Bitcoin Forum

Hi guys,

I'm totally new to the bitcoin. And I'm very interested in the blockchain application. Just had this idea and want to check with the community to see if it makes senses at all. Thanks a lot in advance.

I'm thinking to use blockchain to replace the software license, such as serial number. So when end user bought a software, the service can generate a message signed by user's public key and put this data into blockchain with some trivial fee. Then when user starts the software, the software goes to the service and service can download the message, then user can use his own private key to decrypt the message. If it succeeds, the software is unlocked.

Does this make sense?  
 

I think this needs to be proof of concept, because you aren't giving a lot of technical details to go off. Also what if I use your software for a 10000000 years but in 10 years you are out of business, now I can't unlock the message cause it sounds like some centralization is involved.

Try to make it decentralized that would be awesome!

Your idea would work, but wouldn't stop piracy. All someone would have to do is drain the bitcoin wallet and create a new one. Then distribute the private key so anyone can use the software.

He would probably put a cap, at 5 or per payment. So once the key has been verified 5 times by the server it can't be used again.

Well the entry would be in the blockchain, and the record would be kept on a stable source. So the idea is great. The implementation might be a bit tricky.  ;D

Good luck, and give us more detailed feedback, when you finished please.

The OP is just asking if using the digital signature of Bitcoin addresses is a feasible method of verifying software licenses.



Most commercial software are designed to be supported for only up to 5-10 years. If you are using software that is over 10 years old, then you are using outdated software that has not been patched for any possible exploits. It may still work, but it is pretty much guaranteed that faster and more efficient variants of that software had been written within that span of time.

Centralization is obviously involved -- in fact, it is required. The point is to make sure that the end-user paid for the license to use the software. Why would a business need to decentralize that? What point is there in decentralizing it?



If I were using the OP's method, then I would add an "Invalidate this license" feature to the software. That way, if a private key was being shared around to pirate the software, then the software vendor (or anyone) could simply use that same key to invalidate the license key of every copy of the software using it. If the software required the user to connect online every 15 minutes or so, then the license key can still be invalidated post-verification.