Bitcoin Forum

Recently, I'm in roll winning in roulette with a live dealer instead of machine based RNG games.

So I have to ask, specially for those roulette players here, which one do you prefer, a roulette game with a live dealer or a game that is base on machine and RNG? There is this kind of games wherein you are going to play against the machine in most provider of roulette like Evolution.

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

There is no strategy in winning in purely luck based games that skills is not applied, unless the machine has a loop hole that you can advantage of, as it has happened like that in the past from what I've head.

Back to the question. In Roulette, ill choose live dealer over machines any day because of the experience.

I will be choosing the live dealer as well, no strategy but maybe you can see some pattern and try to guess when it will land, at least a good 5 numbers around it if you are betting on a single bet to hit.

Worst is a double 0, the odds are 1/38 chance ≈ 2.63%.

So this is a very dangerous game for gamblers, although I play some just for fun of it. But if I go and win some money already, I immediately go and withdraw.

Do they have the same house edge? well if no then I would go on the lower one but if yes it will definitely on the player which he should choose. If playing with live dealer, you'll see it live and you will have other players betting along with you which is for me, a more trusted and real but if you are going to choose the RNG or machine roulette it feels like less trusted as you can't see the spin and all is happening in the background, usually these kind of games used a 3rd party generator which was verified by 3rd party service but most of the casinos now have their own provably fair system which the players can verify themselves.

So in short if you want something like real or more realism  but slow gameplay, you should go with live dealer and if you want faster for speed and convenience, then go with the RNG gameplay (Assuming they have the same house edge). So I think it's just a matter of preference.

Even though it's just an online roulette game, with a live dealer, we can at least see human interaction. This feels distinctly different from playing with a machine. For example, seeing a dealer whose communication style and conversation are engaging provides a sense of comfort for players, which is very different from a virtual dealer. Inconsistent spins can also be a challenge, we may never know whether the system's spins will be stable or altered. However, with a human, there's no system that delays the spins, and the speed can be vary.

They should have the same house edge, as they will have to play the same, with single/double zero. But the thing is that with machine play, and if someone has played or experienced it already, it seems that it's hard to win against them.

That's why I prefer the live dealer, you can see how the dealer will throw, maybe it's hard or soft and then with your experience, you will have to predict where it will land or what color the number will fall, or it is high or low numbers. Strategy is up to yours.

I'd rather pick the live dealer, too.

I have been playing a lot of different RNG games, and all I can say is that you will lose more than you win. IMO, there's a better chance of winning through a live dealer than there is with the system-picked results.
I think many will agree with that, and if more gamblers are betting in one game, it's better than just me alone betting against the house. It's like playing a Crash game with many players with different bet amounts placed.

Not only on roulette games but all table games I preferred live games since I can verify the authenticity of the game physically.

RNG based games is very hard to verify fairness since provider usually have a close source code on their games.

But assuming RNG based game is verified fair I think the game result is just the same. Being live is more on preference because we can feel the sense of assurance that game is fair because we can see the results with our naked eyes.

I just played live dealer roulette, and I also often play xxxtreme roulette from the provider evolution. For me, live dealer roulette often gives small wins with the strategy I use. Another reason is that live roulette provides a more enjoyable experience because we can interact with the dealer and joke around.

The most important thing in live roulette is to never increase your base bet amount, or else you will lose more often.  :D

I prefer live roulette, but the reason isn't really because I have a better chance of winning on a live roulette, but because it is more entertaining than the RNG roulette(at least in my opinion). Also, I don't think there is a difference in the chance of winning between live roulette and RNG roulette, so it doesn't really matter which one you choose if your focus is to gain profit from it.

If you’re not in a hurry, live dealer is the better option. But i think the house edge is still the same, it just looks more realistic since there’s a live dealer. So its not really a question of our chance of winning, its more on preference, like which one gives us better entertainment.

most of the time when i play roulette, not on a live dealer, so what i can say is that i'm in a hurry. lol

Since I started playing roulette, it's been machine and RNG, not with real dealer, I just prefer playing against machine not because I have a strategy that makes me win, perhaps no strategy that works but yet I am usually lucky more of the time and I also enjoy the game which is why I don't change the option to live dealer.

Congratulations about your wins. I don't prefer playing roulette. It doesn't matter if it's RNG or with a live dealer. Roulette seems pretty boring to me. Does having a live dealer really make any difference(maybe except having a small talk with the dealer, I guess)? ;D
Maybe some gamblers are superstitious and think, that the dealer brings them luck. I don't believe in such BS. You shouldn't believe in this as well. I've heard stories about roulette games being manipulated even in land based casinos, by the usage of magnets or something.
There's no strategy in a luck based game. Just enjoy your wins and try to quit at the right time(before you start losing).

With what you shared, i think i might try roulette with live dealers. It’s a bit time consuming since you have to wait for others to put their bets within the time limit, but if that can deliver a win then why not give it a try.

Honestly, I’m not really into roulette, more into sports betting, but maybe it’s worth a try since I’m not that active in sports lately, especially with the NBA not resumed yet.

Personally, I prefer to bet on roulettes with a live dealer.

The reason is simple: with a live dealer, there is no possibility that the results may be faked as everything is happening real time. If you play on animated roulettes, there is that feeling that it might be rigged or that results are already predetermined at a given game.


I also share the same sentiments with you.

I have tried playing roulette multiple times in the past and every game was played on a physical casino. It was fun and nerve-wracking but I want to put my money where there is a higher chance for me winning in the process.

I always preferred live dealer over first person game mainly because I get better satisfaction on playing live due to the interaction with dealer instead of playing the same type of games that doesn’t have any live interaction.

We are already on the era that we can have an actual playing on the casino experience through live games so I’m capitalizing it.

I’m already bored on the first person games after experiencing live games.

There’s really no strategy to win in roulette since it’s a luck based game, the name itself suggest that only when we are lucky we win. In the comparison between live dealer and RNG (system generated), i think there’s a reason why live dealer exist -- its simply more entertaining and realistic.

Pretty sure most bettors would go for live dealers, especially if they are betting with a decent amount.

Strategies based on random numbers seem as unrigged as playing with a live dealer, because I'm sure all good casinos already make a steady income from this game and don't need to risk their reputation and cheat gamblers.

But playing with a live dealer eliminates the feeling of loneliness quite well, and subconsciously such a game seems more transparent. It also creates the feeling of a real casino, where I am a guest with money)

I will choose the live dealer because with that you can be sure that it will be pure luck to win and there will be no system on it.
With the roullette, there is a game with multiplier also on the boardm thats a cool game.

---

I love watching Drake playing on roullette.

I've played roulette with both live and RGN dealers several times and there's no significant difference in the odds of winning; most of the time, we lose. LOL, but if I had to choose, I personally prefer live dealers because it's very different from playing with a real person and interacting directly, especially if the dealer is skilled at communicating. It's quite enjoyable.

If you talk about the roulette gambling in a direct dealer system and for me, it is clearly choosing RNG, even though the game is often called the "random number generator" or "random generation" using using RNG/in online casino technology but the approach can be said to be fair and can be verified.

Unlike the direct dealer, honestly I do not believe the roulette round when turning the wheels, you can say that each round is controlled or depends on the dealer, for that if compared to the roulette game directly with RNG I prefer RNG/engine.

I used to play a lot of roulette and I have had good sessions on both types, live dealer and electronic. I prefer live for the interaction factor, but really there is no difference between the 2. Some will say electronic is rigged but casinos don't need to rig games.

i don't think there's a huge difference between the two. i believe the reason people who play live dealer roulette prefer it is because they feel safer. even though the casino has complete control when playing in a virtual casino, i think this seems a bit fairer. also, the fact that it's a live action might make people feel more comfortable.

other than that, i think the fully virtual version of roulette is more logical for trying out long-term roulette strategies, etc.

I agree with the other members that I would prefer live dealers because, in a way, it feels more trustworthy to have live interaction. It gives realism and a more social feeling.

I don't think there's a difference in what the results could give, but it's more fun when it is a real dealer. What I'm curious about is the game's speed. For live dealers, the speed would be different.

Roulette is actually fun with a real life player, that's even if you are more concern about having fun rather than making money, many online gamblers don't care because they are always after money.

If you are one of them then know this and accept peace, either you are playing with someone or you decide to play with the machine it doesn't make any difference, you are going to need luck to be a step ahead of the machine or the player.

Another good example is using sport bets to compare to casino games, since casino games are all about you and the machines and sports is about real life players why aren't you still always lucky with sport bets then? It's obvious that luck is everything with gambling.

everyhere the math is analogous, whether you go for  live or RNG.. you know the casino's edge still crop up from the wheel afaik european 2.7% where american 5.26%, it not crop up from the streamer, right ? ? if i tell about RNG or auto roulette then it runs faster so the hourly loss also increases faster, if i tell about physical then it is  slower, is more social & the wheels are still checked. there is another edge you know, you will find lower limit & rapid spin in RNG table so it gives you cool excitment... imo it is super cool if your bankroll is tiny. so you just have to choose the real vibe, if you preffer speed & clarity then go for RNG or if you preffer atmosphere & control then go for  live

Regards

duke

I rarely play roulette games but most of the time I play the live game from evolution gaming specifically lightning roulette due to the random huge multiplier that can boost profit to huge win.

I like live roulette because it offer much better roulette experience due to its real roulette game and different roulette version which the RNG based roulette only offer the classic roulette games.

RNG based roulette is perfect if you want to use it to accumulate wager because each round on that version has lower countdown compared to live games.

As far my experience goes, yes, I prefer to play live dealer in roulette. Specially in land base casinos? The experience is very different, so it's hard to compare online and offline. That's one thing that it makes this game random, the dealer could be one factor and makes it harder.

He or she can control the spin and if you think that you can cheat like knowing the speed, gonna be very hard as they might be taught by the casino itself to alter their every spins so it will be totally random.

I don't think there is a significant difference but I prefer live roulette. When I play roulette, it is naturally martingale, so purely psychologically it is pleasant for me to believe (although this is wrong) that a series of identical results (which will kill my deposit) in live will appear with a lower probability than if the results of the throws are generated by RNG. Although this method has its disadvantages, since the pause between throws is quite significant, when we play emulation, we can place bets much faster.

I believe this is due to luck (chance) and not because there was a live dealer at the roulette table.

For me, playing with a live dealer would be more attractive than playing against a "soulless" machine. :)

I don't think the odds are going to be better with a live dealer in roulette. Here's why. I've heard stories of experienced dealers being able to send the ball into the exact slot they want with a very high probability (casinos don't seem to encourage this). I can't say how likely this is, but if it is, the dealer can easily leave your bets in favor of the house.

Maybe different people prefer machine-based random number generated games and some prefer live dealer games.
But everyone has to agree on one thing, and that is the outcome of the wager, because the outcome of both depends entirely on luck, no strategy is useful here.
So we cannot say that in the case of such games, any strategy will basically make us win more.

However, if I talk about my personal choice, then Roulette is more enjoyable for me in terms of live dealer, so I choose live dealer for these games, there is no other reason behind it.

My pick is also the live dealer option because you can skip rounds, and the live experience is always more fun for me compared to the original version.

In terms of luck, it's a tie between the two as i've had my fair share of success on both original and live roulette.

Even then, i'd still go for live because I remember playing a different version of live roulette from Evolution where you get some of your bet back if it lands on green.

I preferred live in the past, because i am old school and i enjoyed company and that felt legit. But back then i was drinking more when partying, and that tuned out the stress from the crowds.  And when i am stressed out i am more inclined to raise my bets to tune out the stress. These days i am more isolated, and i don't have a reason to drink while gambling online, so my self control is better and my money safer.

Technically i still see live roulette being fun, and i probably would try it if i was partying, and having only access to my cash in my pockets, and not my debit/credit card.

There's no other strategy involved, then being aware of my weaknesses and strengths while gambling.

Although I'm not what we could call a passionate roulette player, the few times I play I prefer live games with a human dealer, instead of just a machine based game.



No it has nothing to do with strategy in my case. It's simply that I like to see a human managing the event, and I also like to think that this person is making a living thanks to my choice.

But it's not something very rational, because I don't usually do the same with other games different from roulette, where I don't mind if there's a live dealer or not..

It is not about having an strategy or anything like it, it is because people could believe there is fairer entropy being generated through the use of an actual roulette, instead of casinos relying on random number generators and electronic entropy.
Though, it is a matter of fact there have been historical instances of fraudulent casinos rigging physical roulettes in order to increase their edge against gamblers even further.

So it really does not matter whether one chooses to go with physical/live roulettes or Random number generators, actually I would dare to say the best option would be random number generators coupled with provably fairness.

Although I'm not a roulette player but I played it few times in the past both with live dealer or the one with provably fair system.
Which one I prefer? The one with provably fair system because it is faster compared to roulette with dealer, I can play with auto betting system without placing bet in every single bet unlike roulette with live dealer which is slower.
Of course gamblers may have different preferences whether which type of roulette they want to play but I think this type of roulette has nothing to do with strategy.