Bitcoin Forum

Other => Beginners & Help => Topic started by: geffaxiv-532 on April 06, 2012, 12:27:54 AM



Title: Sinking ships
Post by: geffaxiv-532 on April 06, 2012, 12:27:54 AM
Why do governments sink ships instead of melting it back to base metals?


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: Rothgar on April 06, 2012, 12:29:50 AM
Think about the first part of your question a little bit more.

"Why do governments"

Let me ask you:

What incentive do governments have?


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: 5850Guy on April 06, 2012, 12:36:21 AM
Why do governments sink ships instead of melting it back to base metals?

Because it's easier to sink a sheep than bring it on-shore, break it down, and melt it down?

At least for now.  Once metals become scarce (if they do), their value will skyrocket and these things won't happen anymore.

And, congratulations on Post #2


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: Endgame on April 06, 2012, 06:08:17 AM
You must be talking about that ship near alaska that the US wants to sink. I suppose it would be a lot of work towing it to a place capable of stripping it down.


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: geffaxiv-532 on April 06, 2012, 09:53:24 AM
Think about the first part of your question a little bit more.

"Why do governments"

Let me ask you:

What incentive do governments have?

MY QUESTION IS NOT METAPHORICAL OR RHETORICAL BY NATURE. DO THAT SOMEWHERE ELSE.


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: Lazer on April 06, 2012, 06:59:46 PM
Why do governments sink ships instead of melting it back to base metals?

LOOSE LIPS

In the US, it's because of an incredible complete bureaucracy.

You wouldn't believe how a seemingly simple action needs to first go through a number of departments to get approval.
These approvals take time, energy, and dedication in their consistency.

It's much easier for the bureaucrats in charge to do what they've already been doing in the past and not deal with the other bureaucrats in this bureaucratic system.

So they instead take the straightforward, but not optimal, way out and do what's best for them (or their dept) rather then what's best for the country and the people. Just my opinion anyways.


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: DeathAndTaxes on April 06, 2012, 07:14:36 PM
This has nothing to do with bureaucracies.  Many private entities sink ships also.

OP it is simply expensive to strip, cut, and melt ships.  Far cheaper to just sink it.  They also becomes artificial reefs so that becomes a plus given the rate we are destroying natural reefs.

Kinda the same question of "why do people throw away metal, paper, glass & plastics only to have to mine new resources out of the earth each year"?


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: Bees Brothers on April 06, 2012, 08:17:48 PM
Moral boost (training lesson) for a bunch of trigger happy guys?
 


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: Foxpup on April 07, 2012, 01:00:58 AM
Recycling metal is almost as expensive as mining it out of the ground. Add to that the cost of dismantling the ship (which is a huge job, requiring a drydock facility), and it's just not worth it. Metal has to become a lot more valuable in order for recycling a ship to become profitable.


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: Helpcoin on April 07, 2012, 01:05:51 AM
This is an interesting little article on Shipbreakers in India: http://moneylinked.blogspot.com/2011/01/ship-breakers-in-india.html


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: btcnoodle on April 07, 2012, 01:06:45 AM
Why do governments sink ships instead of melting it back to base metals?

The Coast Guard said it would be too dangerous to either repair or salvage. There was a party who wanted to go get it but they were refused permission due to the aforementioned reasons.


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: casascius on April 07, 2012, 01:10:24 AM
It's a good thing that we have a Coast Guard to save people from themselves!


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: btcnoodle on April 07, 2012, 01:22:11 AM
It's a good thing that we have a Coast Guard to save people from themselves!
Yup, it was so dangerous it took them several attempts and some time to sink it.


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: terrytibbs on April 07, 2012, 02:01:02 AM
bueracracies
what


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: benjamindees on April 07, 2012, 08:32:31 AM
The US government blows things up because blowing things up is a component of GDP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_product).  A rising GDP gives the government an excuse to claim that the economy is doing well, which gives them an excuse to borrow money to spend on blowing more things up, also known as "providing government services."  This borrowed money is provided by the central bank, known as the Federal Reserve, which prints money out of thin air to lend to the US government to blow things up, at interest.  This interest is also known as the national debt, and will never be repaid anyways so it doesn't matter.  Welcome to America.


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: zelmer on April 09, 2012, 04:54:17 PM
I can't say that I blame the Coast Guard for sinking that ship, it must be tough to sail around the ocean all day every day with a big ol' cannon and not shoot at anything. Finally something to shoot at! Good hits, Coast Guard, good hits!


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: Nicotinefreek on April 10, 2012, 01:34:13 AM
The US government blows things up because blowing things up is a component of GDP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_product).  A rising GDP gives the government an excuse to claim that the economy is doing well, which gives them an excuse to borrow money to spend on blowing more things up, also known as "providing government services."  This borrowed money is provided by the central bank, known as the Federal Reserve, which prints money out of thin air to lend to the US government to blow things up, at interest.  This interest is also known as the national debt, and will never be repaid anyways so it doesn't matter.  Welcome to America.

Lol love this post. Had to read it twice over :)


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: dunand on April 10, 2012, 04:05:39 AM
This is an interesting little article on Shipbreakers in India: http://moneylinked.blogspot.com/2011/01/ship-breakers-in-india.html

The title remembered me of this documentary about indian shipbreakers. www.ipexview.com/solution/videos/National_Film_Board_of_Canada/Shipbreakers/64/


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: FiZiX on April 10, 2012, 02:03:18 PM
Because it's easier to sink a sheep than bring it on-shore, break it down, and melt it down?

Poor sheep   :'(


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: bitsforcoins.com on April 10, 2012, 07:35:24 PM
I wonder if the EPA made them burn all the fuel and such, as they would the rest of us.


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: SgtSpike on April 10, 2012, 07:49:50 PM
I wonder if the EPA made them burn all the fuel and such, as they would the rest of us.
I would imagine any unused fuel has been removed via pump to be used elsewhere.  THAT'S a cheap process, and considering how expensive fuel is, they'd be fools not to.

Also, @OP, because blowing stuff up is fun, and boys never grow up.


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: FiZiX on April 10, 2012, 07:58:51 PM
I saw something on TV about this. It's actually a very thorough process. They strip practically everything except the metal from the ship and tow it out to a place they want a reef. Then they cut giant holes in it and let it sink. It's actually pretty good for ocean life because they use them to start new reefs.


Title: Re: Sinking ships
Post by: Kettenmonster on April 10, 2012, 08:19:40 PM
Why do governments do X?
... uhm how would we know? Ask them governments!

DonŽt know how it is handled at your place, geffaxiv-532. Here youŽd just ask a member of parliament.