Bitcoin Forum

Is it true that big bettors don't just place bet?
Is it true that some big bettors have stronger data analysts working for them?
Is it true that these people wins more than someone who use small amount of money?

I was told that rich people who gambles don't just risk a fortune on a game or  match, they have reliable sources and their chances of losing is lower than a normal gambler?

I was told to find and follow these type of people's bets and i will end up winning more than i will lose. Does bigger money makes or means bigger sense and cautiousness?

I don't know where you got this information from because the last time I checked rich gamblers run at loss just like a normal gambler because only few people have made profit from gambling in the long run.

There was a rich man that got broke through gambling, he sold his house and he's currently in his village. Don't get it twisted because these guys that you are talking about might not exist. Gamble for fun and don't allow making profit mislead you into losing more money. I might be wrong though.

I do not know but the probability is high. They save the money and use it to bet on a single match after a long period of time. Yes, I think so too.

It is very possible but I do not think they need any analyst.
Anyone can become broke, it is good to know this. Gambling can turn good or bad for anyone but those that gamble frequently will definitely lose more.

No.

This is complete nonsense, frankly. Where are these conclusions coming from? What kind of strange new theory is this? Another illusory vision of the gambling world. Rich people also lose money, and in large quantities. They're far from an indicator to rely on. It's better to do your own research and make your own choice than to trust someone else with your money.

No, I don't think that's the case.

Use Drake as an example. Betting big and losing money, especially in sports events, where he only uses his emotions when placing the bet.

There's a possibility that they are just gamblers who can afford such amounts. There's also a chance that it's a pool. (A group of people who shared money to place in one bet.) I tried this before and actually even asked it here in the forum if following the high rollers is a good idea. I tested it, and because there's a "copy the bet" feature in Stake.com, it's easy to do it. Sadly, I have not won anything from following them. Zero. Nada. So I stopped.

Winning is winning and it doesn't matter whether you won big or small. It's all best to the strategies that brings you the success.
When you chasing high multiplier on high odds or you're staking with huge amount and you're lucky to win, definitely you'll win big.
I don't think there's reliable data that particularly gives big wins. We're all just trying luck even though we've professional analytical skills or tools.
We've also been hearing about Ai prediction tool that claims to be reliable but yet non has been provable to be true of guaranteeing you winning.

Using rich people as a reference might not be accurate. If you’re talking about gamblers who actually study stats and think carefully before placing bets, then it’s more appropriate to call them professional gamblers. Sure, they bet big amounts, but that doesn’t automatically make them rich, we don’t really know their net worth BTW. In my view, there are two kinds of gamblers, the casual ones who just play for fun, and the pros who treat betting seriously, aiming to make a living out of it.

This is partly true, big bettors do not rely solely on luck but also have various management systems, including data analysis, team tracking, and weather, as well as the team's mental state. Those who bet big definitely take the help of a strong team and they analyze and use various sources and information. Basically, they have a higher number of wins than normal people because they do not bet on emotions but bet calculatedly, which means they do not lose but win more. And betting with big money is a bit risky, but they bet with a lot of discipline, and use their long-term strategy with caution. Yes, big bets often keep them alert and aware, they bet with experience and responsibility and avoid emotions.

I will counter all these questions with a simple answer from my personal experience related to such persons. I thought the same as you regarding these questions and saw these persons as winning ones until something happened. In a casino platform where they let you copy other people bets, I tried to copy the bets of people who placed thousand dollars as their bet amount and I kept losing when I copied their bets. So from that moment I changed my mind as these persons despite having a lot of money they kept losing in a consistent way and their bets were with very low odds, so based on such statement I can clearly say no one, not even rich people have an edge to win in sport betting.

Great question and it could be possible. If you really make sports betting your job then possible that you might have all the data and crunched it and probably used AI to analyze and make the right bet for you.

Again, their could be pro sports bettors as compare to those who just have a lot of money and bet on certain sports with just little to no analysis at all. As compare to individuals who make betting their livelihood, their main income.

There are only a few who are really reckless in gambling, some just do it for fun because they’re already making huge money from their businesses. I’ve seen a documentary too about a guy who runs a mattress business and makes millions, yet he regularly goes to Vegas just to burn money at the tables. with that, not all big bettors are serious about winning. Some just have so much money to burn that gambling becomes their way to unwind and enjoy themselves.

It seems very exaggerated to me, a rich person rather than paying an analyst to calculate bets, perhaps pays a broker to invest in the stock market.
Because if you pay to have an analyst it's meant to make money from gambling it's certainly not meant to have fun, if you want to earn money invest in something safer don't you think?
It really seems counterintuitive to me, maybe I'm wrong.
They are less likely to lose, but they are not infallible.

AI make the world to be very easy now but that does not mean the person would win the bookies. That is just the problem in betting. The day the bettor will lose, the bettor will not know it is coming. The bookies are happy with AI as they can not be used to guarantee bets to be won.

Yes, they are pros but unfortunately only 3% of gamblers are winning. And even on long term, we do not even now if the 3% is accurate because some that won within a year might lose the in the following years.

3% might even be high.. I’d say 1% is a much safer number.

You never really know what these people are doing behind the scenes unless you’re betting big yourself. But for most of us, we tend to get a bit bitter when we see someone placing huge bets. We start thinking they’re crazy because, in our minds, gambling is only winnable by luck, so eventually, they’ll lose. That’s just the kind of perception we sometimes have, especially when we can’t relate to that level of risk-taking.

Putting all rich gamblers in the same category is a mistake. Some rich gamblers are wasting money on the casino like there's no tomorrow.
The theory about some rich people having connections with the betting mafia will never get old. There's no way for me and you to prove such theory and relying on gossips and rumors about rich people betting on fixed games isn't a good approach. I do believe that the betting mafia actually exists, but I do not believe that betting mafia would ever help some rich people to make big profits out of sports betting.
What do you mean by "stronger data analysis"? You could have the best data analyst in the world, but your bet can still be wasted, because no data analyst could have a 100% success rate.

I don't know why most gamblers normally believe on other bettors success, especially when they hear about huge win they wouldn't ask questions, they would start having the feeling that they can get it the same way, forgetting that luck plays a significant role in the game. It is very important for a gambler to make his own decisions without depending someone win,  because gambling doesn't seem to work the same way, it is only luck that can easily make it to be possible.

I don't think this is entirely the case because betting is a game of luck and not fixed predictions. There have being several occasions of people buying fixed games and they lose out on this games so it's not assured at any point.

With proper analysis, you could minimize the risk of loss and maximize your earnings because even the analyst cannot get you perfect predictions always. There must be occasions of losses too so it's more or less a waste of resources.

The big game bettors could invest that into a more controlled entity over gambling which is a risk and a drain to one's mental and emotional health when put into full consideration or dependency.

There's a saying that when you hear the same thing from different persons, it means that there's an atom of truth in it but I'm just getting to hear this from you. It could be true because some big bettors are not just taking it for fun but as a result to make money regardless of the risk. We know that nothing is actually impossible (apart from a few things) for many people.

Don't bother yourself don't what you were told. You may not find one and in your quest you may get scammed of valuable money as these games with inside information is mostly expensive and rare.

Being a big bettor doesn't guarantee success, some big bettors got addicted and went into financial crisis so whatever could happen to the average bettor is still applicable to the big bettor.

Some big guys get inside information about fixed matches and all that but the scam of them are more rampant than genuine ones, here I'll advise you to continue gambling moderately and have your fun, that's what I do now and I'm fine

From what I understood, your post refers to privileged information. People who have access to athletes or to some kind of fraud or corruption inside betting. I believe that this type of person is not easy to come across, especially for regular people. Maybe only if someone is a family member or very close.

There’s also an important point: wealthy people don’t put their money at risk randomly. They don’t play to lose. They only place bets when they are highly confident they can win. And it’s very hard to know where a wealthy person is betting, since casinos and betting platforms don’t make that information public. Unless the person decides to share it, no one will know.

Whoever says that clearly isn’t a real winner. Why focus only on big bets when a good gambler can still win through solid game analysis? Sure, betting big might show confidence in your pick, but what really matters isn’t confidence it’s your record. If someone claims their picks usually win, then they should be able to show the results to back it up.

Big bettors usually have a more mature strategy and analysis before placing a bet, they don't bet carelessly, especially in large amounts, without being supported by confidence or other things that make them enthusiastic. It's not true that they never lose, but they tend to have a greater success rate because they have more complex strategies and analysis.

I also believe that gambling is not about how much you can afford to bet, but also requires a deeper approach and mature knowledge. There is nothing wrong with wanting to follow the bets of people who often bet large amounts, but it is important to note that there is no guarantee that you will win in gambling.

It sound ridiculous to me too but someone believes in this, very much like they have some proof about it, I told him that rigged games and cheating are still happening in betting and gambling anyway.

Casinos runs unrealistic promotions with influencers, although it is not all casinos that do this but some believe this is the only way to attract many more people to their casino.

I also still believe that sports games can be rigged too but I believe that such change of event will all be for loads of money not 500k bet or a million dollars bet, horse racing became less attractive to many people because of this.

the edge they have is not necessarily because they have better analyst than the average bettor. what is the case in most instance is always that they have enough funds that can go round and that can be used to try out multiple of bets which increases their chance of winning than an average person that can only make his prediction with the little he has and so, he might even over calculate just because he is trying to avoid losing his bet by any means possible. in terms of luck and winning potential, everyone has equal luck, what is the only difference is that with an higher wagering amount, it is easier to win more.

I think yes, if you bet carelessly but in large amounts, you are prepared to lose, you place big bets, of course you have mastered everything related to that sport.

Yes, the facts on the ground that I know of course they have accurate data, the point is only for those who are close to certain individuals, not all of them are a 1/10 comparison.

Of course, that's if they do, automatically multiply a lot more than gamblers who bet little by little.

I don't know but I'm sure they'll be very careful with their bets not just randomly.

Not sure --- but big bettors usually have more accurate information, especially from insiders.

Yep, if they bet a large amount then they win more, right?
What is certain is that we cannot compare this matter.

It may not be entirely true, I have seen big bettors lose just like us the average bettors. Having a bigger money doesn't guarantee you that you have more advantage of getting accurate games to bet on unless you are working with someone in the field and you are getting correct information from them that you can even bet your life on and this can only be possible when fraud is also involved. Having so much confidence as a bettor only means that someone is communicating with an athlete that is involved in the game and you are sure that they would definitely manipulate the game in your favor, and no having bigger money doesn't mean having bigger sense or cautiousness.

Big bettors place big bets and small bets, it depends on their choice.

Analysts and all that, whatever they keep end of the day it does not matter. Those who are going to be lucky they will win and others will lose.

The capital amount does matter in the bet, a big capital means a big win or a big loss incoming as well. Beyond this I dont think there are going be any other options.

Ultimately your luck matters even in an EV+ game, if you are not lucky you will be the loser.

I think that you have already answered all of your questions. You've got an idea on how these big gamblers do, and they're not just gambling to have fun but they're in it for the serious money and wins that they can get. That's why these gamblers have a serious way of taking their bets before doing it, they are analyzing and making sure that they're able to put up the data that they have gathered together before verifying the bets that they have made. If you know someone that you can follow and they've got a good accuracy of winning, why not?

What kind of data analyst will tell you the exact outcome of a game? I don't think they exist except in fiction and this isn't fiction this is reality as big bettors lose as much as if not more since they are betting more than the regular guys, if such a system actually existed where they will always win then the betting companies would already be bankrupt by now because the bigger your stake the bigger your payout and if I win all my 6 figure bets than my winnings would be of the charts and that isn't something that happens in real day to day betting.

First of all, people who bet big don't necessarily mean they are rich, there are lot of irresponsible guys out there who simply make a big wager because they thought they were winning, and sometimes they place the wager with no money, and loansharks will come and collect them later in their style. :D

And it could be true that the analyst part, they can afford to have a dedicated analyst and pay a salary only for that job, but I never heard anyone doing that...

I don't know if the previous analysis is useful for gambling in any other field than sports betting, but I have a lot of confusion about it. What if the casino locks in online betting are arranged in such a way that the managers can win or lose anyone at will and if all these people have contact with those who make big bets?
But I would say that the big bets of high-income people are as big as the small bets of low-income people are.

Who said that? is it your friend who're in the same boat like you (average bettor) ? or is it from a person who become rich through gambling?

So many people act like they know a lot thing when they're not even reach on that level, how do we can trust their words when they're not the one like what they told? saying the big bettors have better analysis and bet size will increase the chance to win is totally bullshit.

Not all big bettors get rich through gambling.

I think that rich people lose in gambling as much as poor people, if it's true that rich people have some high level strategy of winning all the time they will make many bet sites to go bankrupt. I always have the believe that casinos get richer through the loses of big players than many poor gamblers that uses insignificant amounts to place bets. I don't think that anybody can get an accurate statistics whether what the OP said is a fact or not, if there are such big bettors that have ways of knowing accurate predictions they will not share it with the public, infact nobody will know that they have a strategy of winning very big.

Yes, they are use to research before place a bet on a particular game, because they don't just bet for what will make them to loose more than other people. They always place their bet on some games they understand very well, and even though the game is going to cut it will not be all the games bettors predicted, because the experience to make their winning greater than losing is there for the bettors to apply.

Not all bettors use big amount of money to bet, and not the amount of money you use to bet that will make you win big from gambling, because there are some people that is using small amount of money to bet and they are making it more than some bettors using big amount of money to bet.

In my opinion, I think this huge bettors are surely ready for a huge bet so they probably waiting just for the right bet where they really think that it is surely going to win. But surely not all of them because there are a lot of people gambling here in my country, I mean like politicians, mostly corrupt official, where they gamble gamble doesnt really came from them, I really doubt that they have some kind of analysis to win a bet, they mostly think that they are going to multiply there money on gambling, Probably they also win huge on gambling since most gambling website would like to get a deal with this kind of people putting some kind of VIP treatment on this people.

But still you're not sure, if this are actual analysis and you could see the percentage of winning on their account is very high I would probably give it a shot if follow their bet as well, but I really doubt that, I mean you dont just dont the actual data of there loses, we often heard a story of rich people that is successful to being poor because of gambling losing everything and getting drown from depth. So for sure they were just getting greedy most of the time why they lose a lot of money, they werent responsible at all.

One tactic big bettors use is to choose maybe just one or not more than three games, if it concerns sports betting, and place a huge amount on it.
Am sure they also use big amounts too when they play some casino games online with sheer focus.

Whereas some of the small bettors would pick more games and place a small amount because of the greed of winning millions overnight.
Bookmakers are not stupid and when they see your account balance they know how to deal with you accordingly.

Smart, affluent people who manage their money, meaning everything must be controlled and organized, and maximized, is very different from being interested in gambling and mostly hoping to profit from the game.

I'm interested in copy trading. If we follow someone who is classy and experienced, the risk of loss is minimal, but it's difficult to find someone who is truly professional and works when we want. What's wrong with trying even though we don't have an accurate guarantee of winning and there are even losses and that can be seen factually from the history of the game.

I don't know whether wealthy gamblers who bet heavily have sources that provide them with betting information. They bet large amounts, of course, being more careful in placing bets. The chances of winning remain the same as ordinary gamblers, but we don't know about the sources they follow. We cannot rule out the possibility of people getting special information before placing bets. But the accuracy, we never know. How would you find people like that?

Unless the big better is not working with the casino whereby he win and showcase it in social media then he's a lucky gambler. Why I said this is actually because some rich gamblers that spend a lot of money can be working with the casino but we might not know. A lot of rich gamblers also lose their bets because it's just about luck. The same way some low gamblers win and lose their bets, it's also the same way rich gamblers win and lose their bets too.

If I get your point what you mean is that they don't bet anyhow without reliable and proper data analysis? Well I will say most times they don't even need to have too many data analysis but could just bet with a single match with 2 odd and stake high.

I am not sure because gambling prediction is not a guarantee that you must win, but somehow they have a data analysis that could be helpful, which will draw closer to winning than prediction made by random person. This is why they rely and  register for some vip tipstar to get updates but I doubt if those tipstar are really accurate like that.

It all depends on luck, somedays they win and some days they lose, the interesting part is that they lose huge amount at ago since they are gambling with huge amount. They also win huge when they bet with big amount, but plus or minus their loses will eventually be higher than win, but one big win will look like they never lose.

All what I can tell you for free is that they lose and win like the normal people and like I said their loses are also huge but people only focus more on their win and neglect their loses, It's just vise versa.

The chances of winning are much greater because wealthy players bet with larger amounts of capital, allowing them to play longer than those with limited funds. However, this also depends on the individual character of each player. If they can't control the game, they will consistently make mistakes in every decision they make.

If they dont just place bet what do they do? They place bet like regular bettor and what influences their game is no difference from that of regular bettor.
What do you mean by stronger data analysts? As long as there is no insider or manipulation in the game, I will rate every analyst equally which is "5 out of 10", the remaining 5 is for luck.
Highroller win more than regular small bettor because they stake high with lesser odd. Meaning they take risk with high stake amount. You cant compare them to someone who takes high risk.

Like you said, "I was told", unless that person has undeniable evidence that big bettors/rich people have reliable sources, chances of losing are lower, wins more than someone with a small amount of money, etc... then sure, but if not, then they are just making an assumption. Also, there are a lot of rich people who lose to gambling, copying their bets will not guarantee that you will win more than you lose.

I confess I didn't understand what you want to know, but I suppose you want to ask if big bettors analyze games before placing bets or not. The answer is that they do analyze before placing bets.


I confess I've never heard of that.


I confess I've never heard of that.


Everyone who bets on sports loses money, but in the case of the wealthy, they rarely go bankrupt because of gambling; they have money every day. If they lose today, tomorrow the profits from their businesses cover today's loss.


Don't follow anyone. Just focus on learning how to analyze games on your own and place your bets for fun, putting in small amounts that you can afford to lose.

Most of this big bettors don’t even have time for analysis, they have the money already, so they can’t be stressing themselves. They pay people that will do analysis, so what they just do is to place bet after analysis has been done by people which they pay.

People who gamble with big amount of money might not really be picking big odds in their bet, most of them pick little odds, and they will decide to gamble with big amount of money. Most people that gamble with small amounts are always going for big odds, and the chances of them winning is less.

If you are going for higher odds, then the chances of you winning will be less, but if you are using lower odds, then the chances of you winning will be high.

I don't think this is exclusive to rich gamblers; anyone can do it if they have the means to access or find a reliable source. Gamblers are gamblers; they will find a way to win. Average gamblers are not different from rich gamblers when it comes to finding a source on how they can win.

There's no exclusivity in gambling; winning is not for rich people. You didn't mention your sources' reputations or how good his advice is, but there's also a risk in doing that.

I believe this is half true half false since I knew a lot of big bettor that plays dumb. They just have a huge bankroll because of their rich status when born but they play like a normal gambler with just higher bet amount.

There’s big bettor that bet smart too since they climb from small to high bankroll through hardship so we can’t generalize that big bettor as smart bettor/dumb bettor.

It’s always a case to case basis.

Well, they probably do but what we could also do is speculate on these things because we don't have much of an insider's info. If they do then it's probably they're just doing what it's like to have sound gambling. I think if I also have the money I'd better have some source of good and reliable information to make my odds way more preferable than it was, it's still gambling but more smart.

In the end, we all want to win. The difficult thing to do is finding them these days as they're probably rare and probably have a close circle or they wouldn't even bother to be on the spotlight. Being cautious on your bets isn't bad and if they can pay for it and could afford to do so then it's on them. It was also our thing especially if we research more on what we tend to be a valuable bet, what's them is that they got manpower and more trusted and reliable sources.

If they don't place bets, how can they be big bettors at first place?

What difference would it make to have data analysts working for them since long term performance in gambling can't be determined on gambler's favour? Data analysts can do nothing to overcome casinos' house edge.

No, unless they have access to privileged odds, what I think isn't feasible for the casinos to offer. Rich gamblers lose like everyone else, but in higher proportions, taking into consideration they must place larger bets.

Yeah it's true that big bettors don't place bet bro, and they also have people who analyse games for them before they stake on those games, so they don't just risks fund's for risking sake, or just like that, they are always assured that the game will play as predicted before they finally stake money on those games, and I can remember back then when I was a manager in a gambling office, there is always this big bettors who normally come to my office to gamble, and what they always play is draw, and they stake heavily on those draws, and after they have finished staking heavy on those games you will hear them saying this like, this matches was fixed to play draws according the source of those games, and most times we see those game playing as predicted draws.

Yes I think there's some truth to that. Why would they risk large sums of money if they're betting haphazardly? Surely they're aiming for victory, right? Similarly, with data analysis, I personally wouldn't rule out the possibility that they might have some assistance from competent individuals, after all they have the resources, but in terms of win rates, they'd probably end up with the same results as us, which means they might also experience more losses in the long run, the only difference might be that they'd be much more cautious.

yes big bettors do not only rely on luck like a normal gambler, they usually treat betting like a business operating with informational and analytical edge that reduces their chances of losing, And yes they don't just place bets, they make comprehensive data analysis and proper risk management, And they don't do it all by their selves they do employ analysts and data scientist to handle these for them.

With this you should totally expect these individuals to have much more profits than normal gamblers. Normal gamblers rely on luck and are generally expected to lose money because of the built in house edge of casinos

Usually big money is a synonym for smart money, but that usually applies to investments, stocks and cryptocurrency. When comes to gambling I don't think it is reliable to follow the movements of big bettors in order to seek for advantage.

It could only be applied to match fixing in small leagues, but those matches do not have markets in popular bookies on the internet.
I would advice you not to follow big bettors in order to get advantage over other gamblers, it is better you go through your own analysis before risking your money.

The key word in this is big bettors.  What does big bettors have that small bettor are struggling to have?  It is fund yes?  If a bettor have the money, he can hire analyst to check the information of matches for them.  Create a possible simulation on the given data and see the result and check it multiple times.  With this money big bettors can have a better data analysis, have fight simulation tests and can bet on the result of the team data tests.

This can give big bettors a higher chance of winning because they have team of people who are professional on analyzing match data.  I guess this answer the question why big bettor have a higher chance of winning.  It is not an absolute or sure win but at least they make use of their money to provide them a good chunk of information, better than any small bettors.

On these two, I don’t find it to have any truth in it.
I don’t think or don’t find it to come with good reasons that there are gamblers who employ the services of data analysts to look up available data on fixtures just to come up with predictions.
This is what you could do for yourself as a gambler and every needed data on any fixture is available on the web. You just need to know where to look.

Big risks, big wins and also big losses.

There’s a lot of stories about gambling addiction that user lose a huge funds through excessive gambling and it proves that theory correct that big bettors on gambling is not always a smart money.

Gambler can spend even their life savings for gambling when they are already addicted that usually end up to a huge devastating loss.

It’s very hard to use the word smart on betting since there’s always risk involved no matter how good he is on sports analysis.

I can only answer: maybe. It’s true that some of the big bettors might have an data analysts, matched statistics, or even information that a normal player would never have in his/her lifetime. This makes sense because they are actually emit huge amounts of money and would like to exist in a lesser risk environment, but in a more professional and calculated manner. I do not think there is anyone who would put such huge sums of money at stake without any form of strong research or even analysis backing him.

Nevertheless, it is not all-inclusive when it comes to the aspect of winning. data from information sources may be unerring, but the outcome of such engagement will be speculative. Suchlike big roles are attributed to luck, to emerge triumphantly. Even the reputed professional gamblers “win all the time” have experienced great losses. Said in another way, although the big money makes you that much more strategic and cautious, the final result will be entirely unpredictable. At its core, therefore, it is a matter of chance- a matter of game playing that can never fully be tamed by logic and data.

Well, Drake is a big bettor and he loses like crazy. His losses make headlines that goes to see that. Despite being a big bettor, he’s not a smart one. He uses all of all these things that you have listed out.

As far as I know, I don't know if what you said is correct and I haven't found such people yet. I have found people who have lost even after being rich and betting big. Sometimes in the news, people who have lost big bets and become completely destitute. So gambling is equally risky for everyone, not less risky for someone. The risk that a person will take when betting with a small amount of money, a rich person will take the same risk when betting with a large amount of money because they are sure to lose their money at any time. So I want to tell you to stop thinking like this and think of gambling as just a means of entertainment and gamble for fun with a small amount of money because gambling is not the best way to earn money.

It could also be true for small bettors like the most of us here. We analyze the data we have before placing.


It's hard to answer this, so maybe they have someone working for them. Or they are the only one looking at all the data, again like a usual bettor.


For sports betting this might be true, but still though when you have all this data, it might just confused you. What I'm saying is that maybe the best strategy is that you didn't have to be a statistical genius to place your bet. Even if you're a big whale, a simple ML bet or a handicap bet will do without much of looking at the statistics.

There's something you should understand about a rich man's gambling, and this is it: you should understand that when a rich man loses a fortune, it's painful, but because he has backup plans, it can be hidden.
In fact, they are not ready for our pity, so it doesn't matter, most of them keep it to them self. I'm not objecting to this question, it can be reality, but there are levels to how they react to it.
I know a man who always comes in with a prediction, and he always gets the win, but sometimes when he loses, he will just tear his slip and walk away. You can see his mood, but he will only relate to this calibre, not make noise of it. They go for better analysis too, and some buy what they call a 'sure bet', even though it's not every time sure, but most times they win. And sometimes, don't be surprised if it's just luck because they won't tell you about their unlucky days. It's the desperation of winning the jackpot that affects more gamblers, that's why it's advisable not to expect too much from it. Another is, you want a jackpot; you want it huge. How much do you think this man stakes compared to yours? Most of them pick just a few games and use huge money to get what they want.

This may be true, but it is completely unfounded. Having more money does not mean that you will win at gambling. Elon Musk's wealth would have increased several times over. How skillfully and wisely you gamble has some impact on winning, and most importantly, you have to be lucky. If you are not lucky, then you are definitely going to lose, in which case your money will not be worth it. Winning at gambling may require luck and statistical analysis, more money does not play any role.

These are always theories. When gambling and betting are involved, a whole host of theories automatically arise. Unfortunately, corruption exists in most sports. Recently, the Football Federation in my country announced that many referees were unfortunately registered on gambling sites. I don't think this is the case in just one country, I'm sure there are many similar ones. Unless proven, some things remain in the air, simply in theory.

I don't know about that but I believe that is possible. Those rich people can hide themselves from people so they can place big bets without worry. They have sources that help them to select the team so they don't just place a bet on random. Once they win, their winnings will be bigger than others. They place big bets so their win will also be big. That is normal and can not be compared to others. You will not find them easily because I think they are hiding themselves from the public.

Before placing a big bet, the bettor must make all arrangements to reduce the risk using information, data analysis, software and wants to put himself in the position of winning. In this case, even if the chances of winning are high, the winning streak will not be the same. If that were the case, the world's billionaires would have abandoned all their other activities or worked hard to become involved in betting only. If you can win a big bet, there is a possibility of profit as well as a huge amount of loss.

Its all about who you test I suppose, when you get that big I feel like the platform may even pay that person (not saying that Stake is doing that) but we can't rule out the possibility that perhaps they even have some of these influencers paid off to place off bets for the purpose of raking in more dough. Not a proven theory or anything again this is just my guy speaking here. Drake is a great example to use though, he has famously lost huge bets!

My dear, the word "gamble" is a respected of no man, no matter your financial capability it doesn't treat any set of persons special then the other, when it wants to hit you hard not even your money or your big stakes can save you. As a matter of facts, big bet that worth millions of dollars has failed like wise little bet as well, so it's not mandatory or a most that  gambling success is one sided or based on your big stakes no, it's up and down is for the both sides, the big stakes and also the small stakes is just depends on how lucky you are.