Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Development & Technical Discussion => Topic started by: Balloon on August 13, 2014, 11:50:34 PM



Title: Is there any implementation of bitcoin-based spam email control system?
Post by: Balloon on August 13, 2014, 11:50:34 PM
"Bitcoin's micropayment feature has been a killer feature for application like spam email control." I think this has been mentioned a lot. But is there any real implementation or proposal about such idea? Also some other applications like ad-hoc network, paid wifi access, tor, etc. Is there any implementation about them?


Title: Re: Is there any implementation of bitcoin-based spam email control system?
Post by: mmeijeri on August 14, 2014, 12:18:09 AM
Check out HashCash and Bitmessage.


Title: Re: Is there any implementation of bitcoin-based spam email control system?
Post by: amincd on August 14, 2014, 04:44:41 AM
No there is not. Hashcash was the first proof of work application, and preceded Bitcoin. Bitmessage is a messaging system that requires proof of work in order to limit bloat (including spam). It is not directly based on Bitcoin, is not for email, and does not use micropayments.


Title: Re: Is there any implementation of bitcoin-based spam email control system?
Post by: shorena on August 14, 2014, 09:15:14 AM
Paying with bitcoins for mail? sounds like De-Fail [1] just international. People aint gonna pay for mails. They are used to it beeing free. Thats like suddently paying a special tax just to be able to use that bridge... oh wait.


[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De-Mail


Title: Re: Is there any implementation of bitcoin-based spam email control system?
Post by: virtualx on August 14, 2014, 10:01:05 AM
spam control? Not that I know of. There is a messaging system called BitMessage https://bitmessage.org/wiki/Main_Page (https://bitmessage.org/wiki/Main_Page)
I have heard about paid-wifi access but never looked into it.


Title: Re: Is there any implementation of bitcoin-based spam email control system?
Post by: mmeijeri on August 14, 2014, 11:40:26 AM
No there is not.

I didn't say there was, I said 'check out'.