Bitcoin Forum

Other => Politics & Society => Topic started by: Chef Ramsay on June 10, 2014, 06:31:38 PM



Title: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Chef Ramsay on June 10, 2014, 06:31:38 PM
Insurgents seize Iraqi city of Mosul as troops flee
Quote
All key facilities are now controlled by the insurgents, including the airport and the prisons, said Nujaifi, who is from Mosul.

The capture of the airport, which had served as a major hub for the U.S. military, could not be independently confirmed, but Nujaifi said it had been seized and that all of the aircraft there also were captured.

Maliki is urging the United States to deliver more advanced weaponry, but ISIS fighters have already been seen riding round in U.S.-supplied Humvees in other areas they control, and much of the weaponry captured in this latest battle is likely to be American, Lister said.

The speed with which one of Iraq’s biggest cities has fallen under militant control is striking and suggests the U.S.-trained Iraqi security forces are even more vulnerable than had previously been thought.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/insurgents-seize-iraqi-city-of-mosul-as-troops-flee/2014/06/10/21061e87-8fcd-4ed3-bc94-0e309af0a674_story.html (http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/insurgents-seize-iraqi-city-of-mosul-as-troops-flee/2014/06/10/21061e87-8fcd-4ed3-bc94-0e309af0a674_story.html)
Let's face it, it's not like this US trained Iraqi Security force would want to die for some false state of alleged democracy setup by some illegal war for the last decade. Geez, did these middle east wars get rid of the terrorists or summon up that much more of them? Way to go, Dubya!


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: beetcoin on June 10, 2014, 07:07:36 PM
wasn't this inevitable.. from the day that obama decided to withdraw troops? i'm not saying this is on obama though, but this is just the consequence of a very hard decision he had to make.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: vokain on June 10, 2014, 07:34:04 PM
wasn't this inevitable.. from the day that obama decided to withdraw troops? i'm not saying this is on obama though, but this is just the consequence of a very hard decision he had to make.

it's been a known consequence since Alexander. probably past him


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: newflesh on June 10, 2014, 07:39:24 PM
All thanks to bush & blair and their cronies in the oil industry. These parasites should be locked up for war crimes.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: RodeoX on June 10, 2014, 07:47:52 PM
Well we broke Iraq into pieces then got mad and went home with our toys. What did we think would happen? This did not even happen in Iraq. This is Kurdistan. You may not know of Kurdistan if you live in the U.S. We like pretending it's still part of Iraq. but they have their own flag, money, government, etc. That split with Baghdad has made it easier to take Mosul.
Now ISIS (formerly part of Al Qaeda but deemed to radical) has control of vast areas near Al-Falluja. This is going to take many years to play out.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Ron~Popeil on June 10, 2014, 09:55:20 PM
Glad to see all the money and mangled lives made a better Iraq.  ::)


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: RiverBoatBTC on June 10, 2014, 10:02:25 PM
wasn't this inevitable.. from the day that obama decided to withdraw troops? i'm not saying this is on obama though, but this is just the consequence of a very hard decision he had to make.

It was not obama, it was the Iraqis that failed to sign a security agreement same shit that is going on in afgan today. They do not sign security extensions we do not stay. Then everything reverts back to the way it was before we got their if not worse.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Ron~Popeil on June 10, 2014, 10:12:29 PM
wasn't this inevitable.. from the day that obama decided to withdraw troops? i'm not saying this is on obama though, but this is just the consequence of a very hard decision he had to make.

It was not obama, it was the Iraqis that failed to sign a security agreement same shit that is going on in afgan today. They do not sign security extensions we do not stay. Then everything reverts back to the way it was before we got their if not worse.


That and we have a few million more people pissed at us. Neither administration did us any favors in those wars.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Balthazar on June 10, 2014, 11:18:54 PM
It was not obama, it was the Iraqis that failed to sign a security agreement same shit that is going on in afgan today. They do not sign security extensions we do not stay.
What a nonsense... "Bush the Great, came to us and take our natural resources, please. We need a democracy!". Occupation isn't an act of philanthropy. You speak as if somebody in Iraq asked Bush to organize the occupation and install a puppet government.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: RiverBoatBTC on June 10, 2014, 11:22:27 PM
What are you talking about? I am just stating the facts lol
Fact Iraq did not sign a security agreement with the U.S. to extend security forces.
side note - The gov that voted not to sign the agreement was elected by the iraqi people, in essence saying they did not want us in that country.
Fact the same thing is about to happen in afgan if the new president of afgan does not sign the agreement.



Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Cryptopher on June 10, 2014, 11:40:25 PM
All thanks to bush & blair and their cronies in the oil industry. These parasites should be locked up for war crimes.

Hear hear. What they started is an atrocity, just as 9/11 was an act of terror, so too should the decision to screw the UN and start bombing countries in the name of 'WMDs' and 'national security'.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Welcome to the machine on June 11, 2014, 12:27:08 AM
Not surprised by this, after all the entire country is comprised of cowards. 

They Won't fight, they drop their weapons and shed their uniforms when confronted but yet they are brave enough to stone women to death.

Cowards.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: beetcoin on June 11, 2014, 12:41:02 AM
Not surprised by this, after all the entire country is comprised of cowards.  

They Won't fight, they drop their weapons and shed their uniforms when confronted but yet they are brave enough to stone women to death.

Cowards.

uh, good job generalizing a nation of people. america can do no wrong and iraqis are a bunch of freeloaders, right?


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Welcome to the machine on June 11, 2014, 12:48:33 AM
Not surprised by this, after all the entire country is comprised of cowards.  

They Won't fight, they drop their weapons and shed their uniforms when confronted but yet they are brave enough to stone women to death.

Cowards.

uh, good job generalizing a nation of people. america can do no wrong and iraqis are a bunch of freeloaders, right?
I didn't say freeloaders I said COWARDS every last one of them.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: niothor on June 11, 2014, 01:20:04 AM
It was not obama, it was the Iraqis that failed to sign a security agreement same shit that is going on in afgan today. They do not sign security extensions we do not stay.
What a nonsense... "Bush the Great, came to us and take our natural resources, please. We need a democracy!". Occupation isn't an act of philanthropy. You speak as if somebody in Iraq asked Bush to organize the occupation and install a puppet government.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/10731708/Russias-Lukoil-opens-giant-Iraq-oil-field-adding-to-crude-glut.html

Russia's Lukoil has opened a giant untapped oil field in Iraq that will play a major part in driving up production to new highs in the Middle Eastern country and potentially force down the price of crude.
Spigots in the West Qurna-2 field, Iraq’s second-biggest, were opened officially over the weekend in a move that will release 120,000 barrels per day of crude oil onto international markets. The field in Southern Iraq near Basra will eventually pump out 1.2m barrels-per-day (bpd) of oil.

Those damn american companies drilling iraq oil for free:)


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 11, 2014, 01:58:40 AM
Iraq is a deeply polarized society, with Sunnis, Shias, Kurds and other minorities deeply distrustful of each other. Despite this, Saddam Hussain was able to unite them, although by applying force. He suppressed the radical Islamists as well, making the lives of minorities (Christians, Yazidis, Mandeans.etc) easier. Once the Americans overthrew him, the Islamist radicals immediately rose to power and caused problem for the minorities. 80% of the minority population has vanished from Iraq during the last decade.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: RiverBoatBTC on June 11, 2014, 02:00:16 AM
Iraq is a deeply polarized society, with Sunnis, Shias, Kurds and other minorities deeply distrustful of each other. Despite this, Saddam Hussain was able to unite them, although by applying force. He suppressed the radical Islamists as well, making the lives of minorities (Christians, Yazidis, Mandeans.etc) easier. Once the Americans overthrew him, the Islamist radicals immediately rose to power and caused problem for the minorities. 80% of the minority population has vanished from Iraq during the last decade.

Here you go again lol, He did not unite them, he suppressed them. Pretty sure the North of Iraq was not even under his control at the time of occupation.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 11, 2014, 02:07:31 AM
Here you go again lol, He did not unite them, he suppressed them. Pretty sure the North of Iraq was not even under his control at the time of occupation.

He suppressed the Islamists, just like what Abdel Fattah el-Sisi is doing in Egypt right now. That's why the Saudis and the Qataris were against him, although he was a Sunni. And the Northern part was controlled by the Kurds, who were also secular.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: RiverBoatBTC on June 11, 2014, 02:11:17 AM
Really, I mean really? Are you going to say that he just suppressed the islamist? How about it was  do what I say or I kill you regardless of race, color, creed, or religion?
I mean it is easy to suppress uprising and violence when you just suppress everyone......


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: 5flags on June 11, 2014, 06:34:11 AM
Really, I mean really? Are you going to say that he just suppressed the islamist? How about it was  do what I say or I kill you regardless of race, color, creed, or religion?
I mean it is easy to suppress uprising and violence when you just suppress everyone......

Yes, you're absolutely right. Saddam oppressed the people of Iraq, he didn't unite them. This is just the latest in the ramifications of the Blair-Bush war of aggression that they got away with.



Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: 5flags on June 11, 2014, 06:37:36 AM
This is yet further proof that the lines drawn on maps by the imperial powers after WWI are fading. They don't mean anything. People are clinging to the European-style nation state as the only way of organising geography.

Those lines are artificial. They don't mean anything. They appear on the maps, but there is no state there. There is no country called "Iraq" that has the same shape that it does on a map.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 11, 2014, 06:38:38 AM
Yes, you're absolutely right. Saddam oppressed the people of Iraq, he didn't unite them. This is just the latest in the ramifications of the Blair-Bush war of aggression that they got away with.

No one can unite the people of Iraq. They are divided along the sectarian lines. But during Saddam's rule, people were afraid to talk about the sects. Saddam gave his emphasis for pan-Arab nationalism. He despised the divides between the Shia and Sunni. He did whatever he could, to eliminate the sects.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Ron~Popeil on June 11, 2014, 06:41:47 AM
Iraq is a deeply polarized society, with Sunnis, Shias, Kurds and other minorities deeply distrustful of each other. Despite this, Saddam Hussain was able to unite them, although by applying force. He suppressed the radical Islamists as well, making the lives of minorities (Christians, Yazidis, Mandeans.etc) easier. Once the Americans overthrew him, the Islamist radicals immediately rose to power and caused problem for the minorities. 80% of the minority population has vanished from Iraq during the last decade.

Iraq needed a federal republic after the occupation. Each region with real representation in the legislature would go a long way toward their various groups feeling enfranchised. Of course not breaking it in the first place would have been good as well.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: 5flags on June 11, 2014, 06:46:24 AM
No one can unite the people of Iraq. They are divided along the sectarian lines.

There is no Iraqi nation, no Iraqi people. There is no reason on Earth for there to be a country called "Iraq".


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: TECSHARE on June 11, 2014, 06:51:58 AM
Not surprised by this, after all the entire country is comprised of cowards. 

They Won't fight, they drop their weapons and shed their uniforms when confronted but yet they are brave enough to stone women to death.

Cowards.
I bet if we dropped you off in the middle of Iraq we could find you again by following the trails of piss and shit you leave behind you...


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: beetcoin on June 11, 2014, 06:54:48 AM
last week's episode of through the wormhole implied that people from africa and the middle east had too much diversity, so it made something about their genes more sectarian. through the research, they found that the societies with the a good balance of diversity, but not too much, would be the ones that have the most success as societies.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: galbros on June 11, 2014, 06:56:29 AM
This is bad no doubt.  However, I think it also has a lot to do with the civil war in Syria as well.  Especially since I thought the north was supposed to be a lot more stable.

I'm not sure Iraq not signing a status of forces agreement would have made that much difference - US forces might have been too small to stop the offensive or not committed quickly enough as this seems to have been something of a surprise.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: 5flags on June 11, 2014, 06:56:52 AM
I bet if we dropped you off in the middle of Iraq we could find you again by following the trails of piss and shit you leave behind you...

Lol, careful, "Welcome to the machine" is a pretty formidable warrior. At least when tapping on his keyboard from the comfort of his parent's basement. He plays Call of Duty several times per day. Watch yourself.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: 5flags on June 11, 2014, 06:57:36 AM
There is a larger theme playing out here.

The Sykes-Picot agreement is burning. May it rot in hell.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 11, 2014, 07:03:25 AM
Iraq needed a federal republic after the occupation. Each region with real representation in the legislature would go a long way toward their various groups feeling enfranchised. Of course not breaking it in the first place would have been good as well.

Well, at least initially that was the plan. But there is a very serious problem. Most of the oil wells are located in the Sunni and Kurd areas, and not in the Shiite inhabited regions. Shiites constitutes somewhere around 60% of the Iraqi population, and they want the oil wealth to go to the central government. And obviously the Sunnis and Kurds are opposed to this.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Ron~Popeil on June 12, 2014, 08:16:03 AM
Iraq needed a federal republic after the occupation. Each region with real representation in the legislature would go a long way toward their various groups feeling enfranchised. Of course not breaking it in the first place would have been good as well.

Well, at least initially that was the plan. But there is a very serious problem. Most of the oil wells are located in the Sunni and Kurd areas, and not in the Shiite inhabited regions. Shiites constitutes somewhere around 60% of the Iraqi population, and they want the oil wealth to go to the central government. And obviously the Sunnis and Kurds are opposed to this.

All stuff we should have thought if before going in. Assuming of course we would still have gone in if we had simply thought it through in that much detail.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: jaberwock on June 12, 2014, 08:36:39 AM
The only country that can save Iraq from falling from Al Qaeda is Iran.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: 5flags on June 12, 2014, 08:42:29 AM
The US has been encouraging Islamic extremism in the Middle East for years. Every time the US decides to smash secular nationalism, you can guarantee that something more sinister will take its place. It's like a 5 year old is in charge of US foreign policy.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 12, 2014, 10:11:43 AM
The US has been encouraging Islamic extremism in the Middle East for years. Every time the US decides to smash secular nationalism, you can guarantee that something more sinister will take its place. It's like a 5 year old is in charge of US foreign policy.

For the first time, I'll agree with you.

Iraq: Pan-Arabic nationalist Ba'ath party (under Saddam Hussain) replaced by the Islamic Da'awa Party. Power shifted from Sunni Arab to Shiite Arab.
Syria: Pan-Arabic nationalist Ba'ath party (under Bashar al Assad) is about to be replaced by the FSA, which includes Islamist factions such as the ISIL/ISIS.
Egypt: Secular ruler Hosni Mubarak replaced with Mohammed Morsi of the Islamic Brotherhood.
Tunisia: Secular government by Zine El Abidine Ben Ali replaced by Hamadi Jebali of the Islamic Brotherhood.

The only exception has been Libya.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: niothor on June 12, 2014, 01:04:06 PM
The US has been encouraging Islamic extremism in the Middle East for years. Every time the US decides to smash secular nationalism, you can guarantee that something more sinister will take its place. It's like a 5 year old is in charge of US foreign policy.

For the first time, I'll agree with you.

Iraq: Pan-Arabic nationalist Ba'ath party (under Saddam Hussain) replaced by the Islamic Da'awa Party. Power shifted from Sunni Arab to Shiite Arab.
Syria: Pan-Arabic nationalist Ba'ath party (under Bashar al Assad) is about to be replaced by the FSA, which includes Islamist factions such as the ISIL/ISIS.
Egypt: Secular ruler Hosni Mubarak replaced with Mohammed Morsi of the Islamic Brotherhood.
Tunisia: Secular government by Zine El Abidine Ben Ali replaced by Hamadi Jebali of the Islamic Brotherhood.

The only exception has been Libya.

The Ennahda movement is probably the best thing that could happen to tunisia.
Also Hamadi is not in power anymore and he was not part of the islamic brotherhood , he was a moderate islamic.


http://www.thedailystar.net/tunisias-successes-and-egypts-regressions-27936


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 12, 2014, 01:42:06 PM
The Ennahda movement is probably the best thing that could happen to tunisia.
Also Hamadi is not in power anymore and he was not part of the islamic brotherhood , he was a moderate islamic.

Ennahda is the Tunisian version of Islamic Brotherhood, which is funded by Saudi Arabia. They call themselves moderate Islamists, but in truth they are even more hard-line than the Egyptian Islamic Brotherhood.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: niothor on June 12, 2014, 01:50:13 PM
The Ennahda movement is probably the best thing that could happen to tunisia.
Also Hamadi is not in power anymore and he was not part of the islamic brotherhood , he was a moderate islamic.

Ennahda is the Tunisian version of Islamic Brotherhood, which is funded by Saudi Arabia. They call themselves moderate Islamists, but in truth they are even more hard-line than the Egyptian Islamic Brotherhood.

Of course...
That's why this happened:

http://www.spc.rs/eng/patriarch_theodoros_ii_alexandria_visits_president_tunis

Really , you have no clue about what's going there , admit it :)

http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2014/05/tunisia-constitution-democracy-2014516161024354720.html



Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: RodeoX on June 12, 2014, 01:59:28 PM
Not surprised by this, after all the entire country is comprised of cowards. 

They Won't fight, they drop their weapons and shed their uniforms when confronted but yet they are brave enough to stone women to death.

Cowards.
And yet they won the war.  ???
The scariest fighters I have come across hide and bide their time. They only fight when it's in their interest and the odds are good. That is how you fight asymmetrically. They simply know more about this than you do. 


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 12, 2014, 02:01:27 PM
^^^ I know exactly what is going on there. Tunisia has been historically a very tolerant nation, unlike Egypt and Libya. There are only a few thousand Christians there and there have been no attacks against them. So I am not surprised at Theodoros II thanking the Tunisian president for protection. But what this has to do with the current government?


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: niothor on June 12, 2014, 02:12:10 PM
^^^ I know exactly what is going on there. Tunisia has been historically a very tolerant nation, unlike Egypt and Libya. There are only a few thousand Christians there and there have been no attacks against them. So I am not surprised at Theodoros II thanking the Tunisian president for protection. But what this has to do with the current government?

You claimed that Tunisia is run by radical  Islamist party.
I showed you proof it's not.
Read the constitution they've adopted.

Have you ever been there? Have you ever traveled to Tunis both before 2010 let's say and after 2012?

Why I'm even bothering asking that I don't know as I already know the answer. You never set foot out of the country but you now better than anybody what's happening in urkaine china and usa.

Show me one proof that Tunis is going to turn into a radical Islamic state


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Divinespark on June 12, 2014, 03:45:50 PM
1 trillion bucks, one dead dictator, 1mn dead Iraqis later, we are back to square one
Well done, Uncle Sam!


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 12, 2014, 03:53:13 PM
1 trillion bucks, one dead dictator, 1mn dead Iraqis later, we are back to square one
Well done, Uncle Sam!

1 trillion was the old figure. According to the latest reports, NATO has spent a total of $4 trillion in Iraq so far (most of it by the United States). And the civilian deaths are approaching 2 million.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Chef Ramsay on June 12, 2014, 05:27:03 PM
1 trillion bucks, one dead dictator, 1mn dead Iraqis later, we are back to square one
Well done, Uncle Sam!

1 trillion was the old figure. According to the latest reports, NATO has spent a total of $4 trillion in Iraq so far (most of it by the United States). And the civilian deaths are approaching 2 million.
My guess is they went in to make matters much worse like they did in 89-90' to pave the way back in at some point in the future when the MIC needs to test tanks and ammo. The neocons will come out saying that we "invested" so much over there that we can't let it go to waste so we need to get the job done right this time. Good thing is, the American people by and large aren't going for this stuff anymore.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 12, 2014, 05:31:02 PM
Looks like Obama is seriously considering sending troops to Mosul.

Obama: 'I don't rule out anything' on Iraq

http://rt.com/usa/165596-obama-iraq-statement-any-option

I can see a conflict of interests here. In Syria, the ISIL is fighting against Assad, whom the Americans are trying to topple. They are supported by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, some of the best allies of America.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Benjig on June 12, 2014, 07:39:09 PM
This is a problem for Saudi Arabia and Iran to sort out. Both hate each other, but neither like al-Qaeda. It's about time we let the Sunni and Shiite sort out their own problems directly - by fighting if necessary.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Chef Ramsay on June 13, 2014, 03:51:43 AM
Sunni insurgents extend control in Iraq, close in on refinery
Quote
TIKRIT Iraq (Reuters) - Sunni insurgents from an al Qaeda splinter group extended their control from the northern city of Mosul on Wednesday to an area further south that includes Iraq's biggest oil refinery in a devastating show of strength against the Shi'ite-led government.

Security sources said militants from the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) - Sunni militants waging sectarian war on both sides of the Iraqi-Syrian frontier - drove into the town of Baiji late on Tuesday in armed vehicles, torching the court house and police station after freeing prisoners.

The Baiji refinery can process 300,000 barrels per day and supplies oil products to most of Iraq's provinces and is a major provider of power to Baghdad. A worker there said the morning shift had not been allowed to take over and the night shift was still on duty.

The push into Baiji began hours after ISIL overran Mosul, one of the great Sunni historic cities, advancing their aim of creating a Sunni Caliphate straddling the border between Iraq and Syria.

The United States, which pulled its troops out from Iraq to and half years ago, pledged to help Iraqi leaders "push back against this aggression" as the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki asked parliament to declare a state of emergency.

It said Washington would support "a strong, coordinated response", adding that "ISIL is not only a threat to the stability of Iraq, but a threat to the entire region"
.
http://news.yahoo.com/sunni-insurgents-close-iraqs-biggest-oil-refinery-111013537.html (http://news.yahoo.com/sunni-insurgents-close-iraqs-biggest-oil-refinery-111013537.html)
Yep^, we comin for that ass again.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 13, 2014, 07:48:51 AM
This is a problem for Saudi Arabia and Iran to sort out. Both hate each other, but neither like al-Qaeda. It's about time we let the Sunni and Shiite sort out their own problems directly - by fighting if necessary.

Iran hates the Al Qaeda. But the same can't be said about the Saudis. There are members of the Saudi Royal Family, who are supportive of Al Qaeda. However, Abdullah of Saudi Arabia remains opposed to them.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: baebygoodnight on June 13, 2014, 11:21:55 AM
Iraq is a deeply polarized society, with Sunnis, Shias, Kurds and other minorities deeply distrustful of each other. Despite this, Saddam Hussain was able to unite them, although by applying force. 

Chemical attacks on Kurdish cities were surely a great way of uniting Iraq.

I feel shame to see how the Iraqi army took of their clothes and fled to Kurdistan, giving up without a fight, and now Iraq is asking the Kurdish Peshmergas for help when Baghdad has failed to pay any contribution towards funding the Peshmerga units which it may now need.



Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 13, 2014, 11:29:15 AM
Chemical attacks on Kurdish cities were surely a great way of uniting Iraq.

Saddam Hussain was a pan-Arab nationalist. He wanted to forcibly assimilate the minority ethnic groups, which the Kurds despised. Feels bad for them. Their language is banned almost everywhere.... Turkey, Syria, Iran.etc.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: baebygoodnight on June 13, 2014, 11:42:36 AM
Chemical attacks on Kurdish cities were surely a great way of uniting Iraq.

Saddam Hussain was a pan-Arab nationalist. He wanted to forcibly assimilate the minority ethnic groups, which the Kurds despised. Feels bad for them. Their language is banned almost everywhere.... Turkey, Syria, Iran.etc.
Trust me, it's not only the language that is banned in those countries, dare to say you're a Kurd and you will see what will happen to you. Arabs look down on us but they sure as hell do enjoy going to Kurdistan for their holidays :).


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: niothor on June 15, 2014, 02:28:25 PM
Seems like the iraq army still has some power:

Quote
Iraqi government forces, backed by Shia Muslim and Kurdish militias, are reportedly holding back an advance by Sunni militants north of Baghdad.

A number of towns have been retaken from the rebels, but they still control the key cities of Tikrit and Mosul.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-27856223

http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=122479



Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 15, 2014, 03:09:06 PM
Trust me, it's not only the language that is banned in those countries, dare to say you're a Kurd and you will see what will happen to you. Arabs look down on us but they sure as hell do enjoy going to Kurdistan for their holidays :).

Feels sad. I have heard that in Turkey, they are not even allowed to use the term Kurds. They are referred as Mountain Turks. How is the situation in Iran? Do the Persian Kurds face any type of discrimination?


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: baebygoodnight on June 16, 2014, 07:27:30 AM
Trust me, it's not only the language that is banned in those countries, dare to say you're a Kurd and you will see what will happen to you. Arabs look down on us but they sure as hell do enjoy going to Kurdistan for their holidays :).

Feels sad. I have heard that in Turkey, they are not even allowed to use the term Kurds. They are referred as Mountain Turks. How is the situation in Iran? Do the Persian Kurds face any type of discrimination?

I can't really speak for Iran, I myself am an Iraqi Kurd and in our region you can come out for being a Kurd. And you're right in Turkey we are being called Mountain Turks.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Lethn on June 16, 2014, 07:40:32 AM
Chemical attacks on Kurdish cities were surely a great way of uniting Iraq.

Saddam Hussain was a pan-Arab nationalist. He wanted to forcibly assimilate the minority ethnic groups, which the Kurds despised. Feels bad for them. Their language is banned almost everywhere.... Turkey, Syria, Iran.etc.
Trust me, it's not only the language that is banned in those countries, dare to say you're a Kurd and you will see what will happen to you. Arabs look down on us but they sure as hell do enjoy going to Kurdistan for their holidays :).

I didn't even know there would be any Kurds hanging about on this forum of all places! I watched a pretty lengthy independent documentary about you guys and how you even had a women sniper team in your armed forces, is it true you guys don't discriminate as much against people of different faiths? It's hard to get accurate information over here in the west about Iraq and the documentary was mainly just the journalist talking to the Kurds themselves but these were mostly military people so of course they'll just talk up their own side as much as possible.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: baebygoodnight on June 16, 2014, 07:51:17 AM
Chemical attacks on Kurdish cities were surely a great way of uniting Iraq.

Saddam Hussain was a pan-Arab nationalist. He wanted to forcibly assimilate the minority ethnic groups, which the Kurds despised. Feels bad for them. Their language is banned almost everywhere.... Turkey, Syria, Iran.etc.
Trust me, it's not only the language that is banned in those countries, dare to say you're a Kurd and you will see what will happen to you. Arabs look down on us but they sure as hell do enjoy going to Kurdistan for their holidays :).

I didn't even know there would be any Kurds hanging about on this forum of all places! I watched a pretty lengthy independent documentary about you guys and how you even had a women sniper team in your armed forces, is it true you guys don't discriminate as much against people of different faiths? It's hard to get accurate information over here in the west about Iraq and the documentary was mainly just the journalist talking to the Kurds themselves but these were mostly military people.
I go back once every 2 years in the summer and I have seen muslims and christians living together in peace. Just like how we have mosques, I've seen churches there. There's a city nearby Erbil and it's called Ankawa and me and my cousins would always go there, I really like it. I've seen muslims and christians who are best friends.  And yeah for our armed forces, I feel huge pride. I was raised in Holland and I would grow up to the stories of my dad when he was a Peshmerga and why I should always have respect for them and now that I am at a certain age and seeing how our Peshmerga are reacting to this situation, I am finally understanding what my dad was talking about. 


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 18, 2014, 07:17:23 AM
Latest reports claim that the ISIS is only a few kilometers from Baghdad. The advantage with ISIS is that they don't care much about their own casualties, while the Iraqi soldiers seems to be deserting, unwilling to fight.

BTW, Iraq's biggest oil refinery, at Baiji has been captured by the ISIS.  ;D

http://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/assets/4607739/ISIS_control_june_12.png


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: niothor on June 18, 2014, 08:34:47 AM
Baghdad will never fall , we have 17 000 us troops and mercenaries there , remember? ;)


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 18, 2014, 11:14:16 AM
Baghdad will never fall , we have 17 000 us troops and mercenaries there , remember? ;)

The US embassy is heavily fortified and there are thousands of US troops and private security contractors guarding that facility. But if the ISIS launches a surprise attack with all their might, the Americans will not even get time to evacuate their personnel.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: niothor on June 18, 2014, 12:22:31 PM
Baghdad will never fall , we have 17 000 us troops and mercenaries there , remember? ;)

The US embassy is heavily fortified and there are thousands of US troops and private security contractors guarding that facility. But if the ISIS launches a surprise attack with all their might, the Americans will not even get time to evacuate their personnel.

If the ISIS will ever try to launch an all attack on that embassy it will be their doom.
They will die there without setting foot inside.

The moment they gather in large groups for such an attacks they are targets for the planes and drones.

My guess is that they will wait until the Americans will evacuate and just then storm Baghdad.
That is they will even reach the city.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Tzupy on June 18, 2014, 12:26:44 PM
Iraqi army lost a lot of fighting assets lately, they probably can't repair those damaged anytime soon:
http://www.janes.com/article/39550/iraqi-abrams-losses-revealed


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: RodeoX on June 18, 2014, 02:54:51 PM
Baghdad will never fall , we have 17 000 us troops and mercenaries there , remember? ;)

The US embassy is heavily fortified and there are thousands of US troops and private security contractors guarding that facility. But if the ISIS launches a surprise attack with all their might, the Americans will not even get time to evacuate their personnel.

If the ISIS will ever try to launch an all attack on that embassy it will be their doom.
They will die there without setting foot inside.

The moment they gather in large groups for such an attacks they are targets for the planes and drones.

My guess is that they will wait until the Americans will evacuate and just then storm Baghdad.
That is they will even reach the city.
If only it were that easy. We were not able to beat these guys after more than a decade of fighting on the ground. We certainly wont beat them with airstrikes now. There is really nothing we can do to stop this.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 18, 2014, 02:57:59 PM
My guess is that they will wait until the Americans will evacuate and just then storm Baghdad.
That is they will even reach the city.

OK. Confirmed news. The American Embassy is currently evacuating its nationals from the Baghdad installation (including security personnel). The local employees are staying on, but I think if the situation gets any worse, then they will also be evacuated to Basra. The Correspondent of the Telegraph is saying that the USAF has no plans to get directly involved in this fight.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Chef Ramsay on June 18, 2014, 06:37:35 PM
From what I can tell this is all by design to create something bigger and build on what Bush sr and jr set up. The neocons like McCain were doing backflips hoping to arm these Syrian rebels and now they are in possession of top notch weaponry and doing untold damage. THIS kind of thing is why us liberty minded personnel need to be the drivers of the GOP from here on out and let the neocons go back to their Troskyite ways in the democratic party from whence they came. They sure as hell aren't fiscally conservative in the least.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: beetcoin on June 18, 2014, 06:38:39 PM
From what I can tell this is all by design to create something bigger and build on what Bush sr and jr set up. The neocons like McCain were doing backflips hoping to arm these Syrian rebels and now they are in possession of top notch weaponry and doing untold damage. THIS kind of thing is why us liberty minded personnel need to be the drivers of the GOP from here on out and let the neocons go back to their Troskyite ways in the democratic party from whence they came. They sure as hell aren't fiscally conservative in the least.

mccain seems to be oblivious, bellicose, and faux pas when it comes to foreign policy.. yet he still acts like he is some sort of expert. it seems like the man loves war.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Tzupy on June 18, 2014, 07:10:47 PM
McCain wanted to ship weapons and other equipment to moderate fractions fighting against Assad, not to ISIL. And Hillary Clinton had a similar opinion.
But Obummer said no, just like he said no to recent requests of help from the Iraqi government. The ISIL has some US built weapons, but shipped
from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf States. If the Iraqi army collapses, the fight will be carried on by Shia militias and Iranian volunteers, resulting
in a civil (sectarian) war that could last years and could do massive damage in destroyed property and loss of life.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: beetcoin on June 18, 2014, 07:15:09 PM
McCain wanted to ship weapons and other equipment to moderate fractions fighting against Assad, not to ISIL. And Hillary Clinton had a similar opinion.
But Obummer said no, just like he said no to recent requests of help from the Iraqi government. The ISIL has some US built weapons, but shipped
from Saudi Arabia and other Gulf States. If the Iraqi army collapses, the fight will be carried on by Shia militias and Iranian volunteers, resulting
in a civil (sectarian) war that could last years and could do massive damage in destroyed property and loss of life.

obama haters and lovers alike put him in a catch 22 position. many people are asking why even bother meddling in other countries? and obama seems, at least on this issue, to not want to meddle. then you have people like you and mccain who want more involvement in the middle east.

FYI the rebel fighters fighting against assad are al queda. you know, the same one that we armed in the russian war.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Tzupy on June 18, 2014, 07:54:51 PM
Maybe now only al-Qaeda are still alive, fighting against Assad, because the moderate ones had no chance (thanks Obummer).
I don't want more involvement, but what Obummer does is similar to what happened in Vietnam. The US army eventually won
the attrition war (the vietcong was depleted), then left and the NVA conquered the South. If you think US occupation of Iraq
was bad (and I don't say it was good, they made many mistakes, especially under Rumsfeld), the civil war is going to be worse.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: beetcoin on June 18, 2014, 07:57:47 PM
Maybe now only al-Qaeda are still alive, fighting against Assad, because the moderate ones had no chance (thanks Obummer).
I don't want more involvement, but what Obummer does is similar to what happened in Vietnam. The US army eventually won
the attrition war (the vietcong was depleted), then left and the NVA conquered the South. If you think US occupation of Iraq
was bad (and I don't say it was good, they made many mistakes, especially under Rumsfeld), the civil war is going to be worse.

you are complaining that we are leaving the iraqi government to fend for itself.. i don't know how to take that other than "we need more support and troops in iraq." that, to me, is calling for more involvement in iraq.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: ChiliPowder on June 18, 2014, 07:58:51 PM
Islam the religion of peace!


Its obvious this was going to happen, anyone who has been around Iraqi or even Afghan soldiers, or has personally known soldiers that were over there has allready heard about thier complete incompetence. I recommend everyone watches this Vice Video on the next army to have to defend itself the Afghan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja5Q75hf6QI (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja5Q75hf6QI).

I jsut saw the other day the ISIS robbed all the banks in Mosul and made an absurd ammount of money, guess they are richer than Al Qaeda now.

Due to the soldiers abandoning thier posts and gear the ISIS  also now have up armored humvess, massive ammounts of ammunitions and arms, Sapi plates and body armor and who knows the may have some abrahms and a fucking mrap for all we know.

4 trillion and large ammount of us soldiers, such a god damn joke.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: beetcoin on June 18, 2014, 08:00:40 PM
Islam the religion of peace!


Its obvious this was going to happen, anyone who has been around Iraqi or even Afghan soldiers, or has personally known soldiers that were over there has allready heard about thier complete incompetence. I recommend everyone watches this Vice Video on the next army to have to defend itself the Afghan https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja5Q75hf6QI (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ja5Q75hf6QI).

I jsut saw the other day the ISIS robbed all the banks in Mosul and made an absurd ammount of money, guess they are richer than Al Qaeda now.

Due to the soldiers abandoning thier posts and gear the ISIS  also now have up armored humvess, massive ammounts of ammunitions and arms, Sapi plates and body armor and who knows the may have some abrahms and a fucking mrap for all we know.

4 trillion and large ammount of us soldiers, such a god damn joke.


yeah it's the same as vietnam.. the southern government was equally incompetent. it's funny that we side with the people who don't give a shit about winning a war.. or maybe they don't give a shit about winning because it's the "american side."

either way, there are so many teams in the game.. and we never choose the right one (if there is one).


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 19, 2014, 03:57:42 AM
ISIS is edging closer to Baghdad. They might attack Erbil as well. According to most reports, the hard core fighters of the ISIS numbers only a few thousands. The remaining is made up of dissident Sunni Arab civilians. The Iraqi army is low on morale and is fleeing to the South. Only the Peshmerga is willing to fight the ISIS, but they are both outmanned and outgunned.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: beetcoin on June 19, 2014, 04:26:46 AM
i guess it'll be interesting to see how much isis can inspire people to join them.. he sure looks like a darkhorse.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 19, 2014, 06:44:14 AM
i guess it'll be interesting to see how much isis can inspire people to join them.. he sure looks like a darkhorse.

Read this. You'll know how they are getting support:

http://rt.com/news/166920-isis-iraq-offensive-report

But seriously, ISIS does have a lot of support among the Sunni Arabs, who feel discrimination at the hands of the pro-US Shiite regime.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: beetcoin on June 19, 2014, 07:46:27 AM
i guess it'll be interesting to see how much isis can inspire people to join them.. he sure looks like a darkhorse.

Read this. You'll know how they are getting support:

http://rt.com/news/166920-isis-iraq-offensive-report

But seriously, ISIS does have a lot of support among the Sunni Arabs, who feel discrimination at the hands of the pro-US Shiite regime.

being cool and pro is one thing, but the more important part is where you don't get people who are uninspired/not loyal.. you know, like those iraqi guys who just surrendered their weapons and uniforms. ISIS would do well if they knew how to appeal to people by giving them a goal or reason to fight.


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: bryant.coleman on June 19, 2014, 10:23:41 AM
ISIS would do well if they knew how to appeal to people by giving them a goal or reason to fight.

Reason to fight is already there, as I have posted (discrimination of the Sunni Arabs by the Shiites). Even in Mosul, a large part of the local population is supporting the ISIS right now. (Mosul is an ethnically polarized city, divided between the Sunni Arabs and the Kurds).


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: Chef Ramsay on June 19, 2014, 07:20:45 PM
ISIS Poses No Existential Threat to America

Quote
As the Islamic warriors of ISIS rolled down the road from Mosul... “We are now facing an existential threat to the security of the United States of America,” said McCain. But nothing that happens in Mesopotamia is going to threaten the existence of the United States. As for the terrorist threat from ISIS, for us it is neither greater nor less than it was a week ago.

The existential threat here is to Iraq. Its survival as one nation is now in question, with the possibility it could be torn apart in a civil and sectarian war. But this is preeminently Iraq’s problem, not ours. And if Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, his 900,000-man army, and Shia militia cannot defend Baghdad from a few thousand Islamist warriors, America is under no obligation to do it for them. Maliki told us to go home three years ago. We did. And before we plunge back into that misbegotten war, let us consider what the real threats are—to America.
...
...ISIS has as allies in the north and west of Iraq Sunnis who detest Maliki and wish to be rid of him. But these Sunni are not demanding a Taliban regime to abolish smoking and drinking. Nor are they fighting to cut off the heads of their Shia countrymen. If ISIS goes beyond the liberation of the Sunni triangle to trying to take over all of Iraq, they will lose many Sunni allies and find themselves facing Iraq’s Shia majority, backed up by Iranian forces, virtually alone.

But while the Iraqi army and Shia militia may well hold Baghdad, it is hard to see how Maliki can soon reconquer the Sunni provinces. For the Sunnis want no part of him or his regime. Nor does Maliki seem capable of taking back Kirkuk, which the Kurds seized in the chaos as a step toward independence. What should America do? Take a hard look at our entire Middle East policy.
More...http://www.theamericanconservative.com/isis-poses-no-existential-threat-to-america/ (http://www.theamericanconservative.com/isis-poses-no-existential-threat-to-america/)


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: niothor on June 20, 2014, 12:15:06 AM
Number of Australians fighting with militants in Iraq and Syria 'extraordinary', Julie Bishop says

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-06-19/150-australians-fighting-with-extremists-in-iraq-and-syria/5535018

Quote
Foreign Minister Julie Bishop says 150 Australians have been or are currently overseas fighting with extremists in Iraq and Syria.

Things must be pretty boring there , with no neighbors to fight :)


Title: Re: Iraq's second largest city, Mosul, captured by Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
Post by: RodeoX on June 20, 2014, 07:20:55 PM
We should remind ourselves that there was never a time we were going to win this war. That self delusional nonsense was only for the most gullible soccer moms and neo-con flag waivers.   
I remember when GWB announced a "crusade" in the middle east. I was like "Holly shit, did he just say that?" Such a statement showed me that he knew nothing about the region. But I assumed that his CIA advisers would steer him back to planet Earth.  Sadly, Dick Cheney's office went after anyone who spoke truth to power and promoted those who said "yes sir!".
Their claim that in six months the war would be over and we would be welcomed with roses was... well a bit off.
So settle in folks. We will be fighting this war for the rest of your life. In the mid-east, in Europe, and in America.

"Wars begin when you will, but they do not end when you please."
-Niccolò Machiavelli