitcoin, gets bitcoin by working and there are many processes that must be undergone.
In the past it might have been quite easy, but now it is very difficult to be able to get 1BTC.

OP just thinks that every supply of BTC should be divided equally for the inhabitants of the Earth, and for example,
for example, Fiat circulating in his country should be shared with the population equally, earning money without working and what kind of world is that.

back then when the bitcoin price was 0.01$ - and you say everything and anything?

this is not working, risking, trading, and of course not a sacrifice

and dont tell me that all rich people have risked or sacrificed, working? maybe, but luck is the main factor


of course i talk about the early years, what else do you think...

that was the only time when distributing fair bitcoin costed almost nothing, and it could be done easily, but they didnt do it, because they didnt wanted the majority to be wealthy, they already knew the future, otherwise this project wasn't invented

as i said Bitcoin should have been distributed fairly in early days

but not only then, but even here on the discussion people dont want others to have bitcoin

its no surprise why it turned out this way, greedy people dont want others to succeed that is why the majority didnt had the opportunity to learn bitcoin in the early days, not menioning now

they say "they dont deserve bitcoin"? oh really? i think they can decide for themselfes, give them the knowledge, but even that is not given

our society is fucked up to the core

my statements is straight and clear

but they think its me who is desperate for bitcoin lol, are you shocked up in the head or what?

LOL, you need to know how the Bitcoin ecosystem works and how Bitcoin distribution was done when Bitcoin was first introduced.

It is not easy and that simple, especially since Bitcoin in the early days appeared only as a project that had no hope and was considered garbage.

Satoshi has even done a hint about Airdrops or in the past so-called free distribution by giving Bitcoin rewards to early miners who successfully verify transactions.
It is an incentive for those who contribute to the Bitcoin ecosystem.

Then you say everyone should get Bitcoin, let alone without any contribution, that's just nonsense.
You need to learn more about how this ecosystem works.

LET PEOPLE KNOW WHAT IS BITCOIN AND THEY WILL CONTRIBUTE

knowledge is not given, what are you talking about? how can someone contribute if people dont even know WTF bitcoin is?

only a small group of people knew that

as i said it was randomly distributed, and not fairly...how can i guy had 1000 btc and buy pizza? he got lucky and unlucky at the same time



So you say it was considered "Garbage" of course, but the small group knew the truth, but for the majority it was showed as garbage, no surprise

This is what structural poverty look a like, whenever they see someone success, they want to get the portion and blaming other entity without any sense. :D

I ever have a conversation with this kind people, they're selfish, NPD, and can't accept what people are saying, they always think they're correct and people must help them when they're not even help other people.

The best is to avoid @OP because he will keep blabbing.

maybe it is you who is selfish and dont want to listen?

i dont ask for help, dont say nonsense


people say what they want to say, not whats really happening

and of course this includes you


i can't believe how blunt people are, when you tell them obvious things, they keep blaming you haha, most of them dont even wanna understand, just dumb blaming, this is our society

It would be far more useful for every person on the planet to have an ASIC miner. That would ensure a level of real blockchain decentralization we've never seen before. Without decentralization, Bitcoin is worthless.

Bitcoin was basically worthless back in 2009. Even if Satoshi decided to launch Bitcoin by giving it away to as many people as possible, the people would still not give a damn about Bitcoin. Imagine having to setup a BTC wallet or node back in 2009 just for the sake of getting 1 BTC, which was worth less than a dollar back in 2009. This doesn't make any sense.
Many people became aware about Bitcoin mostly because the BTC price kept rising. If the BTC price was still less than a dollar in 2025, nobody would give a damn about BTC and BTC would most likely be a dead shitcoin. Airdrops are not a successful marketing approach. All the failed altcoins/tokens are a proof for this.

As time goes by, the generation that does not know about Bitcoin will be replaced by a new generation that at least knows more about Bitcoin. You don’t need to worry about the present, because those who will enjoy the benefits of owning and using Bitcoin in the future are those who are currently aware of and understand Bitcoin.
The knowledge and information related to Bitcoin are already available. The decisions of those who do not want to know and have no desire to own Bitcoin are their own business. But of course, they cannot complain about what happens in the future.

That is basically what happened before if you think about it. There were a lot of giveaways before giving bitcoin for free but not everyone was aware of it nor were they even interested. You can't give someone they do not want to accept. Technically, bitcoins before was so cheap you could get it for free. You just did not know it existed or you did not foresee the value it will have.
Satoshi did not make the value of bitcoin today. It is us who found the value of bitcoin and made it in demand and now it is expensive. He initially wanted to make something to use for transactions without having a centralized authority hovering over us. I do not think he wanted to use bitcoin to create such an unfair distribution of wealth. And besides, the fact that you can buy fractions of bitcoin helps you close that gap you speak of.

"Everyone on the planet" is free to have Bitcoin - unless you dont have access to the
internet or you are in a country which makes it impossible for you to buy it.

Deserve is another thing altogether. You phrase it that they or everyone should
be given it. How do you distribute a decentralised digital commodity with limited
supply to everyone in the world when at least 90% has been mined already and in
the hands of about 1% of the worlds population?

This is a lovely world we live in. People who cannot make solutions hate all others who try to provide better solutions than the ones we have right now.

It is not about giving people BTC all over the world. Nobody ever said in the whitepaper about fairness and justice and equality and all that shit that a lot of people claim (and don't really do shit with BTC anyway).

It was about giving us and each other a free open independent and safe way to send money to each other digitally.

that we have about 8 billion people in the world with an approximate of 21 million bitcoin in circulation does not mean such quantity can not distributed among people. the essence of bitcoin creation was not even that each person should own a single bitcoin. it was rather that means of transaction, most especially international transaction can be more seamless.

if anyone in any part of the world decides to buy bitcoin today, he(s) can buy his bitcoin today without an issue. the inventor of bitcoin has done his part to create what has become relevant in the whole world. instead of sitting back to do the criticism, maybe you should consider what the world will remember you for in years to come and create something that solves the worlds problem and it stands the test of time and still remains relevant.

Bitcoin is already known worldwide. People interested in owning Bitcoin can buy it or do work that is paid in Bitcoin. But it's unlikely they'll get Bitcoin for free. If everyone had Bitcoin for free, then no one would buy Bitcoin, and it wouldn't have reached its current price.

It's important to understand that this is a market open to everyone, and wealthy people would eventually have advantages because they can buy in large quantities. But by doing so, they also gain significant wealth. In the business world, that's how things work. We can't blame wealthy people.

And what if they don't? Maybe you don't know, but there are many people, who think, that Bitcoin is bad, and shouldn't exist. And even in early days, there were a lot of scepticism, and a lot of people thought, that it will fail, even if they knew about it. See: https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoin-obituaries/

For example, you have an article from 2010: https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoin-obituaries/why-bitcoin-cant-be-a-currency/

And then, the question is: do you want to send Bitcoin to all people, including those, who think, that it shouldn't exist? They would sell it instantly, no matter if they would receive it today, or in the past. Because they simply trust more in dollars, or other fiat currencies, or sometimes gold or other things, so why should they deserve to get any Bitcoin?

When Satoshi launched Bitcoin (2009) at least 50% of people in the world had no access to the internet - what was he supposed to do, print private keys on pieces of paper and send them to all possible addresses in the world? Even if every living being in the world miraculously received 1 BTC, that same BTC would be practically worthless today.

Unfortunately, people like you who advocate such stupid ideas do not understand at all what the value of Bitcoin comes from, but if you think that Satoshi was unfair, be better than him, fork BTC and send it to every one of the 8 billion people on the planet ;)

Satoshi created BTC for the benefits of the world while must he or she give 1 BTC to everyone in the world? He or she is not looking for what to gain from people. Satoshi created BTC to reduce delay from far distance transaction and short distance transaction, which is what the world is enjoying today.

Poor and Rich people have been existing in this world before the founder of BTC established this decentralized coin everybody wish to buy and sell to grow wealth, because people know the benefits of BTC.

Thoughts of an offended child who didn't get a piece of cake. You, OP, must understand that no one in this world owes you anything. This is the only expression where you need to use the word "should." You talk about utopia, dividing everything between everyone, and distributing it equally. Try to do something like that in your small life, in your circle, you know, there will still be dissatisfied people. Therefore, the strongest survive in the world, while others are waiting for "communism," hoping for justice, and do not dare to buy something for themselves; others act without looking back at those who are behind.

Yes life is not fair, everybody cannot have the good things of life but fortunately anybody that hears about Bitcoin can have a piece of it, not necessarily 1 Bitcoin but in fractions (Satoshi) so there is nothing stopping anybody from starting now. What about the people that understands the potentials of Bitcoin as a store of value yet they refuse to buy and hold it,? It shows that even if Satoshi Nakamoto, had offered everybody 1 Bitcoin each at the time of it's creation for free many people wouldn't have accepted it because at that time including myself thought that it was a Ponzi scheme. Bitcoin has proven it's reputation and potentials and smart people that didn't get in at the time of it's creation are getting in now because it is a valuable asset.