Bitcoin Forum

Author and activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali says Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu deserves a Nobel Peace Prize for his resolve during Israel’s latest conflict with the terrorist group Hamas.

“I really admire Benjamin Netanyahu,” Ali told the Israeli newspaper Israel Hayom.

“He is under so much pressure, from so many sources, and yet he does what is best for the people of Israel, he does his duty,” she continued. “I really think he should get the Nobel Peace Prize. In a fair world he would get it.”

Born in Somalia, Ali was granted political asylum by the Netherlands in 1992. Living in the European country, she renounced her Muslim faith and became a campaigner for women’s rights in the Muslim world. Elected to the Dutch parliament in 2003, her outspoken criticism of radical Islam led to death threats and the need for round-the-clock security.

“Everyone was upset with Netanyahu when he said that he would not negotiate before the other side said that they recognize the existence of the State of Israel,” she said. “That is a basic demand. Without that it is pointless to go to the negotiations table. It is Negotiations 101.”


http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/04/ayaan-hirsi-ali-netanyahu-should-get-the-nobel-peace-prize/

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Amazing Lady.

She is fearless.

Fuck the Nobel Peace Prize and those who ruined it.

Interesting that this is the first of my seeing this today. Usually, these attaboys for Bibi usually make the rounds on talk radio but the shows I heard today were talking about this Ebola situation developing here. My guess is that there's this coordinated effort w/ this immigration/open boarders scenario coinciding w/ the Ebola outbreak and the 2 Americans who've contracted it to overshadow the real economic damage that's going on right out in the open but trying to hide it in plain view based on flipping the script in a deceitful way. After all, people are more likely to focus their minds on something that affects their well being more so than economic stagnation.

She is maybe right from Israel viewpoint but not from Palestinian's viewpoint.
Real question here is it's correct to kill 100 innocent people in order to kill one terrorist?
For Israel obvious answer is yes but for all others answer is NO.

Yep, lots of smokescreens being put up to cover all the money printing.

No kidding?

"We want to launch rockets at Israel and they do nothing, hahaha we laugh! So we launch more rockets and they do nothing, hahahaha!"

....oops

That's a biased way to ask the question, the correct way would be: "is it's correct to kill 100 innocent people in order to kill one terrorist AND potentially save 100 Israelis?" (can never know if the rocket will hit civilians or not, but the intent is surely there).
Than the correct answer is yes.

People forget that Israel targets the terrorists not because they are just terrorists, but because they shot at Israeli civilians putting their life in danger.

Look at the border with hizballah, Israel doesn't shot at the terrorists there and they are there and very much visible. They aren't being shot at because they don't shot Israelis (for now).

I thought this was a headline from The Onion...

It's not the first time I've seen such a call, even some Natanyaho advisor said so in my country a few weeks ago presenting the same propaganda, I was amazed how such people can say straight in the face of other people he deserve a noble peace prize with the blood of almost 2 thousands people just in this current event on his hand

Here go. Enjoy! (http://www.theonion.com/)  ;)