Bitcoin Forum

The mindset of be coming rich overnight will not allow ourselves see that there are a better opportunity to win if not everyday but every week if we eventually single our games than accumulating so many games in one stake, and i noticed that the poor Masses are the one staking so many games just to win millions in a ticket and while the rich men will just be interested in a single game that he can put money and he will eaten as much he can single, while to is fews ones that has making through so much accumulating of games, so there are so many risky in accumulating many games than a single game, we should reduce the ambition of winning big money from gambling but constantly winning with singles.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1234109.0
You can see dozens of bets that I have placed in the last years.
It has been somewhat easy to bet and play SINGLE EVENTS and rarely (less than 5%) trying for few muliple bets.
Jackpots, multipliers, bonus ... all of these are designed to let people have the taste of the dream for making money and nothing more than a dream... ::)

That's exactly right, although most people place combination bets for what you said, for money, since many bet for it, while those who bet for fun aren't interested in betting on a single match either, since money isn't an important factor for them. But those who bet looking for money sometimes go overboard with the combinations, making their bet incredibly improbable, but I doubt that even so the system will allow them to win "millions", since this type of bet has a limit depending on the amount you bet.

Accumulated games are not risky unless you use high amount of money for it. I can decide to use $1 for accumulated games instead of using $5 for a single game. If I lose the accumulated bet, $1 is nothing to me.

Single bets also have their own advantage which is what you posted but accumulated bets have their own advantages and one of them is using lower amount of money to bet.

That’s right, it’s not really risky if you’re only betting money you’re okay throwing away. Parlays already have a much lower chance of winning, so being conservative with them just makes sense. For me, I could even do $1 per parlay, but I’m a bit ambitious. I usually cap it at $2 per parlay per day. I like going for around x1000 odds, so if it ever hits, that’s $2000, and honestly I’d already be very satisfied with that.

You will find more poor persons staking on a lot of games because of the amount they are betting with. A small amount, but their ambitions are huge so they stake on a lot of games. Rich people bet with better amounts and have no need for playing with a lot of money. For poor people who have big ambitions, there is greed there, but it is more of desire I am thinking, but for rich people who already have and are trying to still place multiple bets with the big money they use in gambling, that looks like more of greed and less of desire.

Poor people are making a lot of picks because they want to get rich from gambling by winning big which has happened to some gamblers, but the rich are making a lot of picks because they want more which is almost like greed completely.

You are right in distinguishing between gambler who hopes to be lucky and investor with smart system. Most common trap people fall into is idea of stacking much of games on single ticket to win millions and this is risky since mathematics of it all is that more games you add to your ticket lower your chances of winning.

Although these big tickets are seen by many as means of getting out of poverty, they tend to lose money since chances are very small. Conversely, rich or intelligent players use single bets as it is simpler to predict single outcome and therefore player can win smaller sums each week as opposed to losing daily.

You can make gambling disciplined risk management system that brings more money in long term by reducing desire to get rich quick and focusing on researched single games.

Do not think that you want to get rich in gambling, this is just a hallucination that there is even continuing to chase losses and eventually you run out of money.

Yeah I know low stakes have low risk but little return... unless you take the same risk for example the odds above 2.50 are still high, the potential for losing is also large.

While this combination or parlay bet is actually just a thrill by chasing high accumulation odds, it is clear that the risk is big but don't have too many matches in the parlay bet for me just 2-3 rather than 10 more then it is difficult to win.

Sometimes I make some “crazy” bets like that

For example, I'll put eight games in a multiple bet, but I'll bet a low amount, like just $1
And it's just for fun, without expecting much

Sometimes it can work out, hehehe

It's nice to do with bonus too

A gamblers betting strategy has nothing to do with if they are rich or poor in my own opinion, because I believe it is how one understands and has learnt how to gamble, that they do so.
Single bets with huge bets could definitely offer better rewards, but I doubt multiple bets all come up to potential millions when a gambler chooses more than one games but with little odds.

Odd difference is what makes some multiple bets selection more believe and realistic that others as compared to single bets and even with single bets, one has to be sure when picking the odds so that their huge bet would either amount to a substantial winning potential rather than just a few cents in the bets they placed.
It's all logic and availability of funds one can afford to lose that matters more.

For obvious reasons, a single bet is simpler to play, just as the winnings are also lower.
In life, those who don't laugh don't laugh. I believe that individual bets should be made, but risking multiple bets clearly results in more satisfaction in terms of financial winnings than in terms of adrenaline while waiting to play the last game of a multiple bet.
In all of 2025, I haven't made any big wins, but I'm not losing either. I can say I've only gambled for small profits that have allowed me to gamble again without using any more money.

It seems that you are comparing the single bet vs betting on multiple games to try your luck, and you also compared both poor and rich.
Take note, there are some poor people who bet one time or in a single bet, and there are also rich people who bet in multiple games to try their luck. So don't compare them on how they gamble.

My father is always betting on the lottery; for him it is a habit to bet, and sometimes he wins huge with less risk, but he is able to win compared to people who try their luck on multiple games, but even though they had many chances, they still end up losing much compared to those people who bet on the lottery as a habit.

Anyway, it depends on what you're looking for when you bet. In my case, I love dreaming and that's why I don't care the risk of multibets, even when I know that it is almost impossible to win. Or very improbable bets on single games that won't change your life, but make the experience more thrilling while not spending too much, and yet opt for a decent prize.

Almost impossible to win? There can be two matches accumulated bets and there can be  three matches in accumulated bets. I have won 2 and 3 matches in accumulated bets several times before. The higher the matches, the less likely to win the accumulated bet. So it depends on what you bet on and how long the number of matches are.

Assuming you're talking about parlay bets.  I disagree quite a bit actually.  Parlays allow the bettor to structure the bet so that easy wins come early and if they begin to lose one of their bets they can cash out and still make a profit.  With individual bets, it is hard to come out ahead once things start going bad.

From a risk management perspective, spreading your bets across multiple games is safer than putting all your money on one.

Wealthy individuals can afford a large loss so they risk a single, huge bet because they believe a big win will offset the potential loss.
Poor people or ordinary people, pursue the dream of becoming "millionaires" by piling small bets across several games because they cannot risk all their money on one game.

Single bets are for bigger stakes, unless the odd is huge. Unlike parlays, the total selected odds define how big our potential payout will be, also with the amount staked on.

When it comes to dealing with mitigating risk, I also think single bets are less risky. You only need one outcome for you to either win or lose.

Ohh, I agree with that. The only problem is the budget. If you have a low budget, it will take a long time before you even feel the profits of betting on single games, only with a high chance of winning. The rich are using that method because they do have the money. If they bet 100k USD at @1.3 odds, they will get 30k more. While the poor one will get only $0.3 in a $1 bet.
That is the reason why a gambler with a low budget will probably just choose to make a long parlay and have a chance for that jackpot. The high multiplier combo that might change his life. It's a shot to the moon, but it can definitely be profitable if done right.

The chances of winning single betting is quite high compared to accumulated games but single bet has its disadvantages and one of them is the fact that you need to stake high because the odds are mostly of low values. I don't bet on single games  because I don't stake high amounts of money. The higher the amount of money that you stake with the higher the risks involved so I rather go for accumulated games

Single bet is not with lesser risk rather there's a high chance of winning if you're going with that method. To me I would say that single bet is even more risky than multiple bet, because in single bet you need to stake high to enable you achieve something bigger and this can probably make you go with the whole of your bankroll and if you're not lucky to win from your first attempt then you will still have to fund your bankroll. While multiple bet allows you to achieve that certain amount you wish to achieve with a smaller stake, and this would make your bankroll to last for a longer period.

Combination bets make it almost impossible to win. I don’t really combines more than 2 bets most of the time. Single bet works better for me. It is also quite tiring to wait for the ending of all those games. When it is one game, it is much easier to track the bet result. I used to make combo bets when I was much younger but I lost my interest over time. I lost my greed too I think. Nowadays I am playing for fun mostly and it doesn’t make me much of a difference if i make a bet on one game or five of them combined. Either way I get the same fun but single bet is much faster. That way I have more time to accomplish more important stuff too instead of tracking my bets for hours.

Of course, there's so much more risk in taking games than just staying to one or a couple of them. Because the amount that you'd be risking isn't that much too.

Winning constant is ideal but we can't do that often.

Gambling is a game of chances and you'll not know when you'll be consistent but if it comes, then stay on it. But not to break the bubble, one should also expect that it might not happen often.

Well it might be true that single bet looks less Risker than an cumulated games but that doesn't mean that Single bet is sure than accumulated game. Both are risky. Sometimes single bet win and sometimes it lose. Likewise accumulator games win and lose. All are just based on luck. Sometimes rich guys also bet huge amount on single bet and lose at once and no body is talking about that.  In fact no game is sure no matter how simple it looks because you might be betting and hoping to win because it looks simple but you end up losing more than win.

I agree to all you said but saying that only the poor compiles too many games in the slip all because to make it bigly. Although I agree with you that the essence of picking too many of games to bet on a single slip is to increase their returns if they wins but does that real matter? I am think we shoul accept it as their personal betting strategies which may be about financial management.
I don't know if you're aware that those that bets on single games on single slips bets stakes higher still to increase their returns since the odds as low? So about them, who do we give the remark as a responsible gambler? I also think being proud of being a rich gambler is an attribute of lack of financial managements because While betting in the long term we're also liable to loose higher. We all just bets according to affordable risks.

Isn't it obvious from the start. single bet will have lower risk and better odds because it's just about our predictions being right or wrong where the ratio can be 50:50 here will be very much different from betting on multi bets where the risk is the more bets entered for multi then the greater the risk.

But in this case the risk is proportional to the result because the risk is large then the return when winning is also greater and we know that the more bets we enter in multi then the odds we have will be much greater so in this case some gamblers including me still like multi bets even though the risk is higher.

If you are betting that way, then you are reducing your risk and also increasing the amount of time which you could use the money you budget. This is one thing many don't understand.

All games carry almost equal risk. We just have to go for the one that will favour us the most or based on what you target just like some people have targeted potential amount for winning.

My recent experiment between single bets and multiple games bet selections have pointed out that what you said is the truth about betting and any bet is as risky as the other which is why we need to apply caution and use minimal amount to bet of any bet since we have the same tendency of losing, so the amount in bet is what determines the difference in the two form of bets selections,  sport betting can be risky sometimes since one can easily get carried away to stake high amount based on the confidence that they build via they information on the various teams, so financial control is very important to stay at safe zone.

Using a well computed betting strategy provides us with a chance to survive longer when there is a stiff competition. I know you have learnt the importance of budgeting so as to lengthen your bankroll after every playing session. The next step will be to select a sensible win goal to prevent a total loss because of unreasonable greed. To be able to control the most profitable game spaces is to be on schedule and be on the personal financial stability line.

What you said makes perfect sense. Many people want to get rich quick and end up betting on several games at the same time, greatly increasing the risk of losing everything. Focusing on smaller, conscious bets really helps control losses and makes gambling safer, less stressful, and even more fun. In the end, the key is not to let the ambition to win big interfere with control and enjoyment.

Because balance leads to awareness.

It depends on the preference of gambler on how they want to enjoy gambling. Low bankroll players usually preferred to bet on huge odds with small stake since that’s the only affordable bet for them to win huge amount out of small stake.

However, not all low bankroll players play like this some just want to play safe and bet steady with small amount on small odds game.

Which is why I said it’s based on player preference on how they will enjoy gambling.

This is all about our various choices when gambling, some like to play a single bet, while in other cases, some gamblers will prefer playing parlay, but when we look at the conditions that surrounds either of the decisions to play, we could deduce that the risk involved is one thing we must first consider together with the amount we are going to stake, which the chances of losing is almost the same regardless of which option we choose to play.

I have tried both and I must say that it is better to play single betting but if you are going to be able to withstand the hurdles that comes with this you should have enough money to spare because single betting is better when you stake valuable amounts of money to get high value profits. Winning accumulated bets is difficult and can be very frustrating because it is rare to win huge odds with small amounts

You have a point with single betting and that is what most gamblers that I know are betting and winning from. It is easier to focuse on few games or even one game at a time than cluster of games just because you want to take the advantage of accumulation of games and the bonus but at the end of it, one of them or two will not be successful and you start regretting. I prefer single games no doubt.

However, you have to put the words in your post very well so that people can make coherent sense from what you are saying.

Actually in this case for those people whose economic quality is below average they are not too much in spending money (if calculated nominally) but they often do it because it is not uncommon for them to continue playing when they have money that they can bet in the hope that they can get better returns to support their lives.

On the other hand adrenaline becomes a differentiating situation in this case because sometimes multi bets have more adrenaline that makes us sometimes more motivated than single bets even though the main reason is obviously back to money because in the end multi bets will be much more profitable than single bets.
But is that wrong? Of course not because every gambler must know the risks and when they are in multi which does provide a much greater return but the risks that will be faced are also clearly greater than single.

Singles are definitely safer, but I don’t think it’s only rich vs poor thinking it’s more about mindset and patience many people know accumulators are risky and still play them because they chase that lucky hit if someone wants steady results, singles make more sense

Our passion to find a quick way out of dismal financial situations is evidenced by the decision to make numerous profits by numerous bets. I believe that the massive heartbeat of being exposed to high risks is what makes this activity have more life. You demonstrate that every people always has their own calculations in calculating the boundaries of courage which it is ready to go in the name of its future. To the extent as we know of the possible rewards and losses, that course is a life choice.

Most gamblers don’t involve themselves in our single game, most of them do pick multiple games in their bet so that your odds is going to me much, and your potential win is going to be much also. Most people do believe in high odds, because they know that’s when they going to high jackpot, but they don’t know the risk involved in it.

As a gambler we are not suppose to be so greedy, it’s better to win small than not to win at all, the odds in single bet might just be smaller than that of multiple bet, but if you the way people lose in multiple bets, it’s just better to go for little odds and win often.

While I strongly agree that it's a wrong mindset to pursue richness through gambling, the other way isn't necessarily to just place a bet on a single game. It's always up to your analysis. If you're confident of a number of bets, the option is always there to bundle them together in a multi-bet. That isn't necessarily irresponsible. If you think one match is considerably riskier than the rest, then you can remove it and bet on it separately. In the end, it's always your analysis that matters. And being responsible to your bankroll, too.

Yes, that is a fact... single bets have less variance than accumulators bets, less risk and are better suited for players with a more conservative betting style.

Bookmakers know this, and that is why they calculate the odds of accumulator bets by multiplying them as more bets is accumulated. This encourages players... the prize increases exponentially, but very few people actually win. Sites much prefer bettors to make parlays rather than individual bets.

I prefer to maintain consistency and bankroll discipline... risking small amounts per bet (1% to 5%).

I prefer to accept that slow growth is better than the possibility and risks of getting rich overnight... accumulator bets are good for those who want more entertainment without worrying about expenses, but for those who aim to "survive" for longer, single bets are always preferable.

That’s right, this is the same as trading in crypto. In gambling psychology, emotional control is something that must be mastered because it directly relates to the assets being played. What you said about many people playing to make a lot of money but instead losing money is true. They play without strategy, preparation, or mental discipline—only hoping to win and get rich. In gambling, that is not enough.

Some people including me preferred accumulated games rather than single betting games, my own reason is that most odds that I placed bet with are low and I don't want to take risk with low odds so what I do is I accumulate 3-4 games with the same odds and in that way, I feel my bets are worth it with accumulated low odds than normal single bets. However, the only cons here is that we all know that even with low odds, the chances of losing is high and sometimes what I do is do a system betting, in that way I won't be able to lose even if 1 of my bets failed.

Already right from time single bet is my favorite. Honestly, single bets has a big chance of winning than multiple bets because is always one story or another all the time due to much acculturation to become rich overnight, and it's obvious that the poor are the ones surfing this because they always want to beat the casino all the time knowing fully well that multiple bets has the highest risk in gambling. It's very essential to always bet on few games because there's no how you can compare them together, the difference is pretty clear that's why the rich normally bet single.

The poor only have small funds, so if they bet on single bets with odds that are not too high, the results are very small, which may be the reason for small gamblers to multibet, while high rollers with large funds can already make thousands of dollars at average odds.
However, I am not sure that small gamblers bet on multibets with many legs because they want to get rich overnight because in gambling it is very possible to get rich overnight when winning the lottery or jackpot.

It is the get rich fast syndrome that is disturbing them and it is common amongst the lower and middle class folks. They enjoyed accumulating many games on a bet with small amounts of money, hoping to hit the jackpot some day. Just imagine some betting games with #100 staked amount hoping to win #10,000,000.

In confirmation to your post, yesterday while I was at my leisure period watching home movies a close neighbour came and asked me to help checking his games he played in one of our local betting site called bet9ja. So I brought out my phone and requested for the tickets and he brought out five different tickets with each #500 staked amount. When I started entering the coupons code I looked at the numbers of games on each slip and I observed that each slip was containing not less than 27 games, some he played cut 2. I smile because I possibly knows the out come. After checking all his games lo and behold they were all lost and I showed it to him, his reaction was very pitiful.

Nothing much I can do to help him get rid of his lost than to advise him. So I started advising him to reduce the numbers of games on his slips at least not exceeding 5. And also he should try and increase his staking amount while hoping for a potential winning.

Even with your single games, there is vividly no guarantee you will win it. Winning constantly is only an illusion, don't fall for it.

Talking about risks, in gambling the risks are loosing a large sum of money that ordinarily you cannot afford to loose and a gambler is more exposed to such risks if he is single betting since he might use higher stakes for a single match to get a tangible profit, if he looses these bets more often, then he loses a considerable amount within a short while.