Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Bitcoin Discussion => Topic started by: elux on January 17, 2012, 12:20:22 PM



Title: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: elux on January 17, 2012, 12:20:22 PM

https://i.imgur.com/MN1t6.png

Significant, yet perhaps underwhelming? :)




Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: paraipan on January 17, 2012, 12:40:44 PM
woow, some awareness is building up


Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: herzmeister on January 17, 2012, 12:44:32 PM
sry folks, it was me.  :-X

a review of the episode linked to the wiki entry, and i clicked on it.  :-[


Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: BTCurious on January 17, 2012, 12:45:53 PM
sry folks, it was me.  :-X

a review of the episode linked to the wiki entry, and i clicked on it.  :-[
Then your browser locked up, and refreshed the page 20 000 times, switching IPs every time.

Happens to us all, now and then.


Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: elux on January 17, 2012, 12:48:23 PM
I'm wondering: Are these hits coming from the Good Wife viewership,
OR perhaps bitcoin nerds getting all excited in anticipation? :P

I also visited that page yesterday. (For the first time in a good while.)



Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: herzmeister on January 17, 2012, 12:50:04 PM
I'm wondering: Are these hits coming from the Good Wife viewership,
OR perhaps bitcoin nerds getting all excited in anticipation? :P

I also visited that page yesterday. (For the first time in a good while.)


yap that's what i wanted to hint at


Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: apetersson on January 17, 2012, 12:51:41 PM
compare this to: http://stats.grok.se/en/201105/Bitcoin
almost the same top peak. although i suspect this peak to wear off faster.

my conclusion: fundamentals suggest same price levels as in 05/2011, minus more "bubble-awareness" and shortselling opportunity.


Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: fornit on January 22, 2012, 03:38:23 PM
already down to previous levels.  :-\


Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: Phinnaeus Gage on January 22, 2012, 04:06:45 PM
already down to previous levels.  :-\

Quote
Bitcoin has been viewed 99445 times in the last 30 days.

All in all, that's still a hell of a lot of eyeballs, many not repeats. Hopefully, one of those eyeballs belongs to someone that'll join this BBS and be a replacement for Atlas.

Libertarian Mom: Howard's been pretty quiet lately, dear.
Libertarian Dad: Nothing to worry about, dear. He's up in his room chatting with his new friends on the internet.

http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lt2eal5iJS1r4q8eoo1_500.jpg


Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: Nicolai Larsen on January 23, 2012, 01:55:09 AM
Most awesome! :D

I know of at least 3 people who I made look up Bitcoin on wikipedia :P


Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: Sandrine on June 06, 2015, 04:33:10 PM
Hello:

for research purposes, I am intrested in Wikipedia traffic statistics for "Bitcoin".

In particular, I am looking for daily data since 2009. Does anyone know where such statistics is available? Not that http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Bitcoin does not provide tables for download.

Thanks in advance,
Sandrine

PS It used to be available on Bitcoinpulse, but now it is closed :-(


Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: anderson00673 on June 06, 2015, 05:53:53 PM
Gah!!! Zombies!!!!

Is this (http://stats.grok.se/en/latest90/Bitcoin) what you are looking for?  That was the first result from google, if it isn't exactly what you want I am sure you can find other sources of the data.  Sorry if this isnt what you wanted, it is possible I misunderstood.


Title: Re: Wikipedia traffic statistics: "Bitcoin"
Post by: Sandrine on June 07, 2015, 11:56:28 AM
Thanks for suggestion.

However, this page does not allow to download the daly data. I know that one can disply the month-by-month the traffic, and write down the daily hits, however, I was wandering, if there is a more civilised way of doing that.

I fact, I think that I have discovered one (by looking at the source code of the page).

Thanks anyway,
sandrine