Bitcoin Forum

There is an Appointed TIME for everything. And there is a time for every event under heaven—
      2A time to give birth and a time to die;
            A time to plant and a time to uproot what is planted.

      3A time to KILL and a time to heal;
            A time to tear down and a time to build up.

      4A time to weep and a time to laugh;
            A time to mourn and a time to dance.

      5A time to throw stones and a time to gather stones;
            A time to embrace and a time to shun embracing.

      6A time to search and a time to give up as lost;
            A time to keep and a time to throw away.

      7A time to tear apart and a time to sew together;
            A time to be silent and a time to speak.

      8A time to LOVE and a time to HATE;
            A time for WAR and a time for PEACE.

We have to face it the US will go to WAR sooooooner than later :( The Russians and North Korean's are Preparing for something... Evil is at hand and the only way you can destroy Evil is by going to WAR.

now after year laters cold war converts into real war :P

What are you talking about? They're always at war with some country or another. Or do you mean one which they don't start or they actually get invaded?

If you mean war in terms of troops vs troops, it won't. The US is afraid of Russia.
But if you mean wars in general then the US is already at war with humanity.

I think they're both scared of each other. Both could easily destroy each other and having nukes the situation could escelate quite quickly.

with nukes in hands , both would  not dare to go against  each other .

You can see how "scared" Russia is of the US when you take a look on how they increased the defence on their borders.
Tip: They didn't increase it.

USA is always at war with someone, because it is profitable for a lot of the people towards the top (which is really sad).   They would never send their own family members to war.   They view life like a game of Monopoly.

you die first day at front soldier

Or maybe because there's currently no threat. It's not about being 'scared' but how cautious you are.

Umm the USA is still in a war with the Middle East and always will be . Things have been so crazy the last 10 years I don't see it changing and really it's all so the government gets paid

The US' war against humanity will end when the US looses.

You should know that when people refer to America/ns in this context they're infering the USG and not the actual people.

I think most Non-Americans refer to US Govt. when they refer to USA in general .

Every Country's  citizen wants peace , its just Govt.'s  shit that they have to deal with and face consequences of Govt.'s policies.

Civilians are the reason a government can go to war. Because they are working and paying taxes...
So every american (that is paying taxes) is guilty of supporting terrorism of the US government.

There's a very easy way to stop your goverment from doing things you dont want them to and that's to stop paying them.

It's not about paying taxes in general (yes you have the choice not to pay them), it's about paying taxes to terrorists.
You could easily leave the country and live somewhere else.

Exactly. Just move. You always have a choice, but people are too lazy to make it but not lazy enough to sit at home in front of the computers and moan about it.

So if a Govt. has policies which you don't like , you can just leave the country and go somewhere else and when you go to another country and same thing happens in that country , you again leave the second country ? It is that easy ?

Yes. Supporting terrorism should never be considered.
Choose a neutral one, what's so hard about that?

Probably soon. That's how countries make the most money, of course, by going to war with others.

When Russia had Afghanistan under its control then how many Russians left the country ?

Here's some: http://www.cnbc.com/id/48054006

Let me know which one you pick and don't forget to post some pictures enjoying your tax breaks lol

There's a big difference. The US doesn't just enslave people, it kills many of them. The US is the greatest terrorist on the planet, and no decent person would pay taxes to such a government.

I love that song. The Birds are an underrated band, IMO.  :D

Might have to consider some of these. Qatar looks nice  ;D.

This isn't a debate, it's a serious topic. You contribute to mass murder and destruction. You should be ashamed of yourself.

I notice you're not willing to move like you said you would once we showed you some tax-free countries. What does where I live have to do with anything? I live in Middle Earth. Zero taxes and weed is free. Sometimes we get invaded by Orks and shit though.

Are you stupid or something? This doesn't have anything to do with the point I'm making.

I find the discussion to be rather infantile.  We should be discussing ways to prevent war.  The act of war is no game and should be given the respect it deserves.

We did. We talked about how civilians play the biggest role in the theatre of war.

He's just trying to deflect the argument. So are you going to move to one of those countries I linked to?

You pick one you like the most. There's ten to choose from. Do some research and see which country benifits you the most.

What? I'm pretty sure that's not true at all and you can go and live wherever you like. I think you just like making excuses. IF you hate the goverment so much you should just move. You'd be much happier.

America already at war  ;D : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Db5qkKcVU4E#t=19 .

Typical american way of thinking. The others must do this, the others must do that, but I don't have to do anything.

When will the USA go to WAR?
Seriously?:
When will the USA come home from the wars we are already in?

Exactly. How is it even 'your' country? Do you own it?

Maybe he's Native American?

I thought American's loved democracy? I suggest you vote in to power a government you like, but nobody will ever be happy with whatever government you put in, so probably best to move, but I doubt you'll be happy anywhere else either.

Like I said before: This had nothing to do with the discussion.

Nobody did that. Are you a lawyer? Because you twist everything around like one.

I don't think he was bashing you for being an american but you're just overly sensitive about being one.

You just answered your own question.

You just stopped twisting something around and made something up.

Unfortunately War is part of life ...you will havepeace for a time but unfortunately humanity is selfish and like Russia we want MORE and MORE

US wants more, not Russia. Do some research before posting something stupid.

Ha... We ALLL want more STUPIDOOOOOOOOOOOO! jeje
http://opinionsandexpressions.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/millionaire-stupid-contestant4.jpg

No... let him talk and say all that's on his mind... he probably live in Russia ...

americans actually wonder why they are being hated around the world...

lol , this one is good.

Qatar looks amazing. Richest country in the world, as you might expect given its size, location and tax status.

2017 is a prime year.  so if History serves me correctly, always the year after a prime :o

You might want to consider the civil rights implications of living as a foreigner under an absolute monarchy.    ::)

If war really starts this could be the last war on earth. I mean war with Russian Empire or some country with atomic potential.
I doubt that North Korea has nukes capable of destroying even one small American village.
But let's hope it will be peace for now.

not only  Nukes but there is threat of chemical and bio warfare as well .

We been going through wars, like the whole 2008 and everything.

Were still in Afghanistan.

Jesus man, she gets a chance of a life time to win some serious big money.

And shes just clueless? fml.

Is not RTL german TV? And yet question is in English? I is photoshopped in my opinion.

It almost has to be a Photoshop graphic.
Modern people have issues but very few are that stupid.

I don't think the people will support another war.  Honestly I think the people will have to be tricked into supporting a war and even then their will be a vast majority who are against it.

The US is almost permanently in a state of war with somebody or the other

FTFY

Defense contractors give good bribe.

and then NATO (USA) declares Russia as Adversary and Russia annouces  drills with china. USA (Obama) Also declared that it will intervene in the china sea to defend the sankaku islands and other zones that China claiming as part of their territory....

While all these are not serious threats for a war, the escalation is increasing

Due again in 2015 sometime ;)
Think Crimea will blow over into a stalemate

With China emerging as super power , such encounters are bound to happen .

which country is the next USA target ?
syria? russia? iran?
war is profitable for few arms industry, but kill many innocent people
UN fail to prevent war, because they are US sockpuppet, lol

USA won't attack Russia directly but there can be cold war as there has been recent tensions between the 2 countries on Crimea issues .

In other words we should prepare for another 9/11.

Hard to say for sure. The fascist pigs in DC probably draw cards or something to decide who to "liberate" next. Smart money is on a country that lacks a central bank, doesn't have an advanced nuclear weapons program, and has lots of brown people in it. Bonus points if a particular nation state is trying to sell oil for something other than US dollars.

I don't think will be possible anymore a full scale war  like the WW1/WW2. I hope !
Only some skirmish and regional wars between the "marionettes" in the eternal game of power.
Why ?
Because there is something called ATOMIC BOMBS.
Even an small atomic device (aka "tactical") if it is unleashed, severe consciences will be.  http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/ (http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/)

The ancestors were more wise than us: they never "play" with the BIG words. These words where TABU. They never says for example directly TIGER, who is a savage beast, a death-bringer.
Today we can hear the words WAR, NUCLEAR, DEATH so many times per day and these become so common like PIE, CHIPS, SODA..
Actually these words where striped by their meaning allowing the people to become more careless.
 "The sleep of reason produces monsters". Francisco Goya http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goya (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goya)

I hope that whole world will stop wars. Scientists say that we use about 11% of brains, well when you see how many wars we have, it does not looks like that. There is still many countries which want to take something what is not their on hard way. People are weird, that is easy word for real condition :)

Peace in our lifetime?
Yeah right...but it is possible.
If you hope for a better future, at least you have Hope.  :)

I am not sure if I want to talk about that too much. I think that we need to stop the wars.

Unlikely, more sabre rattling far likelier

You've got to be an idiot if you think that's real. You can quite clearly tell it's been edited.

As is Russia and soon to be China, but never with each other.  Political posturing and saber rattling, sure, all out war with each other, no profit in that.

The US, Russia, and China rule the world.  We know that and like it that way.

There are quite a few things wrong with this comment.

protip: the whole suspense thing doesn't work as well on the interwebz.

Could add a few more countries, such as Brazil or Saudi Arabia. But I will agree that some of the current superpowers (France, Germany, UK, Japan.etc) will lose their dominance.

Nuclear weapons and a worldwide delivery system are required to be a superpower.

I ain't going to war with Russia or China. F that, the rich old men who decide to send us to secure their wealth are going to have to fight this one.

Old, rich men decided for us in the past and I don't think that this will ever change. They got the power to bend people to their will and propaganda to 'fix' undecided. So nothing is gonna ever change.

There could be war within 5 years. As China and Russia became more powerful they became more bolder, they want to gain control. And USA would not let that happen. A simple mistake in calculation there could be war.

Germany is a dominate economic power in Europe.
Are they a military power?
Unless I missed a big change, Germany has had no large military since WW2, and the USA has bases and troops there.
Same with Japan...The countries that won WW2 didn't allow the losers to rebuild their forces, instead "we" protect them.
AFAIK that is still going on, but I might be wrong.

You're not wrong. The USG has it's grubby little fingers in everybody's pie.

Yes, in case of Germany tho they are producing conventional weapons, they have restriction due to WW2 agreements for example, but they have quality army, and Germany needs no one to defend it, that the whole reason for NATO

war is part of Lifeeeeeeeeeeeee :(

Believe it or not, negative human traits aren't the sole cause of wars. Community, belonging, connection, and patriotism are just as equal. While you could argue that the negative emotions spark the conflict, it’s those good qualities which allow the escalation.

the United States are always at war...

we're all die

Stop this BS. China and Russia are not going to attack anyone. It is the US which is invading other countries for their oil and gas. Your post reminds me of the Hollywood BS propaganda, where the evil Russians try to destroy the world, only to be defeated by the American heroes. Ohoho... Americans save the world once again... what sort of bull crap?

If this will happen everyone will suffer, make Peace not War.

Well, for all matters, the USA is already in a right hand war in Afghanistan and still has his left hand (or foot) on Iraq.
On war against a major nuclear power, forget about it. It's not guaranty, but MAD (mutual assured destruction) will provide for peace, as it has done in the past.

you better ask when the last time USA isnt in some imperial war?

1989 maybe

when they'll go to war again? soon enough once, the schist oil productions gets low, right now USA is almost self sustained in terms of Gas, and producing a huge portion of oil, but they can't keep doing that for, it will go down pretty fast, and once that happens US of A will go spread some democracy

Arent we still at war?

Of course, the empire of oppression must be protected.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_military_deployments

Naturally this is only a list of the personnel that the US admits to deploying.  

wont happen anytime soon. Obama has neither the brains NOR the balls to pull it off...
read here: http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/mcinnes-me-president (http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/mcinnes-me-president)

Scientists don't say that. If they did, you could also hear them say something along the lines of: "oh, you were lucky; the bullet passed through the 90% of your brain that you don't use, so there was no damage". That obviously doesn't happen. :P



The US does have much better propaganda than they do, which allows the story to always be framed in the context of US defending itself (even if on the other side of the planet) and the current targets to be seen as the aggressors (even if they are a third world nation that has had practically no contact with the outside world).

That said, and to be fair, China and Russia as well as many other large powerful countries, are as aggressive as they think they can get away with within their sphere of influence. Now, of course their reach is vastly smaller than that of the US and they are far less aggressive than the US overall, but they aren't holy enlightened states; they're nations like any other, with many of the same ambitions and faults.

Sure, the US has the best propaganda ministry hands down.

Thanks to the state run media and expertly managed .gov psyop program many sheeple in the US don't even know their goobermint is slaughtering people all over the globe in their name. If you tell them, they deny it. If you provide incontrovertible proof of US global terror operations they become defensive and disconnect. Soon dancing with the stars(or some other mindless crap) will chase those unpleasant thoughts away and they will get back to what's really important...stacking more inflationary cotton dollars.

Drones are worth their weight in gold because as long as there isn't a steady stream of caskets coming back with US flags draped over them there is no war. When the drones are used to kill Americans abroad it's because they were "bad guys". The foreign women, children, and men being slaughtered, the entire families being obliterated, the entire communities being destroyed by us terror strikes are "collateral damage" in the undeclared war on terror.

After all the US was allegedly attacked by some saudi nationals 13 years ago...obviously the slaughter in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, etc is necessary for the security of soccer moms in idaho.

That's true, most of the population is distracted and asleep and many others simply won't care as long as their lives aren't affected (though they always are in the end). But you also have to consider that many others simply can't handle that on top of the difficulties of just living day to day, maybe spending the whole day at work (sometimes more than one) and then coming home to take care of their families. And then, even if they are aware of it, a good portion will always think there's nothing they can do about it and tune out. Maybe that's one of the reasons that often changes come from student movements, not having yet been burdened by all that - though the student debt probably takes care of that nowadays.



And the Saudis themselves, apparently having helped organize the whole thing, were never bothered with it... who cares if they attacked the US; they're a useful ally, for now, so let's go slaughter a more convenient and easy target. After all, the defense contractors are making a killing either way (sorry about the pun).

US will go to war if the market tank again.

USA = world imperator, but everyday less and less

Well the US is at war as we speak. But the world (the people atleast) seems to be very anti-war right now so a real outbreak of war is probably unlikely, or would probably end up in a revolution or somethinf

North Korea is a nuclear power. So I don't think that the Americans will provoke a fight with them. If such a battle ever happens, it will be extremely expensive for the Americans. North Korea is no Libya or Iraq, to be conquered within a few days.

United States would be mad to get into a situation where a military confrontation with Russia were even possible. Unfortunately, this does not mean that such a situation would not be possible in the right circumstances.
Nobody would have thought that the assassination of an Austrian archduke and his wife could produce the firestorm of World War I. Some historians have said that either side in that war would have been better off if it had accepted the other side’s most extreme terms at the outset. Theodore Roosevelt had a good point about “speaking softly and carrying a big stick.” Vainglorious ranting of “we are all Ukrainians now” is something that should be avoided, not encouraged.

The atomic explosions organized by North Korea were more or less a fiasco. It seems they used plutonium bombs and couldn't do a proper implosion necessary to make the bomb explode with all its power.

May be... but they are rumored to be in the possession of a few nuclear weapons, smuggled in from Ukraine at the time of disintegration of the Soviet Union. Can't take them lightly.

Clearly, the times are gone when US could bully Russia as a “defeated nation” (which was never the case really, for those uninformed, I highly suggest Stephen Cohen lectures on the subject, staring with “US betrayal of Russia”), it’s time to either be partners or adversaries.

Well... it is very simple.

From 1991 to 2000, the United States could dominate Russia, since they could bribe the drunkard Yeltsin. When Putin assumed office in 2000, things changed. But it was not a sudden change. Putin painstakingly and slowly rebuilt the lost glory of Russia, without appearing to be hostile to the United States (at least in the initial years).

They have quite a lot of weapons, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea_and_weapons_of_mass_destruction
 but much much less than, say, the United States. I doubt the U.S. will start a war in North Korea. In the past they had conquered the entire peninsula, but China got involved and finally they got where they are today. If China would get involved again it would mean a disaster for the U.S.

Looks like US is targeting Russia economically.

The US is targeting any country that will not submit to the Rothschild bankers. Just look at what happened to Libya.

We tried to do the same to Syria, but Russia and China said "No."

Ukraine is strategic because Russia needs them to supply their oil to the rest of Europe.

So what happens in Ukraine? USA- backed coup followed by mainstream news propaganda.

The US cannot target Russia economically, without destroying itself. Russia is the world's no.1 producer and exporter of petroleum, nuclear fuel and natural gas. Without the Russian supplies, crude oil will be trading at $300-$500 per barrel. This will result in financial ruin for the United States, which is the world's largest importer of petroleum right now.  ;D

The US is always at war. Drones, Afghanistan, and I'm sure there's plenty of dark-ops operations that we don't know anything about. Now to start an open, large-scale conflict...that is difficult to say. The politicians know they can't be so belligerent as to do another Vietnam or Iraq...the public is fed up with their lies and will not support another large military undergoing, unless there is a VERY good reason, like Russia attacking Poland or something.

You've evidently had a bucket over your head for the last  25 years or so.

The USA has been at has effectively been at war with someone since 1991 and currently is operating on a war-based economy.

The only way that can save US from falling from the world stage is another World War. Their will be a world within 10 years.

Another world war could mean the complete disintegration of the United States as a nation. Especially, if China and Russia could form an alliance against it, with support from Iran, DPRK, Venezuela.etc.

But we don't know for sure until it is finished. USA has the most advance weapons, china,russia and the world don't know.

This war would include

USA, Canada, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Philippines, Australia, Italy, Poland and nato countries.

on the opposite

China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, Cuba, venezuela, pakistan, Syria


Neutral for now. India, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina.

Pick your side.

tomorrow, i'm killing all J-ws

USA might be having the most advanced fighter jets and warships. But Russia is having the best air-defence systems and the most capable ICBMs. And China is having a population of 1.3 billion, which by itself is a weapon.  ;D A Russia-China combo will be able to counter the US.

Right now population does not have very big impact like the wars before. Unless that population is protected under the bunker and skilled that can help the manufacturing of weapons and equipments. Vaporising a few millions or vaporising a few billions has very little difference today.

Population has always been an important aspect of the warfare. The ability to withstand the long-term effects of a devastating battle, partially depends upon the population size.

There are many examples in history, the most recent being the withdrawal of IDF from the Gaza Strip. They withdrew, because the Palestinian population was rapidly rising and it was getting increasingly difficult for the IDF to control the area.

Population is an asset if it is well protected and has resources to feed this population. Once the war starts, sea blockade, dams destroyed, airport, bridges and roads destroyed, water, electricity, food supply, communication are cut, access are block this population is useless and became a liability. This has a very big impact on counties that has most of its population on cities. War like this can start without you knowing it on advance, all you know your city is hit by raining missiles/warheads.

In this total last world war very few rules is followed. No human rights or geneva rules. 1 soldier can shot those hundreds of civilians. Killed or be killed.

There will be no civilians. Machine guns such as AK-47s are very cheap now. We can train everyone to use a gun in less than two days. So China can have half-a-billion soldiers, ready to take on the Americans.  ;D

This half billion soldiers can't go anywhere. They are already incircled, They can't go out china. Who they gonna shot? This guys would be likely die from famine, nuclear fallout and disease. Most of this militia not even see an enemy soldiers only the effects of war. The allied forces would only attack vital areas, vital infrastructure, vital supply lines.

You can kill a lot of people with machine guns, but given enough people some get trough. This is what happend on d-day and afaik there were not a billion people arriving. Even if 50% of that billion soldiers die, you still got a quarter billion.

I think China would have other plans though, they would simply sit by and profit.. and become world market economy for the next decades while the rest of the world spends all money on wars.

I'm not sure when will USA go to war. But, when they do that'll end up killing lots of innocent peoples.

its all about the money !!!

Haha are you serious? Russia has some of the world's most advanced military technology. I would say it is relatively equal in terms of military technology between Russia and the US. Having said that though, it wouldn't really matter...if there is another World War, it will be nuclear...and its main portion wouldn't last more than a month because half the world will be destroyed by nukes.

Fighter jets, warships, radars - advantage US.
SAM batteries, ICBMs, Heavy machine guns - advantage Russia.

Also, Russia possess more nukes when compared to the US, but that doesn't matter.

I hate this thread, and while I could choose to ignore it I keep seeing it crop up - I must have replied to it in the past.

It's inevitable that a war will break out in the future, it is instilled within the nature of humans. Of course there are wars breaking out all over the world, just not so much on a global scale.

The number of nuclear warheads in the world is alarming, even if it is just considered as a deterrent. What would it take for a country to actually deploy one?

Most of the super-powers are having advanced air-defence systems. Even the best Intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM) will not guarantee you that the nuclear weapon is actually dropped in the enemy territory.

That's why you can sneak in using a sub and launch the nukes from off the enemy's coast; the very short flight time will ensure there is little to no defense. This option is limited to only a few countries, though. But in relation to the anti-missile systems, I was under the impression it was mostly for show, with the system having very low hit rates. I guess part of the controversy about the missile shield installed in eastern Europe some time ago was because of this, and I remember a more recent American test that produced the same disappointing results. I suppose this hasn't really changed all that much in the meantime?

when the defense industry wants to.

to be honest, it would seem inevitable. however, just like the market, timing it is nearly impossible. the USA could keep the status quo going for another decade or three i think before things really fall apart. everyone talks like doomsday is tomorrow, but you'd be surprised. :)

The fact that they even exist to be launch though is concerning. I get the whole idea that they are a deterrent, like "don't try it on with us, because we can wipe you out etc", but what if one was actually used in this day and age, imagine the implications that it would have.

Aside from the mass devastation that it would cause, inevitably killing many innocent civilians, the economic and political effects would be felt for years, and that's before you consider the actions you might see in response.

Well, now, that's not very nice.

Paardon me but horseshit.

2015 is the year, they're going to have war with the Mexicans.

Well, that one would last about a day and a half.

One day to strategise, a few hours for coffee and breakfast, three hours to destroy the entire Mexican military and take out the government; all done by lunchtime.

2014

Why do you people not understand that the USA has been at war for the last ten years or so?

WTF?

US. At war with humanity since it's foundation.

I think the original poster is asking when the next major war with another country will occur.

Oh, OK.

Thanks.

It won't be that simple. Imagine the American marines fighting in Mexico against all those drug cartels (Sinaloa cartel, Los Zetas.etc). The last time I heard, the drug cartels alone were having more than 200,000 soldiers. Also, some of the American states (such as New Mexico) are having an absolute Mexican majority population.

I guess you've never heard of stealth bombers?

Well, considering they get their weapons from the US to begin with, it should at least be fairly easy to disarm most of them if you really wanted to. ;D

But yes, that seemed very much like a "USA! We're number one!" sort of post, which completely forgets that you have to deal with the aftermath of the war.

The "aftermath" of a war with Mexico?

yeah.

Close and enforce the border, wait until they come to us for aid and then set very strict terms, reparations, etc.

Hey, you could be more right than you know.  ;)

"Mexican military chopper flies into US, shoots at border guards": http://rt.com/usa/168940-mexican-military-helicopter-shoots/ (http://rt.com/usa/168940-mexican-military-helicopter-shoots/)

PS: this was obviously just an isolated incident, no need to go and get your guns. :P

I notice you're typing in English and not in German.  Interesting.  Hitler was such the humanitarian  ::)

What the heck are you talking about?

Ahh.. this thread suits you a little better than the "end with a question" thread. DrG is talking about the fact that if it where not for Americas "war on humanity"  as you call it, you would be writing your post in German if you where aloud to write it at all. The US has and does participate in wars it should not but..it has participated in wars that mattered the most and prevailed I am sure you have heard of World War 2…maybe you are a youngster and just don't know history well enough yet.

I think you got that question wrong. It should have been " Will there ever be the time when USA won't be at WAR "

I'm well aware of history, but the US had almost nothing to do with WW2.
And nazi Germany was at war with most of mankind, not all of it. While the US kills people of all so called "races" just for the money.

I wouldn't say that they had almost nothing to do with it; their participation was important, but it's true that their role is often vastly overstated. Still, at least you can't blame Americans for discrimination; they only see in shades of green. :P

bump ;D