Bitcoin Forum

Bitcoin => Press => Topic started by: LiteCoinGuy on August 29, 2014, 04:08:52 PM



Title: [2014-08-29] theverge.com: Meet the man building the Fort Knox of bitcoin
Post by: LiteCoinGuy on August 29, 2014, 04:08:52 PM
Meet the man building the Fort Knox of bitcoin

http://www.theverge.com/2014/8/29/6082195/the-fort-knox-of-bitcoin-xapo-wences-casares


Title: Re: [2014-08-29] theverge.com: Meet the man building the Fort Knox of bitcoin
Post by: fryarminer on August 29, 2014, 04:29:24 PM
This is insanely awesome! Makes me feel safe just reading it!


Title: Re: [2014-08-29] theverge.com: Meet the man building the Fort Knox of bitcoin
Post by: 311 on August 29, 2014, 04:55:34 PM
Quote
In July, a bitcoin startup named Xapo announced it was raising $20 million, bringing its total backing to $40 million. It was using this funding for an unusually intense security setup. Xapo tells users that they can feel secure because their bitcoin will be stored in offline servers, scattered across multiple continents, in secret underground vaults, with armed guards, and biometric sensors. We sat down with Xapo CEO Wences Casares to discuss why he thinks such extreme measures are necessary and how he sees bitcoin changing the world.

Umm... seriously? Is that even necessary. Sounds like it could make a great heist movie though  :D.


Title: Re: [2014-08-29] theverge.com: Meet the man building the Fort Knox of bitcoin
Post by: dserrano5 on August 29, 2014, 05:34:31 PM
Umm... seriously? Is that even necessary.

The article mentions it's necessary in order to get insurance.

"and all that stuff, because that was the only way we could get it insured", "For us to get the insurance, we wouldn’t get it if there was a high risk of a hack. If you’re not thorough with your security the insurance guys won’t touch you."


Title: Re: [2014-08-29] theverge.com: Meet the man building the Fort Knox of bitcoin
Post by: 311 on August 30, 2014, 12:00:25 PM
Umm... seriously? Is that even necessary.

The article mentions it's necessary in order to get insurance.

"and all that stuff, because that was the only way we could get it insured", "For us to get the insurance, we wouldn’t get it if there was a high risk of a hack. If you’re not thorough with your security the insurance guys won’t touch you."

Didn't bitpay just get insurance? I'm sure they don't have armed guards etc. I'm sure they have to satisfy their insurers but this seems overkill.