Bitcoin Forum

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/10916086/The-scandal-of-fiddled-global-warming-data.html
USA has actually been COOLING since 1930s, the hottest decade on record...

Sadly this really wouldn't surprise me…

The radical environmental movement is based on lies and intentional misrepresentations of data that is skewed to meet the agenda out of the gate. Of course, much of this analysis comes from those that are sucking off the govt teet and thus are just filling in the blanks w/ pre-approved garbage. Anyone want a grant to prove X, Y or Z? Pretty much how it goes. Then the media picks up this bunk and presents it as news and then the gullible boobs buy into it.

NOAA Reinstates July 1936 As The Hottest Month On Record

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, criticized for manipulating temperature records to create a warming trend, has now been caught warming the past and cooling the present.

July 2012 became the hottest month on record in the U.S. during a summer that was declared “too hot to handle” by NASA scientists. That summer more than half the country was experiencing drought and wildfires had scorched more than 1.3 million acres of land, according to NASA.

According to NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center in 2012, the “average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during July was 77.6°F, 3.3°F above the 20th century average, marking the warmest July and all-time warmest month on record for the nation in a period of record that dates back to 1895.”

“The previous warmest July for the nation was July 1936, when the average U.S. temperature was 77.4°F,” NOAA said in 2012.

This statement by NOAA was still available on their website when checked by The Daily Caller News Foundation. But when meteorologist and climate blogger Anthony Watts went to check the NOAA data on Sunday he found that the science agency had quietly reinstated July 1936 as the hottest month on record in the U.S.

“Two years ago during the scorching summer of 2012, July 1936 lost its place on the leaderboard and July 2012 became the hottest month on record in the United States,” Watts wrote. “Now, as if by magic, and according to NOAA’s own data, July 1936 is now the hottest month on record again. The past, present, and future all seems to be ‘adjustable’ in NOAA’s world.”

Watts had data from NOAA’s “Climate at a Glance” plots from 2012, which shows that July 2012 was the hottest month on record at 77.6 degrees Fahrenheit. July 1936 is only at 77.4 degrees Fahrenheit. [Annotations in the graph are from Watts].

http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/30/noaa-quietly-reinstates-july-1936-as-the-hottest-month-on-record/

Of COURSE they're fabricating the data AND they're yanking the funding of any scientist who has the guts to poke up his head and comment that climate change is the result of faulty data. In fact, I just heard somebody talk about May of this year being the hottest May when I distinctly remember that I was still walking around in my sweatshirt -- I live in the Midwest USA, BTW, and I haven't seen snow in mid-April for several years until this one. And of course we had that "polar vortex" with near-record snowfalls last winter.

What is the reason for fudging the data and lies?

What's going on is that they fudge old data, make it colder.  That makes current data much hotter than the past.  Then they can talk about the trendline pointing toward droughts, and floods, and ice caps melting, and puppies drowning, and little girls crying.

And how we need to pay more taxes or the world will come to an end.  Then these guys in the gubbermints that rake the money in, they have these friends they give it to.  These guys say they will fix the planet but it's going to be expensive.

Yea but isn't that some scarily cool shit?

Polar vortexes....

Zombie Polar Vortexes coming....

snaking their way toward YOU in the dead of night....

You can't get grants without a good crisis. As always "follow the money."

Don't you remember when the "scientists" in East Anglia were caught changing the data so that their paid grants would continue?  Their grants were dependent on "global warming" when, in fact, no warming has occurred.  Sad that they would attempt to hoodwink the world for financial gain.

I agree, if you have to fudge the data your theory isn't worth the time of day. And if your defense against anyone that doesn't 'buy your theory is to claim they are idiots who believe the world is flat then your theory isn't based on fact or that would be your defense. I believed in global warming because of what the media reported, then a couple of engineers I worked with told me to google the issue and find out the truth. What an eye opener that was. Follow the money, in this case its trillions of dollars and most of it ends up in the pockets of politicians and their rich friends.

That makes TWO groups that have been caught fudging the numbers and there are probably lots more.  It is a great hoax on the American people and just another way to extract taxes from them.  Soon we will have nothing left to live on.

http://cnsnews.com/mrctv-blog/craig-bannister/obama-proclaims-hurricane-intensity-increase-climate-continues-warm   
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AS_AUSTRALIA_CLIMATE_CHANGE?SITE=MYPSP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2014-06-23-01-12-16
its NEVER been about global warming, global cooling, climate change.. its ALWAYS been about the MONEY!!!

And who do you think is the hardest hit by the price increases from global warming? If the rich pay an extra 10k a year in income taxes to cover this crap they don't miss it. When the middle class pay an extra 1k in income taxes it matters. And when the cost of utilities and gas  and food goes up who is the hardest hit? The middle class and the poor because you know full well the Romneys and the Gates and the Buffets don't cut back on their groceries because of the increases and they don't turn the heat down a notch to cut the heating bill, its the poor and the middle class that is hardest hit. Who's making money while obama fiddle faddles over the Keystone? Why warren buffet of course. And who made hundreds of millions in tax payer dollars for failed green energy? That would be the rich while the workers got screwed out of jobs.

Who has always enthusiastically supported the 'science' of global warming/climate change? The Alinsky left, which means it's far more political than science, because all their 'solutions' just happen to be the legal enforcing of liberal causes.

Some segments of the Internet are abuzz with the claim by climate change skeptic Steven Goddard (Tony Heller) over at his Real Science blog that NASA/NOAA have been jiggering the numbers so that they can claim that warmest years in the continental United States occurred recently, not back in the 1930s. Folks, please watch out for confirmation bias.http://reason.com/archives/2011/07/12/scientific-literacy-climate-ch
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/noaanasa-dramatically-altered-us-temperatures-after-the-year-2000/

Via email, I asked Anthony Watts, proprietor of WattsUpWithThat, what he thinks of Goddard's claims. He responded...
http://wattsupwiththat.com/
    ...while it is true that NOAA does a tremendous amount of adjustment to the surface temperature record, the word“fabrication” implies that numbers are being plucked out of thin air in a nefarious way when it isn’t exactly the case.

    “Goddard” is wrong is his assertions of fabrication, but the fact is that NCDC isn’t paying attention to small details, and the entire process from B91’s to CONUS creates an inflated warming signal. We published a preliminary paper two years ago on this which you can read here: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/29/press-release-2/

    About half the warming in the USA is due to adjustments. We' received a lot of criticism for that paper, and we’ve spent two years reworking it and dealing with those criticisms. Our results are unchanged and will be published soon.

    continue:  http://reason.com/blog/2014/06/23/did-nasanoaa-dramatically-alter-us-tempe

Driven by exceptionally warm ocean waters, Earth smashed a record for heat in May and is likely to keep on breaking high temperature marks, experts have said.

May’s average temperature on Earth of 15.54 degrees Celsius was the warmest since records began in 1880, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Last month was especially hot in parts of Kazakhstan, Indonesia, Spain, South Korea and Australia, while the United States was not close to a record, just one degree warmer than the 20th century average. However, California is having a record hot first five months of the year, a full 5 degrees above normal.

Kim Cobb, a climate scientist at Georgia Tech, said there is a good chance global heat records will keep falling, especially next year because an El Nino weather event is brewing on top of man-made global warming. An El Nino is a warming of the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean that alters climate worldwide and usually spikes global temperatures.

Ocean temperatures in May also set a record for the month. But an El Nino is not considered in effect till the warm water changes the air and that has not happened yet, NOAA said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/10921695/May-was-the-hottest-month-ever-for-Earth.html#disqus_thread

the thing is, this Global Warming bullshit is akin to a major religion, the faithful will NEVER renounce it, any more than Ms. Ibrahim would renounce Christianity to save her own life.

I hope one day to see AlGore hanged from a sour apple tree.

somehow this just gets better and better...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAlMomLvu_4

I have eyes, ears and a mind. I am also a natural skeptic, I do my due diligence before making up my mind on things, particularly as important as this is. I am hardly an alarmist, more pragmatic really. So, best you calm down and do some critical thinking about this climate denial you are so fond of. Not sure why.....obsession it seems.
In the mean time the truth marches on, remember the earth is NOT flat either.

Also the scandal of a round Earth. Round, pfft. I don't need no science learn'n to know if the world was round we'd all fall off.

And we all know what's coming after the Zombie Polar Vortexes... White walkers...  ;D
https://i.imgur.com/5k8Ru4J.png

Climate Chaos Charlatans

Global Warming
Global Climate Change
It's Worse Than We Thought
Catastrophic Sea Level Rise
The Sun's Going Nuts
We're All Gonna Die

CO2 increase =  9 billion people exhaling
Methane increase = 20 billion farting cows and pigs
Temperature increase = Weather stations sited on asphalt parking lots 

For a more measured view ..

http://wattsupwiththat.com/

Triff .. still breathing and contributing to atmospheric CO2

Had you read any further down the thread, you would have found that I did your homework for you and found a critique of bookers report from a source that I consider to be reasonable.

I still find it odd that you so blindly follow 'science' when it comes to AGW while, at the very same moment, you believe genetically modified crops and critters to be deadly poisen despite the obvious fact that genetics is a far more legitimate discipline than climate could ever hope to be.

Believe one branch of 'science'... especially as shoddy a one as AGW while you dismiss geneticists as quackery?  Are 'scientists' to be believed without question or are they to be questioned whenever you have a question?

Believe whatever you like, the results are in. The only thing left is to take action that might extend our existence on this planet. But keep on barking up that tree, see how it works for ya.  good luck........

Well fiddle faddle...yet somehow the sea level continues to rise.  Water is coming from somewhere. I wonder how that happens?  Must be that underwater volcano in the Antarctic, that's probably something new.

Sea levels have been rising since the end of the last ice age and no one much notices or cares except, perhaps, the Dutch.

A relatively new phenomina is federal subsidies for flood insurance on the east coast.  Prior, when the ocean reach up and smote someone, they would know not to rebuild in that spot.  Thanks to feds subsidies, they keep building over and over again in the same spots where the last storm smacked 'em.

Meanwhile, over in the gulf states, the continent has been slowly subsiding for a thousand years.  The mississippi used to flood pretty much every year and the sediments deposited raised the land about the same rate as the subsidence dropped it.  However, now the mississippi is not allowed to flood any more, so.... the subsidence wins.

Oh, the feds rebuilt new orleans after the gulf reached up and smote it.

Wow – are you for real?.  Talk to the people in South. Florida, and they will tell you more about the rising of the seas levels than google does .

You mean the ones who keep rebuilding their homes in flood plains and then act all surprised when their homes get washed away in storm surge?  Those same people who's home owners insurance is subsidized by you and me so that they can live in their palaces on the beach?  Those guys?
If you build your home on the beach, eventually you are going to get wet.
Oh, but lets make rewarding stupid choices the norm, shall we?   In Alaska there are avalanche zones.  Lets have the feds subsidize home owners insurance so that building in an avalanche zone becomes a smart thing to do... after all, when your house is destroyed, you get a brand new one!I love this idea!  Oh, and lets extend the flood plain subsidies to the west, too!  I want to build a home on the banks of the Susitna river!  When the bank erodes out from under my home, I'll get another home build a few feet away... for free!
What an awesome idea!  Very Keynesian!  Think of all the employment this could generate as peoples homes get washed away by erosion or avalanche!

When these hypocritical idiots start acting like there is a problem, then I will listen to them, until then, its all about how much money they can make and how much money they can screw people out of:

Greenpeace executive flies 250 miles to work

And al gore flies his private jet all over the world to give speeches about global warming and the dangers of fossil fuel. Yep, follow the money, the trail leads to rich guys like this who are getting richer selling the fear and convincing people they can control the weather.

Isn't this whole global climate change argument just a massive
smoke screen obfuscating the real issue that no one wants to
directly address ?? Namely that we live on a planet with finite
carbon based resources that are the basis of our transportation
and power generating capabilities ?? Peak Fossil Fuels is coming
( sooner or later ), it's a mathematical certainty .. We can continue
with business as usual until we can't .. I'd prefer a smoother transition
UP the energy density curve to meet our future energy needs ..

Bottom line .. it's all about the cheapest way to boil water to make steam to
turn a turbine to generate electricity .. The liberals hate coal ( dirty but cheap ) ..
Fine .. but wind turbines, solar PV and solar thermal are intermittant and
don't/won't  scale .. This leaves Gen III and Gen IV fission plants and we'd
better have the sense to roll them out before we pull the kill switch
on existing coal and gas generating stations ..

Forget climate change ..
Time to focus on solutions and the best path forward ..

Triff ..@I luv the thorium fuel cycle .. MSBR/LFTRs anyone ?????