|
Title: US Marshals: One Auction Bidder Claimed All 30,000 Silk Road Bitcoins Post by: btc777stone on July 02, 2014, 08:57:25 AM In my mind, this is a good thing. It means all coins sold at the highest price possible.
The bad news is that it means it's less likely we'll find out what that price point was. Title: Re: Lowest Unique number Wins 0.0001 bitcoins Post by: Velkro on July 02, 2014, 08:59:38 AM Whats this, a joke? 0.0001 is nothing :)
Title: Re: Lowest Unique number Wins 0.0001 bitcoins Post by: cech4204a on July 02, 2014, 09:01:01 AM I'll pick 1 , if nobody else picks 1 than that means i win, so please people don't take 1 :) Anyways this can be also no winner game, you can get 777X2 posts here with 777X 2 numbers and you have no winner. :) Funny, btw , why do you do that giveaway? Who are "we" ?
Title: Re: US Marshals: One Auction Bidder Claimed All 30,000 Silk Road Bitcoins Post by: C.Steven on July 02, 2014, 09:15:14 AM I don't really get it.
While the thread is "US Marshals: One Auction Bidder Claimed All 30,000 Silk Road Bitcoins", the replies are "Re: Lowest Unique number Wins 0.0001 bitcoins". Did OP put the wrong stuff in the thread originally and edit it very quickly? Or did the repliers reply the wrong thread? Title: Re: US Marshals: One Auction Bidder Claimed All 30,000 Silk Road Bitcoins Post by: Velkro on July 02, 2014, 10:22:09 AM I don't really get it. before edit it was post about winning 0.0001 in game of choosing lowest number from 1 to 777 smth like that While the thread is "US Marshals: One Auction Bidder Claimed All 30,000 Silk Road Bitcoins", the replies are "Re: Lowest Unique number Wins 0.0001 bitcoins". Did OP put the wrong stuff in the thread originally and edit it very quickly? Or did the repliers reply the wrong thread? |