Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Speculation => Topic started by: sgbett on May 05, 2014, 11:33:33 PM



Title: 3 important graphs everyone should see
Post by: sgbett on May 05, 2014, 11:33:33 PM
https://i.imgur.com/EP6BRbLl.png (http://imgur.com/EP6BRbL)

i might not even be trolling.


Title: Re: 3 important graphs everyone should see
Post by: kireinaha on May 05, 2014, 11:45:39 PM
http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/gallery/yes/kevthumb.gif


Title: Re: 3 important graphs everyone should see
Post by: frienemy on May 05, 2014, 11:49:59 PM
http://xkcd.com/605/ (http://xkcd.com/605/)


Title: Re: 3 important graphs everyone should see
Post by: Equus on May 06, 2014, 12:00:09 AM
I prefer log scale for my pie charts.

https://i.imgur.com/9FfMR5j.jpg (http://imgur.com/9FfMR5j)


Title: Re: 3 important graphs everyone should see
Post by: RyNinDaCleM on May 06, 2014, 12:08:33 AM
Me's thinks you have bad data for the people given up on BTC...

A simple extrapolation of that chart says that everyone will give up within the next year.
If in the last year, the number of quiters went from 0 to 2, that is an increase of infinity. Therefore, we will all give up in the next year.   :o


Title: Re: 3 important graphs everyone should see
Post by: Roy Badami on May 06, 2014, 12:13:42 AM
Or, it is an increase of 2, and next year 4 will give up :)


Title: Re: 3 important graphs everyone should see
Post by: RyNinDaCleM on May 06, 2014, 12:48:18 AM
Or, it is an increase of 2, and next year 4 will give up :)

Well, yeah... But that isn't as much fun  :-\

Ok, in 33 years, an exponential rise in quiters will outnumber people on Earth. ;)


Title: Re: 3 important graphs everyone should see
Post by: y3804 on May 06, 2014, 12:51:04 AM
I prefer log scale for my pie charts.

https://i.imgur.com/9FfMR5j.jpg (http://imgur.com/9FfMR5j)

hahaha


Title: Re: 3 important graphs everyone should see
Post by: sgbett on May 06, 2014, 09:06:52 AM
I prefer log scale for my pie charts.

https://i.imgur.com/9FfMR5j.jpg (http://imgur.com/9FfMR5j)

bravo sir! How could I have overlooked such a fundamental error :)