|
Title: ANN discussion Post by: hatecrypti on July 10, 2014, 12:23:13 PM Recently there are some coins which IPO via platforms, e.g. FIMK, Crypti, this is very unfair for the guys who have been following on and giving good suggestion and support to the coins, I want to tell all guys who want to announce their coins, if you want to IPO via platforms, you can leave this community and register a company and sell your coins. Don't get free support from this community and IPO your coins to the dumpers in the platform.
Let me take an example, I have following on Crypti at the very beginning and read all posts in the thread, the devs are just interesting in money not tech innovation,there is even basic errors in their codes, but they IPO their coins via big platform(bter), they just want to raise as much money as possible and ignore the community member's benefits, it's really unfair and I am so disappointed, these devs are trying to break up the balance of the ecosystem of this community. I am a senior member in this community and this is my sock puppet, hope everyone join in the discussion on this topic. Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: mydearvoice on July 10, 2014, 12:24:27 PM Friend, I agree with your idea
Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: bathrobehero on July 10, 2014, 12:25:55 PM Friend, I agree with your idea Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: shadowduck on July 10, 2014, 12:30:53 PM Exact what I feel,
I just feel pity for the time I spent in the past several months. I won't spend even one satoshi on this greedy team. Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: Bbeenn on July 10, 2014, 12:35:30 PM I agree with you .
Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: robinf on July 10, 2014, 12:38:23 PM Friend, I agree with your idea +1 We resist the ipo, please return to the original way of ipo. Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: prix on July 10, 2014, 12:44:10 PM @hatecrypti
Can you explain your position more clearly? Why is distribution through Bter is unfair? I see the main risky option for investors - no IPO max cap. Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: mydearvoice on July 10, 2014, 12:48:13 PM I just want to say, the author and the website has a problem, want to cheat money?
Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: hatecrypti on July 10, 2014, 12:50:00 PM @hatecrypti Can you explain your position more clearly? Why is distribution through Bter is unfair? I see the main risky option for investors - no IPO max cap. There are a lot of guys in the platform, they know nothing, do nothing to the coin, they even don't know the coin, they just join in the IPO and when the coin launches then sell them like they exchange the launched coins, do you think this is fair to the community guys who give good support and suggestions to the coin? do you think this is good to the long-term project? Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: Buratino on July 10, 2014, 01:01:01 PM It is hard to give value to your 'good support and suggestions'. I didn't read it yet - I am too lazy for finding those exclamations.
Can you do post there resume of 'good support and suggestions'? After this we can judge your position. Thanks. Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: aqlzf123 on July 10, 2014, 01:08:32 PM To resist these immoral IPO.
Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: shadowduck on July 10, 2014, 01:10:33 PM It is hard to give value to your 'good support and suggestions'. I didn't read it yet - I am too lazy for finding those exclamations. You can judge...Can you do post there resume of 'good support and suggestions'? After this we can judge your position. Thanks. Who are you? Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: huxdy on July 10, 2014, 01:16:57 PM In Chinese, bter behavior has been suspected of illegal fund-raising charges, this is very serious in China
Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: Buratino on July 10, 2014, 01:27:09 PM You can judge... 'We' - this means a whole community, not only me. Everyone would like to know alternative opinions. Who are you? I am potential investor and also would like to know more. And you? Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: loveyouforever on July 10, 2014, 02:02:26 PM Totally agree with this guy, platform should not join in the IPO, it will break up the ecosystem in this community.
Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: wangjin098 on July 10, 2014, 03:06:31 PM you say good i agree with you !
Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: kdrop22 on July 10, 2014, 07:59:14 PM In Chinese, bter behavior has been suspected of illegal fund-raising charges, this is very serious in China Can you provide further details on this. I have some funds on BTER, is it okay to keep them there. Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: tobeaj2meraa on July 10, 2014, 10:37:38 PM I agree with this guy, there are potential policy risk in the BTC things in China especially IPO.
Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: tobeaj2meraa on July 10, 2014, 10:40:23 PM In Chinese, bter behavior has been suspected of illegal fund-raising charges, this is very serious in China Can you provide further details on this. I have some funds on BTER, is it okay to keep them there. I think your fund is safe but not sure the IPO things, bter is a company but I don't know if they have the qualification to make an IPO. Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: balu2 on July 11, 2014, 02:03:42 AM not touching an ipo ever. Ipo translates to "fundraising donation to the devs".
I am not the salvation army. Title: Re: ANN discussion Post by: ARGpentem on July 11, 2014, 02:13:47 AM Recently there are some coins which IPO via platforms, e.g. FIMK, Crypti, this is very unfair for the guys who have been following on and giving good suggestion and support to the coins, I want to tell all guys who want to announce their coins, if you want to IPO via platforms, you can leave this community and register a company and sell your coins. Don't get free support from this community and IPO your coins to the dumpers in the platform. Let me take an example, I have following on Crypti at the very beginning and read all posts in the thread, the devs are just interesting in money not tech innovation,there is even basic errors in their codes, but they IPO their coins via big platform(bter), they just want to raise as much money as possible and ignore the community member's benefits, it's really unfair and I am so disappointed, these devs are trying to break up the balance of the ecosystem of this community. I am a senior member in this community and this is my sock puppet, hope everyone join in the discussion on this topic. There is a good point here. These coins look more like straight start-ups. Invest accordingly. |