Bitcoin Forum

Economy => Gambling => Topic started by: tunafish on September 13, 2014, 06:22:59 PM



Title: Weekly football pick 'em? (no line/spread, pool ideally)
Post by: tunafish on September 13, 2014, 06:22:59 PM
Hey all,
I didnt turn up much on google for this----I guess I really should have started looking about 2 weeks ago before the season began---- but does anyone know of any simple weekly football pick 'ems (without line preferably) ideally with a pool system and weekly payouts since its too late for me to do whole season. I browsed through here but didnt see much, I mean I know there are plenty of sites with picking on the spread but I'm looking more for the no line, simple, pick em all and total points tiebreaker for monday simple betting. Seems like everyone is busy doing fantasy football, nobody wants to do simple pools or what?
Anyway if anyone knows a site or someone hosting a btc pool like this (or if nobody knows one maybe post if your interested in joining too and we'll start one up)


Title: Re: Weekly football pick 'em? (no line/spread, pool ideally)
Post by: n2go on January 21, 2015, 04:33:17 AM
Hey!

I'm interested in this too, but didn't find one so i decided to open one, it will be no line, just a pick 'em, and the prices will be depending on the bettings on each team, I'll start with the Superbowl (And probowl as a test) Once it's ready I'll post it here  :)


Title: Re: Weekly football pick 'em? (no line/spread, pool ideally)
Post by: btcpicks on January 21, 2015, 08:49:09 PM
It's done!  :) Well it took some time but you can try a simple pick em bettting on btcpicks.com

If anybody have suggestion or critics for the site, please go ahead! I bet myself on both superbowl teams to test it out!

PD I'm the same user as the last post, i'll abandon it so this can be the official user for this site.


Title: Re: Weekly football pick 'em? (no line/spread, pool ideally)
Post by: yahoo62278 on January 23, 2015, 05:47:34 AM
you can always bet the moneyline on the other sites. no spread involved in that