|
Title: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: dogeforlife on April 09, 2014, 08:07:48 PM Please post any coins that I am missing to this thread so that I can update this list.
These are the development teams and their coins that have responded to the Heartbleed bug identified and publicized yesterday, April 8, 2014. I am using this as an example to evidence the coins with active and attentive developers. Coin / Date of Fix 1. DOGE / 4.9.14 2. Bitcoin / 4.9.14 3. Quark / 4.9.14 4. Cryptogenic Bullion / 4.9.14 5. Vertcoin / 4.9.14 6. Hobonickels / 4.9.14 7. Zetacoin / 4.9.14 8. HongKongCoin / 4.9.14 9. CommunityCoin / 4.9.14 10. Cryptographic Anomaly / 4.8.14 11. YACC / 4.9.14 12. Mint / 4.9.14 13. Reddcoin / 4.9.14 14. ECC / 4.9.14 15. Noblecoin / 4.9.14 16. PND / 4.8.14 17. Litecoin / 4.8.14 18. BTQ / 4.9.14 19. DRK / 4.9.14 20. YAC / 4.8.14 21. BlackCoin / 4.9.14 22. RSC / 4.10.14 23. PDR / 4.10.14 24. GPUC / 4.10.14 25. LKY / 4.10.14 26. GoldCoin / 4.10.14 27. QBC / 4.10.14 28. Infinitecoin / 4.10.14 29. Myriadcoin / 4.10.14 30. beecoin / 4.10/14 31. Cloudcoin / 4.10.14 32. Offerings to Cthulhu / 4.9.14 33. Worldcoin / 4.10.14 34. TagCoin / 4.10.14 35. PHS / 4.10.14 36. NRS / 4.10.14 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: DubFX on April 09, 2014, 08:10:12 PM DigiByte? But they didn't move to new wallet yet but they infrormed their community about it.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: yogabba on April 09, 2014, 08:12:38 PM Vertcoin: Today.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: tokyoghetto on April 09, 2014, 08:35:14 PM Hobonickels is updated.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Giskard on April 09, 2014, 08:40:00 PM Zetacoin updated.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: HongKongCoin on April 09, 2014, 08:44:05 PM HongKongCoin, was fixed at 1am... depends on timezone, but could be listed as 4/8
proof https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=518669.msg6134084#msg6134084 we are also giving away some coins here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=563792.0 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: amacar on April 09, 2014, 08:44:50 PM Communitycoin 9/4/2014
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: dogeforlife on April 09, 2014, 08:49:22 PM DigiByte? But they didn't move to new wallet yet but they infrormed their community about it. I don't think that counts. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: brokedummy on April 09, 2014, 09:05:23 PM Cryptographic Anomaly (CGA) devs were one of the first to update and alerted much of the community including poloniex and probably btc devs.
YACC is also updated. Mint too. My patched CGA wallet shows OpenSSL 1.0.1g build date = Apr 8 2014, 12:38:11 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: brokedummy on April 09, 2014, 09:26:54 PM YACC build date = Apr 7 2014, 18:51:12
Winner? Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: brokedummy on April 09, 2014, 09:29:19 PM Just a note that YACC and YAC are two different coins.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Nxtblg on April 09, 2014, 09:29:52 PM Reddcoin too, a/o today.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: reRaise on April 09, 2014, 10:26:33 PM Well noticed, this says indeed something.
On a side note is it necessary to change your wallet password too? Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: brokedummy on April 09, 2014, 10:34:42 PM ECC updated today, though they seem to rely on mintcoin upstream.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Rofo on April 09, 2014, 10:36:29 PM NobleCoin - today at 7am
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=402667.msg6136655#msg6136655 Edit: Thanks for adding. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Thrillho on April 09, 2014, 11:21:32 PM PND -pandacoin- (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=464476.0) updated yesterday. OP should list the coins in chronological order by date, at least. To better illustrate the activity, dedication, and responsiveness of the listed developers as per the threads intention.
https://i.imgur.com/M0q8vOg.png Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: dogeforlife on April 09, 2014, 11:23:46 PM Got them, thank you for the information. So just 16 out of hundreds???
Considering the fix is as simple as recompiling clients using SSL 1.0.1.g instead of 1.0.1.e, surely there a more coins in compliance ??? Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: El Dude on April 09, 2014, 11:29:08 PM litecoin - https://litecointalk.org/index.php?topic=18506.0
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: pandacoin-official on April 09, 2014, 11:49:38 PM Please consider listing PandaCoin with its symbols (PND) as there are three of them.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: creamynebula on April 09, 2014, 11:51:28 PM Please consider listing PandaCoin with its symbols (PND) as there are three of them. This, specially since the one called PAND was a scam, so as a member of the community that still mines and pay attention to PND (the pandacoin that did patch the heartbleed bug), we would like to not be confused with PAND ~ Also, another coins for the OP to add, Bitquark (BTQ), Darkcoin (DRK) references: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=468018.msg6135032;topicseen#msg6135032 (btq) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6144786;topicseen#msg6144786 (drk) Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Joe_Bauers on April 10, 2014, 12:27:47 AM Just a note that YACC and YAC are two different coins. Awesome job on the part the the YACC devs to make that something that needs to be pointed out :D OP, are you referring to us for 11? Yacoin, or YAC was upgraded on 4/8/2014 https://github.com/yacoin/yacoin/pull/45 Includes security fix for https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140407.txt Qt checkbox to enable stake minting. Multiple POS enhancements. MSVC++ Native version. Scrypt-Jane updates. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Elun on April 10, 2014, 12:34:44 AM BlackCoin fixed(Apr 9, 2014): http://www.blackcoin.co/update-2/security-issue-heartbleed/
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: crunchynut on April 10, 2014, 12:36:01 AM The highly skilled RapeCoin dev team updated openssl and the coin to the latest version, as well.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: micryon on April 10, 2014, 12:51:54 AM (RSC) Realstackcoin patched
(PDR) Planetdollar patched (GPUC) GPUCoin patched Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Titan on April 10, 2014, 01:05:00 AM [LKY] Luckycoin-QT v1.0.1 security update: OpenSSL Heartbleed fix
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/9842-luckycoin-qt-v101-security-update-openssl-101g-heartbleed-fix/ (https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/9842-luckycoin-qt-v101-security-update-openssl-101g-heartbleed-fix/) Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: brokedummy on April 10, 2014, 01:09:56 AM YACC build date = Apr 7 2014, 18:51:12 Winner? You still haven't given the king his crown. Put YACC up at the top of the list. Cassey is a good developer and his lesser known coin deserves some recognition for his fast attention to patching this security flaw. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: dustint on April 10, 2014, 02:18:12 AM GoldCoin has made the fix
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: raze182 on April 10, 2014, 04:18:12 AM Darkcoin (4/9/14): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6144786#msg6144786 (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg6144786#msg6144786)
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: anonymousxx1503 on April 10, 2014, 04:30:45 AM The QBC (Quebecoin) dev has fixed his wallet before the coin is even released, don't know if that counts but he has been great in responding to everything so far. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=552561.msg6141963#msg6141963
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Monetizer on April 10, 2014, 04:43:59 AM It's good to see a lot of good devs out there actually working on their coins, it really shows which coins may be worth investing in if you ask me.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: mtrycz on April 10, 2014, 08:38:40 AM dogeforlife, You're using different naming standards in that list, full names for some, symbols for some, shortnames (?) for others.
There is no coin called Panda, afaik. Our coin is called Pandacoin and the symbol is PND. Thanks for your efforts, tho ;) Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: hostmaster on April 10, 2014, 09:23:45 AM ECCoin yesterday... did update
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: TECSHARE on April 10, 2014, 09:43:23 AM WWW.INFINITECOIN.COM (http://WWW.INFINITECOIN.COM) - PLEASE DOWNLOAD 1.8.7 FOR HEARTBLEED FIX
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: 8bitcoder on April 10, 2014, 09:49:32 AM Myriadcoin updated.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483515.msg6152772#msg6152772 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: BroTroxer on April 10, 2014, 12:12:41 PM Anoncoin servers updated upon bug disclosure. New wallets will be available as they are built.
Why does the wallet update get such big attention compared to the websites, and servers (infrastructure) surrounding the coin? The only way a wallet could potentially be exploited is by enabling rpcssl (not enabled by default), and rpcallowip from other IP's than your own computer/server in the config file. Anyone running said configuration is already begging for the coins to be stolen regardless of heartbleed. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: tokyoghetto on April 10, 2014, 12:19:27 PM I would be nice in saying that any coin that takes longer than 1 week to update, should be avoided like the black plague.
Cryptos is a game of speed so a big thank you to all the great devs who reacted quickly to this "heartbleed" issue. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: coinsfuture on April 10, 2014, 12:34:18 PM It's good to see a lot of good devs out there actually working on their coins, it really shows which coins may be worth investing in if you ask me. I agree. Altcoins should be a breeding ground for innovation, and that can only happen with active devs. We should not be supporting coins with fake devs or inactive devs. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: masterOfDisaster on April 10, 2014, 01:24:27 PM Peercoin has the bug basically fixed since yesterday morning (http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=2629.msg22394#msg22394). The fix has not yet been applied to the official client, though...
But it is effectively of low importance for Peercoin, because unlike in Bitcoin 0.9.0 where is a "Payment Protocol feature" that is called BIP70 this Payment Protocol feature is NOT in Peercoin 0.4; hence no need to hurry ;) Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: cryptohunter on April 10, 2014, 01:29:47 PM beecoins developer has fixed their wallet too now.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=559876.80 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: bramvnl on April 10, 2014, 01:40:55 PM mintcoin wallet version 1.8
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: tokyoghetto on April 10, 2014, 02:07:30 PM Cloudcoin CDC is updated.
ref: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=555563.0 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: GTO911 on April 10, 2014, 02:09:41 PM Whats the point? Lots of coins will get updated with time
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: tokyoghetto on April 10, 2014, 02:13:25 PM Whats the point? Lots of coins will get updated with time Would you say the same thing if the lock to your local bank vault was broken? Exploits like Heartbleed need to be patched up ASAP. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: coinsfuture on April 10, 2014, 02:18:53 PM Whats the point? Lots of coins will get updated with time Would you say the same thing if the lock to your local bank vault was broken? Exploits like Heartbleed need to be patched up ASAP. I agree, these coins are a game to some people. But the reality is people are using these coins for real tangible financial transactions. If you are not willing to update, DON'T CREATE A COIN! Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: dogeforlife on April 10, 2014, 03:34:29 PM 31 out of ???
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Blazr2 on April 10, 2014, 04:04:34 PM Offerings to Cthulhu has been patched as of last night.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: HysonCorp on April 10, 2014, 04:16:12 PM worldcoin appears to have just patched it too.
official announcement on worldcoinforum.org: under discussion Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: peterlustig on April 10, 2014, 04:21:28 PM Coins that are based on bitcoin versions older than 0.9.0 should be fine though, right? Since the bug was only introduced recently and is not present in older openssl versions.
More FUD please. :P Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: praxiscat on April 10, 2014, 04:30:52 PM Not every coin is effected by the bug, it really depends if the coin uses TLS in public operations, this is something bitcoin does use. If it does, it's vulnerable to the heartbleed bug. But not every coin uses this functionality, and those coins which do not are not vulnerable to the bug. Our developer has already looked into this for us, Einsteinium (EMC2) does not use the functionality which is in question with the heartbleed bug. However, to be on the safe side we will be implimenting the fix in the next wallet. We actually have a pretty active dev, they implimented a hard fork to fix the KGW issue and replaced it with digishield over the weekend.
Not every scrypt coin uses this functionality, many are implimenting the fix for PR than actual need. If your developer is active, they will clearly express how the vulnerability effects the coin, if it does at all. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: HysonCorp on April 10, 2014, 04:40:42 PM Coins that are based on bitcoin versions older than 0.9.0 should be fine though, right? Since the bug was only introduced recently and is not present in older openssl versions. More FUD please. :P not precisely. rather, I feel it is the importance to 'examine' if they are vulnerable and announce it, this is the act of a good dev team. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: tagbond on April 10, 2014, 04:55:29 PM Tagcoin updated
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Palmdetroit on April 10, 2014, 05:07:23 PM PHS binaries have been updated
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=292720 http://phstones.com/images/sslg.PNG Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: defaced on April 10, 2014, 06:23:57 PM Anyone who can compile can fix this problem their self just by compiling with the new openssl :O
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: awais3344 on April 10, 2014, 06:30:55 PM you just have to download new openssl version. build it and compile on it. lool
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: defaced on April 10, 2014, 06:31:43 PM Coins that are based on bitcoin versions older than 0.9.0 should be fine though, right? Since the bug was only introduced recently and is not present in older openssl versions. More FUD please. :P Dont tell to many people this or they cant be trendy with their patch. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Nxtblg on April 10, 2014, 07:43:48 PM Whats the point? Lots of coins will get updated with time This thread makes for a good wake-up call for any devs who are slow with the fix. It's also an info clearing house for anyone wondering about his own coin. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: feina24h on April 10, 2014, 08:52:30 PM what about NXT? They updated every thing pretty fast.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Radar on April 10, 2014, 09:30:24 PM I got the SSL heartbleed email this morning also :-\
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: LiteCoinGuy on April 10, 2014, 09:48:37 PM Litecoin
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: tokyoghetto on April 10, 2014, 09:52:30 PM Even if there are clients that dont need to update, this is a good "fire drill" for blockchains. If shit really does hit the fan I would rather have my investment in a blockchain with devs that are quick to react.
To the ones saying we can just compile our own clients, that is not the right answer. While most of us are ahead of the curve and can do so, in order to have widespread adoption you will have users who are not as techsavvy. These people will need to depend on those who do know to help them. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: lajz99 on April 10, 2014, 11:21:51 PM NRS is heartbleed free!!!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=565623 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: peterlustig on April 11, 2014, 01:02:31 AM Coins that are based on bitcoin versions older than 0.9.0 should be fine though, right? Since the bug was only introduced recently and is not present in older openssl versions. More FUD please. :P Dont tell to many people this or they cant be trendy with their patch. You dipshits need to realize that the older wallets needed openssl to compile them in the first place. Might it be that *gasp* there are actual features that rely on the library, namely the rpcssl flag? */gasp* No that can't be, that would be absurd, right? This isn't about stroking your e-dick as a developer but rather about protecting the users that rely on the feature. Check this: Quote What versions of the OpenSSL are affected? http://heartbleed.com/Status of different versions: OpenSSL 1.0.1 through 1.0.1f (inclusive) are vulnerable OpenSSL 1.0.1g is NOT vulnerable OpenSSL 1.0.0 branch is NOT vulnerable OpenSSL 0.9.8 branch is NOT vulnerable Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: defaced on April 11, 2014, 01:53:50 AM Please read this.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=563048.0 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: Rofo on April 11, 2014, 02:07:07 AM When you got guys (that may or may not be technical) using your wallet seeing only this 'A bug in OpenSSL, used by Bitcoin-Qt/Bitcoin Core, could allow your bitcoins to be stolen' at the top of their forum and getting worried, I felt it necessary either way.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: dreamwatcher on April 11, 2014, 08:41:59 AM Though I agree the vulnerability is highly unlikely to effect alt coin clients, I have updated the Windows QT versions of the Star Trek coins along with a routine checkpoint update for all versions.
With all the publicly this vulnerability is getting, I felt that giving users peace of mind was worth the small amount of time needed to update my Windows QT compile environment. I have started a thread on the SciFi Coin Talk forum announcing the updated clients and welcome any other Scifi coin developer to post announcements pertaining to this there. http://scificointalk.com/index.php/topic,462.0.html (http://scificointalk.com/index.php/topic,462.0.html) Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: @ThisWeeksCoin on April 11, 2014, 04:09:14 PM Add H2O coin as well.
I'm posting wallets right now. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: masterOfDisaster on April 12, 2014, 02:14:37 PM Maybe the bug fix is not yet included in the official Peercoin client (for which is no hurry as Peercoin is not affected from the bug) although the code is ready until 9th of April.
But does that not look like very active development? http://www.peercointalk.org/index.php?topic=2648.msg22599#msg22599 Read it and make up your own mind what Peershares will do to Peercoin ;) Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: GTO911 on April 12, 2014, 03:27:01 PM Please add Machinecoin to the list, it was updated within a day - machinecoin.org
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: MicroGuy on April 12, 2014, 06:24:41 PM Thanks for making this awesome thread!
Just for the record, Goldcoin (GLD) was updated on April 9th (not the 10th). :D https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=317568.msg6149192#msg6149192 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: bumface on April 13, 2014, 01:18:56 PM Ultracoin has the heartbleed fix within 2 weeks
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: ethought on April 13, 2014, 06:19:04 PM Megacoin has been updated in latest sourceforge version 996G :)
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: sxcer on April 14, 2014, 03:27:26 PM Sexcoin is fixed as of v0.6.4.5
v0.6.4.5 release https://github.com/sexcoin-project/sexcoin/releases master/ https://github.com/sexcoin-project/sexcoin/ windows qt client http://sex-coin.info/clients/windows/sexcoin-qt-0.6.4.5-win32.zip linux clients http://software.opensuse.org/download.html?project=home%3Ap_conrad%3Acoins&package=sexcoin OSX binary is not online yet, should be tonight Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: mammix2 on April 14, 2014, 03:42:39 PM KillerCoin Update v2.0, released 08-April-2014 which included the fix
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=530736.msg6131502#msg6131502 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: pandher on April 15, 2014, 01:54:03 PM Coin2 switched to POS and updated wallets with heartbleed fix. Please add to list
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: salfter on April 15, 2014, 06:57:05 PM Please add BitGem to your list. I've made updated Windows installers available for BitGem:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=207008.msg6235566#msg6235566 Linux users (like me) are recommended to update OpenSSL from their usual sources and rebuild bitgemd from the current GitHub source. mineral hasn't posted anything since word of Heartbleed got out, but hopefully this will keep BitGem users safe. Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: dogechode on April 15, 2014, 06:59:40 PM Didn't potcoin also release a fix pretty quickly? I believe they went from 0.8.6.3UNK to just 0.8.6.3
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: mammix2 on April 17, 2014, 02:45:18 PM Please post any coins that I am missing to this thread so that I can update this list. These are the development teams and their coins that have responded to the Heartbleed bug identified and publicized yesterday, April 8, 2014. I am using this as an example to evidence the coins with active and attentive developers. Coin / Date of Fix 1. DOGE / 4.9.14 2. Bitcoin / 4.9.14 3. Quark / 4.9.14 4. Cryptogenic Bullion / 4.9.14 5. Vertcoin / 4.9.14 6. Hobonickels / 4.9.14 7. Zetacoin / 4.9.14 8. HongKongCoin / 4.9.14 9. CommunityCoin / 4.9.14 10. Cryptographic Anomaly / 4.8.14 11. YACC / 4.9.14 12. Mint / 4.9.14 13. Reddcoin / 4.9.14 14. ECC / 4.9.14 15. Noblecoin / 4.9.14 16. PND / 4.8.14 17. Litecoin / 4.8.14 18. BTQ / 4.9.14 19. DRK / 4.9.14 20. YAC / 4.8.14 21. BlackCoin / 4.9.14 22. RSC / 4.10.14 23. PDR / 4.10.14 24. GPUC / 4.10.14 25. LKY / 4.10.14 26. GoldCoin / 4.10.14 27. QBC / 4.10.14 28. Infinitecoin / 4.10.14 29. Myriadcoin / 4.10.14 30. beecoin / 4.10/14 31. Cloudcoin / 4.10.14 32. Offerings to Cthulhu / 4.9.14 33. Worldcoin / 4.10.14 34. TagCoin / 4.10.14 35. PHS / 4.10.14 36. NRS / 4.10.14 Please add KillerCoin to the list. we've been HeartBleed free for a while :-) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=530736.0 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: pandher on April 17, 2014, 02:50:38 PM I think the OP forgot about this thread
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: solarion on April 17, 2014, 03:28:07 PM Patched Zeitcoin wallet is available:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=487814.msg6257292#msg6257292 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: catoshi on April 17, 2014, 04:07:13 PM CATCOIN :D
9.0.1 http://www.images-apmex.com/handlers/ThumbJpeg.ashx?VFilePath=~/Resources/Catalog%20Images/Products/11206_Obv.jpg&width=300&height=300 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: bramvnl on April 17, 2014, 06:22:14 PM Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: @ThisWeeksCoin on April 17, 2014, 09:26:57 PM OP's status:
Quote Last Active: 11 April 2014, 15:59:21 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: maxvall on April 18, 2014, 05:40:45 AM Fixed NYANcoin wallet is available:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=477944.msg6270404#msg6270404 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: TamB on April 29, 2014, 04:38:46 PM Earthcoin 1.2.1
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=379236.msg6458501#msg6458501 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: bloods-n-cryptos on April 29, 2014, 04:53:21 PM Bitcoin sCrypt patched Heartbleed in v.1.3.2.
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/10570-mandatory-client-upgrade-to-v132-for-hardfork-at-block-96000/?p=89627 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: dogechode on April 29, 2014, 05:29:59 PM Kinda scary that some (actually many) coins still haven't bothered to fix this...???
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: omahapoker on April 29, 2014, 05:56:08 PM i think the list is missing a few
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: First.Bitcoins on April 29, 2014, 07:24:34 PM AppleByte launches this week. Fixed before launch.
Announce Thread: Announce Thread (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=503131.0) Website: AppleByte.me (http://AppleByte.me) Crowd Funding Campaign: Indiegogo Campaign (https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/applebytes) Facebook: AppleByteMe FB Page (https://www.facebook.com/applebyteme) Twitter: AppleByteMe Twitter (https://twitter.com/AppleByteMe) Reddit: AppleByteMe Reddit (http://www.reddit.com/r/AppleByteMe/) Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: axismundi on May 06, 2014, 11:46:18 PM Had to change to a new repo but Carboncoin (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=526031.0) is now heartbleed proof as of today. Will be able to push future fixes much faster.
Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: fsb4000 on May 10, 2014, 02:04:34 PM Novacoin 9 April 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=114712.msg6146405#msg6146405 Title: Re: Coins with active devs, per Heartbleed bug example Post by: XCASH on May 10, 2014, 08:10:47 PM Kinda scary that some (actually many) coins still haven't bothered to fix this...??? This situation really worries me. The hearbleed bug was discovered ages ago and unpatched wallets are a hell of a risk to use. |
