Bitcoin Forum

I just found an interesting feature in one of the local online casinos that's popular in my countryside. While trying to check around what they have to help a problem gambler limit how they gamble. I found a feature which was to set the amount limit which you can only fund your account with daily, and weekly and also monthly if you want, decided to test the feature since we can make direct funding from any of our banking payment app, I funded my gambling account with the exact limit I set it went through and was credited on my balance, after few minutes I went back to try another deposit it became pending on the app and later my money was reversed back to me.

I found that feature interesting, but unfortunately, it can't work in crypto casinos since they don't decide which transaction can go through the blockchain and which one that can not. If there is any way for such to be implemented, I believe it will help some problem gamblers remind them of their limit. No solution solves the problem 100%, but it's definitely going to help a little percentage of gamblers, just like the self-exclusion option which can still be bypassed.

Who told you such features can't work in crypto casino, you are wrong, limit settings feature is part of the gambling control feature just like the self exclusion features, most centralized Fiat casino have that because of their banks requirements and enforcement of banking laws, so if crypto casino want to include that feature it won't be a pain in the ass and their could also achieve that easily, setting a limit in deposits could work in crypto casino if the gambler is ready to follow all the conditions, and ber the risks that comes with it, such as risks that comes with self exclusion features.

Now let's assume such a feature is available which I have not seen on crypto casino, or maybe I'm the one who did not look well. And if you enable it, if you forget to set up such a feature and make a deposit into your address linked to the casino, where will the money go to? Or will you have to contact the casino for a manual refund, which if that's the case, then part of the deposit will be used to cover up for the transaction fee.

These features exists on few casinos but it would have been great if the only casino that existed forced players to abide by this rule, if a addicted gambler use such casino and they still feel like gambling, they will look for another casino, period.

If one forced them to take limited risk they will find others, even if all existed casinos have this feature a addicted gambler will reach the daily limit on every five or ten other casinos that they can find.

An addict don't know how to stop until their urge for gambling that day is been fulfilled.

This feature might not be in a crypto casino but personally, I feel it wouldn't change anything because it's when you set it to your daily limit that it will work for you. If you don't set it and just keep on gambling like that, you can gamble with whatever amount you want to gamble with. I believe that in life discipline and self control plays a major role in our daily activities so likewise, in gambling too. This is why I prefer to set my daily limit manually by having a gambling budget set for the day to gamble with from my weekly budget.

OP is talking about crypto casinos automatically returning deposited funds after a gambler exceeds his funding limit. It's not about if the feature exists or not. I have not actually used the limit settings because I don't need them now.

My thought to the OP is that instead of the casino sending back the money and incurring transaction fees, the amount could be frozen for a period and unfrozen when the time limit has expired.   

Stake has a feature like this called stake smart that allows you to modify your deposit limits and bet limits just like what you described here.

I don’t use this feature so I don’t know how exactly it works to limit the deposit maybe deposit address will be unavailable or deposit will just be floating until the limits expires.

These "anti-addiction lock" systems are great, but the big problem with heavily addicted players is that they find ways around them , they’ll just move to another casino. Addiction makes a person completely irrational, unable to see anything other than the urge to keep playing more and more.

Lol, why not?
They would credit your account with the sum and return the extra, pretty easily.
How do you think this works with bank accounts? I can send 100 or 100 000 the casino has no way of accepting only a part of it.

Also, it's a mandatory requirement for all casinos licensed in the UK:
https://safergamblinguk.org/take-action-safer-gambling-tools/set-your-limits


In the void!!
It will be credited to your account, the system will detect that you have deposited more than you set the limit to and would automatically process a widrawl for the amount over to the address you have selected as your withdrawal address.
For gods sake , we have fridges that alert you you have only two beers left and make you a shopping list or are even able to order it alone from a shop and you think something that can be done with 5 lines of code is impossible?

The coins will be regarded lost, and the casino will decide whether or not to return them; this will be handled similarly to exchange deposits, where deposits less than the minimum and maximum amounts are typically considered lost.

It would work with crypto, but it is better with fiat since it can be set to automatically reimburse excess deposits to the sender.  These limitations features are useful, but they do not prevent anything entirely.

I confess I never cared about this, but reading some people's comments in this thread, I see that it is possible that it will be implemented in cryptocurrency casinos. My point is that I have seen many addicted people and I know well that these types of measures do not combat addiction. The addicted person is sick, he can remove these limits or look for other casinos that do not have these limits. So I see this resource as being more propaganda of the style: "we are doing something at least" to please the government than realistic.

That is right and reason I said it worked perfectly with Fiat casinos and some of them have affiliation with some bank and you get shown your minimum and max deposit limits, you can't send above such an amount, but with cryptocurrency where there is no such limitations features the sender will have to bear the risk if they send more than the maximum accepted deposits.

Not going to help much but still better than doing nothing to help - it's the thought that matters.

At least they'd have something in their defense if being sued " we provided features to manage gambling addictions, we care about our customers". They've played their part.

It's a start, right?

I have also heard about that news, and I think many countries that have made gambling legal are also using this kind of strategy to limit the gambling sessions of every gambler.
I think it's a good idea. Once the gambler sets his limits, then there's no turning back. That way, it could limit the chasing of losses of a gambler and it will prevent him from spending more. It could be a way to make him think about the decisions he made and maybe change the way he sees gambling.

I don't know if you know this, but this rule has already been implemented by the UK Gambling Commision. So all betting platforms across the UK must provide their customers with the option of setting deposit limits in their account. According to the commission, it is a way to protect customers.

However, i think it is good for casinos to add this as part of their self-exclusion option, but i do not like the idea of the government (U.K.) enforcing this as a general law to all betting operators, so every customer falls under it by default and not just those who need the option.

Some of the gambling sites doesn't really care about the players and they just wanted to suck your bankroll. It's pretty interesting to have this kind of feature even in gambling site, I think the it can be implemented, for instance they can just lock the deposit feature if they have reached the deposit threshold, the problem is when they reuse the address they've used before. Maybe they can just pending the top up since it's irreversible through blockchain.

In that way the deposit will be credited when the threshold resets. This is a great idea for players but for business minded like casino owners, didn't want anything that will slowdown their profit.

It can be easily done on a crypto casino (or any casino) since it can be implemented at the app level, not the smart contract. Let's say your deposit goes into a vault, which can only be opened, or the funds made available, up to a maximum of x dollars every week. That way, you can see your vault balance, but cannot access it, depending on your settings. Let's say you can only tweak your settings every x months. Moreover, you can withdraw from the vault at any moment. Problem solved!

But like others have said, the casino won't bother to do that since it won't increase their profit. It makes sense only if the casino wants to follow certain country laws.

Casino can do manual approval of deposit since it’s centralized which they have control on the display balance of each user for both deposits and withdrawals.

User with set limits can put their deposit and withdrawals on manual approval that will make the casino have power to control how much a gambler can gamble while the limits is active.

If the casino really wanted to implement a limit, it would be easy
Some options:

• Set a daily, weekly, or even monthly spending limit, and don't let the user exceed that spending limit. No matter how much they deposit.
  
• Change the deposit address for each transaction
  
• Block deposits if the user has already reached the amount they requested from the casino
  

These solutions are not very difficult to implement, but I don't know how effective these measures are, since if the user really wants to play, they will simply open another casino and bet on another account

This is a good idea but it's not going to work for people that have no discipline, after setting a limit on a particular account and they can't gamble anymore they might just switch to another one or even open another bet account, so it doesn't really solve the problem of addiction. Although it can be helpful to a lot of people who are not overly addicted to gambling, I don't think it's a permanent solution but it's a good idea

Funding limit may help gamblers who cannot control and manage their finances well. But for those who already limit their gambling deposits daily or weekly, I don't think they would consider this feature important.
I also would not use such a feature because I usually deposit larger amounts when I receive a monthly bonus. I agree to allocate the bonus money to additional gambling allocations.

I have seen a feature in a casino that telling gamblers to gamble responsible and, there are many things to consider. And the number one thing to consider is the financial consideration. How much should be used in a day and a week. And he has to gamble what he can afford to lose. And all that, he needs to create a budget to be a responsible gambler.  

The thing is that such features can't stop an addicted gambler from gambling, because at the end of the day, the option is available on the gambler's end, and they are the ones who can decide whether to turn it on or off, and whether to increase the limit, etc. If I'm addicted to gambling, and I don't have control over my emotions, what would make me stop from increasing the limit of the transaction that I can make into my account? In fact, I would simply turn the feature off and then make another deposit if I'm unable to control myself in the first place.

So, in my opinion, a person can only be stopped if the control is not in their hands. For example, if someone is addicted to gambling, or they are trying to control themselves from gambling more money than they should, their finances should be in the hands of someone else, and they should have a limit decided for a day, week, or month, and the person managing the finances shouldn't deposit more than the allocated or decided amount. This way, the gambler wouldn't be able to do it themselves, so they won't have any say in it.

Well said. If a compulsive gambler understands they're ill, that's already a big plus for changing their casino behavior. However, we often see otherwise: compulsive gamblers don't understand the problem that many want to warn them about. And you're right: only the person themselves must understand that they need to be careful with their spending. If they can't control themselves, they'll find ways to gamble as much as they want.

This is actually an interesting feature, it makes our job a lot easier, because many of us want to gamble by limiting our gambling bankroll, but sometimes we lose control of our emotions and cross that limit and gamble. In this case, I think that such features will help the players to some extent.
However, I will disagree with this statement that this cannot be implemented in cryptocurrency or blockchain systems, because I think it can be implemented in cryptocurrency as well. Here, the casino just needs to have an extra compulsory form where the wallet address has to be given to reverse the money. In this case, the player can implement the feature like the casino you described using the limit if he wants.

It can work with crypto casino perfectly well just the way it's working with normal bank but I guess what the casino would do is to credit you just the amount you have set to spend on gambling for that day, while the leftover fund will be frozen and then ask you to withdraw it back. Remember that the casinos are the once in charge of the deposit address you use when funding your account, so I believe they could still credit you with just the amount limite which you have set.

This feature is good but still requires discipline to adhere to it, else some problem gamblers may exit one physical casino and go gamble on the next which might be only like some meters away depending on the location. This in my opinion is the same reason online casinos doesn't stress themselves including it since it may mean losing money to other casinos when the gambler lacks emotional control. I think for that control feature to work properly, you need to make up your mind first that you're not gambling anywhere else as long as you cannot continue on that casino and that indication ends your gambling session for the day, week or month.

Measures like this is simply an attempt to save some gamblers from themselves, but it is hard to save someone who does not want to be saved. This is similar to the self-exclusion feature, a gambler could self-exclude themselves on one casino, and when that urge hits them, they simply register on a different casino and gamble. In order to kill gambling addiction, the addict has to make a conscious decision to do better, rules and regulations like this can do only so much.

That is a good feature for the gamblers that can't stop themselves and can't limit on how much they gamble.

So, this is another side of the feature that protects the gamblers from their own gambling activities. Aside from self exclusion, there is this limitation that they set.

An auto reversal of the transaction if you reach the threshold that you should deposit for the day.

As far as I know, I think it's a very good feature. It's very interesting because it can indirectly help minimize the losses of problem gamblers. Although this regulation may prevent gamblers from venting their anger, that's the purpose. Initially, they'll certainly be quite annoyed by the restrictions, but over time, they'll get used to it and eventually bet with amounts they can afford to lose.
One thing, I hope such regulations are implemented soon at popular casinos that support crypto payments, as that would definitely be very helpful. ;)

That kind of feature where a player sets a daily weekly or monthly deposit limit is a really good example of responsible gambling design it helps people control how much they spend without needing to rely only on self discipline because sometimes emotions take over after a few losses and it becomes hard to stop when the system itself blocks any further deposits after the limit is reached it gives the player a forced reminder to pause and think before going deeper.

In traditional online casinos it’s easier to enforce this because all transactions pass through centralized payment systems like bank cards or local gateways once the limit is reached the casino simply rejects new payments automatically but with crypto casinos it’s a lot more complicated since blockchain transactions can’t be stopped or reversed by the platform once they are sent they are confirmed on the network whether or not the casino wants to accept them. Still it’s possible for crypto casinos to create internal systems that mimic this kind of limit for example the platform could apply restrictions at the account level so even if a player sends crypto to their deposit address the system won’t credit the balance if they’ve hit their limit instead it could automatically return the funds to the sender wallet this would require some extra smart contract setup or off chain monitoring but it’s technically doable it’s just that most crypto casinos don’t bother adding these features because they focus on fast and unrestricted deposits rather than user protection.

But do you think the casino would implement such initiatives? That's quite hard to fathom though.  ;D Of course, the casino would want their players to play as much as they can. They have no business knowing where you got your funds to play. As long as you play, that's their business.

On this particular feature, I believe, this will be more on the gambler's restriction of himself how much he will spend on his gambling activities. It is not the responsibility of the casino to limit their players. So I don't think we will see such feature on them.

Funding limit will be useful to those gamblers who make use of only one casinos and are not in control of their gambling activities, if they have different casinos where they gamble the feature will not be useful because they may not have the access to fund in one casino but they can move to another one to continue gambling but for someone like you who usually deposits a big amounts, you may not need the feature because it will affect your deposits unless they have a very big amount in the feature that you can place as your limit.

Although it is true that in regular casinos it is easy to block more deposits since they can be in charge of bank transfers and know who you are, and crypto transfers cannot be stopped once they have begun, many crypto casinos have deposit limits. They do this by taking in crypto but then through inner system they can either give money back or simply refuse to add it to your playing balance when you have reached your limit. To have truly spread out gambling sites, Smart Contract can be written to automatically say no to any deposit over your limit on your specific crypto wallet. These limits are not cure all to problem gamblers, but they are helpful tool that gives individuals with needed stop to help them stick to their budgets.

I think the same features work in crypto casinos but you haven't really paid attention to it...This feature is actually very helpful to those that are dealing with gambling addiction...although setting these limits don't help to curb or stop this addiction, you can call it a temporary solution not a permanent one but asides from that I think it's.a good feature, it can help you minimize losses a little bit if it's constantly used

Heavily addicted gamblers won't even be in the right sense to make use of such a feature; rather, even if it's going to help them, they can't go ahead to set up something that will limit their gambling time. Such a feature will only be helpful if the gambler is not deeply addicted yet; if not, they will still use their hand to disable the settings or rather create a new account in another casino to continue with.

OP it can work in crypto casino, you did not think critically about it.
This is how it will work. Firstly, when a user wants to deposit, a page will appear for them to set a limit using the input field, and a minimum/maximum amount that can be deposited in the network should be displayed so that the user will know the right amount to now lose their funds. Or the they can make it very simple by making every network/chain have a minimum limit when the users are selecting their limit.

Not sure I have come across this feature in reality but I have heard such thing so exist like setting limits to how much you can deposit and how much can gamble daily, weekly month and of course I do agree with you that it doesn't not solve the problem totally but it for sure would help reduce the way the problem itself is on the gambler, more like rehabilitation unti they opt out of the excessive gambling.

Yes, it is true that this feature is easy to implement in traditional casinos because they use a centralized and banking system, so instant moneyback can be done.

But as we are thinking, it is not that difficult to implement such a feature in crypto currency based casinos, which will have to face a lot of difficulties. Yes, it is true that instant moneyback like traditional banking will not come here, but if we can accept the fact that moneyback will come within a minute or two, then it will not be very difficult to implement it in crypto currency based casinos as well, as I said earlier that a blanket reverse address should be provided when the user makes a deposit.

However, I doubt whether any casino will implement this type of feature.

Well actually crypto casinos can't cancel the transaction but they can relay them back or alternatively lock the coins for the given period of time before you are again allowed to deposit. But the big question is if the reason for this particular feature is to reduce addiction, how effective will it be?
Addicts will always find a way around it and in this case it's me include having multiple accounts or making use of another casino if they reach their limit. Basically it would seem like the casino offering the feature is losing customers.

That's going to be the best, since it will cost a transaction fee and extra manual effort to send back the overpayment to the customer's wallet. The best is just to withhold the deposit which passes the limit until when they are allowed to fund their account again, then it can automatically be available for use by the customer.

It won't solve the problem of addiction 100%, but it's better there is a solution than nothing being done, right? At least some people will be able to use that option to limit themselves, while those who are already addicted will always figure out a way to bypass what they use their own hand to set as a limit for their own safety.

This feature may not apply in crypto casinos because transactions on the blockchain cannot be censored or restricted by third parties. Once users deposit any amount into the casino wallet, it will be immediately transferred to their wallet.
Therefore, what casinos can do is simply create a feature that limits players' losses or wagers. When players activate this feature, they set a maximum loss limit or the maximum amount they can wager within a certain period, which helps them control themselves and prevent excessive losses.

Users or gamblers can ignore it, like its nothing. If casino really wants and cares to their users they should add a statistics of their users either in chart, bar or line graph of everything they do in the past day, week, months. The statistics should have the total deposit (categorized by coins) what games to they win/loss the most, what time/hour/day they usually win/loss, their total PnL, and so many more... This will really help gambler to think again, of course they can ignore it but upon seeing those charts they will think again for their own.

There will be no restrictions of crypto casinos doing this.
In fact, there is no need for any blockchain requirement for that because they can set it every user for how much they would like to have as a limit.
It's doable and in favor to the severe gamblers that can't stop themselves from gambling and opts out to continue even if they have already stretched their gambling budgets or bankrolls.

There are differe ways to kill a rat :)
It depends on the casino and however they choose to implement it.. once the crypto is confirmed to have reached the casino address then they can move it anyhow/anywhere they want …

One of the ways the casino can handle it is having an extra deposit address bank where crypto funds that enters can’t be used but the withdrawal will be enabled. So once you hit the limit and you make a deposit it gets moved into the address where you can easily withdraw but can’t use it for gambling..

Unfortunately, this feature won't help addicted gamblers, as they need to exercise self-control, and an app or website shouldn't do it for them. It's great that this feature has been implemented in an online casino, but it won't work as intended. It's simple: gamblers know many different casinos. And they'll simply move on to another one if that casino prohibits them from adding funds to their balance.

Addicted players will be able to limit their own activities when they realize what they are doing is wrong, it is good if this feature is implemented in online casinos, but what you said is true, this will not fully help players who are addicted to gambling, especially since currently there are many casinos operating so that addicted players can move casinos when they can no longer gamble at the previous casino.

I’m not so sure this is a feature setup to help the end user at all. It seems more like some sort of anti-money laundering policy to help keep the casino out of hot water. Likely they are not collecting enough KYC information and are trying to limit their liability to potential bad actors. Just a guess on my part…

The feature is helpful for gamblers that don't have self control to set bankroll limits by themselves, they will set it automatically so that they won't deposit more than their capacity. But an addicted gambler can still set a limit that is beyond their capacity and the casino wouldn't know so it comes down again to self control. Besides the setting limit feature is optional, it's not like it is a must and addicted gamblers can just ignore it and deposit any amount that they want. Gamblers should try as much as possible to learn responsible gambling so the casinos or government regulations will not be the reason why they need to set bankroll limits.

A crypto casino could simply block the ability of the gambler to play games, after he reaches a certain limit for a certain time frame.
For example, if the gambler spends more than 1000 USDT per 12 hours, the casino blocks his account and a sign appears telling him "You have reached you daily limit" or something similar. Blocking crypto transactions on the blockchain isn't possible, but blocking gambling accounts by setting spending limits is definitely possible. The problem is that most crypto casinos won't agree to implement such "responsible gambling" limits, because they will lose revenue from their most active players. Also such limits aren't required by the gambling regulators in the jurisdictions, where most crypto casinos get a gambling license.

Due to its irreversible nature, we can't control everything that happens on the blockchain. However, that doesn't mean crypto casinos can't limit problem gamblers playing on their sites. This could include daily, weekly, or monthly bankroll limits. This can be done internally, so blockchain adoption shouldn't be a reason. The question is, will crypto casinos be willing to implement such a feature, given that they are businesses seeking to maximize profits?

Such features can work in any casino be it crypto and local, its just for the casino to see the need to implement that. It will just require few days of redesigning and programming and it will be up and running but like I said, is there really a need for that? The local casino that implemented that may be under regulatory pressures to comply which is why they did that and unlike local casinos, the online and bigger casinos may not face such pressures here their various disclaimers and self-exclusion features should suffice.

The rule is not a bad idea at all, at least this would help the user or gambler in protecting them from much activity on gambling or even reduce rate of money loss from such user but what you said looks accurate. Maybe the casino or gambling site does not have well structured legal papers and they are trying to make protection for themselves incase of any abnormalities that might occur and they are finding a positive means.

The truth is that casinos only care about keeping you interested in the game, and they have no reason to show complete statistics for each player, because that could make people realize that they are spending too much time and money on gambling. If you are concerned about your own statistics, you will have to track them yourself, most likely without charts, but with the most important data that will help you draw conclusions. And if you see that you are spending too much, you will be able to decide to reduce your playing time or possibly your bankroll if you are losing more than you planned.

This is indeed a good function in this betting platform you mentioned.  But I have some questions. Are fiat transactions free from charges in your country? If it is not, who bears the cost of the deposit that was reversed? This is because gambling platforms are businesses established to maximise profit. I guess they wouldn’t want to be burdened with expenses even when the customer is at fault. Nevertheless, the suggestion of keeping the funds for a specific period is good since it will cut costs and other hurdles.

Any banking transaction which you send out, and it went successfully, the bank always charges some kind of fee either the fixed one by CB, or the bank which you are using has their own fee rate. But in this case, let's say you have funded your casino account already with a specific amount and your next deposit is going to exceed the limit you set, the casino is not going to accept that payment just reject it and the money will be seen from your banking account as unsuccessful if was never delivered, so nobody is going to pay for any fee for such transaction.

That's right, responsible gaming measures serve as a brake but do not prevent the problem. If you set a deposit limit at one casino, nothing prevents you from depositing at another. However, it can be useful for people with limited funds who do not have the option to borrow, so it's not all bad. That's why I welcome these kinds of measures because, even though they are not the ultimate solution, they do help.

You can set a limit on the funds you can spend on gambling and then split it among as many different casinos as you like, as long as you don't exceed the initial limit. If you stick to the limits at one casino and do whatever you want at another, those aren't limits, but rather specific restrictions for individual casinos. A limit is something I can't exceed, but that doesn't mean I have to spend that amount every month. If I play without major losses, a single bankroll can last me months, maybe even longer.

I think this kind of deposit limit feature is actually quite effective in terms of responsible gambling. Many times people do not understand their limits, but when the system imposes a limit that is what stops them. This has been possible in local casinos because there transactions have been made through fiat currency. Which is mainly due to centralization and is easy to send back.

But it is difficult to give this limit in crypto casinos because the transactions are decentralized on the blockchain not under anyone's control. Still, a solution is possible. I think if the casino can separate the user's deposit wallet on its platform and impose the limit internally. The blockchain will not change but there will be responsible control from the casino's side.

The casino will never get in the way of his earnings to make him stop, I understand that these things are their responsibility but not only that, there should be an organization that takes care of protecting these people who are certainly fragile and who cannot do without gambling.

The crypto casinos can implement that by offering people a daily limit in USD or other currency deposit max and they can fine tune their system to not accept transactions over such limit, I know it is much more difficult to implement than from those local casinos but I think it is still doable, just like they offer you to exclude yourself for a certain limit of time. I think that this move is not seen as very positive from casinos direction as they may think that an angry gambler can flow to another casino, the competition and most probably they won't be very keen on implementing it. The gambling problem can only be solved by the gambler itself when he finally decides that this isn't bringing me anywhere, I doubt another solution exist to this.

That helps gamblers who want to limit their fund when gambling but not for those gamblers who often gamble. They will not use that feature because it limits them from depositing more money especially when they lose.

If you want to limit yourself in gambling, you don't have to use features but rely on yourself. You have the power to limit yourself if you realize it. But most gamblers will deny that because they think that they can win shortly. It needs awareness to use that feature, while many gamblers want to chase the win and that can make them deposit more money to continue playing.

It is a really good one to help gamblers build that control but if it can still be adjusted then gamblers will likely set the limits and still adjust it in a later time when they see what they believe to be a promising game at the time which may later seem like an abuse to that feature because it will not be serving it purpose enough, except they are going to include a period of time for which you will have to stay before you will be bale to adjust the restriction. with crypto casinos it will be more difficult yo incorporate such future at a time because we know that  crypto runs mostly on the decentralized platform so that control over it mostly lays with the person doing the deposited themselves.

except the casino will add such feature in a way that they are going to be able to regulate how you spend the crypto from your wallet after deposit by limiting the amount you can stake a day regardless of how much worth of coin you have in your wallet. that way even if deposit you will have it sited there and cannot be able to use it thereby giving you some control.

While this feature may be useful the most helpful thing is to discipline ourselves. If you have discipline you won’t even need someone else or the casino to control you. I know some addicts are way beyond that point but still it’s good to practice self control.

A feature that most crypto casinos haven't used yet, it's a great idea with interesting features, daily, weekly, monthly I think other casinos can do it like that, It seems that such a method can overcome betting limits especially for addicts, I think that will be a pro and a con for some casinos.

There is a positive side for online casinos that use such features, limiting daily, weekly, monthly bets. The positive side can be limiting for those who are addicted, of course there is also a negative side, this feature can limit the casino's own income.
For example: the daily limit for one user is $100 for gambling, if 100 people lose their bets of course the casino only gets $10k, but if they don't implement such a feature the casino can make unlimited money from those who lose their bets.

If you think about the feature of limiting daily, weekly, monthly deposits, very few casinos are willing to use this feature, good for those who are addicted, not good income for the online casino itself.

I think all of the features given to us as gamblers are there if we can't control ourselves. If we can't control ourselves, there goes these features. And I agree that if we have discipline, there's no need for us to use these feats. But then, not all of us are the same in terms of controlling ourselves because no one can stop their own addiction on an instant when they've been doing it for the most of time. This is one way for them to be controlled forcibly if they keep on going out with the budget that they've planned before they gamble.

That's the point, it would be better if we can control ourselves than relying on such a feature like funding limit, self-exclusion, etc because we are the one who should have a full control for our own activity.
Such feature might be useful but if we cant deal with ourselves the such a feature will be useless because we can simply move to other casinos once our limit is exceeded in a casino.
If we are worrying about this kind of feature is not available in online casino (while in fact it is available), it is just a proof that we are not able to control ourselves or in other word is that we are not doing responsible gambling.

If I'm not mistaken, some casinos are already using this feature, or it's in development. I saw something similar in a thread here on the forum. It can help gamblers gain greater control over their budget. The problem is that if they decide they need to increase their budget, they will, and depending on the increase in the limit, it won't solve anything. If they continue with the same mindset, lacking control, and lacking awareness of their own limits, no tool or resource will help.

I find that kind of system interesting- in fact, gambling companies are limiting their financial capacity with this kind of implementation.

Normally, you would not hear this kind of feature being offered to most casinos because this will serve as a limitation to the potential profit on their end. Consequently, gambling companies will try their best to keep you staying from their casinos/website by offering tons of complementary and other kinds of privileges just for you to stay.


Whoah so casinos are somehow becoming "ethical" by developing this feature? Perhaps the effects of gambling addiction has become so destructive to the point that even gambling companies itself are limiting their users by adding deposit limitations.

Haha, what you're thinking is also true, my friend. On the other hand, something that's fun for casinos is when a gambler keeps playing and loses more money. The reason is that for them, gambling is a business where they profit from gamblers' losses. So what you said is also true: casinos hope gamblers will play as often as possible.
So, in conclusion, it's unlikely for most casinos to implement such a feature because their goal is to maximize profits from losing gamblers.

Casino like this wont change anything because if a gambler exceeds his or her their gambling limits and they feel like gambling more they will still look for another casino to continue their games. It is good to have casino like this but since their are other casino that allows gamblers to gamble the way, these casinos that gambling is unlimited we capture more gamblers. If the idea of a casino giving gamblers limit is to reduce addiction i dont think it will work because an addicted gambler will always look for a way to gamble more just the way they want.  This will only work for gamblers if all casino can have this the same limit of gamblers.

Perhaps this will have an effect on a small percentage of players, and they'll stop playing, while for others it could have the opposite effect, preventing them from doing what they want, which can be downright annoying. I think it would irritate me, and I'd deliberately find a way to play more. Maybe the casino knows this, because they understand the psycho-emotional addiction of the average player perfectly well. The whole point here is for the player to understand this themselves, without resorting to restrictions, so that they're not being unnecessarily limited by anything, namely, themselves. At least that's what I do.

If users react positively to this feature, it can likely be integrated into crypto casinos. Try approaching the representatives of casinos here in the forum; maybe they could do something about it.

If the user and the casino collaborated on determining the values, it could lead to an implementation that benefits both parties.

IIRC, Stake has something like this called "Stake Smart"

https://stake.com/responsible-gambling/stake-smart

I think this is a good first step for us to minimise losses in gambling. For those who use banking for deposits or withdrawals, this restriction feature can be the answer for those who are starting to/are already addicted to gambling. You will learn to control yourself or become a responsible gambler who can manage your own finances by setting a gambling budget within a certain period of time.

On the other hand, this can train you to be more consistent, and also to not get carried away by emotions when experiencing a loss, which could trigger you to chase that loss by depositing more money outside of your gambling budget. Therefore, i can say that this feature is very useful for those who use banking for transactions.

If such feature is in a casino, that should be a good one because it will control excess gambling habit of the day, week and the month. But in every good thing, there is a disadvantage because it will affect those who play big amount every day, weekly and monthly. And the casino will not make much money in the month, so they have to consider those factors. Op can you provide the casino for us to confirm it too?

Setting daily or weekly funding limits is a smart bankroll control method. It keeps emotions out and ensures gambling stays within planned boundaries. Some sites even let you set these caps automatically for better discipline. Do you think limits should be mandatory for all platforms or left as a user choice?

At the user's discretion. I understand that those who spend a lot of money at online casinos and spend a lot of time there are likely to be suspected of being addicted. But on the other hand, everyone's lifestyle is their choice. And if someone has earned a lot of money, they can spend the rest of their lives playing at casinos, after all, we are all independent adults.